A Phase 1/2 interventional study of DREPAGLOBE drug product in Sickle Cell Disease, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 20 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-05.
Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Gene Therapy of the Sickle Cell disease by Transplantation of an Autologous CD34+ enriched cell fraction that contains CD34+ cells transduced ex vivo with the GLOBE1 lentiviral vector expressing the βAS3 globin gene (GLOBE1 βAS3 Modified Autologous CD34+ Cells) in Patients with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)
1,103 studies on the registry are indexed under Anemia, Sickle Cell; 235 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 6 is below the median of 40 across 750 interventional studies indexed under Anemia, Sickle Cell.
Browse Anemia, Sickle Cell studies →Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,505 studies on the registry; 1,006 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Clinical history or ongoing evidence of severe sickle cell anemia with one OR more of the following clinical complications demonstrating disease severity:
Exclusion Criteria:
The DREPAGLOBE is a genetically modified cell therapy product that consists of autologous human CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) that are enriched in CD34+ cells which have been transduced ex vivo with the lentiviral vector, GLOBE1, expressing an anti-sickling β-globin protein (AS3) containing three amino acid substitutions in the wild-type β-globin gene.
Genetic: DREPAGLOBE drug product
Each patient will receive a single IV infusion of DREPAGLOBE drug product
Incidence of transplant related mortality
To evaluate the procedure safety
Time frame: up to 100 days post treatment
Incidence of the need for rescue autologous bone marrow transplant
To evaluate the procedure safety
Time frame: up to 100 days post treatment
Frequency and severity of AEs post transplant transplant
Based on the United States national Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03 To evaluate the procedure safety
Time frame: 6 months post-transplant
Incidence of vector-derived Replication competent lentivirus (RCL)
To evaluate the procedure safety
Time frame: 6 months post-transplant
Incidence of clinically detectable malignancy and/or abnormal clonal dominance assessed as related to study treatment
To evaluate the procedure safety.It will be evaluated by vector insertion site analysis (VISA.
Time frame: 6 months post-transplant
Concentration of neutrophil
To evaluate the efficacy
Time frame: 6 months post-transplant
Concentration of platelet
To evaluate the efficacy. It will be quantified by High performance liquid chromatography
Time frame: 6 months post-transplant
Percentage HbAS3
To evaluate the efficacy. It will be quantified by High performance liquid chromatography It will be quantified by High performance liquid chromatography
Time frame: 6 months post-transplant
Frequency and severity of adverse events
based on the United States national Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03 To evaluate the long -term safety
Time frame: 24 months post-transplant
Absence of RCL (Replication competent lentivirus)
To evaluate the long -term safety
Time frame: 24 months post-transplant
Absence of clinically detectable malignancy or abnormal clonal dominance assessed as related to study treatment
To evaluate the long -term safety. It will be evaluated by vector insertion site analysis (VISA).
Time frame: 24 months post-transplant
Protein expression through percentage of anti-sickling Hb
To evaluate the long -term efficacy
Time frame: 24 months post-transplant
This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris