CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04009915VOLCANOUpdated May 9, 2022

VATS VS. Open Thoracic Surgery for Stage II - III Lung Cancer

A Phase 3 interventional study of VATS and Open surgery in Lung Cancer and Surgery, sponsored by Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-05-09.

Sponsored by Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2024, 1 year 9 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jun 2019; still recruiting 7 years 4 months later.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

For patients with stage I lung cancer, the NCCN guidelines point out that if the patient has no contraindications for anatomy and surgery, as long as it does not violate the standard of tumor treatment and the principle of thoracic surgery, it is highly recommended of VATS or minimally invasive surgery.

Although previous papers seem to have obvious advantages, there is a lack of clinical prospective data from patients with stage II-III lung cancer, and especially in the prevalence of uniportal VATS, there is still no objective analysis of this hypothesis. Therefore, the investigators plan to conduct a randomized, prospective study to compare perioperative complications, postoperative pain, life quality, lung function recovery, tumor-free survival rate, etc., in lobectomy for stage II-III lung cancer patients with VATS and thoracotomy.

Read the detailed description

Lung cancer is the most common malignant tumor in the world. Surgical treatment is the first and most important treatment for lung cancer. It can completely remove the primary lesions of lung cancer and metastasis of lymph nodes to achieve clinical cure. Opening the chest into the chest allows for an excellent surgical field of view, but it is usually necessary to divide the pectoralis and separate the ribs. To prevent these shortcomings, in the early 1990s, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) was first applied to anatomical pneumonectomy and proved to be safe and feasible. Nowadays, for patients with stage I lung cancer, the NCCN guidelines point out that if the patient has no contraindications for anatomy and surgery, as long as it does not violate the standard of tumor treatment and the principle of thoracic surgery, it is highly recommended of VATS or minimally invasive surgery.

For lung cancer, the benefit of VATS over open surgery is mainly due to the reduction of surgical trauma and the relative maintenance of chest integrity, the reduction of immune function, the reduction of postoperative pain, and the preservation of lung and shoulder function. What's more, the incidence of postoperative complications is reduced, patients recover faster, hospitalization is short, and normal activities are restored early. Although previous papers seem to have obvious advantages, there is a lack of clinical prospective data from patients with stage II-III lung cancer, and especially in the prevalence of uniportal VATS, there is still no objective analysis of this hypothesis.

Therefore, the investigators plan to conduct a randomized, prospective study to compare perioperative complications, postoperative pain, life quality, lung function recovery, tumor-free survival rate, etc., in lobectomy for stage II-III lung cancer patients with VATS and thoracotomy. the investigators would complete the real and effective accumulation of data through strict enrollment, detailed records, and regular follow-up, in order to provide suggestions for the development of new guidelines.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lung Cancer
  • Surgery

Browse trials for

03

In context

Lung Neoplasms

7,243 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Neoplasms; 1,557 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 60 across 5,295 interventional studies indexed under Lung Neoplasms.

Browse Lung Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China is the lead sponsor of 149 studies on the registry; 91 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Diagnosis of stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer by CT and PET-CT and requiring radical surgery for lung cancer;
  2. Age ≥ 18 years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. palliative surgery;
  2. previous thoracic surgery;
  3. chest wall resection;
  4. Pancoast tumors;
  5. reconstruction of carina.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    VATS

    Patients undergo a standard VATS operation for stage II-III lung cancer

    Procedure: VATS

  • Active comparator
    open surgery

    Patients undergo a standard open operation for stage II-III lung cancer

    Procedure: Open surgery

Interventions

  • ProcedureVATS

    Patients undergo a standard VATS operation for stage II-III lung cancer called a lobectomy.

  • ProcedureOpen surgery

    Patients undergo a standard open operation for stage II-III lung cancer called a lobectomy.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. disease free survival after surgery

    Determine if VATS provides a non inferior oncologic control to open Lobectomy, as measure by 3-year progression free survival.

    Time frame: 3 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative pain

    Numericrating scale (NRS) is to asses the development of acute and chronic pain after VATS surgery. 11 point numeric rating scale of 0 represented "no pain"and a score of 10 represented "worst pain ".

    Time frame: 6 month

  2. Quality of life

    The EQ5D questionnaire consists of five questions (primary dimensions) about mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression, which all have three possible answers ("no problems", "some problems", or "extreme problems"). Additionally, EQ5D includes self-reported overall quality of life as a linear 100 point scale, where 0 is the worst imaginable health state and 100 is the best imaginable health state. EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire, from which six functional domains of quality of life (physical function, emotional function, cognitive function, social function, and role function), and nine symptom domains (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting, dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite, constipation, diarrhoea, and financial difficulties) can be extracted, as well as an overall score.

    Time frame: 6 month

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital
    Shanghai, 200020, China
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 9, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04009915
Lead sponsor
Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China
Responsible party
duan liang (Principal Investigator, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 5, 2019
Start date
Jun 1, 2019
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
May 9, 2022

Study contacts

liang duan, doctor
Contact
duan-liang@163.com
+8613044634176 ext. +8613044634176

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion