CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04004104Updated May 10, 2023

Supine Exercise in Hepatopulmonary Syndrome Patients With Orthodeoxia

An interventional study of Upright Exercise and Supine Exercise in Hepatopulmonary Syndrome, sponsored by Unity Health Toronto. Recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-05-10.

Sponsored by Unity Health Toronto · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2023, 2 years 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jul 2019; still recruiting 7 years 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) is a rare condition that presents in about a quarter of patients with liver cirrhosis. In addition, a small subset of these HPS patients also have orthodeoxia, defined as a drop in oxygen levels when they are sitting up (upright), as opposed to lying flat (supine). At present, there is little known about this condition. Patients diagnosed with HPS and orthodeoxia experience reduced ability to exercise, especially when upright. While standard cardiopulmonary exercise is routinely performed in the sitting position, there are machines that enable candidates to exercise in the supine position. This is especially relevant in patients with severe HPS, with clinically significant orthodeoxia, where conventional upright exercise is difficult. Currently there is a gap in the literature regarding the efficacy of supine exercise compared to upright exercise in these patients. Due to their improvement in dyspnea when lying supine, it is predicted that these patients will be able to exercise for a greater length of time and have increased exercise capacity, which can be projected to improve outcomes pre- and post-transplant.

Overall, HPS patients tend to experience hypoxemia and exercise limitation. Exercise limitation impacts quality of life, incidence and severity of comorbid conditions, and in those who are liver transplant candidates, low exercise tolerance deleteriously impacts transplant outcomes. Accordingly, a strategy that enables patients to exercise more often and/or for longer periods would offer direct benefits to patients with HPS, and if employed as part of an exercise program, could also improve exercise capacity, and thus, liver transplant outcomes.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of supine, compared to upright position on exercise in patients with HPS and orthodeoxia. We hypothesize that these patients will be able to exercise for longer in the supine compared to the upright position, given improved oxygen levels when supine.

Read the detailed description

This is a 1 year randomized crossover controlled trial study of the effect of supine exercise position (intervention arm) compared to the upright exercise position (control arm) within 4 weeks. This is a single-center study conducted at St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario.

The exercise will be performed at a constant work rate, individualized for each participant. Peak work rate will be calculated using results from the most recent room air 6-minute walk test (6MWT), within the past 6 months. The equation used to estimate peak work rate is: Peak Work Rate = 0.168 x 6MWD (m) - 4.085 (ref Kozu Respirology 2010). The individualized constant work rate will be set at 70-80% of this estimated peak work rate.

The main stopping criterion will be the point at which, after standardized encouragement, the subject is unable to continue because of symptoms (i.e. patient does not wish to continue or cannot maintain a minimum peddling frequency of 40 rpm for ≥ 10 seconds). This is defined as the "tolerable limit" (tLIM). Additional safety-related stopping criteria will include: the appearance of life-threatening arrhythmias, a drop in systolic blood pressure by ≥ 10 mm Hg from baseline, or a desaturation below a set point for ≥ 30 s. The set saturation point will be chosen individually for each patient, as the lower of: 80% or the lowest saturation seen on room air 6MWT.

Exercise tests in each position, for each subject, will be standardized with respect to the proper seat adjustment relative to leg length and pedaling cadence (50-60 rpm). Inspiratory capacity will be measured before and after the exercise maneuver.

The cycle ergometer resistance will be set to the pre-determined constant work rate, as described above. There will be continuous monitoring of saturation, ECG, gas exchange, blood pressure, and subjective dyspnea/leg fatigue (Borg scale), with standardized verbal encouragement throughout. Participants will be asked to bring running shoes and comfortable exercise clothes, ensure that they have eaten before the test, to take all usual medications, and to avoid major exercise for 24 hours before the test.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hepatopulmonary Syndrome

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Supine Exercise
  • Orthodeoxia
03

In context

Syndrome

9,221 studies on the registry are indexed under Syndrome; 1,034 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 10 is below the median of 50 across 6,517 interventional studies indexed under Syndrome.

Browse Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Unity Health Toronto is the lead sponsor of 434 studies on the registry; 76 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (20%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Diagnosis of moderate HPS (defined by liver disease, hypoxemia [PaO2 \< 80 mmHg and AaDo2 (alveolar-arterial PO2 difference) ≥ 15 mmHg or ≥ 20 mmHg if age > 64 years] and IPVD (intrapulmonary vasodilatations) as shown by contrast echocardiography])
  2. Presence of orthodeoxia (PaO2 decrease by >4 mmHg when patient moves from supine to upright position).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pulmonary hypertension (echocardiographic estimated right ventricular systolic pressure >/=50 mmHg and/or right heart catheterization mean pulmonary artery pressure >25 mmHg with pulmonary capillary wedge pressure \</= 15 mmHg);
  2. Significant obstructive ventilatory impairment (FEV1/FVC ratio \< 0.65) (FEV=forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FVC=forced vital capacity)
  3. Known significant coronary artery disease;
  4. Significant neurologic, orthopedic or rheumatological disorders preventing the use of a cycle ergometer;
  5. Other absolute contraindications to submaximal tests (uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia with hemodynamic compromise, symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, decompensated heart failure and acute cardiopulmonary illness);
  6. Moderate or severe ascites.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
10 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control - Upright Exercise

    Participants will perform upright exercise on a cycle ergometer. The opposite test will be completed within 4 weeks.

    Diagnostic Test: Upright Exercise

  • Experimental
    Intervention - Supine Exercise

    Participants will perform supine exercise on a cycle ergometer. The opposite test will be completed within 4 weeks.

    Diagnostic Test: Supine Exercise

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testUpright Exercise

    Exercise is generally performed in the upright position.

  • Diagnostic testSupine Exercise

    Since HPS patients with orthodeoxia experience an improvement in their symptoms and oxygen levels when supine, the intervention will involve them performing exercise in the supine position.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Stopping time (tLIM)

    The main stopping criterion will be the point at which, after standardized encouragement, the subject is unable to continue because of symptoms \[defined as the "tolerable limit" (tLIM)\]. Additional safety-related stopping criteria will include: the appearance of complex ventricular arrhythmias, intraventricular and/or atrioventricular conduction disorders, bradyarrhythmias, or a desaturation below a set point for ≥ 10 s. The set saturation point will be chosen individually for each patient, as the lower of: 80%, or the nadir desaturation seen on room air six-minute walk test (6MWT).

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Isotime Oxygen Uptake (VO2)

    Comparing oxygen uptake in the supine and upright position.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Dyspnea

    Patient's subjective measure of shortness of breath using Borg scale. This scale ranges from 0 to 10, with 0 being no shortness of breath to 10 being maximal shortness of breath.

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Leg Fatigue

    Patient's subjective measure of leg fatigue using Borg scale. This scale ranges from 0 to 10, with 0 being no leg fatigue at all to 10 being maximal leg fatigue.

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Work Rate

    Constant work rate / resistance at which the cycle ergometer was set.

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Arterial Oxygen Saturation

    The saturation of oxygen in the arteries.

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. Change in Inspiratory Capacity

    Measuring volume of air that can be maximally inspired after normal tidal breaths and comparing between supine and upright.

    Time frame: 12 months

  7. Reason for Stopping Exercise

    Reason due to which tLIM was reached and exercise was stopped.

    Time frame: 12 months

  8. Minute Ventilation (VE)

    The quantity of air expired out of the lungs per minute.

    Time frame: 12 months

  9. Heart Rate

    The number of heart beats per minute, also known as pulse.

    Time frame: 12 months

  10. VCO2

    Carbon dioxide output per unit of time.

    Time frame: 12 months

  11. VCO2 over VO2

    The volume of carbon dioxide produced to the volume of oxygen consumed in respiration over a period of time, also known as respiratory quotient (RQ).

    Time frame: 12 months

  12. HR over VO2

    The change of heart rate to the volume of oxygen consumed in respiration over a period of time.

    Time frame: 12 months

  13. VE over time

    The change of VE during the entire duration of the exercise.

    Time frame: 12 months

  14. VO2/ HR over time

    The change of oxygen pulse during the entire duration of the exercise.

    Time frame: 12 months

  15. Heart rate over time

    The change of heart rate during the entire duration of the exercise.

    Time frame: 12 months

  16. Cardiac output

    The volume of the blood pumped by the heart through the circulatory system in a minute.

    Time frame: 12 months

  17. Change in inspiratory capacity

    The difference of the maximum volume of air that can be inspired following a normal, quiet expiration

    Time frame: 12 months

  18. VE max

    Maximum minute ventilation

    Time frame: 12 months

  19. End tidal CO2 over time

    The point at the end of exhalation when the CO2 reaches its highest concentration.

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • St. Michael's Hospital
    Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada
    • Samir Gupta, MD, MSc · Contact · guptas@smh.ca · (416) 864-6060
    • Samir Gupta, MD, MSc · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Parikh H, Lui E, Faughnan ME, Al-Hesayen A, Segovia S, Gupta S. Supine vs upright exercise in patients with hepatopulmonary syndrome and orthodeoxia: study protocol for a randomized controlled crossover trial. Trials. 2021 Oct 9;22(1):683. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05633-7. PubMed 34625098 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 10, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04004104
Lead sponsor
Unity Health Toronto
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 1, 2019
Start date
Jul 24, 2019
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 31, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
May 10, 2023

Study contacts

Samir Gupta, MD, MSc
Contact
GuptaS@smh.ca
(416) 864-6060 ext. 2252
Samir Gupta, MD, MSc
principal investigator · Clinician-Scientist

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion