CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03964792DREPAGLOBEUpdated Mar 5, 2026

Safety and Efficacy of Gene Therapy of the Sickle Cell Disease by Transplantation of an Autologous CD34+ Enriched Cell Fraction That Contains CD34+ Cells Transduced ex Vivo With the GLOBE1 Lentiviral Vector Expressing the βAS3 Globin Gene in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease (DREPAGLOBE)

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of DREPAGLOBE drug product in Sickle Cell Disease, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 20 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-05.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
6
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
12 Years to 20 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Gene Therapy of the Sickle Cell disease by Transplantation of an Autologous CD34+ enriched cell fraction that contains CD34+ cells transduced ex vivo with the GLOBE1 lentiviral vector expressing the βAS3 globin gene (GLOBE1 βAS3 Modified Autologous CD34+ Cells) in Patients with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)

02

Conditions studied

  • Sickle Cell Disease

Browse trials for

03

In context

Anemia, Sickle Cell

1,103 studies on the registry are indexed under Anemia, Sickle Cell; 235 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 6 is below the median of 40 across 750 interventional studies indexed under Anemia, Sickle Cell.

Browse Anemia, Sickle Cell studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,505 studies on the registry; 1,006 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 20 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • - Age 12-20 years
  • Diagnosis of HbSS or S-beta zero thalassemia by Hb electrophoresis or genetic analysis.
  • Clinical history or ongoing evidence of severe sickle cell anemia with one OR more of the following clinical complications demonstrating disease severity:

    • At least 3 vaso occlusive crises requiring hospitalization, under hydroxyurea or transfusion, within 2 years prior to enrollment
    • One severe acute chest syndrome (ACS) hospitalized in intensive care unit
    • At least 2 episodes of ACS within the prior 3 years), including one under HU.
    • Acute priapism (at least 2 episodes > 3h in the preceding year or in the year prior to the start of a regular transfusion program), OR stuttering priapism ≥ 1 by week under sickle cell treatment (HU, transfusion or phlebotomy).
    • Cerebral vasculopathy confirmed by MRA (magnetic resonance angiography) without Moya-moya
    • Presence of sickle cell cardiomyopathy documented by Doppler echocardiography (left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \<55% AND tricuspid regurgitation velocity >2.5m/s on cardiac echocardiograph),
    • Tricuspid regurgitation velocity >2.8m/s on cardiac echocardiograph without pulmonary hypertension confirmed by right heart catheterization (mPAP\<25mmHg)
  • Failed hydroxyurea (HU) therapy, were unable to tolerate HU therapy, or, if 18 years of age or older, have actively made the choice to not take the recommended daily HU regimen. Inadequate clinical response to HU, defined as any one of the following outcomes, while on HU for at least 3 months: 2 or more acute sickle pain crises requiring hospitalization, no rise in Hb >1.5 gm/dl from pre-HU baseline or requires transfusion to maintain Hb > 6.0 gm/dL, had an episode of ACS despite adequate supportive care measures.
  • Karnovsky/Lansky performance score ≥ 60%
  • Sexually active patients must be willing to use an acceptable method of double-barrier contraception for at least 12 months post-infusion (beyond 12 months at the discretion of the investigator)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chromosomal (karyotyping) or molecular anomalies (detected by NGS) ( ie 7 chromosomal monosomy)
  • Existence of a matched sibling donor
  • Patients who have started new treatment for SCD within 6months of enrollment
  • Hematologic evaluation: Leukopenia (WBC \< 3000 µL) ( en cours) or neutropenia (ANC \< 1000 µL) or thrombocytopenia (platelet count \< 100,000 µL) (not due to an erythropheresis procedure)
  • PT/INR or PTT > 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN) or clinically significant bleeding disorder
  • Evaluations within 6 months prior to screening visit:
  • ALT or AST > 3 times ULN
  • Liver Cirrhosis suspicion on echography, CT scan or MRI AND confirmed by histology
  • Cardiac evaluation: LVEF \< 40% by cardiac echocardiogram or by MUGA scan
  • Stroke with significant CNS sequelae i.e., Rankin > 2
  • Lung interstitial infiltrate AND Forced Vital Capacity less than 70% AND DLCO less than 60% at steady state
  • Confirmed pulmonary hypertension defined by a right heart catheterization (PAPm>25mmHg). Right heart catheterization is required if tricuspid regurgitation velocity >2.8m/s on cardiac echocardiograph OR >2.5m/s with an abnormal Brain Natriuretic Peptide dosage or an important decrease in transcutaneous Hb O2 saturation during the 6 minutes walk test.
  • Seropositivity for HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus), HCV (Hepatitis C Virus), HTLV-1 (Human T-Lymphotropic Virus), or active Hepatitis B Virus, or active infection by CMV or parvovirus B19, based on positive blood PCR.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding in a postpartum female
  • Any current cancer or prior history of a malignant disease, with the exception of curatively treated non-melanoma skin cancer
  • Immediate family member with an established or suspected Familial Cancer Syndrome
  • Diagnosis of significant psychiatric disorder of the subject that could seriously impeded the ability to participate in the study
  • Patients who failed previous HSCT and are severely ill
  • Any clinically significant active infection
  • Participation in another clinical study with an investigational drug within 30 days of screening
  • Any condition, based on perspective of the medical monitor and treating investigator, which may lead to increased safety risk or inability to comply with the protocol
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
6 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    DREPAGLOBE drug product

    The DREPAGLOBE is a genetically modified cell therapy product that consists of autologous human CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) that are enriched in CD34+ cells which have been transduced ex vivo with the lentiviral vector, GLOBE1, expressing an anti-sickling β-globin protein (AS3) containing three amino acid substitutions in the wild-type β-globin gene.

    Genetic: DREPAGLOBE drug product

Interventions

  • GeneticDREPAGLOBE drug product

    Each patient will receive a single IV infusion of DREPAGLOBE drug product

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of transplant related mortality

    To evaluate the procedure safety

    Time frame: up to 100 days post treatment

  2. Incidence of the need for rescue autologous bone marrow transplant

    To evaluate the procedure safety

    Time frame: up to 100 days post treatment

  3. Frequency and severity of AEs post transplant transplant

    Based on the United States national Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03 To evaluate the procedure safety

    Time frame: 6 months post-transplant

  4. Incidence of vector-derived Replication competent lentivirus (RCL)

    To evaluate the procedure safety

    Time frame: 6 months post-transplant

  5. Incidence of clinically detectable malignancy and/or abnormal clonal dominance assessed as related to study treatment

    To evaluate the procedure safety.It will be evaluated by vector insertion site analysis (VISA.

    Time frame: 6 months post-transplant

Secondary outcomes

  1. Concentration of neutrophil

    To evaluate the efficacy

    Time frame: 6 months post-transplant

  2. Concentration of platelet

    To evaluate the efficacy. It will be quantified by High performance liquid chromatography

    Time frame: 6 months post-transplant

  3. Percentage HbAS3

    To evaluate the efficacy. It will be quantified by High performance liquid chromatography It will be quantified by High performance liquid chromatography

    Time frame: 6 months post-transplant

  4. Frequency and severity of adverse events

    based on the United States national Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03 To evaluate the long -term safety

    Time frame: 24 months post-transplant

  5. Absence of RCL (Replication competent lentivirus)

    To evaluate the long -term safety

    Time frame: 24 months post-transplant

  6. Absence of clinically detectable malignancy or abnormal clonal dominance assessed as related to study treatment

    To evaluate the long -term safety. It will be evaluated by vector insertion site analysis (VISA).

    Time frame: 24 months post-transplant

  7. Protein expression through percentage of anti-sickling Hb

    To evaluate the long -term efficacy

    Time frame: 24 months post-transplant

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Biotherapy, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital
    Paris, 75015, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sobrino S, Joseph L, Magrin E, Chalumeau A, Hebert N, Corsia A, Denis A, Roudaut C, Aussel C, Leblanc O, Brusson M, Felix T, Diana JS, Petrichenko A, El Etri J, Godard A, Tibi E, Manceau S, Treluyer JM, Mavilio F, Bushman FD, Marcais A, Castelle M, Neven B, Hermine O, Renolleau S, Magnani A, Asnafi V, El Nemer W, Bartolucci P, Six E, Semeraro M, Miccio A, Cavazzana M. Severe inflammation and lineage skewing are associated with poor engraftment of engineered hematopoietic stem cells in patients with sickle cell disease. Nat Commun. 2025 Apr 1;16(1):3137. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-58321-4. PubMed 40169559 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 5, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03964792
Lead sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Collaborators
URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 28, 2019
Start date
Nov 12, 2019
Primary completion
Jul 28, 2022
Completion
Jan 23, 2024
Last update
Mar 5, 2026

Study contacts

Pablo BARTULOCCI, MD & PhD
study director · Department of internal medicine, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Creteil, France.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion