A Phase 2 interventional study of CPX-351 and Daunorubicin in MDS and AML, sponsored by GWT-TUD GmbH. Completed at 27 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-10.
Sponsored by GWT-TUD GmbH · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
To compare the event-free survival at 2 years of CPX-351 vs. conventional care regimens before allogeneic blood cell transplantation as first line treatment in patients with higher risk MDS and oligoblastic AML.
Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT) is considered the only potentially curative treatment option for MDS patients and is therefore often considered the standard treatment for mainly higher-risk MDS patients up to the age of 75 years. One common approach to "bridge" higher-risk MDS from the time of diagnosis to transplantation is a treatment with hypomethylating agents such as azacitidine due to its anticipated low toxicity profile. Alternative strategies are intensive 7+3 chemotherapy with anthracycline and cytarabine or direct and immediate transplantation. By this strategy the time interval for donor search can be significantly prolonged leading to a higher proportion of success.Nevertheless, not every patient initially eligible for transplantation undergoes this procedure subsequently. A direct prospective comparison of different therapeutic approaches as outlined above versus CPX-351 prior to alloHCT has not been performed so far and is subject of the PALOMA trial. We hypothesize that CPX-351 will lead to higher and more durable response rates including a more favourable safety profile and long-term outcome compared to currently used conventional care regimens approaches prior to alloHCT.
GWT-TUD GmbH is the lead sponsor of 39 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
CPX-351 is a liposomal formulation with a fixed 5:1 molar ratio of cytarabine and daunorubicin. It will be administered as a 90-minute intravenous infusion. The treatment includes up to 2 cycles of induction as follows: * 1 x CPX-351 1st induction: daunorubicin 44 mg/m² and cytarabine 100 mg/m² in liposomes on days 1, 3, and 5 * 1 x CPX-351 2nd induction: daunorubicin 44 mg/m² and cytarabine 100 mg/m² in liposomes on days 1 and 3 Each induction cycle will last 28 days. Depending on the type and extent of response as well as toxicity, the patient may continue on to consolidation therapy after induction or be discontinued from the treatment phase and transferred directly to alloHCT, if applicable. CPX-351 consolidation is with daunorubicin 29 mg/m² and cytarabine 65 mg/m² in liposomes on days 1 and 3. For patients \< 60 years up to 3 consolidation cycles and for patients ≥ 60 years up to 2 consolidation cycles are allowed.
Drug: CPX-351
The conventional care regimens (CCR) arm has 2 options according to the discretion of the investigator: 1. conventional "7+3" cytarabine/daunorubicin chemotherapy regimen 2. treatment with s.c. Azacitidine
Drug: Daunorubicin · Drug: Cytarabine · Drug: Azacitidine
CPX-351 is a liposomal formulation with a fixed 5:1 molar ratio of cytarabine and daunorubicin. It will be administered as a 90-minute intravenous infusion.
Also known as: Vyxeos
Daunorubicin is commercially available as a powder for reconstitution in 20 mg vials. In this trial, daunorubicin should be administered as an IV infusion over 60 min.
Cytarabine is commercially available as vials/bottles for preparation of diluted infusion solution. Cytarabine will be administrated intravenously. In this trial, cytarabine is administered as a continuous infusion.
Azacitidine at 75mg/m² for 7 days. Patients should receive a minimum of 2 and up to 6 cycles.
Also known as: Vidaza
2-year EFS in both arms
To compare the event-free survival (EFS) at 2 years of CPX-351 vs. CCR before allogeneic blood cell transplantation (alloHCT) as first line treatment in patients with higher risk MDS and oligoblastic AML.
Time frame: 2 years
Response rate
To compare best and overall response rate of CPX-351 vs. CCR according to AML-ELN and MDS-IWG criteria
Time frame: 2 years
Toxicity Assessment
To compare the safety and tolerability of CPX-351 vs. CCR measured by NCI CTCAE v5.0
Time frame: 2 years
Proportion of patients proceeding to alloHCT
To compare the effects of CPX-351 vs. CCR on the proportion of patients proceeding to alloHCT
Time frame: 2 years
Minimal residual disease
To compare the effect of CPX-351 vs. CCR on minimal residual disease which will be assessed at all times of bone marrow puncture
Time frame: 2 years
Patient's quality of life
To compare the effect of CPX-351 vs. CCR on the quality of life. It will be measured using the EORTC-QLQ30 questionnaire
Time frame: 2 years
This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
GWT-TUD GmbH