CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03973424PATHUpdated Jun 16, 2020

Mobile Methods for Reducing Obesity Risk in Parents and Children

An interventional study of Simple and Standard in Overweight and Obesity, Overweight and Obesity, sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 2 Years to 55 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-06-16.

Sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
144
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
2 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to test the efficacy of an innovative 6-month smartphone-delivered intervention using simplified monitoring of dietary intake compared to a smartphone-delivered intervention with standard calorie monitoring among parents with overweight or obesity.

Read the detailed description

This is a 6-month randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of two smartphone-based dietary and weight change interventions among 70 parent-child dyads with at least one child between the ages of 2 and 12 (70 adults and 70 children ages 2-12). One intervention group (Simple) will use a simplified, low-burden form of dietary tracking in the study smartphone application and the other group (Standard) will use standard calorie tracking. Components of both interventions include (1) setting personalized goals for weight, dietary intake, and daily activity (2) adaptive text message interventions based on behavior change techniques such as goal setting and in-the-moment progress feedback several times per week, (3) weekly tailored feedback updated in the study smartphone app, and (4) weekly lessons on the smartphone app. The primary objective is to promote weight loss in the parents, and the secondary objective is to determine if one or both interventions produce a ripple effect of parent dietary change onto dietary changes in the child.

02

Conditions studied

  • Overweight and Obesity
  • Overweight
  • Obesity
03

In context

Obesity

6,296 studies on the registry are indexed under Obesity; 1,692 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 144 is above the median of 78 across 4,878 interventional studies indexed under Obesity.

Browse Obesity studies →

Lead sponsor

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill is the lead sponsor of 1,340 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.

Of its 155 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 136 (88%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria (parent):

  • Currently age 21-55.
  • Body mass index (BMI) of 25-50 kg/m².
  • Have one child between the ages of 2-12.
  • Own an iPhone running at least iOS11 with a data and text messaging plan.
  • Have the ability to read, write, and speak English.

Inclusion Criteria (child):

  • Currently age 2-12.

Exclusion Criteria (parent):

  • Lost more than 10 pounds in the last 6 months.
  • Currently participating in another nutrition or weight loss program.
  • Currently meeting exercise recommendations of 150 minutes per week of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity.
  • Currently pregnant or breastfeeding, pregnant within the past 6 months, or planning to become pregnant within the next 6 months.
  • Planning to relocate in the next 8 months.
  • Will be out of town for 2 weeks or more in the next 8 months.
  • Cannot attend two visits at the UNC Weight Research Program clinic.
  • Pre-existing medical condition(s) that preclude adherence to an unsupervised exercise program, as determined by items endorsed on the PAR-Q (Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire).
  • Treatment of diabetes with insulin or oral medications that may cause hypoglycemia.
  • History of clinically diagnosed eating disorder.
  • Diagnosis of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.
  • Hospitalization for a psychiatric diagnosis within the last year.
  • Report a past diagnosis of or current symptoms of alcohol or substance dependence.
  • Another member of the household (family member or roommate) is a participant or staff member in this study.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
144 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Simple

    This arm uses a simplified form of dietary tracking that involves tracking only high-calorie, high-fat foods, in addition to the core behavioral smartphone-delivered intervention that consists of weighing, physical activity, goal setting, adaptive text messages, tailored weekly feedback, and lessons.

    Behavioral: Simple

  • Experimental
    Standard

    This arm uses standard calorie tracking, in addition to the core behavioral smartphone-delivered intervention that consists of weighing, physical activity, goal setting, adaptive text messages, tailored weekly feedback, and lessons.

    Behavioral: Standard

Interventions

  • BehavioralSimple

    Participants have three daily goals (weighing, dietary goal, activity goal), will self-monitor (weigh on Wi-Fi enabled scale, use a simplified form of tracking only high-calorie, high-fat foods in the study smartphone app, wear Fitbit activity tracker), will receive 4-5 tailored text messages each week, and will view weekly tailored feedback and lessons in smartphone app.

  • BehavioralStandard

    Participants have three daily goals (weighing, dietary goal, activity goal), will self-monitor (weigh on Wi-Fi enabled scale, track calorie intake, wear Fitbit activity tracker), will receive 4-5 tailored text messages each week, and will view weekly tailored feedback and lessons in smartphone app.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent weight loss: objective

    Weight change from baseline to 6 months calculated as a percent from baseline weight.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 Months

  2. Weight

    Absolute weight change from baseline to 6 months.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 Months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Dietary tracking adherence

    Number of days of complete dietary tracking summed over the 6-month study period.

    Time frame: from Baseline to 6 Months

  2. Parent diet

    Change in parent daily caloric intake as measured by 24-hour dietary recall from baseline to 6 months.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 Months

  3. Child diet

    Change in child daily caloric intake as measured by 24-hour dietary recall from baseline to 6 months.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 Months

  4. Percent weight loss: WiFi scale

    Weight change calculated as a percent from baseline weight (measured in kg), using official assessment weights taken from participants' study-provided WiFi-enabled weighing scale and transmitted via WiFi, from baseline to 3, and 6 months.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months

  5. Child BMI-percentile

    Change in child BMI-percentile using at-home measurements of child's weight (on parent WiFi-enabled scale) and height

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 Months

Other outcomes

  1. Minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity

    Change in minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity as measured by the Paffenbarger Physical Activity Questionnaire, from baseline to 3, and 6 months. The PPAQ is a self-administered questionnaire that asks for a recall of physical activity over the previous 1 week. Participants report how many days and for how many minutes each day they engage in brisk walking, and report other exercise activities that week (non-occupational and non-household-related), including how many days and for how many minutes each time. Activities are assigned MET values according to the Compendium of Physical Activities, when are then used to classify activities as light moderate, or vigorous, and are also assigned energy expenditure amounts in kcal. These values are used to calculate total energy expenditure in kcal/week, as well as energy expenditure from and total minutes engaged in moderate-to-vigorous activities, measured in kcal/week and minutes/week, respectively.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months

  2. Sedentary behavior

    Change in sedentary behavior as measured by the self-administered Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire for Adults (SBQ), from baseline to 3, and 6 months. The SBQ asks about amount of sitting time on weekdays (8 items) and weekends (8 items), and are scored by summing up the total time spent in sedentary time (in hours) on weekdays and weekends, ranging from 0 hours to 6+ hours per day.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months

  3. Physical food environment

    Change in healthy and unhealthy foods offered in the home as measured by a physical food environment self-report questionnaire, from baseline to 3, and 6 months. There are 80 total items, 32 unhealthy items and 48 healthy items. Participants report whether each food/drink item is in the home or not (yes or no), and the items are summed for an unhealthy total and healthy total, and may also be used to total number of sugar-sweetened beverages/juice (out of 8 items), caloric beverages (15 items), fruits (17 items), vegetables (14 items), high-fat high-calorie items (20 items), and low-fat low-calorie items (14 items). Higher numbers indicate greater amounts of those types of food in the home.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months

  4. Social food environment

    Change in social food environment as measured by the Meals in our Household Questionnaire, from baseline to 3, and 6 months. This consists of 50 items across 6 subscales, summed to create a total score for each: structure of family meals (10 items, score range 0-40), problematic child mealtime behaviors (20 items, range 0-70), use of food as a reward (6 items, range 0-24), parental concern about child's diet (17 items, range 0-85), spousal stress related to child's mealtime behaviors (4 items, score range 4-20), and influence of child's food preferences on what other family members eat (3 items, range 2-14). Higher scores indicate higher instances of use of the scale in question (ex: greater structure of family meals, greater use of food as a reward, etc.).

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months

  5. Household food rules

    Change in household food rules as measured by 12 items from the self-report Active Where Parent-Child Survey, from baseline to 3, and 6 months. The 12 items are summed to create a total score that ranges from 0-12, where higher scores indicate a greater number of food rules used.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months

  6. Weight control self-efficacy

    Change in weight control self-efficacy using the 20-item self-report Weight Efficacy Lifestyle Questionnaire, from baseline to 3, and 6 months. Items are rated on a scale of 0-9, and summed for a total score ranging from 0-180, with higher scores indicated greater self-efficacy.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months

  7. Self-efficacy for exercise

    Change in self-efficacy for exercise, as measured by the self-reported Self-Efficacy and Exercise Habits Survey, from baseline to 3, and 6 months. Responses for two subscales (Sticking to it - 8 items, Making time for exercise - 4 items) are averaged to yield a score from 1 to 5, with higher values representing higher self-efficacy for exercise.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months

  8. Self-regulation

    Change in self-regulation as measured by the 26-item self-report Eating Behavior Inventory, from baseline to 3, and 6 months. Scores range from 26-130, with higher scores indicating more use of positive eating behaviors.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months

  9. Depressive symptoms

    Change in depressive symptoms, as measured by the self-report 20-tem Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), from baseline to 3, and 6 months. Scores range from 0-60, with higher scores indicating more depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months

  10. Stress

    Change in stress, as measured by the self-report 10-item Perceived Stress scale, from baseline to 3 and 6 months. Scores range from 0-40, with higher scores indicating greater stress.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 16, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03973424
Lead sponsor
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Collaborators
The Obesity Society
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 4, 2019
Start date
Aug 14, 2019
Primary completion
May 6, 2020
Completion
May 21, 2020
Last update
Jun 16, 2020

Study contacts

Brooke Nezami, PhD
principal investigator · University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion