CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04059484AMEERA-3Updated Feb 24, 2026Results posted

Phase 2 Study of Amcenestrant (SAR439859) Versus Physician's Choice in Locally Advanced or Metastatic ER-positive Breast Cancer

A Phase 2 interventional study of Amcenestrant and Fulvestrant in Breast Cancer Metastatic, sponsored by Sanofi. Terminated at 109 sites in 23 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-24.

Sponsored by Sanofi · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Sponsor decision to prematurely stop the study, not linked to any safety concern.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
367
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Primary Objective:

To determine whether amcenestrant per overall survival (os) improves progression free survival (PFS) when compared with an endocrine monotherapy of the choice of the physician, in participants with metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer

Secondary Objectives:

  • To compare the overall survival in the 2 treatment arms
  • To assess the objective response rate in the 2 treatment arms
  • To evaluate the disease control rate in the 2 treatment arms
  • To evaluate the clinical benefit rate in the 2 treatment arms
  • To evaluate the duration of response in the 2 treatment arms
  • To evaluate the PFS according to the estrogen receptor 1 gene (ESR1) mutation status in the 2 treatment arms
  • To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of amcenestrant as single agent
  • To evaluate health-related quality of life in the 2 treatment arms
  • To compare the overall safety profile in the 2 treatment arms
Read the detailed description

The duration of the study for an individual participant will include a period to assess eligibility (screening period) of up to 4 weeks (28 days), a treatment period of at least 1 cycle (28 days of study treatment), and an end of treatment (EOT) visit at least 30 days (or until the participant receive another anticancer therapy, whichever is earlier) following the last administration of study treatment. Study treatment may continue until precluded by unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, death or upon participant's request to stop treatment, or Investigator decision, whichever occurs first.

An extension of recruitment for Chinese participants is planned in this study: After completion of randomization in the global part of the study, randomization will continue in China until approximately 90 Chinese participants are randomized.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer Metastatic
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Sanofi is the lead sponsor of 1,508 studies on the registry; 90 are open to participants now.

Of its 198 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 118 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years or older.
  • Histological or cytological diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the breast.
  • Locally advanced not amenable to radiation therapy or surgery in a curative intent, and/or metastatic disease.
  • Estrogen receptor(ER) positive status.
  • Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative status.
  • Participants must have received no more than 1 prior chemotherapeutic or 1 targeted therapy regimen for advanced/metastatic disease.
  • In the main study, a prior treatment with a Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6(CDK 4/6) inhibitor is mandatory if this treatment is approved and can be reimbursed for this participant. The percentage of participants without previous CDK 4/6 inhibitor will be capped to 20%. In the Chinese extension cohort, previous treatment with a CDK 4/6 inhibitor will not be mandatory, and there will be no limitation to the number of participants naïve to CDK4/6 inhibitor.
  • Participants must present a secondary endocrine resistance to endocrine therapy defined as: progression while on endocrine therapy after at least 6 months of treatment for advanced breast cancer, or relapse while on adjuvant endocrine therapy but after the first 2 years, or with a relapse within 12 months after completing adjuvant endocrine therapy.
  • Male or Female.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status =>2.
  • Medical history or ongoing gastrointestinal disorders potentially affecting the absorption of amcenestrant. Participants unable to swallow normally and to take capsules.
  • Participant with any other cancer. Adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer or in situ cervical cancer or any other cancer from which the participant has been disease free for greater than 3 years are allowed.
  • Severe uncontrolled systemic disease at screening .
  • Participants with known brain metastases that are untreated, symptomatic or require therapy to control symptoms.
  • Prior treatment with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors or any other selective estrogen receptor degrader(SERD) compound, except fulvestrant if stopped for at least 3 months before randomization.
  • Treatment with drugs that have the potential to inhibit Uridine'5 Diphospho-Glucuronosyl Transferase(UGT) less than 2 weeks before randomization.
  • Treatment with strong Cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A inducers within 2 weeks before randomization.
  • Ongoing treatment with drugs that are sensitive substrate of organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1/B3(OATP1B1/B3) (asunaprevir, atorvastatin, bosentan, danoprevir, fexofenadine, glyburide, nateglinide, pitavastatin, pravastatin, replaglinide, rosuvastatin, and simvastatin acid).
  • Treatment with anticancer agents (including investigational drugs) less than 3 weeks before randomization.
  • Inadequate hematological, coagulation, renal and liver functions.

The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in a clinical trial.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
367 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Amcenestrant

    Daily amcenestrant dose administered orally under fed or fast condition

    Drug: Amcenestrant

  • Active comparator
    Fulvestrant/Aromatase inhibitors/Estrogen receptor modulator

    Control treatment of the choice of the physician depending on each participant's medical condition and in accordance with the approved label may include 1 of the following treatments used as monotherapy. Fulvestrant Aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, letrozole, exemestane) Selective estrogen receptor modulator (Tamoxifen)

    Drug: Fulvestrant · Drug: Anastrozole · Drug: Letrozole · Drug: Exemestane · Drug: Tamoxifen

Interventions

  • DrugAmcenestrant

    Pharmaceutical form: Capsule Route of administration: Oral

  • DrugFulvestrant

    Pharmaceutical form: Solution for injection Route of administration: Intramuscular

    Also known as: Faslodex®

  • DrugAnastrozole

    Pharmaceutical form:Tablets or capsules Route of administration: Oral

    Also known as: Arimidex®/Anastrozole Generics

  • DrugLetrozole

    Pharmaceutical form: Tablets or capsules Route of administration: Oral

    Also known as: Femara®/Letrozole Generics

  • DrugExemestane

    Pharmaceutical form: Tablets or capsules Route of administration: Oral

    Also known as: Aromasin®/Exemestane Generics

  • DrugTamoxifen

    Pharmaceutical form: Tablets or capsules Route of administration: Oral

    Also known as: Nolvadex®/Tamoxifen Generics

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    PFS is defined as the time in months interval from the date of randomization to the date of first documented tumor progression as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) assessed by independent central review (ICR) or death (due to any cause), whichever comes first. Progressive Disease (PD) as per RECIST 1.1: at least a 20 percent (%) increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.

    Time frame: From randomization to the date of first documented tumor progression or death due to any cause or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: 116 weeks)

  2. Chinese Cohort: Progression Free Survival

    PFS is defined as the time in months interval from the date of randomization to the date of first documented tumor progression as per RECIST 1.1 assessed by ICR or death (due to any cause), whichever comes first. PD as per RECIST 1.1: at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.

    Time frame: From randomization to the date of first documented tumor progression or death due to any cause or data cut-off date whichever comes first, up to primary completion date of 15-Feb-2022, a maximum of 121 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival (OS)

    OS is defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of documented death (due to any cause). In the absence of observation of death, survival time was censored to last date the participant is known to be alive or at the cut-off date, whichever comes first. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.

    Time frame: From randomization to the death due to any cause or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: 116 weeks)

  2. Percentage of Participants With Objective Response

    Objective response is defined as percentage of participants having a partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) according to the RECIST version 1.1 assessed by ICR. As per RECIST 1.1, CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than (\<) 10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

    Time frame: From randomization to the date of first documented tumor progression, death due to any cause or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: 116 weeks)

  3. Percentage of Participants With Disease Control

    Disease control is defined as percentage of participants having a confirmed CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) or Non-CR/Non-PD as BOR determined by ICR as per RECIST 1.1 from the date of randomization to the date of end of treatment. As per RECIST 1.1, CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum diameters. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference the smallest sum diameters. Non-CR/Non-PD: persistence of one or more nontarget lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

    Time frame: From randomization to the date of first documented tumor progression, death due to any cause or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: 116 weeks)

  4. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit

    Clinical Benefit is defined as percentage of participants having a confirmed CR, PR, SD, or Non-CR/Non-PD for at least 24 weeks determined by ICR as per RECIST 1.1 from the date of randomization to the date of end of treatment. As per RECIST 1.1, CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters. Non-CR/Non-PD: persistence of one or more nontarget lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

    Time frame: From randomization to the date of first documented tumor progression, death due to any cause or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: 116 weeks)

  5. Duration of Response (DOR)

    DOR is defined as time (in months) from first documented evidence of CR or PR until progressive disease (PD) determined by ICR as per RECIST 1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. For participants with ongoing response at the time of the analysis, DOR was censored at the date of the last valid disease assessment not showing documented progression performed before the initiation of a new anticancer treatment (if any). As per RECIST 1.1, CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

    Time frame: From the date of first response to the date of first documented tumor progression, death due to any cause or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: 116 weeks)

  6. Progression Free Survival (PFS) According to Estrogen Receptor 1 Gene (ESR1) Mutation Status

    PFS defined as the time (in months) interval from the date of randomization to the date of first documented tumor progression as per RECIST 1.1 assessed by ICR or death (due to any cause), whichever comes first. Progression as per RECIST 1.1: at least a 20 percent (%) increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. The mutation status (wild type, mutant) of twelve specific mutations of the ESR1 gene was determined by multiplex droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR), including their mutant frequency and concentration. Here, PFS is reported based on the ESR1 mutation status of participants: wild type and mutants. ESR1 was the gene encoding estrogen receptor alpha. ESR1 mutant type breast cancer was a disease where the ESR1 gene had a mutation (i.e., a type of error). ESR1 wild type breast cancer was a disease where the ESR1 gene was normal without a mutation. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.

    Time frame: From randomization to the date of first documented tumor progression, death due to any cause or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: 116 weeks)

  7. Pharmacokinetics: Plasma Concentrations of Amcenestrant

    Amcenestrant plasma concentrations at specified time points are reported.

    Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1: 1.5 hours(h), 4h post-dose, Day 15: pre-dose, Cycle 2 Day 1: pre-dose, 1.5h, 4h, 8h post-dose, Cycle 3 Day 1: pre-dose, Cycle 4 Day 1: pre-dose, Cycle 6 Day 1: pre-dose

  8. Within-Participant Steady State Ctrough of Amcenestrant

    Within-participant Steady state Ctrough was defined as the median value of the Ctrough across study using plasma concentration of predose samples at Cycle 1 Day 15 and Day 1 of Cycle 2, 3, 4 and 6 for each individual participant. Average (mean) of all calculated Ctrough values for all participants across study (Cycle 1 Day 15 and Day 1 of Cycle 2, 3, 4 and 6 ) was derived and reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Predose on Cycle 1 Day 15; Cycle 2 Day 1; Cycle 3 Day 1; Cycle 4 Day 1; Cycle 6 Day 1

  9. Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) Domain Scores

    EORTC-QLQ-C30: cancer-specific instrument with 30 questions for evaluation of new chemotherapy \& assessment of participant reported outcome. These include 5 functional scales, 9 symptom scales, \& Global Health Status/quality of life scale (GHS/QoL). All 14 items/domains were scored on scale of 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much) and GHS/QoL, scored on scale of 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent). All scales are transformed from raw scores to linear scales ranging 0 to 100. Higher score for functional \& GHS/QoL = higher level of functioning, \& higher score for symptoms scales = higher symptom burden. Least Square (LS) mean and Standard Error (SE) are derived from MMRM model with change from Baseline values as response variable, treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, Baseline value and stratifications factors as fixed effect. Average of LS mean change from baseline values of overall treatment (i.e., each cycle \[Cycle 1 up to Cycle 30\]) was reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, overall treatment duration (Cycle 1 up to Cycle 30 [i.e.,116 weeks])

  10. Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions (5D), 5 Levels (5L) (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score

    EQ-5D-5L is a standardized measure of health status, provides a simple, generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal, and consists of 2 sections: the EQ-5D-5L health state utility index (descriptive system) and the EQ-5D-5L VAS. The Visual Analogue Scale is designed to rate the participant's current health state on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst imaginable health state and 100 represents the best imaginable health state. LS mean and SE are derived from MMRM model with change from baseline values as response variable, treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, Baseline value and stratifications factors as fixed effect. Average of LS mean change from Baseline values of overall treatment (i.e., each cycle \[Cycle 1 up to Cycle 30\]) was reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, overall treatment duration (Cycle 1 up to Cycle 30 [i.e.,116 weeks])

  11. Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions (5D), 5 Levels (5L) (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Health Utility Index Value

    EQ-5D-5L: consists of 2 sections: EQ-5D-5L health state utility index (descriptive system) \& VAS. The EQ-5D descriptive system consists of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort \& anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, \& extreme problems. Response options are measured with 5-point Likert scale (for 5L version). The EQ-5D-5L responses are converted into single index utility score between 0 to 1, where higher score indicates better health state \& lower score indicate worse health state. LS mean and SE are derived from MMRM model with change from Baseline values as response variable, treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, Baseline value and stratifications factors as fixed effect. Average of LS mean change from baseline values overall treatment (i.e., each cycle \[Cycle 1 up to Cycle 30\]) was reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, overall treatment duration (Cycle 1 up to Cycle 30 [i.e.,116 weeks])

  12. Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Breast Cancer Specific Module (EORTC-QLQ-BR23) Domain Scores

    QLQ-BR23: disease-specific Health-related QOL assesses impact of breast cancer \& side effects of treatment. EORTC-QLQ-BR23 contains 23 items: multi-item scales \& single-item measures. 4 functional scales (body image, sexual functioning, sexual enjoyment, future perspective) \& 4 scales related to symptoms of disease or treatment (arm symptoms, breast symptoms, systemic therapy side effects, \& upset by hair loss). All items scored 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Scores of all scales transformed from raw scores to linear scales ranging 0 to 100. Higher score for functional scales = better outcome; higher score for symptoms scales = higher symptom burden. LS mean and SE are derived from MMRM model with change from Baseline values as response variable, treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, Baseline value and stratifications factors as fixed effect. Average of LS mean change from baseline values of overall treatment (i.e., each cycle \[Cycle 1 up to Cycle 30\]) was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, overall treatment duration (Cycle 1 up to Cycle 30 [i.e.,116 weeks])

  13. Chinese Cohort: Overall Survival

    OS is defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of documented death (due to any cause). In the absence of observation of death, survival time was censored to last date the participant is known to be alive or at the cut-off date, whichever comes first. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.

    Time frame: From randomization to the death due to any cause or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: 183 weeks)

  14. Chinese Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response

    Objective response is defined as percentage of participants having a PR or CR according to the RECIST version 1.1 assessed by ICR. As per RECIST 1.1, CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

    Time frame: From randomization to the date of first documented tumor progression, death due to any cause or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: 183 weeks)

  15. Chinese Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Disease Control

    Disease control is defined as percentage of participants having a confirmed CR, PR, or SD or Non-CR/Non-PD as BOR determined by ICR as per RECIST 1.1 from the date of randomization to the date of end of treatment. As per RECIST 1.1, CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum diameters. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters. Non-CR/Non-PD: persistence of one or more nontarget lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

    Time frame: From randomization to the date of first documented tumor progression, death due to any cause or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: 183 weeks)

  16. Chinese Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit

    Clinical benefit is defined as percentage of participants having a confirmed CR, PR, SD, or Non-CR/Non-PD for at least 24 weeks determined by ICR as per RECIST 1.1 from the date of randomization to the date of end of treatment. As per RECIST 1.1, CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters. Non-CR/Non-PD: persistence of one or more nontarget lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

    Time frame: From randomization to the date of first documented tumor progression, death due to any cause or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: 183 weeks)

  17. Chinese Cohort: Duration of Response

    DOR is defined as time (in months) from first documented evidence of CR or PR until PD determined by ICR as per RECIST 1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. For participants with ongoing response at the time of the analysis, DOR was censored at the date of the last valid disease assessment not showing documented progression performed before the initiation of a new anticancer treatment (if any). As per RECIST 1.1, CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

    Time frame: From the date of first response to the date of first documented tumor progression, death due to any cause or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: 183 weeks)

  18. Chinese Cohort: Progression Free Survival According to Estrogen Receptor 1 Gene Mutation Status

    PFS defined as the time (in months) interval from the date of randomization to the date of first documented tumor progression as per RECIST 1.1 assessed by ICR or death (due to any cause), whichever comes first. Progression as per RECIST 1.1: at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. The mutation status (wild type, mutant) of twelve specific mutations of the ESR1 gene was determined by multiplex ddPCR, including their mutant frequency and concentration. Here, PFS is reported based on the ESR1 mutation status of participants: wild type and mutants. ESR1 was the gene encoding estrogen receptor alpha. ESR1 mutant type breast cancer was a disease where the ESR1 gene had a mutation (i.e., a type of error). ESR1 wild type breast cancer was a disease where the ESR1 gene was normal without a mutation. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.

    Time frame: From randomization to the date of first documented tumor progression, death due to any cause or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: 183 weeks)

  19. Chinese Cohort: Plasma Concentration of Amcenestrant

    Amcenestrant plasma concentrations at specified time points are reported.

    Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1: 1.5 hours(h), 4h post-dose, Cycle 1 Day 15: pre-dose; Cycle 2 Day 1: pre-dose, 1.5h, 4h, 8h post-dose; Cycles 3, 4, and 6 Day 1: pre-dose

  20. Chinese Cohort: Within-Participant Steady State Ctrough of Amcenestrant

    Within-participant Steady state Ctrough was defined as the median value of the Ctrough across study using plasma concentration of pre-dose samples at Cycle 1 Day 15 and Day 1 of Cycle 2, 3, 4 and 6 for each individual participant. Average (mean) of all calculated Ctrough values for all participants across study (Cycle 1 Day 15 and Day 1 of Cycle 2, 3, 4 and 6) was derived and reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15; Cycle 2 Day 1; Cycle 3 Day 1; Cycle 4 Day 1; Cycle 6 Day 1

  21. Chinese Cohort: Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire Domain Scores

    EORTC-QLQ-C30: cancer-specific instrument with 30 questions for evaluation of new chemotherapy \& assessment of participant reported outcome. These include 5 functional scales, 9 symptom scales, \& Global Health Status/quality of life scale (GHS/QoL). All 14 items/domains were scored on scale of 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much) and GHS/QoL, scored on scale of 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent). All scales are transformed from raw scores to linear scales ranging 0 to 100. Higher score for functional \& GHS/QoL = higher level of functioning, \& higher score for symptoms scales = higher symptom burden. LS mean and SE are derived from MMRM model with change from baseline values as response variable, treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, Baseline value and stratifications factors as fixed effect. Average of LS mean change from baseline values of overall treatment (i.e., 183 weeks) was reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline and up to 183 weeks

  22. Chinese Cohort: Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels Score: Visual Analog Scale Score

    EQ-5D-5L is a standardized measure of health status, provides a simple, generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal, and consists of 2 sections: the EQ-5D-5L health state utility index (descriptive system) and the EQ-5D-5L VAS. The Visual Analogue Scale is designed to rate the participant's current health state on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst imaginable health state and 100 represents the best imaginable health state. LS mean and SE are derived from MMRM model with change from baseline values as response variable, treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, Baseline value and stratifications factors as fixed effect. Average of LS mean change from baseline values of overall treatment (i.e., 183 weeks) was reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline and up to 183 weeks

  23. Chinese Cohort: Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels Score: Health Utility Index Value

    EQ-5D-5L: consists of 2 sections: EQ-5D-5L health state utility index (descriptive system) \& VAS. The EQ-5D descriptive system consists of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort \& anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, \& extreme problems. Response options are measured with 5-point Likert scale (for 5L version). The EQ-5D-5L responses are converted into single index utility score between 0 to 1, where higher score indicates better health state \& lower score indicate worse health state. LS mean and SE are derived from MMRM model with change from baseline values as response variable, treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, Baseline value and stratifications factors as fixed effect. Average of LS mean change from baseline values of overall treatment (i.e., 183 weeks) was reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline and up to 183 weeks

  24. Chinese Cohort: Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Breast Cancer Specific Module Domain Scores

    QLQ-BR23: disease-specific Health-related QOL assesses impact of breast cancer \& side effects of treatment. EORTC-QLQ-BR23 contains 23 items: multi-item scales \& single-item measures. 4 functional scales (body image, sexual functioning, sexual enjoyment, future perspective) \& 4 scales related to symptoms of disease or treatment (arm symptoms, breast symptoms, systemic therapy side effects, \& upset by hair loss). All items scored 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Scores of all scales transformed from raw scores to linear scales ranging 0 to 100. Higher score for functional scales = better outcome; higher score for symptoms scales = higher symptom burden. LS mean and SE are derived from MMRM model with change from baseline values as response variable, treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, Baseline value and stratifications factors as fixed effect. Average of LS mean change from baseline values of overall treatment (i.e., 183 weeks) was reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline and up to 183 weeks

  25. Main Cohort and Chinese Cohort: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect or was a medically important event. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed, worsened (according to the Investigator's opinion), or became serious during the on-treatment period.

    Time frame: From first dose of study treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) up to 152 weeks for main cohort and 183 weeks for Chinese cohort

07

Results

Posted Mar 30, 2023
Limitations and caveats
The study was terminated early because it did not meet its primary objective of improved PFS with amcenestrant versus endocrine treatment of physician's choice.

Participant flow

The study was conducted at 88 active centers in 22 countries. 367 participants were screened between 22 October 2019 and 15 April 2021 in main (global) cohort of which 77 were screen failures (mainly due to not meeting eligibility criteria). As pre-specified in the protocol, Chinese participants from main cohort and China cohort were pooled for purpose of analysis of Chinese cohort. 90 participants (including 13 participants from main cohort) were randomized in the Chinese cohort.

Main Cohort
Participant flow — Main Cohort
MilestonePhysician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Main CohortAmcenestrant- Main CohortPhysician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Chinese CohortAmcenestrant- Chinese Cohort
Started14714300
Completed0000
Not completed14714300
Withdrew: Adverse event2500
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject6300
Withdrew: Progressive disease12011800
Withdrew: Not related to coronavirus disease-2019 (covid-19)191700
Chinese Cohort
Participant flow — Chinese Cohort
MilestonePhysician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Main CohortAmcenestrant- Main CohortPhysician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Chinese CohortAmcenestrant- Chinese Cohort
Started004248
Completed0000
Not completed004248
Withdrew: Adverse event0001
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject0014
Withdrew: Progressive disease003332
Withdrew: Not related to covid-1900710
Withdrew: Related to covid-190001
Withdrew: Poor compliance to protocol0010

Outcome measures

SecondaryOverall Survival (OS)

OS is defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of documented death (due to any cause). In the absence of observation of death, survival time was censored to last date the participant is known to be alive or at the cut-off date, whichever comes first. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame:
From randomization to the death due to any cause or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: 116 weeks)
Reported as:
Median · months
Overall Survival (OS)
monthsPhysician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Main CohortAmcenestrant- Main Cohort
Overall Survival (OS)NA (18.9 to NA)NA (21.5 to NA)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Objective Response

Objective response is defined as percentage of participants having a partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) according to the RECIST version 1.1 assessed by ICR. As per RECIST 1.1, CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than (\<) 10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

Time frame:
From randomization to the date of first documented tumor progression, death due to any cause or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: 116 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response
percentage of participantsPhysician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Main CohortAmcenestrant- Main Cohort
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response8.8 (4.8 to 14.6)11.9 (7.1 to 18.4)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Disease Control

Disease control is defined as percentage of participants having a confirmed CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) or Non-CR/Non-PD as BOR determined by ICR as per RECIST 1.1 from the date of randomization to the date of end of treatment. As per RECIST 1.1, CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum diameters. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference the smallest sum diameters. Non-CR/Non-PD: persistence of one or more nontarget lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

Time frame:
From randomization to the date of first documented tumor progression, death due to any cause or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: 116 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control
percentage of participantsPhysician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Main CohortAmcenestrant- Main Cohort
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control53.7 (45.3 to 62.0)54.5 (46.0 to 62.9)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit

Clinical Benefit is defined as percentage of participants having a confirmed CR, PR, SD, or Non-CR/Non-PD for at least 24 weeks determined by ICR as per RECIST 1.1 from the date of randomization to the date of end of treatment. As per RECIST 1.1, CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters. Non-CR/Non-PD: persistence of one or more nontarget lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

Time frame:
From randomization to the date of first documented tumor progression, death due to any cause or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: 116 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit
percentage of participantsPhysician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Main CohortAmcenestrant- Main Cohort
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit29.3 (22.0 to 37.3)27.3 (20.2 to 35.3)
SecondaryDuration of Response (DOR)

DOR is defined as time (in months) from first documented evidence of CR or PR until progressive disease (PD) determined by ICR as per RECIST 1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. For participants with ongoing response at the time of the analysis, DOR was censored at the date of the last valid disease assessment not showing documented progression performed before the initiation of a new anticancer treatment (if any). As per RECIST 1.1, CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

Time frame:
From the date of first response to the date of first documented tumor progression, death due to any cause or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: 116 weeks)
Reported as:
Median · months
Duration of Response (DOR)
monthsPhysician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Main CohortAmcenestrant- Main Cohort
Duration of Response (DOR)NA (3.9 to NA)15.1 (5.6 to NA)
SecondaryProgression Free Survival (PFS) According to Estrogen Receptor 1 Gene (ESR1) Mutation Status

PFS defined as the time (in months) interval from the date of randomization to the date of first documented tumor progression as per RECIST 1.1 assessed by ICR or death (due to any cause), whichever comes first. Progression as per RECIST 1.1: at least a 20 percent (%) increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. The mutation status (wild type, mutant) of twelve specific mutations of the ESR1 gene was determined by multiplex droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR), including their mutant frequency and concentration. Here, PFS is reported based on the ESR1 mutation status of participants: wild type and mutants. ESR1 was the gene encoding estrogen receptor alpha. ESR1 mutant type breast cancer was a disease where the ESR1 gene had a mutation (i.e., a type of error). ESR1 wild type breast cancer was a disease where the ESR1 gene was normal without a mutation. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame:
From randomization to the date of first documented tumor progression, death due to any cause or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: 116 weeks)
Reported as:
Median · months
Progression Free Survival (PFS) According to Estrogen Receptor 1 Gene (ESR1) Mutation Status
monthsPhysician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Main CohortAmcenestrant- Main Cohort
Mutated2.0 (1.9 to 4.3)3.7 (1.9 to 7.2)
Wild type3.9 (3.6 to 9.2)3.5 (2.0 to 3.7)
SecondaryPharmacokinetics: Plasma Concentrations of Amcenestrant

Amcenestrant plasma concentrations at specified time points are reported.

Time frame:
Cycle 1 Day 1: 1.5 hours(h), 4h post-dose, Day 15: pre-dose, Cycle 2 Day 1: pre-dose, 1.5h, 4h, 8h post-dose, Cycle 3 Day 1: pre-dose, Cycle 4 Day 1: pre-dose, Cycle 6 Day 1: pre-dose
Reported as:
Mean · nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Pharmacokinetics: Plasma Concentrations of Amcenestrant
nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Amcenestrant- Main Cohort
Cycle 1 Day 1: 1.5h3185.7 ± 3145.2
Cycle 1 Day 1: 4h4753.1 ± 3463.7
Cycle 1 Day 15: Pre-dose516.4 ± 377.2
Cycle 2 Day 1: Pre-dose479.1 ± 320.3
Cycle 2 Day 1: 1.5h2719.6 ± 2374.0
Cycle 2 Day 1: 4h3801.8 ± 2370.8
Cycle 2 Day 1: 8h2303.8 ± 1411.4
Cycle 3 Day 1: Pre-dose593.6 ± 815.1
Cycle 4 Day 1: Pre-dose661.5 ± 860.5
Cycle 6 Day 1: Pre-dose531.5 ± 468.5
SecondaryWithin-Participant Steady State Ctrough of Amcenestrant

Within-participant Steady state Ctrough was defined as the median value of the Ctrough across study using plasma concentration of predose samples at Cycle 1 Day 15 and Day 1 of Cycle 2, 3, 4 and 6 for each individual participant. Average (mean) of all calculated Ctrough values for all participants across study (Cycle 1 Day 15 and Day 1 of Cycle 2, 3, 4 and 6 ) was derived and reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Predose on Cycle 1 Day 15; Cycle 2 Day 1; Cycle 3 Day 1; Cycle 4 Day 1; Cycle 6 Day 1
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Within-Participant Steady State Ctrough of Amcenestrant
ng/mLAmcenestrant- Main Cohort
Within-Participant Steady State Ctrough of Amcenestrant491.35 ± 316.51
SecondaryChange From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) Domain Scores

EORTC-QLQ-C30: cancer-specific instrument with 30 questions for evaluation of new chemotherapy \& assessment of participant reported outcome. These include 5 functional scales, 9 symptom scales, \& Global Health Status/quality of life scale (GHS/QoL). All 14 items/domains were scored on scale of 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much) and GHS/QoL, scored on scale of 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent). All scales are transformed from raw scores to linear scales ranging 0 to 100. Higher score for functional \& GHS/QoL = higher level of functioning, \& higher score for symptoms scales = higher symptom burden. Least Square (LS) mean and Standard Error (SE) are derived from MMRM model with change from Baseline values as response variable, treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, Baseline value and stratifications factors as fixed effect. Average of LS mean change from baseline values of overall treatment (i.e., each cycle \[Cycle 1 up to Cycle 30\]) was reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline, overall treatment duration (Cycle 1 up to Cycle 30 [i.e.,116 weeks])
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) Domain Scores
score on a scalePhysician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Main CohortAmcenestrant- Main Cohort
GHS/QoL1.8 ± 1.62.5 ± 1.6
Physical functioning-1.2 ± 1.3-3.1 ± 1.3
Role functioning-2.4 ± 1.9-3.0 ± 1.8
Emotional functioning-2.2 ± 1.73.0 ± 1.6
Cognitive functioning-0.9 ± 1.6-0.8 ± 1.5
Social functioning-2.5 ± 1.7-0.8 ± 1.7
Fatigue1.1 ± 1.92.8 ± 1.9
Nausea and vomiting1.7 ± 1.31.3 ± 1.3
Pain1.1 ± 1.92.1 ± 1.9
Dyspnoea1.0 ± 1.60.8 ± 1.6
Insomnia-1.1 ± 2.3-2.3 ± 2.2
Appetite loss2.4 ± 2.31.2 ± 2.3
Constipation-2.3 ± 2.03.0 ± 2.0
Diarrhoea0.3 ± 1.33.9 ± 1.3
Financial difficulties1.7 ± 1.8-2.0 ± 1.8
SecondaryChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions (5D), 5 Levels (5L) (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score

EQ-5D-5L is a standardized measure of health status, provides a simple, generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal, and consists of 2 sections: the EQ-5D-5L health state utility index (descriptive system) and the EQ-5D-5L VAS. The Visual Analogue Scale is designed to rate the participant's current health state on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst imaginable health state and 100 represents the best imaginable health state. LS mean and SE are derived from MMRM model with change from baseline values as response variable, treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, Baseline value and stratifications factors as fixed effect. Average of LS mean change from Baseline values of overall treatment (i.e., each cycle \[Cycle 1 up to Cycle 30\]) was reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline, overall treatment duration (Cycle 1 up to Cycle 30 [i.e.,116 weeks])
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions (5D), 5 Levels (5L) (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score
score on a scalePhysician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Main CohortAmcenestrant- Main Cohort
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions (5D), 5 Levels (5L) (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score0.9 ± 1.40.2 ± 1.4
SecondaryChange From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions (5D), 5 Levels (5L) (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Health Utility Index Value

EQ-5D-5L: consists of 2 sections: EQ-5D-5L health state utility index (descriptive system) \& VAS. The EQ-5D descriptive system consists of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort \& anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, \& extreme problems. Response options are measured with 5-point Likert scale (for 5L version). The EQ-5D-5L responses are converted into single index utility score between 0 to 1, where higher score indicates better health state \& lower score indicate worse health state. LS mean and SE are derived from MMRM model with change from Baseline values as response variable, treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, Baseline value and stratifications factors as fixed effect. Average of LS mean change from baseline values overall treatment (i.e., each cycle \[Cycle 1 up to Cycle 30\]) was reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline, overall treatment duration (Cycle 1 up to Cycle 30 [i.e.,116 weeks])
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions (5D), 5 Levels (5L) (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Health Utility Index Value
score on a scalePhysician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Main CohortAmcenestrant- Main Cohort
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions (5D), 5 Levels (5L) (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Health Utility Index Value-0.0 ± 0.0-0.0 ± 0.0
SecondaryChange From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Breast Cancer Specific Module (EORTC-QLQ-BR23) Domain Scores

QLQ-BR23: disease-specific Health-related QOL assesses impact of breast cancer \& side effects of treatment. EORTC-QLQ-BR23 contains 23 items: multi-item scales \& single-item measures. 4 functional scales (body image, sexual functioning, sexual enjoyment, future perspective) \& 4 scales related to symptoms of disease or treatment (arm symptoms, breast symptoms, systemic therapy side effects, \& upset by hair loss). All items scored 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Scores of all scales transformed from raw scores to linear scales ranging 0 to 100. Higher score for functional scales = better outcome; higher score for symptoms scales = higher symptom burden. LS mean and SE are derived from MMRM model with change from Baseline values as response variable, treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, Baseline value and stratifications factors as fixed effect. Average of LS mean change from baseline values of overall treatment (i.e., each cycle \[Cycle 1 up to Cycle 30\]) was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline, overall treatment duration (Cycle 1 up to Cycle 30 [i.e.,116 weeks])
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Breast Cancer Specific Module (EORTC-QLQ-BR23) Domain Scores
score on a scalePhysician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Main CohortAmcenestrant- Main Cohort
Body image1.8 ± 1.72.2 ± 1.6
Sexual functioning-2.4 ± 1.3-2.6 ± 1.2
Sexual enjoyment-1.1 ± 3.00.4 ± 4.1
Future perspective10.6 ± 2.712.0 ± 2.6
Systemic therapy side effects0.2 ± 1.00.7 ± 1.0
Breast symptoms-0.4 ± 1.3-0.8 ± 1.2
Arm symptoms1.8 ± 1.72.0 ± 1.7
Upset by hair loss-9.7 ± 3.9-10.6 ± 3.7
SecondaryChinese Cohort: Overall Survival

OS is defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of documented death (due to any cause). In the absence of observation of death, survival time was censored to last date the participant is known to be alive or at the cut-off date, whichever comes first. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame:
From randomization to the death due to any cause or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: 183 weeks)
Reported as:
Median · months
Chinese Cohort: Overall Survival
monthsPhysician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Chinese CohortAmcenestrant- Chinese Cohort
Chinese Cohort: Overall SurvivalNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
SecondaryChinese Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response

Objective response is defined as percentage of participants having a PR or CR according to the RECIST version 1.1 assessed by ICR. As per RECIST 1.1, CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

Time frame:
From randomization to the date of first documented tumor progression, death due to any cause or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: 183 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Chinese Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response
percentage of participantsPhysician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Chinese CohortAmcenestrant- Chinese Cohort
Chinese Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response10.8 (3.0 to 25.4)6.5 (1.4 to 17.9)
SecondaryChinese Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Disease Control

Disease control is defined as percentage of participants having a confirmed CR, PR, or SD or Non-CR/Non-PD as BOR determined by ICR as per RECIST 1.1 from the date of randomization to the date of end of treatment. As per RECIST 1.1, CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum diameters. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters. Non-CR/Non-PD: persistence of one or more nontarget lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

Time frame:
From randomization to the date of first documented tumor progression, death due to any cause or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: 183 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Chinese Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Disease Control
percentage of participantsPhysician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Chinese CohortAmcenestrant- Chinese Cohort
Chinese Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Disease Control75.7 (58.8 to 88.2)73.9 (58.9 to 85.7)
SecondaryChinese Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit

Clinical benefit is defined as percentage of participants having a confirmed CR, PR, SD, or Non-CR/Non-PD for at least 24 weeks determined by ICR as per RECIST 1.1 from the date of randomization to the date of end of treatment. As per RECIST 1.1, CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters. Non-CR/Non-PD: persistence of one or more nontarget lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

Time frame:
From randomization to the date of first documented tumor progression, death due to any cause or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: 183 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Chinese Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit
percentage of participantsPhysician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Chinese CohortAmcenestrant- Chinese Cohort
Chinese Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit21.6 (9.8 to 38.2)23.9 (12.6 to 38.8)
SecondaryChinese Cohort: Duration of Response

DOR is defined as time (in months) from first documented evidence of CR or PR until PD determined by ICR as per RECIST 1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. For participants with ongoing response at the time of the analysis, DOR was censored at the date of the last valid disease assessment not showing documented progression performed before the initiation of a new anticancer treatment (if any). As per RECIST 1.1, CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

Time frame:
From the date of first response to the date of first documented tumor progression, death due to any cause or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: 183 weeks)
Reported as:
Median · months
Chinese Cohort: Duration of Response
monthsPhysician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Chinese CohortAmcenestrant- Chinese Cohort
Chinese Cohort: Duration of ResponseNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
SecondaryChinese Cohort: Progression Free Survival According to Estrogen Receptor 1 Gene Mutation Status

PFS defined as the time (in months) interval from the date of randomization to the date of first documented tumor progression as per RECIST 1.1 assessed by ICR or death (due to any cause), whichever comes first. Progression as per RECIST 1.1: at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. The mutation status (wild type, mutant) of twelve specific mutations of the ESR1 gene was determined by multiplex ddPCR, including their mutant frequency and concentration. Here, PFS is reported based on the ESR1 mutation status of participants: wild type and mutants. ESR1 was the gene encoding estrogen receptor alpha. ESR1 mutant type breast cancer was a disease where the ESR1 gene had a mutation (i.e., a type of error). ESR1 wild type breast cancer was a disease where the ESR1 gene was normal without a mutation. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame:
From randomization to the date of first documented tumor progression, death due to any cause or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: 183 weeks)
Reported as:
Median · months
Chinese Cohort: Progression Free Survival According to Estrogen Receptor 1 Gene Mutation Status
monthsPhysician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Chinese CohortAmcenestrant- Chinese Cohort
Mutated5.5 (NA to NA)1.8 (1.7 to NA)
Wild typeNA (1.8 to NA)1.9 (1.8 to NA)
SecondaryChinese Cohort: Plasma Concentration of Amcenestrant

Amcenestrant plasma concentrations at specified time points are reported.

Time frame:
Cycle 1 Day 1: 1.5 hours(h), 4h post-dose, Cycle 1 Day 15: pre-dose; Cycle 2 Day 1: pre-dose, 1.5h, 4h, 8h post-dose; Cycles 3, 4, and 6 Day 1: pre-dose
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Chinese Cohort: Plasma Concentration of Amcenestrant
ng/mLAmcenestrant- Chinese Cohort
Cycle 1 Day 1: 1.5h3643.3 ± 3166.2
Cycle 1 Day 1: 4h6015.0 ± 2887.0
Cycle 1 Day 15: Pre-dose694.3 ± 589.4
Cycle 2 Day 1: Pre-dose553.2 ± 316.9
Cycle 2 Day 1: 1.5h3318.1 ± 3097.9
Cycle 2 Day 1: 4h4912.9 ± 2513.9
Cycle 2 Day 1: 8h3309.7 ± 1318.7
Cycle 3 Day 1: Pre-dose521.6 ± 439.9
Cycle 4 Day 1: Pre-dose475.1 ± 301.2
Cycle 6 Day 1: Pre-dose598.5 ± 379.1
SecondaryChinese Cohort: Within-Participant Steady State Ctrough of Amcenestrant

Within-participant Steady state Ctrough was defined as the median value of the Ctrough across study using plasma concentration of pre-dose samples at Cycle 1 Day 15 and Day 1 of Cycle 2, 3, 4 and 6 for each individual participant. Average (mean) of all calculated Ctrough values for all participants across study (Cycle 1 Day 15 and Day 1 of Cycle 2, 3, 4 and 6) was derived and reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15; Cycle 2 Day 1; Cycle 3 Day 1; Cycle 4 Day 1; Cycle 6 Day 1
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Chinese Cohort: Within-Participant Steady State Ctrough of Amcenestrant
ng/mLAmcenestrant- Chinese Cohort
Chinese Cohort: Within-Participant Steady State Ctrough of Amcenestrant524.51 ± 317.00
SecondaryChinese Cohort: Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire Domain Scores

EORTC-QLQ-C30: cancer-specific instrument with 30 questions for evaluation of new chemotherapy \& assessment of participant reported outcome. These include 5 functional scales, 9 symptom scales, \& Global Health Status/quality of life scale (GHS/QoL). All 14 items/domains were scored on scale of 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much) and GHS/QoL, scored on scale of 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent). All scales are transformed from raw scores to linear scales ranging 0 to 100. Higher score for functional \& GHS/QoL = higher level of functioning, \& higher score for symptoms scales = higher symptom burden. LS mean and SE are derived from MMRM model with change from baseline values as response variable, treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, Baseline value and stratifications factors as fixed effect. Average of LS mean change from baseline values of overall treatment (i.e., 183 weeks) was reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline and up to 183 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Chinese Cohort: Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire Domain Scores
score on a scalePhysician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Chinese CohortAmcenestrant- Chinese Cohort
GHS/QoL6.4 ± 2.60.3 ± 2.5
Physical functioning4.3 ± 1.40.9 ± 1.3
Role functioning-1.9 ± 2.5-0.1 ± 2.4
Emotional functioning-1.0 ± 2.0-1.7 ± 1.9
Cognitive functioning-0.4 ± 2.0-2.5 ± 1.9
Social functioning3.0 ± 2.3-1.9 ± 2.2
Fatigue-1.4 ± 2.10.8 ± 2.0
Nausea and vomiting-0.9 ± 1.90.9 ± 1.8
Pain-2.1 ± 2.1-2.3 ± 2.0
Dyspnoea-0.3 ± 2.52.3 ± 2.4
Insomnia-0.9 ± 2.5-1.4 ± 2.4
Appetite loss-1.9 ± 2.72.3 ± 2.6
Constipation2.3 ± 2.12.8 ± 2.0
Diarrhoea-0.7 ± 1.1-0.2 ± 1.1
Financial difficulties-7.3 ± 3.3-6.4 ± 3.2
SecondaryChinese Cohort: Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels Score: Visual Analog Scale Score

EQ-5D-5L is a standardized measure of health status, provides a simple, generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal, and consists of 2 sections: the EQ-5D-5L health state utility index (descriptive system) and the EQ-5D-5L VAS. The Visual Analogue Scale is designed to rate the participant's current health state on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst imaginable health state and 100 represents the best imaginable health state. LS mean and SE are derived from MMRM model with change from baseline values as response variable, treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, Baseline value and stratifications factors as fixed effect. Average of LS mean change from baseline values of overall treatment (i.e., 183 weeks) was reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline and up to 183 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Chinese Cohort: Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels Score: Visual Analog Scale Score
score on a scalePhysician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Chinese CohortAmcenestrant- Chinese Cohort
Chinese Cohort: Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels Score: Visual Analog Scale Score3.6 ± 1.31.2 ± 1.2
SecondaryChinese Cohort: Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels Score: Health Utility Index Value

EQ-5D-5L: consists of 2 sections: EQ-5D-5L health state utility index (descriptive system) \& VAS. The EQ-5D descriptive system consists of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort \& anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, \& extreme problems. Response options are measured with 5-point Likert scale (for 5L version). The EQ-5D-5L responses are converted into single index utility score between 0 to 1, where higher score indicates better health state \& lower score indicate worse health state. LS mean and SE are derived from MMRM model with change from baseline values as response variable, treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, Baseline value and stratifications factors as fixed effect. Average of LS mean change from baseline values of overall treatment (i.e., 183 weeks) was reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline and up to 183 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Chinese Cohort: Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels Score: Health Utility Index Value
score on a scalePhysician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Chinese CohortAmcenestrant- Chinese Cohort
Chinese Cohort: Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Working Group Health Status Measure 5 Dimensions, 5 Levels Score: Health Utility Index Value-0.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.0
SecondaryChinese Cohort: Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Breast Cancer Specific Module Domain Scores

QLQ-BR23: disease-specific Health-related QOL assesses impact of breast cancer \& side effects of treatment. EORTC-QLQ-BR23 contains 23 items: multi-item scales \& single-item measures. 4 functional scales (body image, sexual functioning, sexual enjoyment, future perspective) \& 4 scales related to symptoms of disease or treatment (arm symptoms, breast symptoms, systemic therapy side effects, \& upset by hair loss). All items scored 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Scores of all scales transformed from raw scores to linear scales ranging 0 to 100. Higher score for functional scales = better outcome; higher score for symptoms scales = higher symptom burden. LS mean and SE are derived from MMRM model with change from baseline values as response variable, treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, Baseline value and stratifications factors as fixed effect. Average of LS mean change from baseline values of overall treatment (i.e., 183 weeks) was reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline and up to 183 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Chinese Cohort: Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Breast Cancer Specific Module Domain Scores
score on a scalePhysician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Chinese CohortAmcenestrant- Chinese Cohort
Body image-0.8 ± 2.40.2 ± 2.3
Sexual functioning-1.6 ± 1.3-3.6 ± 1.3
Future perspective8.3 ± 3.25.1 ± 3.0
Systemic therapy side effects-0.5 ± 1.10.5 ± 1.0
Breast symptoms0.8 ± 1.70.5 ± 1.6
Arm symptoms-0.4 ± 1.4-0.8 ± 1.4
SecondaryMain Cohort and Chinese Cohort: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. An SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect or was a medically important event. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed, worsened (according to the Investigator's opinion), or became serious during the on-treatment period.

Time frame:
From first dose of study treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) up to 152 weeks for main cohort and 183 weeks for Chinese cohort
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Main Cohort and Chinese Cohort: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
ParticipantsPhysician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM) - Main CohortAmcenestrant 400 mg - Main CohortPhysician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Chinese CohortAmcenestrant- Chinese Cohort
Any TEAE1131182233
Any TESAE162525
PrimaryProgression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the time in months interval from the date of randomization to the date of first documented tumor progression as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) assessed by independent central review (ICR) or death (due to any cause), whichever comes first. Progressive Disease (PD) as per RECIST 1.1: at least a 20 percent (%) increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame:
From randomization to the date of first documented tumor progression or death due to any cause or data cut-off date whichever comes first (maximum duration: 116 weeks)
Reported as:
Median · months
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
monthsPhysician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Main CohortAmcenestrant- Main Cohort
Progression Free Survival (PFS)3.7 (2.0 to 4.9)3.6 (2.0 to 3.9)
Statistical analysis
  • Physician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Main Cohort vs Amcenestrant- Main Cohort · Stratified Log-Rank test · p = 0.6437 (One-sided p-value based on Stratified log-rank test. Threshold for statistical significance at 0.025 level.) · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.051 · 95% CI 0.789 to 1.4Amcenestrant versus PCEM
PrimaryChinese Cohort: Progression Free Survival

PFS is defined as the time in months interval from the date of randomization to the date of first documented tumor progression as per RECIST 1.1 assessed by ICR or death (due to any cause), whichever comes first. PD as per RECIST 1.1: at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame:
From randomization to the date of first documented tumor progression or death due to any cause or data cut-off date whichever comes first, up to primary completion date of 15-Feb-2022, a maximum of 121 weeks
Reported as:
Median · months
Chinese Cohort: Progression Free Survival
monthsPhysician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Chinese CohortAmcenestrant- Chinese Cohort
Chinese Cohort: Progression Free SurvivalNA (3.7 to NA)7.2 (3.7 to NA)

Adverse events

Collected over AEs and SAEs were collected from first dose of study treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) up to 152 weeks for main cohort and 183 weeks for Chinese cohort. All-cause mortality (deaths) was collected from first dose of study drug (Day 1) to the end of follow-up for death for each participant, up to approximately 761 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Physician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Main Cohort52/147 (35.4%)16/147 (10.9%)79/147 (53.7%)
Amcenestrant 400 mg- Main Cohort46/143 (32.2%)25/143 (17.5%)86/143 (60.1%)
Physician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Chinese Cohort2/42 (4.8%)2/42 (4.8%)14/42 (33.3%)
Amcenestrant- Chinese Cohort6/48 (12.5%)5/48 (10.4%)25/48 (52.1%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 51
Most frequent serious events
EventPhysician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Main CohortAmcenestrant 400 mg- Main CohortPhysician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Chinese CohortAmcenestrant- Chinese Cohort
Disease ProgressionGeneral disorders2/1475/1430/420/48
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders4/1470/1430/420/48
Pleural EffusionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/1470/1431/420/48
Rib FractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/1470/1431/420/48
Pathological FractureMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/1473/1430/420/48
Cancer PainNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/1470/1430/421/48
HypertensionVascular disorders0/1471/1430/421/48
Malignant Pleural EffusionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/1470/1430/421/48
PneumonitisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/1470/1430/421/48
Breast PainReproductive system and breast disorders0/1471/1430/421/48
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 22
Most frequent other events
EventPhysician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Main CohortAmcenestrant 400 mg- Main CohortPhysician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Chinese CohortAmcenestrant- Chinese Cohort
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders13/14728/1431/423/48
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders5/14727/1431/423/48
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders8/1477/1436/426/48
HeadacheNervous system disorders15/14718/1431/423/48
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders14/14718/1430/422/48
Back PainMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders17/14718/1432/421/48
FatigueGeneral disorders17/14716/1431/424/48
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders11/1477/1434/425/48
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders9/14714/1431/421/48
Hot FlushVascular disorders13/14713/1430/421/48

Baseline characteristics

Analysis was performed on intent to treat (ITT) population which included all enrolled participants (i.e., who sign the informed consent form \[ICF\]) and for whom there is a confirmation of successful allocation of a randomization number by interactive response technology (IRT). 7 and 6 participants were included in PCEM-Chinese Cohort \& Amcenestrant-Chinese Cohort, respectively from the Main Cohort. Therefore, baseline measure data are reported for each cohort separately.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Physician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Main CohortAmcenestrant- Main CohortPhysician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Chinese CohortAmcenestrant- Chinese CohortTotal
Main cohort59.2 ± 12.558.2 ± 11.8——58.7 ± 12.2
Chinese cohort——53.1 ± 10.755.2 ± 10.754.2 ± 10.7
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Physician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Main CohortAmcenestrant- Main CohortPhysician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Chinese CohortAmcenestrant- Chinese CohortTotal
Main cohort — Female146143——289
Main cohort — Male10——1
Chinese cohort — Female——424789
Chinese cohort — Male——011
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Physician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Main CohortAmcenestrant- Main CohortPhysician Choice Endocrine Monotherapy (PCEM)- Chinese CohortAmcenestrant- Chinese CohortTotal
Main cohort — American Indian or Alaska Native00——0
Main cohort — Asian3432——66
Main cohort — Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander20——2
Main cohort — Black or African American00——0
Main cohort — White102102——204
Main cohort — More than one race20——2
Main cohort — Unknown or Not Reported79——16
Chinese cohort — American Indian or Alaska Native——000
Chinese cohort — Asian——424890
Chinese cohort — Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander——000
Chinese cohort — Black or African American——000
Chinese cohort — White——000
Chinese cohort — More than one race——000
Chinese cohort — Unknown or Not Reported——000
08

Study locations

109 sites
  • Alabama Oncology - St. Vincent's Birmingham- Site Number : 8400008
    Birmingham, Alabama 35205, United States
  • Comprehensive Blood and Cancer Center Site Number : 8400018
    Bakersfield, California 93309, United States
  • UCLA Santa Monica - Parkside- Site Number : 8400024
    Santa Monica, California 90404, United States
  • University of Kansas Clinical Research Center- Site Number : 8400027
    Fairway, Kansas 66205, United States
  • Hematology Oncology Clinic Site Number : 8400020
    Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70809, United States
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute- Site Number : 8400015
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
  • Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City- Site Number : 8400032
    Kansas City, Missouri 64111, United States
  • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center - Lebanon - 1 Medical Center Drive- Site Number : 8400013
    Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756, United States
  • Hackensack Meridian Health - Hackensack University Medical Center- Site Number : 8400025
    Hackensack, New Jersey 07601, United States
  • Gabrail Cancer Center- Site Number : 8400006
    Canton, Ohio 44718, United States
  • The Center for Cancer & Blood Disorders - Fort Worth- Site Number : 8400022
    Fort Worth, Texas 76104, United States
  • University of Vermont Medical Center- Site Number : 8400026
    Burlington, Vermont 05401, United States
  • Northwest Medical Specialties Tacoma- Site Number : 8400038
    Tacoma, Washington 98405, United States
  • University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics- Site Number : 8400016
    Madison, Wisconsin 53792, United States
  • Investigational Site Number : 0320005
    Rosario, Santa Fe Province 2000, Argentina
  • Investigational Site Number : 0320007
    Buenos Aires, 1012, Argentina
  • Investigational Site Number : 0320008
    Buenos Aires, 1019, Argentina
  • Investigational Site Number : 0320006
    Buenos Aires, 1125, Argentina
  • Investigational Site Number : 0320001
    Buenos Aires, 1426, Argentina
  • Investigational Site Number : 0320004
    La Rioja, 5300, Argentina
  • Investigational Site Number : 0320002
    Salta, 4400, Argentina
  • Investigational Site Number : 0360003
    South Brisbane, Queensland 4101, Australia
  • Investigational Site Number : 0360002
    Woolloongabba, Queensland 4102, Australia
  • Investigational Site Number : 0360001
    Nedlands, Western Australia 6009, Australia
  • Investigational Site Number : 0560002
    Charleroi, 6000, Belgium
  • Investigational Site Number : 0560001
    Leuven, 3000, Belgium
  • Investigational Site Number : 0560003
    Namur, 5000, Belgium
  • Associacao de Combate ao Cancer em Goias Hospital Araujo Jorge- Site Number : 0760005
    Goiânia, Goiás 74605-070, Brazil
  • Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre- Site Number : 0760001
    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul 90035-903, Brazil
  • Hospital Mae de Deus Site Number : 0760002
    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul 90880-480, Brazil
  • Fundação Faculdade Regional de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto- Site Number : 0760003
    São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo 15090-000, Brazil
  • IBCC - Núcleo de Pesquisa e Ensino- Site Number : 0760006
    São Paulo, 04014-002, Brazil
  • Investigational Site Number : 1240004
    Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N2, Canada
  • Investigational Site Number : 1240003
    London, Ontario N6A 5W9, Canada
  • Investigational Site Number : 1240006
    Montreal, Quebec H3T 1E2, Canada
  • Investigational Site Number : 1560024
    Chongqing, Maryland 400030, China
  • Investigational Site Number : 1560003
    Kunming, Michigan 650106, China
  • Investigational Site Number : 1560001
    Beijing, 100021, China
  • Investigational Site Number : 1560015
    Changchun, 130021, China
  • Investigational Site Number : 1560014
    Changsha, 410005, China
  • Investigational Site Number : 1560025
    Chengdu, 610041, China
  • Investigational Site Number : 1560023
    Hangzhou, 310016, China
  • Investigational Site Number : 1560002
    Hangzhou, 310022, China
  • Investigational Site Number : 1560005
    Harbin, 150081, China
  • Investigational Site Number : 1560010
    Hefei, 230001, China
  • Investigational Site Number : 1560018
    Hefei, 230022, China
  • Investigational Site Number : 1560026
    Jinan, 250013, China
  • Investigational Site Number : 1560008
    Linyi, 276000, China
  • Investigational Site Number : 1560011
    Nanjing, 210029, China
  • Investigational Site Number : 1560013
    Tianjin, 300060, China
  • Investigational Site Number : 1560021
    Ürümqi, 830000, China
  • Investigational Site Number : 1560016
    Wuhan, 430079, China
  • Investigational Site Number : 1560031
    Xuzhou, 221018, China
  • Investigational Site Number : 2030002
    Brno, 656 53, Czechia
  • Investigational Site Number : 2030003
    Nový Jičín, 741 01, Czechia
  • Investigational Site Number : 2030004
    Prague, 140 59, Czechia
  • Investigational Site Number : 2500008
    Angers, 49055, France
  • Investigational Site Number : 2500006
    Créteil, 94010, France
  • Investigational Site Number : 2500007
    Marseille, 13273, France
  • Investigational Site Number : 2500005
    Paris, 75010, France
  • Investigational Site Number : 2500001
    Villejuif, 94805, France
  • Investigational Site Number : 3000004
    Thessaloniki, Quebec 546 45, Greece
  • Investigational Site Number : 3000001
    Heraklion, 711 10, Greece
  • Investigational Site Number : 3000002
    Larissa, 411 10, Greece
  • Investigational Site Number : 3760002
    Jerusalem, 9103102, Israel
  • Investigational Site Number : 3760001
    Petah Tikva, 4941492, Israel
  • Investigational Site Number : 3760004
    Ramat Gan, 5262100, Israel
  • Investigational Site Number : 3760003
    Tel Aviv, 6423906, Israel
  • Investigational Site Number : 3800002
    Milan, Milano 20141, Italy
  • Investigational Site Number : 3800001
    Candiolo, Torino 10060, Italy
  • Investigational Site Number : 3800003
    Prato, 59100, Italy
  • Investigational Site Number : 3920002
    Nagoya, Aichi-ken 464-8681, Japan
  • Investigational Site Number : 3920001
    Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8577, Japan
  • Investigational Site Number : 3920009
    Ōta, Gunma 373-8550, Japan
  • Investigational Site Number : 3920006
    Yokohama, Kanagawa 241-0815, Japan
  • Investigational Site Number : 3920005
    Ina, Nagano 362-0806, Japan
  • Investigational Site Number : 3920004
    Chūō, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
  • Investigational Site Number : 3920003
    Osaka, 540-0006, Japan
  • Investigational Site Number : 3920008
    Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
  • Investigational Site Number : 4280002
    Riga, LV-1002, Latvia
  • Investigational Site Number : 4280001
    Riga, LV-1038, Latvia
  • Investigational Site Number : 4840002
    Monterrey, Nuevo León 64460, Mexico
  • Investigational Site Number : 4840005
    Mexico City, 03100, Mexico
  • Investigational Site Number : 4840006
    Veracruz, 91900, Mexico
  • Investigational Site Number : 6160003
    Poznan, Greater Poland Voivodeship 61-866, Poland
  • Investigational Site Number : 6160001
    Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship 02-781, Poland
  • Hospital Auxilio Mutuo- Site Number : 8400028
    San Juan, 00918, Puerto Rico
  • Investigational Site Number : 6430002
    Saint Petersburg, Georgia 197758, Russia
  • Investigational Site Number : 6430005
    Moscow, 105005, Russia
  • Investigational Site Number : 6430003
    Moscow, 115478, Russia
  • Investigational Site Number : 4100001
    Seoul, Seoul-teukbyeolsi 03080, South Korea
  • Investigational Site Number : 4100004
    Seoul, Seoul-teukbyeolsi 03722, South Korea
  • Investigational Site Number : 4100003
    Seoul, Seoul-teukbyeolsi 05505, South Korea
  • Investigational Site Number : 4100002
    Seoul, Seoul-teukbyeolsi 06351, South Korea
  • Investigational Site Number : 7240006
    Barcelona, Barcelona [Barcelona] 08035, Spain
  • Investigational Site Number : 7240003
    Barcelona, Catalunya [Cataluña] 08036, Spain
  • Investigational Site Number : 7240001
    L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalunya [Cataluña] 08907, Spain
  • Investigational Site Number : 7240008
    Málaga, 29010, Spain
  • Investigational Site Number : 1580002
    Taichung, 404, Taiwan
  • Investigational Site Number : 1580003
    Tainan, 704, Taiwan

Showing the first 100 of 109 sites across 23 countries.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Tolaney SM, Chan A, Petrakova K, Delaloge S, Campone M, Iwata H, Peddi PF, Kaufman PA, De Kermadec E, Liu Q, Cohen P, Paux G, Wang L, Ternes N, Boitier E, Im SA. AMEERA-3: Randomized Phase II Study of Amcenestrant (Oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader) Versus Standard Endocrine Monotherapy in Estrogen Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Aug 20;41(24):4014-4024. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.02746. Epub 2023 Jun 22. PubMed 37348019 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Dec 10, 2021
  • Statistical analysis plan · Dec 10, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04059484
Lead sponsor
Sanofi
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 16, 2019
Start date
Oct 22, 2019
Primary completion
Feb 15, 2022
Completion
Jan 2, 2025
Results posted
Mar 30, 2023
Last update
Feb 24, 2026

Study contacts

Clinical Sciences & Operations
study director · Sanofi

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion