ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04022109VOGASUpdated Jul 26, 2021

Screening of Gastric Cancer Via Breath Volatile Organic Compounds by Hybrid Sensing Approach

An observational study in Gastric Cancer, Atrophic Gastritis and Gastric Dysplasia, sponsored by University of Latvia. Recruiting at 5 sites in 5 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-07-26.

Sponsored by University of Latvia · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2022, 3 years 11 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Nov 2019; still recruiting 7 years later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
5,000
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study is aimed to determine the potential of volatile marker testing for gastric cancer screening.

The study will be addressing the role of confounding factors, including lifestyle factors, diet, smoking as well as addressing the potential role of microbiota in the composition of exhaled volatile markers.

Read the detailed description

Patients with established disease (gastric cancer, precancerous lesions) as well as patients investigated for the lesions and having been documented lack of the lesions will be enrolled to the study at clinical sites in Europe (Latvia, Ukraine) and Latin America (Colombia, Chile, Brazil). In addition, group of persons from general population at average risk for developing the target disease and individuals being referred for upper endoscopy according to clinical indications will be also enrolled.

Testing of volatile markers will be conducted by one of two methods: 1) gas chromatography coupled to mass spectroscopy (GS-MS) and 2) sensor technology. Various sensors will be used and evaluated for the purpose.

The potential sources of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the breath will be addressed by studying VOC emission by using headspace analysis from cancer tissue, gastric contents, cancer cell cultures and H.pylori.

The potential role of gastric and faecal microbiota in the origin of VOCs in the breath will be addressed. Metabolome in the circulation will also get correlated to VOCs in the breath and with microbiome.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gastric Cancer
  • Atrophic Gastritis
  • Gastric Dysplasia
  • H.Pylori Infection

Keywords

  • Volatile organic compounds
  • Breath testing
  • Gastric cancer
  • Atrophic gastritis
  • Precancerous lesions
  • Screening
  • Nanosensor technology
  • GC-MS
03

In context

Stomach Neoplasms

3,399 studies on the registry are indexed under Stomach Neoplasms; 992 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 5,000 is above the median of 278 across 790 observational studies indexed under Stomach Neoplasms.

Browse Stomach Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Latvia is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Cancer patient population will be recruited in the major specialized cancer centres in Europe (Latvia, Ukraine) and Latin America (Colombia, Chile, Brazil) Control group patients will be recruited in the major specialized endoscopy centres in Europe (Latvia, Ukraine) and Latin America (Colombia, Chile, Brazil), most frequently - the same institutions as for cancer patient recruitment General population group (40-64 years) will be predominantly recruited in Latvia from the general population Symptomatic patient validation cohort (Group 5) will be predominantly recruited in Chile from the endoscopy referrals

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with verified gastric cancer (Group 1 \& 2)
  • Patients undergoing or having undergone upper endoscopy according to clinical indications (Group 3 \& 5)
  • Average-risk population group aged 40-64 at inclusion without alarm symptoms (Group 4)
  • Motivation to participate in the study
  • Physical status allowing volatile marker sampling and other procedures within the protocol
  • Signed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known other active cancer
  • Ventilation problems, airway obstruction
  • Unwillingness or inability to co-operate
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
5,000 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Gastric cancer patients undergoing surgery

    Patients with histologically confirmed gastric cancer (adenocarcinoma) planned for surgical management

    Device: Breath sampling for VOC detection · Procedure: Surgery material collection for VOC headspace analysis · Diagnostic Test: Upper endoscopy · Diagnostic Test: Microbiota testing

  • Gastric cancer patients

    Patients with histologically confirmed gastric cancer (adenocarcinoma)

    Device: Breath sampling for VOC detection · Diagnostic Test: Upper endoscopy · Diagnostic Test: Microbiota testing

  • Control group patients without gastric cancer

    Patients without gastric malignant disease according to data obtained in upper endoscopy

    Device: Breath sampling for VOC detection · Diagnostic Test: Upper endoscopy · Diagnostic Test: Microbiota testing

  • Average risk population

    Average risk population of both genders aged 40-64 at the time of inclusion lacking alarm symptoms for gastrointestinal cancer

    Device: Breath sampling for VOC detection · Diagnostic Test: Upper endoscopy · Diagnostic Test: Microbiota testing

  • Patients with dyspeptic symptoms

    Patients with dyspeptic symptoms or other complains being referred for upper endoscopy (Chile)

    Device: Breath sampling for VOC detection · Diagnostic Test: Upper endoscopy · Diagnostic Test: Microbiota testing

Interventions

  • DeviceBreath sampling for VOC detection

    Breath sampling will be performed by using a special sensor device and or GC-MS analysis (by collecting breath samples in adsorbent tubes). Pepsinogen testing will be used in a subgroup to identify serological increased risk for atrophy

    Also known as: Serum, plasma sampling for group description and stratification

  • ProcedureSurgery material collection for VOC headspace analysis

    Only for gastric cancer patients undergoing surgery (Group 1)

  • Diagnostic testUpper endoscopy

    Routine endoscopic evaluation with a standard biopsy work-up according to updated Sydney system. Additional gastric contents for GC-MS and microbiota analysis in a subgroup. Endoscopy will be used only according to the clinical indications (in Group 4 - according to the results of pepsinogen tests)

    Also known as: Histological and microbial evaluation of biopsy samples and gastric content

  • Diagnostic testMicrobiota testing

    Faecal and gastric contents and biopsy samples for microbiota testing

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Characteristic VOC pattern identification for gastric cancer detection

    The characteristic VOC pattern based on sensor analysis and its performance indicators will be detected

    Time frame: 2 years following initiation of patient recruitment

  2. Specific chemistry identification in the exhaled breath

    Identification of specific chemistries (GC-MS analysis) originating from gastric cancer

    Time frame: 2 years following initiation of patient recruitment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Characteristic VOC pattern identification for gastric precancerous lesion detection

    The characteristic VOC pattern based on sensor analysis and its performance indicators will be detected

    Time frame: 2.5 years following initiation of patient recruitment

  2. Identification of the best-performing sensors

    Comparative analysis between the performance of different sensor performance in target disease identification

    Time frame: 3 years following initiation of patient recruitment

  3. Gut microbiota analysis in relation to breath VOCs

    Analysis of the role of gastric and faecal microbiota in the origin of VOCs in the exhaled breath

    Time frame: 3 years following initiation of patient recruitment

Other outcomes

  1. Confounding factor analysis

    The role of confounding factors will be addressed to address their role in VOC emission

    Time frame: 3 years following initiation of patient recruitment

07

Study locations

3 of 5 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mochalski P, Leja M, Gasenko E, Skapars R, Santare D, Sivins A, Aronsson DE, Ager C, Jaeschke C, Shani G, Mitrovics J, Mayhew CA, Haick H. Ex vivo emission of volatile organic compounds from gastric cancer and non-cancerous tissue. J Breath Res. 2018 Jul 30;12(4):046005. doi: 10.1088/1752-7163/aacbfb. PubMed 29893713 ↗
  • Krilaviciute A, Stock C, Leja M, Brenner H. Potential of non-invasive breath tests for preselecting individuals for invasive gastric cancer screening endoscopy. J Breath Res. 2018 Apr 4;12(3):036009. doi: 10.1088/1752-7163/aab5be. PubMed 29528036 ↗
  • Amal H, Leja M, Funka K, Skapars R, Sivins A, Ancans G, Liepniece-Karele I, Kikuste I, Lasina I, Haick H. Detection of precancerous gastric lesions and gastric cancer through exhaled breath. Gut. 2016 Mar;65(3):400-7. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308536. Epub 2015 Apr 13. PubMed 25869737 ↗
  • Krilaviciute A, Heiss JA, Leja M, Kupcinskas J, Haick H, Brenner H. Detection of cancer through exhaled breath: a systematic review. Oncotarget. 2015 Nov 17;6(36):38643-57. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5938. PubMed 26440312 ↗
  • Leja M, You W, Camargo MC, Saito H. Implementation of gastric cancer screening - the global experience. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec;28(6):1093-106. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2014.09.005. Epub 2014 Sep 28. PubMed 25439074 ↗
  • Leja M, Amal H, Lasina I, Skapars R, Sivins A, Ancans G, Tolmanis I, Vanags A, Kupcinskas J, Ramonaite R, Khatib S, Bdarneh S, Natour R, Ashkar A, Haick H. Analysis of the effects of microbiome-related confounding factors on the reproducibility of the volatolomic test. J Breath Res. 2016 Jun 24;10(3):037101. doi: 10.1088/1752-7155/10/3/037101. PubMed 27341527 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Nov 2019 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2022, 37 months after the start.

Of 322 non-industry observational studies under Stomach Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 57 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 29 and three quarters within 171. This study's planned 37 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 364 studies reached it within 54 months; a quarter within 29 and three quarters within 119.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 12, 2019
First posted
Jul 16, 2019
StartActual
Nov 1, 2019
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2022
CompletionEst.
Dec 2026
Last update
Jul 26, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 26, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04022109
Lead sponsor
University of Latvia
Collaborators
Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, University of Ulm, Uppsala University, JLM Innovation GmbH, Universitaet Innsbruck, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Universidad de Pamplona, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, AC Camargo Cancer Center, National Cancer Institute of Ukraine, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
Responsible party
Marcis Leja (Director, Institute of Clinical and Preventive Medicine, University of Latvia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 16, 2019
Start date
Nov 1, 2019
Primary completion
Dec 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 26, 2021

Study contacts

Marcis Leja, MD, PhD
Contact
marcis.leja@lu.lv
+37129497500
Daiga Santare, MD, PhD
Contact
daiga.santare@lu.lv
+37129221107
Hossam Haick, PhD
principal investigator · TECHNION, Israel Institute for Technology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion