CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03982043T2CUpdated Jun 3, 2022Results posted

Text2Connect, Component 2 of iCHART (Integrated Care to Help At-Risk Teens)

An interventional study of Text2Connect in Depression and Suicidal Ideation, sponsored by University of Pittsburgh. Completed at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 26 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-06-03.

Sponsored by University of Pittsburgh · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
47
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
12 Years to 26 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study proposes to develop and examine a personalized, text-based intervention designed to improve engagement with mental health (MH) treatment.

Read the detailed description

Text2Connect (T2C) aims to increase perceived susceptibility/severity of depression/suicidality and decrease stigma in at-risk adolescents and their parents. The investigators hypothesize that modification of patient beliefs leads to change talk, thereby increasing the experience of discrepancy which affects motivation for change. These experiences in turn influence decisional balance away from ambivalence toward readiness for change.

Assignment of Interventions:

This study utilized an open trial design. A stepped wedge design was originally proposed and efforts were made to adhere to this study design, however after a year of low recruitment and resultant recruitment sites pulling out the of the study, the overall study design was changed to an open trial. Additional recruitment sites were onboarded to the study and provided with the intervention arm in order to obtain feasibility data on the intervention components of the study. As a result of the change, there are some TAU participants included in this study.

For reference a stepped wedge design involves the sequential random rollout of an intervention over two time periods. Following a baseline period in which no clusters (=practices) are exposed to the intervention, the crossover is typically in one direction, from control to intervention and continues until both of the clusters have crossed-over to receive the intervention, with observations taken from each cluster and at each time period.

This study will pilot Text2Connect in community pediatric and mental health practices using a stepped wedge design (n = 50 adolescents).

Hypothesis: Readiness for mental health care will be greater among adolescents in T2C vs adolescents referred during TAU.

02

Conditions studied

  • Depression
  • Suicidal Ideation

Browse trials for

03

In context

Suicidal Ideation

515 studies on the registry are indexed under Suicidal Ideation; 195 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 47 is below the median of 80 across 426 interventional studies indexed under Suicidal Ideation.

Browse Suicidal Ideation studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Pittsburgh is the lead sponsor of 1,385 studies on the registry; 167 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 26 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Youth aged 12-26 yo Own a cell phone with text message capability Biological or adoptive parent is willing to provide informed consent for teen to participate Youth speaks and understands English

  • Positive PHQ score or provider determines youth has depressive symptoms based on clinical interaction and refers youth to the study (in cases when PHQ is not available and study staff will complete the PHQ during the screening) OR Provider can refer if they are unclear if symptoms are depressive and PHQ scoring will be used to determine youth's eligibility. OR Screening Wizard screening questionnaire (which includes the PHQ and depressive symptom questions) indicates depression OR provider indicates there is a concern that youth has mood or behavioral problem.
  • Referred to mental health care OR screening wizard questionnaire (which indicates if provider makes referral to mental health care)

PHQ-9 scores:

Score of 8 or higher on PHQ-8 -or- Score of 1 or higher on #9 of PHQ-9 suicidality item

Parent inclusion criteria:

Age 18 or older Own a cell phone with text message capability Speaks and understands English Parent of a youth that scores positive on the PHQ-8 or #9 as described above Parent of a youth who has been referred to mental health treatment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Non English speaking No parent willing to provide informed consent No cell phone with text messaging capability Is currently experiencing mania or psychosis Evidence of an intellectual or developmental disorder (IDD) Life threatening medical condition that requires immediate treatment Other cognitive or medical condition preventing youth from understanding study and/or participating.

Not referred to mental health care

Parent exclusion criteria:

No cell phone with text messaging capability Child meets exclusion criteria as described above Other cognitive or medical condition preventing parent from understanding study and/or participating.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
47 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Text2Connect

    Participants receiving Text2Connect (T2C) personalized messages aimed at increasing motivations in at-risk adolescents and their parents. The most salient of the following behavior change techniques will be selected and targeted messaging will be deployed on the participants' phone: psychoeducation, cued mood monitoring, adolescent-parent communication prompts, cognitive bias modification, and cues to action. Intervention material will be tailored to baseline characteristics and T2C will generate reports to providers.

    Behavioral: Text2Connect

Interventions

  • BehavioralText2Connect

    Text2Connect is a personalized text messaging intervention for patients and parents that targets self-identified barriers to engaging in treatment to increase the likelihood that a depressed or suicidal patient will initiate recommended services.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Attendance to Treatment

    Attendance to the embedded mental health care appointments will be assessed via electronic health record (EHR), as the primary outcome of Text2Connect (T2C)

    Time frame: Week 4 follow up after Baseline

  2. Attendance to Treatment

    Attendance to the embedded mental health care appointments will be assessed via electronic health record (EHR), as the primary outcome of Text2Connect (T2C)

    Time frame: Week 12 follow up after Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of SMS Messages Answered by Participants

    Use of the technical components of T2C will be monitored. Utilization will be measured by the number of participant responses to the automatic T2C SMS messages at the baseline timepoint.

    Time frame: At Baseline phone visit

  2. Number of SMS Messages Answered by Participants

    Use of the technical components of T2C will be monitored. Utilization will be measured by the number of participant responses to the automatic T2C SMS messages at the 4 week follow-up timepoint.

    Time frame: Week 4 follow up after Baseline

  3. Number of SMS Messages Answered by Participants

    Use of the technical components of T2C will be monitored. Utilization will be measured by the number of participant responses to the automatic T2C SMS messages at the 12 week follow-up timepoint.

    Time frame: Week 12 follow up after Baseline

  4. Service Utilization-Baseline

    The Child and Adolescent Service Assessment (CASA) will collect service utilization of all participants to determine the amount of services accessed in each treatment arm. An overall average of the cost of implementing the Text2Connect intervention (including labor, equipment, supplies, facilitates) can be estimated and between the intervention costs and cost of services used from CASA, a comparison will be made and results published. The CASA response data displayed are those who responded positively that they received the service.

    Time frame: At Baseline phone visit

  5. Service Utilization-Follow Up 4 Weeks

    The Child and Adolescent Service Assessment (CASA) will collect service utilization of all participants to determine the amount of services accessed in each treatment arm. An overall average of the cost of implementing the Text2Connect intervention (including labor, equipment, supplies, facilitates) can be estimated and between the intervention costs and cost of services used from CASA, a comparison will be made and results published. The CASA response data displayed are those who responded positively that they received the service.

    Time frame: Week 4 follow up after Baseline

  6. Service Utilization-Follow up 12 Weeks

    The Child and Adolescent Service Assessment (CASA) will collect service utilization of all participants to determine the amount of services accessed in each treatment arm. An overall average of the cost of implementing the Text2Connect intervention (including labor, equipment, supplies, facilitates) can be estimated and between the intervention costs and cost of services used from CASA, a comparison will be made and results published. The CASA response data displayed are those who responded positively that they received the service.

    Time frame: Week 12 follow up after Baseline

  7. Usability & Satisfaction

    Satisfaction to T2C will be assessed through questions developed by investigators to understand experience with the program. The question investigators have adapted from literature reviews on satisfaction is: "If a friend were in need of a mental health referral, would you recommend Text2Connect to him/her?" The response options include: No, definitely not; No, I don't think so; Yes, I think so; Yes, definitely.

    Time frame: At exit interview either following week 4 study visit or week 12 study visit (depending on when youth attend 1st mental health care appointment)

  8. Usability & Satisfaction

    Satisfaction with the technical components of interventions will be assessed through the certain questions from the Post System Satisfaction and Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ). The PSSUQ is 19 items with response options ranging from 1 to 7 where 1=strongly disagree and 7=strongly agree. The PSSUQ has sub-scores derived from subsets of the questions which reflect system usefulness, information quality, and interface quality. Questions from sub-domains were chosen to tailor the questioning to this particular intervention. Another question about the need to learn new things before using the app was asked to be rated on a 1-5 scale, with 1= strongly disagree and 5= strongly agree. Two other satisfaction questions included were: "How satisfied are you with the amount of help you received?" The response options were on a scale of 1 (Very dissatisfied) to 4 (Very satisfied). "Have the services you received helped you to deal more effectively with your problems?" The response options were

    Time frame: At exit interview either following week 4 study visit or week 12 study visit (depending on when youth attend 1st mental health care appointment)

07

Results

Posted Mar 17, 2022
Limitations and caveats
Limitations included recruiting mostly White females, measuring MH care initiation through adolescent self-report, and not capturing specific MH/substance use diagnoses in addition to depression. Therefore, findings may not be valid in males or racial/ethnic minorities and we were limited in the understanding of severity and breadth of MH care needs.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneText2ConnectTreatment As Usual (TAU)
Started434
Completed434
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryAttendance to Treatment

Attendance to the embedded mental health care appointments will be assessed via electronic health record (EHR), as the primary outcome of Text2Connect (T2C)

Time frame:
Week 4 follow up after Baseline
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Attendance to Treatment
ParticipantsText2ConnectTreatment as Usual (TAU)
Attended appointment with mental health specialist220
Did not attend appointment with mental health specialist204
PrimaryAttendance to Treatment

Attendance to the embedded mental health care appointments will be assessed via electronic health record (EHR), as the primary outcome of Text2Connect (T2C)

Time frame:
Week 12 follow up after Baseline
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Attendance to Treatment
ParticipantsText2ConnectTreatment As Usual (TAU)
Attended appointment with mental health specialist82
Did not attend appointment with mental health specialist122
SecondaryNumber of SMS Messages Answered by Participants

Use of the technical components of T2C will be monitored. Utilization will be measured by the number of participant responses to the automatic T2C SMS messages at the baseline timepoint.

Time frame:
At Baseline phone visit
Reported as:
Count of units · SMS Sent
Number of SMS Messages Answered by Participants
SMS SentText2Connect
Number of SMS Messages Answered by Participants621
SecondaryNumber of SMS Messages Answered by Participants

Use of the technical components of T2C will be monitored. Utilization will be measured by the number of participant responses to the automatic T2C SMS messages at the 4 week follow-up timepoint.

Time frame:
Week 4 follow up after Baseline
Reported as:
Count of units · SMS Sent
Number of SMS Messages Answered by Participants
SMS SentText2Connect
Number of SMS Messages Answered by Participants661
SecondaryNumber of SMS Messages Answered by Participants

Use of the technical components of T2C will be monitored. Utilization will be measured by the number of participant responses to the automatic T2C SMS messages at the 12 week follow-up timepoint.

Time frame:
Week 12 follow up after Baseline
Reported as:
Count of units · SMS Sent
Number of SMS Messages Answered by Participants
SMS SentText2Connect
Number of SMS Messages Answered by Participants328
SecondaryService Utilization-Baseline

The Child and Adolescent Service Assessment (CASA) will collect service utilization of all participants to determine the amount of services accessed in each treatment arm. An overall average of the cost of implementing the Text2Connect intervention (including labor, equipment, supplies, facilitates) can be estimated and between the intervention costs and cost of services used from CASA, a comparison will be made and results published. The CASA response data displayed are those who responded positively that they received the service.

Time frame:
At Baseline phone visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Service Utilization-Baseline
ParticipantsText2ConnectTreatment as Usual (TAU)
Use outpatient services351
Use school services302
Use ER services50
Use legal services00
Use inpatient services90
Use medications300
SecondaryService Utilization-Follow Up 4 Weeks

The Child and Adolescent Service Assessment (CASA) will collect service utilization of all participants to determine the amount of services accessed in each treatment arm. An overall average of the cost of implementing the Text2Connect intervention (including labor, equipment, supplies, facilitates) can be estimated and between the intervention costs and cost of services used from CASA, a comparison will be made and results published. The CASA response data displayed are those who responded positively that they received the service.

Time frame:
Week 4 follow up after Baseline
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Service Utilization-Follow Up 4 Weeks
ParticipantsText2ConnectTreatment as Usual (TAU)
Use outpatient services280
Use school services71
Use ER services00
Use legal services00
Use inpatient services00
Use medications250
SecondaryService Utilization-Follow up 12 Weeks

The Child and Adolescent Service Assessment (CASA) will collect service utilization of all participants to determine the amount of services accessed in each treatment arm. An overall average of the cost of implementing the Text2Connect intervention (including labor, equipment, supplies, facilitates) can be estimated and between the intervention costs and cost of services used from CASA, a comparison will be made and results published. The CASA response data displayed are those who responded positively that they received the service.

Time frame:
Week 12 follow up after Baseline
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Service Utilization-Follow up 12 Weeks
ParticipantsText2ConnectTreatment as Usual (TAU)
Use outpatient services230
Use school services60
Use ER services00
Use inpatient services00
Use legal services00
Use medications261
SecondaryUsability & Satisfaction

Satisfaction to T2C will be assessed through questions developed by investigators to understand experience with the program. The question investigators have adapted from literature reviews on satisfaction is: "If a friend were in need of a mental health referral, would you recommend Text2Connect to him/her?" The response options include: No, definitely not; No, I don't think so; Yes, I think so; Yes, definitely.

Time frame:
At exit interview either following week 4 study visit or week 12 study visit (depending on when youth attend 1st mental health care appointment)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Usability & Satisfaction
ParticipantsText2Connect
No, definitely not2
No, I don't think so10
Yes, I think so21
Yes, definitely7
SecondaryUsability & Satisfaction

Satisfaction with the technical components of interventions will be assessed through the certain questions from the Post System Satisfaction and Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ). The PSSUQ is 19 items with response options ranging from 1 to 7 where 1=strongly disagree and 7=strongly agree. The PSSUQ has sub-scores derived from subsets of the questions which reflect system usefulness, information quality, and interface quality. Questions from sub-domains were chosen to tailor the questioning to this particular intervention. Another question about the need to learn new things before using the app was asked to be rated on a 1-5 scale, with 1= strongly disagree and 5= strongly agree. Two other satisfaction questions included were: "How satisfied are you with the amount of help you received?" The response options were on a scale of 1 (Very dissatisfied) to 4 (Very satisfied). "Have the services you received helped you to deal more effectively with your problems?" The response options were

Time frame:
At exit interview either following week 4 study visit or week 12 study visit (depending on when youth attend 1st mental health care appointment)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Usability & Satisfaction
score on a scaleText2Connect
Overall, I am satisfied with how easy it is to use Text2Connect (1 to 7)6.1 ± 1.1
The information provided with T2C was clear (1 to 7)6.3 ± 0.9
I liked interacting with the T2C program (1 to 7)5.1 ± 1.5
I need to learn a lot of things before I could get going with T2C (1 to 5)1.4 ± 1
How satisfied were you with the amount of help you received (1 to 4)3.1 ± 0.5
Have the services you received helped you to deal more effectively with your problems? (1 to 4)2.8 ± 0.6

Adverse events

Collected over Over the 1 year and 1 month of data collection for the study, participants were assessed for adverse events at each timepoint (baseline, 4 week follow-up, 12 week follow-up). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Text2Connect0/43 (0%)0/43 (0%)0/43 (0%)
Treatment As Usual (TAU)0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Text2ConnectTreatment As Usual (TAU)Total
<=18 years28432
Between 18 and 65 years15015
>=65 years000
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)Text2ConnectTreatment As Usual (TAU)Total
Sex at Birth — Male819
Sex at Birth — Female35338
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Text2ConnectTreatment As Usual (TAU)Total
Hispanic or Latino202
Not Hispanic or Latino41445
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Text2ConnectTreatment As Usual (TAU)Total
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian202
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American314
White33235
More than one race213
Unknown or Not Reported303
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Text2ConnectTreatment As Usual (TAU)Total
United States43447
08

Study locations

4 sites
  • CCP Waterdam
    McMurray, Pennsylvania 15317, United States
  • Children's Community Pediatrics (CCP-Natrona Heights) of Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC
    Natrona Heights, Pennsylvania 15065, United States
  • Children's Community Pediatrics (CCP-GIL) of Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15206, United States
  • STAR-Center
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Feb 2, 2021
  • Informed consent form · Feb 2, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All requests for study data will follow NIMH's data sharing and data use policies. The final completely de-identified dataset(s) will include demographic and clinical data at baseline, and primary and secondary outcomes for all studies, including those funded by the innovation contests. These analytic datasets may also include derived variables with documentation. Our form datasets will include original case report forms, a detailed codebook of variable names, value labels, and programming formats and all study documentation including the protocol and manual of procedures. For descriptive/raw data, study investigators/study staff will upload to NIMH's National Database for Clinical Trials Related to Mental Health Illness (NDCT) on a semi-annual basis all analyzed data being uploaded prior to primary paper publication.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 3, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03982043
Lead sponsor
University of Pittsburgh
Collaborators
Kaiser Foundation Research Institute, National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Responsible party
Tina R Goldstein (Associate Professor of Psychiatry and Psychology, University of Pittsburgh) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 11, 2019
Start date
May 28, 2019
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2020
Completion
Jun 30, 2020
Results posted
Mar 17, 2022
Last update
Jun 3, 2022

Study contacts

Tina Goldstein, PhD
principal investigator · University of Pittsburgh
Brian Suffoletto, MD
study director · University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion