CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04000399Updated Aug 8, 2022Results posted

BRITEPath, Component 3 of iCHART (Integrated Care to Help At-Risk Teens)

An interventional study of BRITEPath in Depression and Suicidal Ideation, sponsored by University of Pittsburgh. Completed at 6 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 26 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-08-08.

Sponsored by University of Pittsburgh · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
43
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
12 Years to 26 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

BRITEPath (BP) aims to support co-located mental health clinicians in the development of a high quality, effective, and personalized safety plan for referred patients who screen positive for depression and/or suicidal ideation.

BRITEPath utilizes BRITE, a safety planning and emotion regulation app that is loaded on the patient's smart phone and has previously been shown to be well accepted and to reduce suicide attempts compared to usual care in psychiatric inpatients (HR = 0.49). To support mental health clinicians in the development of effective safety plans, study investigators will develop Guide2Brite (G2B), which provides step-by-step instructions for the mental health clinician on how to populate BRITE onto the patient's smartphone and BRITEBoard, a clinician dashboard that tracks patient symptoms, app use, and rating on helpfulness of different interventions assessed through BRITE.

Read the detailed description

Delivery of Interventions:

BRITEPath has 3 components:1) BRITE, an emotion regulation and safety planning phone app that is delivered by a co-located mental health (MH) clinician to adolescents at the time of their first therapy appointment; 2) Guide2Brite, which will guide the co-located MH clinician in working with the adolescent to population content onto BRITE; and 3) BRITEBoard, which is a clinician dashboard delivered to the MH clinician and PCP.

Assignment of Interventions:

This study utilized an open trial design. A stepped wedge design was originally proposed and efforts were made to adhere to this study design, however after a year of low recruitment and resultant recruitment sites pulling out the of the study, the overall study design was changed to an open trial. Additional recruitment sites were onboarded to the study and provided with the intervention arm in order to obtain feasibility data on the intervention components of the study. As a result of the change, there are some TAU participants included in this study. For reference a stepped wedge design involves the sequential random rollout of an intervention over two time periods. Following a baseline period in which no clusters (=practices) are exposed to the intervention, the crossover is typically in one direction, from control to intervention and continues until both of the clusters have crossed-over to receive the intervention, with observations taken from each cluster and at each time period.

Study investigators will pilot BRITEPath in community pediatric and mental health practices using a stepped wedge design (n =50 adolescents).

Hypothesis: The use of BRITEPath will decrease depressive symptoms, distress, and suicidality (any self-injurious ideation, urges, or behavior) as well as improve overall functioning compared to TAU.

Of note: Study investigators initially intended to do a cost analysis as a secondary outcome measure, but it was later decided that the analysis will not be done in this pilot phase of testing and will instead be completed during the Phase 2 RCT.

02

Conditions studied

  • Depression
  • Suicidal Ideation

Browse trials for

03

In context

Suicidal Ideation

515 studies on the registry are indexed under Suicidal Ideation; 195 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 43 is below the median of 80 across 426 interventional studies indexed under Suicidal Ideation.

Browse Suicidal Ideation studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Pittsburgh is the lead sponsor of 1,385 studies on the registry; 167 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 26 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Youth aged 12-26 yo
  • Own a device (e.g. smartphone, ipod, tablet) with capability to download BRITE app
  • Biological or adoptive parent is willing to provide informed consent for teen to participate
  • Youth speaks and understands English
  • Positive PHQ score or provider determines youth has depressive symptoms based on clinical interaction and refers youth to the study (in cases when PHQ is not available and study staff will complete the PHQ during the screening) OR Provider can refer if they are unclear if symptoms are depressive and PHQ scoring will be used to determine youth's eligibility. OR Screening Wizard screening questionnaire (which includes the PHQ and depressive symptom questions) indicates depression OR provider/parent have concern that youth/patient has a mood or behavioral problem
  • Family agrees to see an (embedded) MH therapist at the practice

PHQ scores:

Score of 8 or higher on PHQ-8 -or- Score of 1 or higher on #9 of PHQ-9 suicidality item

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Non English speaking No parent willing to provide informed consent No cell phone capability of downloading BRITE app Is currently experiencing mania or psychosis Evidence of an intellectual or developmental disorder (IDD) Life threatening medical condition that requires immediate treatment (included emergent suicidality, homicidality, abuse/neglect, or other mental or physical condition) Other cognitive or medical condition preventing youth from understanding study and/or participating.

Currently receiving MH treatment/currently satisfied with treatment

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
43 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    BRITEPath

    Participants will receive the components in BRITEPath from a mental health (MH) clinician trained by the study staff/PI's on how to implement BRITE safety planning with fidelity. First, the MH clinician will review possible barriers to implementation of the safety plan and problem-solve appropriately with patient and parent(s); (2) BRITE is the emotion regulation/safety planning app loaded on the patient's smartphone that populated with support from Guide2BRITE.; and (3) BRITEBoard, a clinician dashboard that shows app use, change in distress and symptoms ratings, and can be used for shared decision making with parents, patients, and PCPs. Clinicians will review adolescent's skill development and app content with parents. Prior to discharge or following acute increases in suicide risk.

    Behavioral: BRITEPath

Interventions

  • BehavioralBRITEPath

    BRITEPath will guide co-located mental health clinicians in the use of an emotion regulation and safety planning app (BRITE) to be loaded on the phone of depressed and suicidal adolescents in order to improve depression and reduce the likelihood of a suicide attempt.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Depression Severity

    Total scores from the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) will be used to assess depression severity, as a primary outcome. The PHQ-9 is 9 items with scoring ranging from 0-27. The higher the score, the more severe the depression symptoms are. A score of 0-4=no depression; 5-9=mild depression; 10-14=moderate depression; 15-19=moderately severe depression; 20-27=severe depression symptoms.

    Time frame: At Baseline phone visit

  2. Depression Severity

    Total scores from the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) will be used to assess depression severity, as a primary outcome. The PHQ-9 is 9 items with scoring ranging from 0-27. The higher the score, the more severe the depression symptoms are. A score of 0-4=no depression; 5-9=mild depression; 10-14=moderate depression; 15-19=moderately severe depression; 20-27=severe depression symptoms.

    Time frame: At 4 week follow up after Baseline

  3. Depression Severity

    Total scores from the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) will be used to assess depression severity, as a primary outcome. The PHQ-9 is 9 items with scoring ranging from 0-27. The higher the score, the more severe the depression symptoms are. A score of 0-4=no depression; 5-9=mild depression; 10-14=moderate depression; 15-19=moderately severe depression; 20-27=severe depression symptoms.

    Time frame: At 12 week follow up after Baseline

  4. Suicidal Ideation and Behavior

    Suicidal attempt \& ideation will be measured through the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Assign score of 0 if no ideation/behavior present and assign a score of 1 if ideation/behavior present. A "yes" answer any time during treatment to question 9 on the PHQ-9 indicates suicidal ideation. A "yes" answer any time during treatment to any 1 of the 5 suicidal behavior questions (Categories 7-10) on the C-SSRS. C-SSRS Categories 7-10 are as follows: 7-Aborted Attempt 8-Interrupted Attempt 9-Actual Attempt (non-fatal) 10-Completed Suicide. Any score greater than 0 is important/may indicate need for intervention.

    Time frame: At Baseline phone visit

  5. Suicidal Ideation and Behavior

    Suicidal attempt \& ideation will be measured through the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Assign score of 0 if no ideation/behavior present and assign a score of 1 if ideation/behavior present. A "yes" answer any time during treatment to question 9 on the PHQ-9 indicates suicidal ideation. A "yes" answer any time during treatment to any 1 of the 5 suicidal behavior questions (Categories 7-10) on the C-SSRS. C-SSRS Categories 7-10 are as follows: 7-Aborted Attempt 8-Interrupted Attempt 9-Actual Attempt (non-fatal) 10-Completed Suicide. Any score greater than 0 is important/may indicate need for intervention.

    Time frame: At 4 week follow up after Baseline

  6. Suicidal Ideation and Behavior

    Suicidal attempt \& ideation will be measured through the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Assign score of 0 if no ideation/behavior present and assign a score of 1 if ideation/behavior present. A "yes" answer any time during treatment to question 9 on the PHQ-9 indicates suicidal ideation. A "yes" answer any time during treatment to any 1 of the 5 suicidal behavior questions (Categories 7-10) on the C-SSRS. C-SSRS Categories 7-10 are as follows: 7-Aborted Attempt 8-Interrupted Attempt 9-Actual Attempt (non-fatal) 10-Completed Suicide. Any score greater than 0 is important/may indicate need for intervention.

    Time frame: At 12 week follow up after Baseline

  7. Quality of Life and Social/Emotional Functioning

    The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Version 4.0 (PedsQOL) will be used to assess overall quality of life and functioning, as a primary outcome. The PEDSQOL has 23 items and ranges in score from 0-92. It is broken down into 4 subdomains of physical functioning, emotional functioning, social functioning, and work/school (psychosocial) functioning. The higher the score, the more problems the respondent associates with the prompt/sub domain.

    Time frame: At Baseline phone visit

  8. Quality of Life and Social/Emotional Functioning

    The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Version 4.0 (PedsQOL) will be used to assess overall quality of life and functioning, as a primary outcome. The PEDSQOL has 23 items and ranges in score from 0-92. It is broken down into 4 subdomains of physical functioning, emotional functioning, social functioning, and work/school (psychosocial) functioning. The higher the score, the more problems the respondent associates with the prompt/sub domain.

    Time frame: At 4 week follow up after Baseline

  9. Quality of Life and Social/Emotional Functioning

    The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Version 4.0 (PedsQOL) will be used to assess overall quality of life and functioning, as a primary outcome. The PEDSQOL has 23 items and ranges in score from 0-92. It is broken down into 4 subdomains of physical functioning, emotional functioning, social functioning, and work/school (psychosocial) functioning. The higher the score, the more problems the respondent associates with the prompt/sub domain.

    Time frame: At 12 week follow up after Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Application Utilization

    Use of the technical components of the BRITEApp for adolescents and young adults will be monitored throughout Phase 1b. Utilization will be measured by the number of participants who have engaged with the application over time, including rating distress levels in the app and utilizing the following app features: learn to savor, reaching out to contacts, soothe breathe, sooth guided meditation, crisis survival strategies, distract with happy thoughts, distract exercise, savor, and soothe activities to help you sleep.

    Time frame: Up to 12 week follow-up

  2. Application Utilization

    Use of the technical components of Guide2BRITE and the BRITEPortal for physicians will be monitored throughout Phase 1b. Utilization will be measured by the number of providers who have completed the Guide2BRITE onboarding process which includes steps 1, 1.2, 1.3, 2, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 3, 3.2, 4, 4.1, and 5.

    Time frame: Up to 12 week follow-up

  3. Service Utilization (Outpatient, School, ER, Legal, Inpatient, Medication) - BRITEPath vs. Treatment as Usual (TAU) at Baseline

    The Child and Adolescent Service Assessment (CASA) will collect service utilization of all participants to determine the amount of services accessed in each treatment arm. An overall average of the cost of implementing the BRITEPath intervention (including labor, equipment, supplies, facilitates) will be estimated and between the intervention costs and cost of services used from CASA, a comparison will be made and results published. The CASA response data displayed are those who responded positively that they received the service.

    Time frame: At Baseline phone visit

  4. Service Utilization (Outpatient, School, ER, Legal, Inpatient, Medication) - BRITEPath vs. Treatment as Usual (TAU) at 4 Week Follow Up

    The Child and Adolescent Service Assessment (CASA) will collect service utilization of all participants to determine the amount of services accessed in each treatment arm. An overall average of the cost of implementing the BRITEPath intervention (including labor, equipment, supplies, facilitates) will be estimated and between the intervention costs and cost of services used from CASA, a comparison will be made and results published. The CASA response data displayed are those who responded positively that they received the service.

    Time frame: At 4 week follow up after Baseline

  5. Service Utilization (Outpatient, School, ER, Legal, Inpatient, Medication) - BRITEPath vs. Treatment as Usual (TAU) at 12 Week Follow Up

    The Child and Adolescent Service Assessment (CASA) will collect service utilization of all participants to determine the amount of services accessed in each treatment arm. An overall average of the cost of implementing the BRITEPath intervention (including labor, equipment, supplies, facilitates) will be estimated and between the intervention costs and cost of services used from CASA, a comparison will be made and results published. The CASA response data displayed are those who responded positively that they received the service.

    Time frame: At 12 week follow up after Baseline

  6. Usability and Satisfaction

    Satisfaction to BRITEPath will be assessed through questions developed by investigators to understand experience with the program. Questions investigators have adapted from literature reviews on satisfaction include: "If a friend were in need of mental health care for depression or suicidal thoughts or behaviors, would you recommend BRITEPath to help him/her manage symptoms? with answer options of: No, definitely not; No, I don't think so; Yes, I think so; Yes, definitely How satisfied are you with the amount of help you received? with answer options of: Dissatisfied; Satisfied; Very Satisfied Have the services you received helped you to deal more effectively with your problems? with answer options of: Really didn't help; Yes, somewhat; Yes, a great deal.

    Time frame: At exit interview following week 4 study visit or week 12 study visit (depending on when youth attends mental health session that uses BRITEPath tools)

  7. Usability and Satisfaction

    Satisfaction with the technical components of interventions will be assessed through the certain questions from the Post System Satisfaction and Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ). The PSSUQ is 19 items with response options ranging from 1 to 7 where 1=strongly disagree and 7=strongly agree. The PSSUQ has sub-scores derived from subsets of the questions which reflect system usefulness, information quality, and interface quality. Questions from sub-domains were chosen to tailor the questioning to this particular intervention.

    Time frame: At exit interview following week 4 study visit or week 12 study visit (depending on when youth attends mental health session that uses BRITEPath tools)

  8. Cost Estimate for Implementation of BRITEPath Intervention

    An overall average of the cost of implementing the BRITEPath intervention (including labor, equipment, supplies, facilitates) will be estimated. Outcome measure data below highlights the estimated cost of the intervention BRITEPath Intervention per participant, measures were based on estimates from staff and not on empirical data at the individual level.

    Time frame: At 12 week follow up after Baseline

07

Results

Posted Aug 8, 2022
Limitations and caveats
The small sample size of this pilot study was selected for feasibility testing, not for hypothesis testing; thus, inferential tests were underpowered and conducted for exploratory purposes. It lacked a full control group we originally intended to collect, which limits our ability to know whether treatment improvements were due to BRITEPath or to standard care. The impact of treatment on individuals who dropped out of treatment and on those lost during follow-up is unknown.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBritePathTreatment As Usual (TAU)
Started385
Completed385
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryDepression Severity

Total scores from the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) will be used to assess depression severity, as a primary outcome. The PHQ-9 is 9 items with scoring ranging from 0-27. The higher the score, the more severe the depression symptoms are. A score of 0-4=no depression; 5-9=mild depression; 10-14=moderate depression; 15-19=moderately severe depression; 20-27=severe depression symptoms.

Time frame:
At Baseline phone visit
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Depression Severity
score on a scaleBritePathTreatment As Usual (TAU)
Depression Severity12.9 ± 4.89.2 ± 5.8
PrimaryDepression Severity

Total scores from the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) will be used to assess depression severity, as a primary outcome. The PHQ-9 is 9 items with scoring ranging from 0-27. The higher the score, the more severe the depression symptoms are. A score of 0-4=no depression; 5-9=mild depression; 10-14=moderate depression; 15-19=moderately severe depression; 20-27=severe depression symptoms.

Time frame:
At 4 week follow up after Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Depression Severity
score on a scaleBritePathTreatment As Usual (TAU)
Depression Severity10.9 ± 65.5 ± 1.3
PrimaryDepression Severity

Total scores from the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) will be used to assess depression severity, as a primary outcome. The PHQ-9 is 9 items with scoring ranging from 0-27. The higher the score, the more severe the depression symptoms are. A score of 0-4=no depression; 5-9=mild depression; 10-14=moderate depression; 15-19=moderately severe depression; 20-27=severe depression symptoms.

Time frame:
At 12 week follow up after Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Depression Severity
score on a scaleBritePathTreatment As Usual (TAU)
Depression Severity10.4 ± 5.49.5 ± 1.7
PrimarySuicidal Ideation and Behavior

Suicidal attempt \& ideation will be measured through the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Assign score of 0 if no ideation/behavior present and assign a score of 1 if ideation/behavior present. A "yes" answer any time during treatment to question 9 on the PHQ-9 indicates suicidal ideation. A "yes" answer any time during treatment to any 1 of the 5 suicidal behavior questions (Categories 7-10) on the C-SSRS. C-SSRS Categories 7-10 are as follows: 7-Aborted Attempt 8-Interrupted Attempt 9-Actual Attempt (non-fatal) 10-Completed Suicide. Any score greater than 0 is important/may indicate need for intervention.

Time frame:
At Baseline phone visit
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Suicidal Ideation and Behavior
score on a scaleBritePathTreatment As Usual (TAU)
PHQ-9 Question 9 (ideation)1.1 ± 10 ± 0
C-SSRS Category 7: Aborted Attempt0.1 ± 0.20 ± 0
C-SSRS Category 8: Interrupted Attempt0 ± 00 ± 0
C-SSRS Category 9: Actual Attempt (non-fatal)0.1 ± 0.30 ± 0
C-SSRS Category 10: Completed Suicide0 ± 00 ± 0
PrimarySuicidal Ideation and Behavior

Suicidal attempt \& ideation will be measured through the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Assign score of 0 if no ideation/behavior present and assign a score of 1 if ideation/behavior present. A "yes" answer any time during treatment to question 9 on the PHQ-9 indicates suicidal ideation. A "yes" answer any time during treatment to any 1 of the 5 suicidal behavior questions (Categories 7-10) on the C-SSRS. C-SSRS Categories 7-10 are as follows: 7-Aborted Attempt 8-Interrupted Attempt 9-Actual Attempt (non-fatal) 10-Completed Suicide. Any score greater than 0 is important/may indicate need for intervention.

Time frame:
At 4 week follow up after Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Suicidal Ideation and Behavior
score on a scaleBritePathTreatment As Usual (TAU)
PHQ-9 Question 9 (ideation)0.9 ± 10 ± 0
C-SSRS Category 7: Aborted Attempts0 ± 00 ± 0
C-SSRS Category 8: Interrupted Attempts0 ± 0.20 ± 0
C-SSRS Category 9: Actual Attempts (non-lethal)0.1 ± 0.20 ± 0
C-SSRS Category 10: Completed Suicide0 ± 00 ± 0
PrimarySuicidal Ideation and Behavior

Suicidal attempt \& ideation will be measured through the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Assign score of 0 if no ideation/behavior present and assign a score of 1 if ideation/behavior present. A "yes" answer any time during treatment to question 9 on the PHQ-9 indicates suicidal ideation. A "yes" answer any time during treatment to any 1 of the 5 suicidal behavior questions (Categories 7-10) on the C-SSRS. C-SSRS Categories 7-10 are as follows: 7-Aborted Attempt 8-Interrupted Attempt 9-Actual Attempt (non-fatal) 10-Completed Suicide. Any score greater than 0 is important/may indicate need for intervention.

Time frame:
At 12 week follow up after Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Suicidal Ideation and Behavior
score on a scaleBritePathTreatment As Usual (TAU)
PHQ-9 Question 9 (ideation)0.6 ± 0.80 ± 0
C-SSRS Category 7: Aborted Attempts0 ± 00 ± 0
C-SSRS Category 8: Interrupted Attempts0.1 ± 0.20 ± 0
C-SSRS Category 9: Actual Attempts (non-lethal)0 ± 00 ± 0
C-SSRS Category 10: Completed Suicide0 ± 00 ± 0
PrimaryQuality of Life and Social/Emotional Functioning

The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Version 4.0 (PedsQOL) will be used to assess overall quality of life and functioning, as a primary outcome. The PEDSQOL has 23 items and ranges in score from 0-92. It is broken down into 4 subdomains of physical functioning, emotional functioning, social functioning, and work/school (psychosocial) functioning. The higher the score, the more problems the respondent associates with the prompt/sub domain.

Time frame:
At Baseline phone visit
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Quality of Life and Social/Emotional Functioning
score on a scaleBritePathTreatment As Usual (TAU)
Quality of Life and Social/Emotional Functioning63.1 ± 12.270.9 ± 18.4
PrimaryQuality of Life and Social/Emotional Functioning

The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Version 4.0 (PedsQOL) will be used to assess overall quality of life and functioning, as a primary outcome. The PEDSQOL has 23 items and ranges in score from 0-92. It is broken down into 4 subdomains of physical functioning, emotional functioning, social functioning, and work/school (psychosocial) functioning. The higher the score, the more problems the respondent associates with the prompt/sub domain.

Time frame:
At 4 week follow up after Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Quality of Life and Social/Emotional Functioning
score on a scaleBritePathTreatment As Usual (TAU)
Quality of Life and Social/Emotional Functioning71 ± 11.864.8 ± 12
PrimaryQuality of Life and Social/Emotional Functioning

The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Version 4.0 (PedsQOL) will be used to assess overall quality of life and functioning, as a primary outcome. The PEDSQOL has 23 items and ranges in score from 0-92. It is broken down into 4 subdomains of physical functioning, emotional functioning, social functioning, and work/school (psychosocial) functioning. The higher the score, the more problems the respondent associates with the prompt/sub domain.

Time frame:
At 12 week follow up after Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Quality of Life and Social/Emotional Functioning
score on a scaleBritePathTreatment As Usual (TAU)
Quality of Life and Social/Emotional Functioning72.6 ± 11.565.5 ± 13
SecondaryApplication Utilization

Use of the technical components of the BRITEApp for adolescents and young adults will be monitored throughout Phase 1b. Utilization will be measured by the number of participants who have engaged with the application over time, including rating distress levels in the app and utilizing the following app features: learn to savor, reaching out to contacts, soothe breathe, sooth guided meditation, crisis survival strategies, distract with happy thoughts, distract exercise, savor, and soothe activities to help you sleep.

Time frame:
Up to 12 week follow-up
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Application Utilization
ParticipantsBRITEPath
First distress level — Completed24
First distress level — Did not complete14
Second distress level — Completed17
Second distress level — Did not complete21
Learn to savor — Completed2
Learn to savor — Did not complete36
Reaching out to contacts — Completed9
Reaching out to contacts — Did not complete29
Soothe breathe — Completed8
Soothe breathe — Did not complete30
Soothe guided meditation — Completed6
Soothe guided meditation — Did not complete32
Crisis survival strategies — Completed9
Crisis survival strategies — Did not complete29
Distract with happy thoughts — Completed8
Distract with happy thoughts — Did not complete30
Distract exercise — Completed4
Distract exercise — Did not complete34
Savor — Completed5
Savor — Did not complete33
Soothe activities to help you sleep — Completed3
Soothe activities to help you sleep — Did not complete35
SecondaryApplication Utilization

Use of the technical components of Guide2BRITE and the BRITEPortal for physicians will be monitored throughout Phase 1b. Utilization will be measured by the number of providers who have completed the Guide2BRITE onboarding process which includes steps 1, 1.2, 1.3, 2, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 3, 3.2, 4, 4.1, and 5.

Time frame:
Up to 12 week follow-up
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Application Utilization
ParticipantsBRITEPath
Step 1 — Completed28
Step 1 — Did not complete10
Step 1.2 — Completed28
Step 1.2 — Did not complete10
Step 1.3 — Completed34
Step 1.3 — Did not complete4
Step 2 — Completed38
Step 2 — Did not complete0
Step 2.1 — Completed34
Step 2.1 — Did not complete4
Step 2.2 — Completed34
Step 2.2 — Did not complete4
Step 2.3 — Completed34
Step 2.3 — Did not complete4
Step 2.4 — Completed34
Step 2.4 — Did not complete4
Step 2.5 — Completed34
Step 2.5 — Did not complete4
Step 3 — Completed33
Step 3 — Did not complete5
Step 3.2 — Completed32
Step 3.2 — Did not complete6
Step 4 — Completed38
Step 4 — Did not complete0
Step 4.1 — Completed31
Step 4.1 — Did not complete7
Step 5 — Completed15
Step 5 — Did not complete23
SecondaryService Utilization (Outpatient, School, ER, Legal, Inpatient, Medication) - BRITEPath vs. Treatment as Usual (TAU) at Baseline

The Child and Adolescent Service Assessment (CASA) will collect service utilization of all participants to determine the amount of services accessed in each treatment arm. An overall average of the cost of implementing the BRITEPath intervention (including labor, equipment, supplies, facilitates) will be estimated and between the intervention costs and cost of services used from CASA, a comparison will be made and results published. The CASA response data displayed are those who responded positively that they received the service.

Time frame:
At Baseline phone visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Service Utilization (Outpatient, School, ER, Legal, Inpatient, Medication) - BRITEPath vs. Treatment as Usual (TAU) at Baseline
ParticipantsBRITEPathTreatment As Usual
Use outpatient services324
Use school services184
Use ER services120
Use legal services00
Use inpatient services80
Use medications312
SecondaryService Utilization (Outpatient, School, ER, Legal, Inpatient, Medication) - BRITEPath vs. Treatment as Usual (TAU) at 4 Week Follow Up

The Child and Adolescent Service Assessment (CASA) will collect service utilization of all participants to determine the amount of services accessed in each treatment arm. An overall average of the cost of implementing the BRITEPath intervention (including labor, equipment, supplies, facilitates) will be estimated and between the intervention costs and cost of services used from CASA, a comparison will be made and results published. The CASA response data displayed are those who responded positively that they received the service.

Time frame:
At 4 week follow up after Baseline
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Service Utilization (Outpatient, School, ER, Legal, Inpatient, Medication) - BRITEPath vs. Treatment as Usual (TAU) at 4 Week Follow Up
ParticipantsBritePathTreatment As Usual (TAU)
Use outpatient services314
Use school services194
Use ER services120
Use legal services00
Use inpatient services80
Use medications312
SecondaryService Utilization (Outpatient, School, ER, Legal, Inpatient, Medication) - BRITEPath vs. Treatment as Usual (TAU) at 12 Week Follow Up

The Child and Adolescent Service Assessment (CASA) will collect service utilization of all participants to determine the amount of services accessed in each treatment arm. An overall average of the cost of implementing the BRITEPath intervention (including labor, equipment, supplies, facilitates) will be estimated and between the intervention costs and cost of services used from CASA, a comparison will be made and results published. The CASA response data displayed are those who responded positively that they received the service.

Time frame:
At 12 week follow up after Baseline
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Service Utilization (Outpatient, School, ER, Legal, Inpatient, Medication) - BRITEPath vs. Treatment as Usual (TAU) at 12 Week Follow Up
ParticipantsBritePathTreatment As Usual (TAU)
Use outpatient services292
Use school services40
Use ER services00
Use legal services00
Use inpatient services10
Use medications262
SecondaryUsability and Satisfaction

Satisfaction to BRITEPath will be assessed through questions developed by investigators to understand experience with the program. Questions investigators have adapted from literature reviews on satisfaction include: "If a friend were in need of mental health care for depression or suicidal thoughts or behaviors, would you recommend BRITEPath to help him/her manage symptoms? with answer options of: No, definitely not; No, I don't think so; Yes, I think so; Yes, definitely How satisfied are you with the amount of help you received? with answer options of: Dissatisfied; Satisfied; Very Satisfied Have the services you received helped you to deal more effectively with your problems? with answer options of: Really didn't help; Yes, somewhat; Yes, a great deal.

Time frame:
At exit interview following week 4 study visit or week 12 study visit (depending on when youth attends mental health session that uses BRITEPath tools)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Usability and Satisfaction
ParticipantsBRITEPath
If a friend were in need of mental health care, would you recommend BRITEPath? — No, I don't think so3
If a friend were in need of mental health care, would you recommend BRITEPath? — Yes, I think so14
If a friend were in need of mental health care, would you recommend BRITEPath? — Yes, definitely9
If a friend were in need of mental health care, would you recommend BRITEPath? — Dissatisfied0
If a friend were in need of mental health care, would you recommend BRITEPath? — Satisfied0
If a friend were in need of mental health care, would you recommend BRITEPath? — Very Satisfied0
If a friend were in need of mental health care, would you recommend BRITEPath? — Really didn't help0
If a friend were in need of mental health care, would you recommend BRITEPath? — Yes, somewhat0
If a friend were in need of mental health care, would you recommend BRITEPath? — Yes, a great deal0
How satisfied were you with the amount of help you received? — No, I don't think so0
How satisfied were you with the amount of help you received? — Yes, I think so0
How satisfied were you with the amount of help you received? — Yes, definitely0
How satisfied were you with the amount of help you received? — Dissatisfied1
How satisfied were you with the amount of help you received? — Satisfied18
How satisfied were you with the amount of help you received? — Very Satisfied7
How satisfied were you with the amount of help you received? — Really didn't help0
How satisfied were you with the amount of help you received? — Yes, somewhat0
How satisfied were you with the amount of help you received? — Yes, a great deal0
Have the services you received help you to deal more effectively with your problem? — No, I don't think so0
Have the services you received help you to deal more effectively with your problem? — Yes, I think so0
Have the services you received help you to deal more effectively with your problem? — Yes, definitely0
Have the services you received help you to deal more effectively with your problem? — Dissatisfied0
Have the services you received help you to deal more effectively with your problem? — Satisfied0
Have the services you received help you to deal more effectively with your problem? — Very Satisfied0
Have the services you received help you to deal more effectively with your problem? — Really didn't help2
Have the services you received help you to deal more effectively with your problem? — Yes, somewhat20
Have the services you received help you to deal more effectively with your problem? — Yes, a great deal4
SecondaryUsability and Satisfaction

Satisfaction with the technical components of interventions will be assessed through the certain questions from the Post System Satisfaction and Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ). The PSSUQ is 19 items with response options ranging from 1 to 7 where 1=strongly disagree and 7=strongly agree. The PSSUQ has sub-scores derived from subsets of the questions which reflect system usefulness, information quality, and interface quality. Questions from sub-domains were chosen to tailor the questioning to this particular intervention.

Time frame:
At exit interview following week 4 study visit or week 12 study visit (depending on when youth attends mental health session that uses BRITEPath tools)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Usability and Satisfaction
score on a scaleBRITEPath
Overall, I am satisfied with how easy it is to use the BRITE app5.7 ± 1.4
The information provided with the BRITE app was clear6.2 ± 1.2
The information provided in the BRITE app such as notifications to rate my mood was clear6.1 ± 1
The information provided during the onboarding with my therapist was clear6.5 ± 0.8
I liked interacting with the BRITE app program5.8 ± 1
I needed to learn a lot of things before I could get going with the BRITE app1.8 ± 1.2
SecondaryCost Estimate for Implementation of BRITEPath Intervention

An overall average of the cost of implementing the BRITEPath intervention (including labor, equipment, supplies, facilitates) will be estimated. Outcome measure data below highlights the estimated cost of the intervention BRITEPath Intervention per participant, measures were based on estimates from staff and not on empirical data at the individual level.

Time frame:
At 12 week follow up after Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · dollars per participant
Cost Estimate for Implementation of BRITEPath Intervention
dollars per participantBRITEPath Intervention
Cost Estimate for Implementation of BRITEPath Intervention457.43 (214.10 to 597.05)

Adverse events

Collected over Participants were assessed for adverse events at each timepoint (baseline, 4 week follow-up, 12 week follow-up).. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
BritePath0/35 (0%)0/35 (0%)0/35 (0%)
Treatment As Usual (TAU)0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Measure Analysis Population Description: 3 participants were recruited, completed the consenting process (where we collect age data), and were randomized, but did not complete the baseline or follow up visits where the rest of our demographic information is collected. These 3 pts also engaged in use of the app/intervention.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)BritePathTreatment As Usual (TAU)Total
<=18 years31536
Between 18 and 65 years707
>=65 years000
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)BritePathTreatment As Usual (TAU)Total
Male819
Female26430
Non-binary/ Queer101
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)BritePathTreatment As Usual (TAU)Total
Hispanic or Latino707
Not Hispanic or Latino28533
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)BritePathTreatment As Usual (TAU)Total
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian202
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander101
Black or African American101
White25429
More than one race202
Unknown or Not Reported415
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)BritePathTreatment As Usual (TAU)Total
United States38543
08

Study locations

6 sites
  • Northwell Hospital
    Hyde Park, New York 11040, United States
  • Children's Community Pediatrics (CCP-Moon) of Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC
    Moon, Pennsylvania 15108, United States
  • STAR-Center
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
  • Wesley Family Services
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15221, United States
  • Children's Community Pediatrics (CCP-Wexford) of Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC
    Wexford, Pennsylvania 15090, United States
  • Seattle Children's Hospital
    Seattle, Washington 98105, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Apr 30, 2020
  • Informed consent form · Apr 19, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The final completely de-identified dataset(s) will include demographic and clinical data at baseline, and primary and secondary outcomes for all studies, including those funded by the innovation contests. These analytic datasets may also include derived variables with documentation. Our form datasets will include original case report forms, a detailed codebook of variable names, value labels, and programming formats and all study documentation including the protocol and manual of procedures. For descriptive/raw data, study investigators/study staff will upload to NIMH's National Database for Clinical Trials Related to Mental Health Illness (NDCT) on a semi-annual basis all analyzed data being uploaded prior to primary paper publication.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 8, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04000399
Lead sponsor
University of Pittsburgh
Collaborators
Kaiser Foundation Research Institute, National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Responsible party
Stephanie Stepp (Associate Professor of Psychiatry and Psychology, University of Pittsburgh) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 27, 2019
Start date
Aug 6, 2019
Primary completion
Feb 9, 2021
Completion
Feb 9, 2021
Results posted
Aug 8, 2022
Last update
Aug 8, 2022

Study contacts

Stephanie Stepp, PhD
principal investigator · University of Pittsburgh
David Brent, MD
study director · University of Pittsburgh

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion