An interventional study of Cool Kids Anxiety Program - Social Enhanced and Cool Kids Anxiety Program in Social Anxiety Disorder, sponsored by University of Aarhus. Status unknown at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-06-24.
Sponsored by University of Aarhus · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The main aim of the present study is to investigate the effectiveness of a disorder specific group cognitive behavior therapy (G-CBT) program for youth SAD, the, Cool Kids Anxiety Program - Social Enhanced (CK-E), developed at Macquarie University, Sidney, Australia.
Furthermore, the study will examine how well this program fares against generic CBT treatment.
The main aim of the study is to investigate the effectiveness of a disorder specific G-CBT program for youth SAD compared to a generic G-CBT program for anxiety disorders.
Reduction in anxiety symptoms is expected for both treatment conditions although we hypothesize better outcome for the enhanced treatment condition.
Approximately 96 adolescents aged 12 to 17 years will be included with data points at pre- and post-treatment, and at 3-month and 1-year follow-ups.
4,868 studies on the registry are indexed under Anxiety Disorders; 1,390 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 96 is above the median of 80 across 4,174 interventional studies indexed under Anxiety Disorders.
Browse Anxiety Disorders studies →University of Aarhus is the lead sponsor of 1,274 studies on the registry; 183 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
CK-E is a G-CBT treatment developed specifically for treatment of youth SAD. The program consists of 10 2-h group sessions with four to five adolescents and their parents in each group. 9 sessions with the adolescents and parents together and one parents-only session (session 5). Three months after ending treatment participant will be offered a 1-h booster group session.
Behavioral: Cool Kids Anxiety Program - Social Enhanced
The standard Cool Kids Anxiety Program is a treatment program based on generic CBT techniques such as cognitive restructuring and gradual exposure. The program consists of 10 2-h group sessions with four to five adolescents and their parents in each group. 9 sessions with the adolescents and parents together and one parents-only session (session 5). Three months after ending treatment participant will be offered a 1-h booster group session.
Behavioral: Cool Kids Anxiety Program
Specific G-CBT intervention for adolescents with social anxiety disorder
Also known as: CK-E
Generic G-CBT intervention for adolescents with anxiety disorders
Also known as: CK
Change in social anxiety disorder symptoms - measured using Anxiety Disorder Interview Schedule for DSM-IV, Child and Parent Version (ADIS-IV C/P)
ADIS-IV C/P is a semi-structured diagnostic interview conducted with youth and parents separately to assess the diagnostic criteria for anxiety disorders in accordance with DSM-IV as well as other disorders often comorbid with anxiety (e.g., depression and ADHD). Severity of the diagnosis is measured on a nine-point Likert scale ranging from not disturb at all to severely disturbed (0-8). CSR scores of 4 or greater indicate a clinical diagnosis. Separate CSRs are made by youths, parents, and the clinician, but only the CSRs provided by the clinician will be used. The most impairing diagnosis, as assessed by the clinician, will be considered as the primary diagnosis.
Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (after session 10 = 10-14 weeks after baseline interview) and follow-up 3-month after session 10.
Change in social anxiety disorder symptoms - measured using The Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN)
The Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN) (Connor et al., 2000). SPIN is a questionnaire used for measuring youths self-rated SAD symptoms. It includes 17 items covering SAD symptoms of fear, avoidance and physiological/bodily reactions (trembling, blushing, heart palpitations and sweating). The adolescents are asked to which degree they have been bothered by these symptoms the preceding week. Each item is rated on a five-point Likert scale (0-4). Higher scores indicate higher degree of distress regarding the symptom. The SPIN has been found to have good internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent and divergent validity (M. M. Antony, Coons, McCabe, Ashbaugh, \& Swinson, 2006; Connor et al., 2000). The SPIN has demonstrated good psychometric properties for assessing youth SAD (Ranta, Kaltiala-Heino, Koivisto, et al., 2007; Ranta, Kaltiala-Heino, Rantanen, Tuomisto, \& Marttunen, 2007; Tsai, Wang, Juang, \& Fuh, 2009)
Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (after session 10 = 10-14 weeks after baseline interview) and follow-ups at 3- month and 1-year after session 10.
Change in social anxiety disorder symptoms - measured using Spence Children's Anxiety Scale (SCAS and SCAS-P)
is used to measure adolescent- and parent-rated anxiety symptoms. The adolescent version contains 44 items (including six positive filler items), and the parent version contains 38 items. Items are rated on a four-point Likert scale (0-3). Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety. It consists of six subscales reflecting symptoms specifically related to social phobia, panic disorder and agoraphobia, generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, separation anxiety disorder, and fear of physical injury
Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (10-14 weeks), 3-month follow-up and 1-year follow-up
The Child Anxiety Life Inference Scale (CALIS)
is used to measure the impact of youth's anxiety on various areas of life functioning including friends, school, extracurricular, and family. The impact is evaluated separately by adolescents (9 items) and their parents (16 items). Items are evaluated on a five point Likert scale (0-4). Higher scores indicate a higher degree of life interference.
Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (10-14 weeks), 3-month follow-up and 1-year follow-up
The Short version of the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (S-MFQ)
will be used in the present study to measure depressive symptoms within the last two weeks. The symptoms are evaluated independently by adolescents and parents. The short version includes 13 items rated on a three-point Likert scale.
Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (10-14 weeks), and 3-month follow-up
The Negative Effects Questionnaire (NEQ)
dis a self-administered measure of negative effects of psychological treatment. For this specific study we adjusted the NEQ for the age group (12-17) and their parents. Both adolescents and parents are to complete the NEQ. NEQ consists of three parts. First, participants endorse whether a specific item has occurred during treatment (yes/no). Secondly, participants rate how negatively the effect was on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from "not at all" to "extremely" (0-4). Third, they attribute the negative effect to either "the treatment they receive" (1) or "other circumstances" (0).
Time frame: posttreatment (10-14 weeks)
The Child Health Utility 9D (CHU 9D)
is developed to determine how health affects children's lives. In this study CHU 9D is rated by the adolescents. CHU 9D is a generic preference-based self-rated measurement of health-related quality of life. It consists of nine dimensions; worry, sadness, tiredness, pain, annoyed feeling, school work, daily routine, sleep, and activities. These nine dimensions each have five levels on which the adolescents rates the level to how they are feeling.
Time frame: posttreatment (10-14 weeks)
Background information
Parents will complete a background questionnaire pretreatment. This questionnaire includes information regarding parents' mental and physical health, adolescent's mental and physical health, family demographics, household income and parents level of education, adolescent's previous and/or ongoing treatment, school absenteeism, and developmental point of orientation.
Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (10-14 weeks), 3-month follow-up and 1-year follow-up
Credibility/expectation questionnaire (CEQ )
is a self-rated measure addressing the participants' expectancy and credibility of the treatment. Both youth and parents complete the questionnaire. CEQ consists of 6 items; three items regarding credibility and three items regarding expectancy.
Time frame: CEQ will be completed after session 1 (week one)
Experience of Service Questionnaire (ESQ)
measures participants' satisfaction with the intervention. ESQ is adjusted by CEBU from the Experience of Service Questionnaire (Attride-Stirling, 2002). There are separate items for parents (10 items) and adolescents (7 items). ESQ includes both positive and negative statements, and items are rated on a 3-point Likert scale.
Time frame: posttreatment (10-14 weeks)
Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS)
is used in the study for parents' rating of their own symptoms regarding anxiety, depression and stress. DASS consists of three subscales measuring symptoms of anxiety (DASS-A), depression (DASS-D) and stress (DASS-S). DASS contains 42 item and each item is rated on a four-point Likert scale (0-3) with higher scores indicating a higher degree of distress.
Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (10-14 weeks), 3-month follow-up
Mini-SPIN
is developed as a brief screening instrument for SAD but can also serve as a repeated outcome measurement. The mini-SPIN is completed by the adolescents themselves. Mini-SPIN includes three specific items from the original SPIN ("Fear of embarrassment causes me to avoid doing things or speaking to people"; "I avoid activities in which I am the center of attention"; and "Being embarrassed or looking stupid is among my worst fears"). Each item is rated on a five-point Likert scale (0-4).
Time frame: In the current study mini-SPIN will be used as a severity measure rated by the adolescents prior to session 1 (week one), 4 (week four), 7 (week seven) and 10 (week 10-14)
Postevent version of the Thoughts Questionnaire (PTQ)
is self-rated measure to assess the degree of post event processing. Adolescents complete the PTQ. Consistent with prior research (Perini, Abbott, \& Rapee, 2006; Wong et al., 2017) only the 15 negatively worded items of the PTQ will be used in this study.
Time frame: Assessed after session session 1 (week one), 4 (week four), 7 (week seven) and 10 (week 10-14)
Focus of Attention Questionnaire (FAQ)
is a self-rated measure of focus of attention. It is completed by the adolescents themselves. FAQ is a 10-item scale including two 5-item subscales; self-focused attention and external-focused attention. All items are rated on a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1-5 (1 = "Not at all", 5 = "Totally"). The two subscales are treated as independent.
Time frame: Adolescents complete FAQ after session session 1 (week one), 4 (week four), 7 (week seven) and 10 (week 10-14)
Subtle Avoidance Frequency Examination (SAFE)
is a self-rated measure designed to assess safety behaviors. In the study adolescents complete the questionnaire. SAFE is designed to incorporate both active safety behaviors, subtle restriction of behavior, and behaviors aimed at avoiding or concealing physical symptoms. SAFE consists of 32 items ranging on a five point Likert scale (0-4), with higher scores indicating a higher degree of safety-seeking behaviors.
Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (10-14 weeks), 3-month follow-up
The Children's Automatic Thoughts Scale (CATS)
measures a range of the adolescents' self-reported negative self-statements. CATS is completed by the adolescents themselves. CATS include four subscales relating to automatic thoughts on social threat, personal failure, hostility, and physical threat. All items are scored on a five-point Likert scale (0-4), with higher scores indicating higher degrees of negative automatic thought. Only two subscales are included in the questionnaire battery of the present study; social threat and personal failure.
Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (10-14 weeks), 3-month follow-up
Plan to share: No
This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Aarhus