ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04007133DIOSUpdated Jul 17, 2019

Statin Compliance of Patients With Non-insulin-dependent Diabetes

An observational study in Non-insulin-dependent Diabetes, sponsored by Lille Catholic University. Terminated at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-07-17.

Sponsored by Lille Catholic University · Observational

Why this study was terminated
The study was conducted in the context of a medical thesis with a deadline.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
119
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The diabetic population has an increased cardiovascular risk compared to the general population.

Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMG-CoA reductase) inhibitors, or "statins", are considered as the standard treatment for hypercholesterolemia.

Many patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes are prescribed with statins, both for primary prevention, before the first cardiovascular event, and as secondary prevention, to avoid recurrence.

However, compliance to these drugs may be difficult due to polypharmacy, side effects (myalgia) or tiredness.

The purpose of this study is to determine the compliance of diabetic patients with statins searching for important factors which could favor adherence.

Read the detailed description

The diabetic population has an increased cardiovascular risk compared to the general population. The mortality of people with diabetes due to ischemic heart disease is multiplied by 2.2, and when is due to cerebrovascular disease by 1.8 compared to those patients without diabetes. Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMG-CoA reductase) inhibitors, or "statins", are considered as the standard treatment for hypercholesterolemia.

Statins have been shown to be effective in reducing the risk of cardiovascular events, each 1 mmol decrease in LDL cholesterol reduces the risk of cardiovascular events by 21% at 5 years.

Many patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes are prescribed with statins, both for primary prevention, before the first cardiovascular event, and for secondary prevention, to avoid recurrence.

However, compliance with these drugs may be difficult due to polypharmacy, side effects (myalgia) or tiredness. Indeed, the persistence of statin use, one year after its prescription, is estimated at 70% in the general population. However, there are no data in the French population, and in particular on French diabetic patients for whom the cardiovascular risk is increased compared to the general population.

The purpose of this study is to determine the compliance of diabetic patients with statins searching for important factors which could favor adherence.

02

Conditions studied

  • Non-insulin-dependent Diabetes

Keywords

  • Non-insulin-dependent diabetes
  • Statins
  • Compliance
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

9,590 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; 1,332 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 119 is below the median of 300 across 1,622 observational studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 studies →

Lead sponsor

Lille Catholic University is the lead sponsor of 112 studies on the registry; 26 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes, taking statins for at least 1 month

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Major patients
  • With non-insulin-dependent diabetes, taking statins for at least 1 month (to assess compliance)
  • Hospitalized in the Diabetology Day Hospital of the Saint Philibert Hospital
  • In capacity to answer the Girerd test
  • Patient who has been informed and not opposed to the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient's refusal to participate in the study
  • Patient under guardianship or curatorship
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
119 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Diabetic patients

    Patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes, taking statins for at least 1 month

    Other: Girerd test

Interventions

  • OtherGirerd test

    This is a simple and quick questionnaire, composed of 6 questions with a binary yes/no answer. It allows to assess the degree of compliance with the prescribed treatment to better identify the constraints related to the treatment.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Compliance rate with statin measured by the Girerd test

    This is a simple and quick questionnaire, composed of 6 questions with a binary yes/no answer. It allows to assess the degree of compliance with the prescribed treatment and thus to better identify the constraints related to the treatment. The score varies from 0 to 6 depending on the presence of "yes". 0 "yes": Good compliance, more than 3 "yes": non compliance.

    Time frame: Day 0

Secondary outcomes

  1. Compliance rate with statin according to the type of prevention

    Type of prevention (primary/secondary) and compliance rate measured by the Girerd test

    Time frame: Day 0

  2. Compliance rate with statin according to risk factors

    Link between compliance rate measured by Girerd test and potential factors analyzed: age, sex, polypharmacy, duration of diabetes, no previous cardiovascular history, no prior dyslipidemia, blood LDL level, duration of statin intake, modalities of treatment preparation, understanding of the benefits of treatment

    Time frame: Day 0

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Lille Catholic Hospitals
    Lomme, Nord 59462, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2018 to primary completion in Jul 2018, 5 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 1, 2019
First posted
Jul 5, 2019
StartActual
Jan 31, 2018
Primary completionActual
Jul 12, 2018
CompletionActual
Jul 12, 2018
Last update
Jul 17, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 17, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04007133
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 5, 2019
Start date
Jan 31, 2018
Primary completion
Jul 12, 2018
Completion
Jul 12, 2018
Last update
Jul 17, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jul 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion