CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04048356CLNUPUpdated Jul 10, 2023Results posted

Chlorhexidine vs. Iodine for Vaginal Preparation in Urogynecologic Procedures

A Phase 3 interventional study of Vaginal scrub, to be applied vaginally and perineally immediately prior to surgery. in Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Floor Disorders, sponsored by University of New Mexico. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-07-10.

Sponsored by University of New Mexico · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
137
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This is a randomized controlled trial to determine if there is a difference between chlorhexidine gluconate and povidone iodine vaginal preparations for urogynecological surgery post operative infections.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to determine whether there is a difference in efficacy of two of the most common commercially available vaginal surgical preparations. The first objective is to determine whether chlorhexidine gluconate is non-inferior to povidone iodine with respect to post-operative infections including urinary tract infections (both culture proven and empirically treated) and surgical site infections (as defined by the Centers for Disease Control). The second objective is to determine whether chlorhexidine gluconate is non-inferior to povidone iodine with respect to vulvar and vaginal irritation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse
  • Urinary Incontinence
  • Pelvic Floor Disorders
  • Gynecologic Disease
  • Post-Op Infection
  • Surgical Site Infection
  • Urinary Tract Infections

Keywords

  • Urogynecology
  • Surgery
  • Antiseptic Preparation
03

In context

Infections

6,688 studies on the registry are indexed under Infections; 807 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 137 is above the median of 120 across 4,201 interventional studies indexed under Infections.

Browse Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

University of New Mexico is the lead sponsor of 306 studies on the registry; 28 are open to participants now.

Of its 25 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 23 (92%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Female Subjects >18 years of age
  • English or Spanish speaking/reading
  • Must be able to provide informed consent
  • Undergoing urogynecologic procedures or surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant - all patients are verified regarding pregnancy status prior to gynecologic surgical intervention at all sites of surgery - for patients who are premenopausal and have a uterus, a urine pregnancy test is administered in the preoperative setting. Pregnancy status is also determined prior to this in the office setting by interview and patient provided history prior to offering surgery to the patient.
  • Inability to return for follow-up visits
  • No concurrent need for vaginal antisepsis, such as cases of sacral neuromodulation
  • Lack of telephone
  • Known allergy to either antiseptic agent
  • Prisoners will not be eligible to participate in this study
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
137 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Chlorhexidine gluconate

    Chlorhexidine gluconate 2% vaginal scrub, to be applied vaginally and perineally immediately prior to surgery.

    Drug: Vaginal scrub, to be applied vaginally and perineally immediately prior to surgery.

  • Active comparator
    Povidone Iodine

    Povidone iodine vaginal scrub, to be applied vaginally and perineally immediately prior to surgery.

    Drug: Vaginal scrub, to be applied vaginally and perineally immediately prior to surgery.

Interventions

  • DrugVaginal scrub, to be applied vaginally and perineally immediately prior to surgery.

    Vaginal scrub, to be applied vaginally and perineally immediately prior to surgery.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of Urinary Tract Infection

    Urinary tract infection as defined by positive urine culture of \>10,000 cfu, or empirically treated symptoms.

    Time frame: 2 weeks post operatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of Surgical Site Infection

    Surgical site infection as defined by CDC guidelines: https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/9pscssicurrent.pdf

    Time frame: 14 days postoperatively

  2. Vaginal Irritation

    Vaginal irritation (including specific symptoms of discomfort, burning, or itching) based on a 5-point scale (Likert type, from 0 minimum/better to 5 maximum/worse, total score reported))

    Time frame: Post operative day 1

07

Results

Posted Jul 10, 2023

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneChlorhexidine GluconatePovidone Iodine
Started7265
Completed6158
Not completed117

Outcome measures

PrimaryRate of Urinary Tract Infection

Urinary tract infection as defined by positive urine culture of \>10,000 cfu, or empirically treated symptoms.

Time frame:
2 weeks post operatively
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Rate of Urinary Tract Infection
ParticipantsChlorhexidine GluconatePovidone Iodine
Rate of Urinary Tract Infection47
SecondaryRate of Surgical Site Infection

Surgical site infection as defined by CDC guidelines: https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/9pscssicurrent.pdf

Time frame:
14 days postoperatively
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Rate of Surgical Site Infection
ParticipantsChlorhexidine GluconatePovidone Iodine
Rate of Surgical Site Infection12
SecondaryVaginal Irritation

Vaginal irritation (including specific symptoms of discomfort, burning, or itching) based on a 5-point scale (Likert type, from 0 minimum/better to 5 maximum/worse, total score reported))

Time frame:
Post operative day 1
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Vaginal Irritation
ParticipantsChlorhexidine GluconatePovidone Iodine
Vaginal irritation - 05050
Vaginal irritation - 110
Vaginal irritation - 210
Vaginal irritation - 302
Vaginal irritation - 4 or 522

Adverse events

Collected over 6 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Chlorhexidine Gluconate0/61 (0%)4/61 (6.6%)0/61 (0%)
Povidone Iodine0/58 (0%)4/58 (6.9%)0/58 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventChlorhexidine GluconatePovidone Iodine
Surgical Site InfectionInfections and infestations1/612/58
BronchitisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/611/58
Suture reactionSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/611/58
Skin irritationSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/610/58
Bacterial VaginosisInfections and infestations1/610/58
Urethral injuryRenal and urinary disorders1/610/58

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Chlorhexidine GluconatePovidone IodineTotal
Mean58 ± 1357 ± 1257.5 ± 12.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Chlorhexidine GluconatePovidone IodineTotal
Female6158119
Male000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Chlorhexidine GluconatePovidone IodineTotal
African American022
White302050
Latinx262551
American Indian51217
Other246
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Chlorhexidine GluconatePovidone IodineTotal
United States6158119
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center
    Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Rockefeller NF, Petersen TR, Komesu YM, Meriwether K, Dunivan G, Ninivaggio C, Jeppson PC. Chlorhexidine gluconate vs povidone-iodine vaginal antisepsis for urogynecologic surgery: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jul;227(1):66.e1-66.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.12.260. Epub 2021 Dec 29. PubMed 34973179 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Oct 22, 2020
  • Informed consent form · Oct 22, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 10, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04048356
Lead sponsor
University of New Mexico
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 7, 2019
Start date
Jul 15, 2019
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2021
Completion
Mar 14, 2021
Results posted
Jul 10, 2023
Last update
Jul 10, 2023

Study contacts

Karen Taylor, BA
study director · University of New Mexico

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion