ClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT03994887BRAINUpdated Nov 22, 2023

Interest of the Study of Electroencephalogram and Peripheral Vegetative Markers for the Evaluation of Nociception Under General Anesthesia.

An interventional study of Experimental group in General Anesthesia, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne. Withdrawn at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-22.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Why this study was withdrawn
study not started
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

General anesthesia (GA) is a state of loss of consciousness induced by anesthetic products. In a GA, two classes of products are usually used: on the one hand, hypnotics that are responsible for the sleep component (hypnosis) and memory loss (amnesia), and on the other hand opioids that have an analgesic role.

The doses of hypnotic and morphine necessary to achieve this state of loss of consciousness and lack of response to painful stimulation vary from subject to subject, and during surgery depending on the intensity of the stimulus, requiring permanent adaptation to avoid overdose or underdosing, responsible for morbidity.

Several monitors of the hypnotic component have been developed in recent years, which can now be used routinely, such as the Bispectral Index (BIS) or Spectral Entropy.

However, there is currently no clinically validated technique for monitoring pain or the effect of opioids in the operating room.

Spectral analysis of the electroencephalogram (EEG) revealed a significant decrease (-30%) in alpha spectral power, observed specifically in painful experimental conditions in healthy awake subjects. On the other hand, a painful experience is accompanied by transient changes in various parameters under vegetative control, whether cardiovascular, cutaneous or pupillary, essentially underpinned by the activation of the sympathetic system.

The investigators hypothesize that a real-time dynamic analysis of the spectral power of EEG combined with that of cardiovascular vegetative parameters, cutaneous conductance and pupillary diameter is likely to be a marker of nociception under GA.

02

Conditions studied

  • General Anesthesia

Keywords

  • General anesthesia
  • Surgery
  • Free Head
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne is the lead sponsor of 597 studies on the registry; 127 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient affiliated or entitled to a social security scheme
  • Over 18 years old
  • To be operated on a regulated surgery allowing access to the head and to one eye, under AG, in the operating theater of the CHU of Saint-Etienne
  • And having given his free, informed, written and signed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject to a measure of legal protection (tutelage, guardianship)
  • Admitted for emergency surgery
  • With known allergy to any of the anesthetic agents used in the study
  • Having been asleep under general anesthesia in the 7 days preceding the intervention
  • A pacemaker or heart transplant patient
  • With a history of Parkinson's disease, insulin-dependent or non-insulin-dependent diabetes at a dysautonomic stage or chronic alcoholism at a dysautonomia stage
  • With psychiatric history or severe depression
  • Presenting a peripheral or central neurological pathology that may modify the physiological responses to nociceptive stimulation
  • With abnormal heart rhythm (atrial fibrillation or frequent extrasystoles)
  • Treated for arterial hypertension with angiotensin type 2 receptor antagonists
  • Treated with anti-arrhythmic, α- or β-blocking, which would make the interpretation of the results more difficult
  • With chronic pain
  • Treated with morphine or long-term neuroleptic
  • Consuming cannabis or another narcotic
  • Presenting bilateral ocular pathology that may interfere with pupillary dilatation
  • Or refusing to participate in the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental group

    Patients under general anesthesia will be included.

    Device: Experimental group

Interventions

  • DeviceExperimental group

    EEG acquisition system BioSemi (Amsterdam, the Netherlands), enabling real-time measurement and continuous recording of EEG on up to 128 leads.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. ElectroEncephaloGram (EEG) Alpha spectral power

    variations of the EEG parameters (spectral power of the alpha rhythms), during nociceptive stimuli performed under AG at constant hypnosis depth (BIS between 50 and 60), without and after injection of a standardized dose of morphine (0.2 μg / kg of sufentanil based on the theoretical weight) of the patient).

    Time frame: 1 day

Secondary outcomes

  1. Beta spectral power

    variations of the EEG parameters (spectral power of the beta rhythms), during nociceptive stimuli performed under AG at constant hypnosis depth (BIS between 50 and 60), without and after injection of a standardized dose of morphine (0.2 μg / kg of sufentanil based on the theoretical weight) of the patient).

    Time frame: 1 day

  2. gamma spectral power

    variations of the EEG parameters (spectral power of the gamma rhythms), during nociceptive stimuli performed under AG at constant hypnosis depth (BIS between 50 and 60), without and after injection of a standardized dose of morphine (0.2 μg / kg of sufentanil based on the theoretical weight) of the patient).

    Time frame: 1 day

  3. delta spectral power

    variations of the EEG parameters (spectral power of the delta rhythms), during nociceptive stimuli performed under AG at constant hypnosis depth (BIS between 50 and 60), without and after injection of a standardized dose of morphine (0.2 μg / kg of sufentanil based on the theoretical weight) of the patient).

    Time frame: 1 day

  4. theta spectral power

    variations of the EEG parameters (spectral power of the tetha rhythms), during nociceptive stimuli performed under AG at constant hypnosis depth (BIS between 50 and 60), without and after injection of a standardized dose of morphine (0.2 μg / kg of sufentanil based on the theoretical weight) of the patient).

    Time frame: 1 day

Other outcomes

  1. Low frequency spectral power

    Low Frequence : 0,04-0,15 Hz on EEG in nociceptive stimuli performed under GA at constant hypnosis depth, without and after injection of a standardized dose of morphine (0.2 µg/kg sufentanil based on the patient's theoretical weight)

    Time frame: 1 day

  2. High frequency spectral power

    High frequency (HF : 0,15-0,4 Hz) on EEG in nociceptive stimuli performed under GA at constant hypnosis depth, without and after injection of a standardized dose of morphine (0.2 µg/kg sufentanil based on the patient's theoretical weight)

    Time frame: 1 day

  3. Cutaneous conductance

    The cutaneous conductance will be given by the Nociception Level index (NoL®)

    Time frame: 1 day

  4. Pupil dilation reflex

    The pupillary dilation reflex will be given by the AlgiScan® videopupillometer.

    Time frame: 1 day

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Chu Saint-Etienne
    Saint-Etienne, 42055, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Jun 2023; primary completion for Jun 2025, 24 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 7, 2019
First posted
Jun 21, 2019
StartEst.
Jun 2023
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2025
CompletionEst.
Jun 2025
Last update
Nov 22, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 22, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03994887
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 21, 2019
Start date
Jun 2023 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 22, 2023

Study contacts

DAVID CHARIER, MD
principal investigator · CHU DE ST ETIENNE

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Nov 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion