CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04026074Updated Oct 21, 2019

Concepts for Analgosedation During Placement of Regional Anaesthesia Before Operations.

A Phase 4 interventional study of Fentanyl and Remifentanil in Knee Arthropathy, Hip Arthritis and Fractures, Closed, sponsored by Medical University of Graz. Completed at 1 site in Austria. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-10-21.

Sponsored by Medical University of Graz · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Aim of the study is to specify the best analgosedation technique during placement of regional anaesthesia from the patients' view.

In this double blind randomized trial the investigators will be testing the application of drugs administered intravenously (fentanyl-bolus, remifentanil-infusion, clonidine-bolus) or transcutaneously (EMLA salve) or placebo (NaCl 0,9% i.v. and skin protection salve).

Read the detailed description

In this doubleblind randomized pilot trial, patients will receive one of five possible combinations to assess which medication leads to the best medication during placement of regional anaesthesia. This assessement includes NRS, patients' satisfaction and wellbeing. The tested substances will be administered intravenously (fentanyl-bolus, remifentanil-infusion, clonidine-bolus) or transcutaneously (EMLA salve). The fifth combination will be the control group with only placebo medication. We expected to get first information for objectifying analgosedation during placement of regional anaesthesia for the conduction of further studies in this field.

02

Conditions studied

  • Knee Arthropathy
  • Hip Arthritis
  • Fractures, Closed

Browse trials for

03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients planed electively for orthopedic surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Missing patient's consent
  • Intolerance against study medication
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Fentanyl i.v. (intravenously)

    Patients will be administered the medication and additionally will be treated with placebo salve (skin protection salve)

    Drug: Fentanyl · Drug: Placebo salve

  • Experimental
    Remifentanil i.v.

    Patients will be administered the medication and additionally will be treated with placebo salve (skin protection salve)

    Drug: Remifentanil · Drug: Placebo salve

  • Experimental
    Clonidine i.v.

    Patients will be administered the medication and additionally will be treated with placebo salve (skin protection salve)

    Drug: Clonidine · Drug: Placebo salve

  • Experimental
    EMLA salve

    Patients will be administered the medication (salve) and additionally will be administered i.v. saline as placebo

    Drug: EMLA Cream · Drug: Placebo iv

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Patients will be administered i.v. placebo (0,9% NaCl) and placebo salve (skin protection salve)

    Drug: Placebo iv · Drug: Placebo salve

Interventions

  • DrugFentanyl

    Weight adapted drug application

  • DrugRemifentanil

    Weight adapted drug application

  • DrugClonidine

    Weight adapted drug application

  • DrugEMLA Cream

    Salve application on the body part where the regional anaesthesia will be administered

  • DrugPlacebo iv

    i.v. administration of 0,9% NaCl

  • DrugPlacebo salve

    Skin protection salve (placebo salve) application on the body part where the regional anaesthesia will be administered

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain intensity during placement of the regional anaesthesia

    Pain assessment during placement of the regional anaesthesia with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS 1 to 10, with 1=lowest pain score, 10=highest pain score). Lower NRS describes a better outcome.

    Time frame: 1 day

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patients' wellbeing

    Wellbeing assessment during placement of the regional anaesthesia with the anaesthesiological questionnaire (ANP anaesthesiological Questionnaire is a self-rating method for the assessment of postoperative complaints, patient wellbeing and satisfaction. The rating scales from 0 to 3, with 0="none" and 3="strongly"). Higher wellbeing values represent a better outcome.

    Time frame: 1 day

  2. Complication rate (delirium, allergic reactions, cardiopulmonary decompensation)

    Complications on operation day will be recorded and compared between the treatment groups.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 day

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Medical University Hospital LKH Graz
    Graz, 8036, Austria
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — After publication of our results, all data will be made available in respect to the austrian data privacy laws

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04026074
Lead sponsor
Medical University of Graz
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 19, 2019
Start date
Jul 26, 2019
Primary completion
Oct 16, 2019
Completion
Oct 18, 2019
Last update
Oct 21, 2019

Study contacts

Gregor A Schittek, MD
principal investigator · Medical University of Graz

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion