CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04061239PALOMAUpdated Sep 10, 2026

Comparison of Therapies Before Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Higher Risk MDS and Oligoblastic AML

A Phase 2 interventional study of CPX-351 and Daunorubicin in MDS and AML, sponsored by GWT-TUD GmbH. Completed at 27 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-10.

Sponsored by GWT-TUD GmbH · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To compare the event-free survival at 2 years of CPX-351 vs. conventional care regimens before allogeneic blood cell transplantation as first line treatment in patients with higher risk MDS and oligoblastic AML.

Read the detailed description

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT) is considered the only potentially curative treatment option for MDS patients and is therefore often considered the standard treatment for mainly higher-risk MDS patients up to the age of 75 years. One common approach to "bridge" higher-risk MDS from the time of diagnosis to transplantation is a treatment with hypomethylating agents such as azacitidine due to its anticipated low toxicity profile. Alternative strategies are intensive 7+3 chemotherapy with anthracycline and cytarabine or direct and immediate transplantation. By this strategy the time interval for donor search can be significantly prolonged leading to a higher proportion of success.Nevertheless, not every patient initially eligible for transplantation undergoes this procedure subsequently. A direct prospective comparison of different therapeutic approaches as outlined above versus CPX-351 prior to alloHCT has not been performed so far and is subject of the PALOMA trial. We hypothesize that CPX-351 will lead to higher and more durable response rates including a more favourable safety profile and long-term outcome compared to currently used conventional care regimens approaches prior to alloHCT.

02

Conditions studied

  • MDS
  • AML
03

In context

Lead sponsor

GWT-TUD GmbH is the lead sponsor of 39 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Male and female adult patients, 18-75 years of age
  • Diagnosis of high risk MDS including oligoblastic non-proliferative (WBC \<13 Gpt/l) AML up to 29% of bone marrow blasts
  • Availability of BM blast count from central morphology
  • Bone marrow blasts ≥ 5%
  • IPSS score intermediate or high
  • alloHCT intended within the next 6 months
  • ECOG performance status of 0 or 1
  • Signed informed consent
  • Laboratory values fulfilling the following:
  • Serum creatinine \< 2.0 mg/dL
  • Serum total bilirubin \< 2.0 mg/dL
  • Serum alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase \< 3 times the ULN
  • Cardiac ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50% by echocardiography
  • Contraception:
  • Female subjects of childbearing potential† must agree to use a medically acceptable method of contraception for at least 2 months prior to the first dose of CPX-351 and consent of female patients to use a medically acceptable method of contraception throughout the entire study period and for 6 months following the last dose of CPX-351. Medically acceptable methods of contraception that may be used by the patient include abstinence, diaphragm and spermicide, intrauterine device (IUD), condom and vaginal spermicide, hormonal contraceptives (patients must be stable on hormonal contraceptives for at least the prior 3 months), surgical sterilization, or post-menopausal (≥2 years of amenorrhea). Medically acceptable methods of contraception that may be used by the male partner of a female patient are condom and spermicide or vasectomy (>6 months prior to Day-1) and are to be used throughout the entire study period and for 6 months following the last dose of CPX-351.
  • Male patients must be willing to refrain from sperm donation for 6 months following the last dose of CPX-351 and must use adequate contraception throughout the entire study period and for 6 months following the last dose of CPX-351.
  • Combined oral contraceptive pills are not recommended. It is recommended that during the study two medically accepted methods of contraception (e.g. as hormonal contraceptive methods along with a condom) apply.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with history of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) (defined as a history of essential thrombocytosis or
  • polycythemia vera, or idiopathic myelofibrosis prior to the diagnosis of AML) or combined MDS/MPN are not eligible.
  • WHO-2016 defined AML entities: AML with t(15;17), PML-RARA; AML with t(8;21), RUNX1-RUNX1T1, AML with inv(16)/t(16;16), CBFβ-MYH11; AML with biallelic CEBPA mutation; AML with mutated FLT3 or NPM1.
  • Clinical evidence of active CNS leukemia.
  • Patients with a "currently active" second malignancy other than non-melanoma skin cancers. Patients are not considered to have a "currently active" malignancy if they have completed therapy and are considered by their physician to be at less than 30% risk of relapse within one year.
  • Any major surgery or radiation therapy within four weeks prior screening.
  • Patients with prior treatment of either CPX-351, hypomethylating agents, cytarabine or intensive chemotherapy for high-risk MDS or AML.
  • Patients with prior cumulative anthracycline exposure of greater than 368 mg/m2 daunorubicin (or equivalent).
  • Any serious medical condition, laboratory abnormality or psychiatric illness that would prevent obtaining informed consent.
  • Patients with myocardial impairment of any cause (e.g. cardiomyopathy, ischemic heart disease, significant valvular dysfunction, hypertensive heart disease, and congestive heart failure) resulting in heart failure by New York Heart Association Criteria (NYHA Class III or IV staging).
  • Active or uncontrolled infection. Patients with an infection receiving treatment (antibiotic, antifungal or antiviral treatment) may be entered into the study but must be afebrile and hemodynamically stable for ≥72 hrs.
  • Current evidence of invasive fungal infection (blood or tissue culture); patients with recent fungal infection must have a subsequent negative cultures to be eligible; known HIV (new testing not required) or evidence of active hepatitis B or C infection (with rising transaminase values).
  • Hypersensitivity to cytarabine, daunorubicin or liposomal products.
  • History of Wilson's disease or other copper-metabolism disorder.
  • Female patients who are pregnant or lactating.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
150 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    CPX-351 Arm

    CPX-351 is a liposomal formulation with a fixed 5:1 molar ratio of cytarabine and daunorubicin. It will be administered as a 90-minute intravenous infusion. The treatment includes up to 2 cycles of induction as follows: * 1 x CPX-351 1st induction: daunorubicin 44 mg/m² and cytarabine 100 mg/m² in liposomes on days 1, 3, and 5 * 1 x CPX-351 2nd induction: daunorubicin 44 mg/m² and cytarabine 100 mg/m² in liposomes on days 1 and 3 Each induction cycle will last 28 days. Depending on the type and extent of response as well as toxicity, the patient may continue on to consolidation therapy after induction or be discontinued from the treatment phase and transferred directly to alloHCT, if applicable. CPX-351 consolidation is with daunorubicin 29 mg/m² and cytarabine 65 mg/m² in liposomes on days 1 and 3. For patients \< 60 years up to 3 consolidation cycles and for patients ≥ 60 years up to 2 consolidation cycles are allowed.

    Drug: CPX-351

  • Other
    CCR Arm

    The conventional care regimens (CCR) arm has 2 options according to the discretion of the investigator: 1. conventional "7+3" cytarabine/daunorubicin chemotherapy regimen 2. treatment with s.c. Azacitidine

    Drug: Daunorubicin · Drug: Cytarabine · Drug: Azacitidine

Interventions

  • DrugCPX-351

    CPX-351 is a liposomal formulation with a fixed 5:1 molar ratio of cytarabine and daunorubicin. It will be administered as a 90-minute intravenous infusion.

    Also known as: Vyxeos

  • DrugDaunorubicin

    Daunorubicin is commercially available as a powder for reconstitution in 20 mg vials. In this trial, daunorubicin should be administered as an IV infusion over 60 min.

  • DrugCytarabine

    Cytarabine is commercially available as vials/bottles for preparation of diluted infusion solution. Cytarabine will be administrated intravenously. In this trial, cytarabine is administered as a continuous infusion.

  • DrugAzacitidine

    Azacitidine at 75mg/m² for 7 days. Patients should receive a minimum of 2 and up to 6 cycles.

    Also known as: Vidaza

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 2-year EFS in both arms

    To compare the event-free survival (EFS) at 2 years of CPX-351 vs. CCR before allogeneic blood cell transplantation (alloHCT) as first line treatment in patients with higher risk MDS and oligoblastic AML.

    Time frame: 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Response rate

    To compare best and overall response rate of CPX-351 vs. CCR according to AML-ELN and MDS-IWG criteria

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Toxicity Assessment

    To compare the safety and tolerability of CPX-351 vs. CCR measured by NCI CTCAE v5.0

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. Proportion of patients proceeding to alloHCT

    To compare the effects of CPX-351 vs. CCR on the proportion of patients proceeding to alloHCT

    Time frame: 2 years

  4. Minimal residual disease

    To compare the effect of CPX-351 vs. CCR on minimal residual disease which will be assessed at all times of bone marrow puncture

    Time frame: 2 years

  5. Patient's quality of life

    To compare the effect of CPX-351 vs. CCR on the quality of life. It will be measured using the EORTC-QLQ30 questionnaire

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

27 sites
  • Ordensklinikum Linz Elisabethinen GmbH
    Linz, 4020, Austria
  • Universitätsklinikum Aachen
    Aachen, 52074, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Augsburg
    Augsburg, 86156, Germany
  • Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
    Berlin, 12200, Germany
  • Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch GmbH
    Berlin, 13125, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Bonn (UKB)
    Bonn, 53127, Germany
  • Klinikum Chemnitz-gGmbH
    Chemnitz, 09113, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Köln
    Cologne, 50937, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden
    Dresden, 01307, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf
    Düsseldorf, 40225, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Essen
    Essen, 45122, Germany
  • Klinikum Frankfurt (Oder) GmbH
    Frankfurt, 15236, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt
    Frankfurt, 60590, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Halle
    Halle, 06120, Germany
  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
    Hanover, 30625, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
    Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Jena
    Jena, 07740, Germany
  • Gemeinschaftsklinikum Mittelrhein gGmbH
    Koblenz, 56068, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR
    Leipzig, Germany
  • Universitätsmedizin Mannheim
    Mannheim, 68167, Germany
  • Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU München
    München, 81675, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Münster
    Münster, 48149, Germany
  • Klinikum Nürnberg
    Nuremberg, 90419, Germany
  • Universitätsmedizin Rostock
    Rostock, 18055, Germany
  • Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus Stuttgart
    Stuttgart, 70376, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
    Tübingen, 72076, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Ulm
    Ulm, 89081, Germany
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04061239
Lead sponsor
GWT-TUD GmbH
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 19, 2019
Start date
Aug 19, 2019
Primary completion
Aug 7, 2026
Completion
Aug 7, 2026
Last update
Sep 10, 2026

Study contacts

Uwe Platzbecker, Prof.
study chair · Universitätsklinikum Dresden

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion