CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03964766Updated Jul 19, 2019

Pulpectomy of Primary Molars With Rotary Instrumentation Versus Manual Instrumentation

An interventional study of Rotary instrumentation and Hand instrumentation in Chronic and Infection, sponsored by Cairo University. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 4 Years to 6 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-07-19.

Sponsored by Cairo University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified May 2019), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
42
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
4 Years to 6 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

One of the major concerns in pediatric dentistry is premature loss of necrotic primary teeth which may cause a deleterious effect on the growth of the facial skeletal complex. In order to sustain the primary tooth as a natural space maintainer, pulpectomy is considered the treatment of choice.

The essential part of endodontic treatment is to shape and clean the root canal effectively from infected tissue with microbial reduction, whilst maintaining the original configuration without creating any procedural errors . Even though, manual instrumentation as used for that purpose in deciduous teeth, presents some limitation concerning root canal cleaning, anatomical fidelity and chair-side time.

To achieve successful pulpectomy technique for the primary dentition in a fast and simple procedure, with short chair time as well as effective debridement of the root canals, rotary instrumentation is one of the methods recommended over the manual.

Read the detailed description
  1. Trial design:

    Randomized clinical trial, parallel groups design with 1:1 allocation ratio.

  2. Method:

    Interventions

    A. Diagnostic procedure:

    • Clinical examination will be done on the dental clinic using mirror and probe to assess the eligibility.
    • Diagnosis of the cases will be performed according to guidelines of AAPD 2017 for treatment of vital pulp therapy in primary teeth.
    • An individual XCP (Extension Cone Paralleling) index will be prepared for each patient by registering the bite to allow consistent comparisons of the radiographs.
    • Preoperative periapical radiograph and photographs will be taken a baseline record.

    B. Intra operative procedure:

    • Local anesthesia administration using articaine 4% with epinephrine 1:100000.
    • Rubber dam application and access cavity preparation will be established using a sterile bur.
    • Coronal pulp tissue will be removed using sharp large spoon excavator.
    • Working length will be determined using no 15 hand K-file that will be kept 2mm short of radiographic apex.
    • Then, the root canal preparation will be done

      • In control group, hand instrumentation will be carried out using hand K-file up to no. 30 K-file using quarter turn and pull motion.
      • In intervention group, rotary instrumentation will be preceded by initial hand instrumentation using no. 15 K-file to check the patency. Then, the rotary instrumentation will be done using the Kedo-S rotary files for primary teeth with D1 and E1.
    • Using EDTA gel as a lubricating paste during canal preparation with rotary files.
    • Saline irrigation for removal of debris after each file.
    • Dryness will be done using paper points size 35 and 40.
    • Root canals will be obturated using calcium hydroxide iodoform paste (Metapex). The Metapex syringe willbe inserted into the root canal space, near the apex. The paste will be pressed down into the canals and the syringe will be slowly withdrawn.
    • The access cavity will be sealed using GC Fuji IX capsule.
    • The immediate postoperative radiograph will be done to reveal optimal filling with metapex.
    • After that, stainless steel crowns will be cemented by Ketac Cem.

    C. Follow up:

    Clinical and radiographic evaluation will be performed at 1week, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.

    D. Criteria for discontinuing or modifying intervention:

    In case of unsuccessful outcomes of the intervention technique, the case will be managed .

  3. Recruitment:

    Recruitment of the patients will be from the outpatient clinic of Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health Department, Cairo University. Screening of patients will continue until the target population is achieved.

  4. Implementation Co-supervisor; Fatma Korany will assign which participant tooth will be included to either control or intervention groups according to the generated random sequence.
  5. Masking/blinding:

The radiographic outcomes assessor will be blinded in this study. 8- Data collection, management, and analysis: 9- Data collection methods

Baseline data will be collected by the operator through a paper-based Case Report custom made form (CRF) which will be developed by the research team. It will include the following items:

  1. Patient serial number.
  2. Demographic data.
  3. Patients medical history:

    • Past medical history.
    • Any present disease or illness.
    • Current medication.
    • Any specific pre-treatment medication.
  4. Past dental history.
  5. Records for current dental condition (intra-oral examination and caries index). The custom made CRF will be developed before online registration of the study protocol. CRF will be anonymous where patients will be identified by their serial number. The full detailed personal data of the patient will be written in a separate sheet having the patient's serial number for further contact with patient, this sheet can be only seen by the operator and the supervisors. The Co-supervisor; Dr.Fatma Korany, will have the role to monitor the process of data collection and check if there is any incomplete CRF.
02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic
  • Infection

Keywords

  • rotary files
  • Primary molar
  • Pulpectomy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Cairo University is the lead sponsor of 4,780 studies on the registry; 1,427 are open to participants now.

Of its 36 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (14%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years to 6 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Primary posterior teeth requiring pulpectomy.
  • Cooperative patient in age range from 4 to 6 years
  • Absence of internal or external pathologic root resorption.
  • Presence of adequate coronal tooth structure.
  • Two-thirds of each root remaining.
  • Parent or guardian agree for participant in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Excessive mobility.
  • Children lacking cooperative ability.
  • Children with underlying systemic disease.
  • Children with special health care needs.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
42 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    rotary instrumentation

    endodontic treatment will be performed with the use of pedo rotary files that will be activated by engine

    Device: Rotary instrumentation

  • Active comparator
    hand istrumentation

    endodontic treatment will be performed with the use of conventional hand files

    Device: Hand instrumentation

Interventions

  • DeviceRotary instrumentation

    using pedo rotary files in cleaning and shaping the root canals of infected primary molars

  • DeviceHand instrumentation

    using conventional hand files in cleaning and shaping the root canals of infected primary molars

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative pain: modified wong-baker pain rating scale

    pain will be assessed using modified wong-baker pain rating scale (0-3),(zero)-no pain; ( one)-slight pain; (two)-moderate pain; and (three)-severe pain.

    Time frame: 12 hours

  2. postoperative pain: modified wong-baker pain rating scale

    pain will be assessed using modified wong-baker pain rating scale (0-3),(zero)-no pain; ( one)-slight pain; (two)-moderate pain; and (three)-severe pain.

    Time frame: 24 hours

  3. postoperative pain: modified wong-baker pain rating scale

    pain will be assessed using modified wong-baker pain rating scale (0-3),(zero)-no pain; ( one)-slight pain; (two)-moderate pain; and (three)-severe pain.

    Time frame: 48 hours

  4. Postoperative pain: modified wong-baker pain rating scale

    pain will be assessed using modified wong-baker pain rating scale (0-3),(zero)-no pain; ( one)-slight pain; (two)-moderate pain; and (three)-severe pain.

    Time frame: 72 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Tenderness to percussion

    Percussion test ,Binary (+/-)

    Time frame: Up to 1 year

  2. Fistula

    Visual examination by operator,Binary (+/-)

    Time frame: Up to 1 year

  3. Instrumentation time

    The time spent using both techniques will be measured and compared between the groups. The time will be recorded in minutes using a stopwatch since the beginning of instrumentation until the beginning of restorative procedure.

    Time frame: 15 Minutes

  4. Furcation or periapical radiolucency

    Digital Radiograph ,Binary (+/-)

    Time frame: 6 month

  5. Furcation or periapical radiolucency

    Digital Radiograph ,Binary (+/-)

    Time frame: 12 month

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Panchal V, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian E. Comparison of instrumentation time and obturation quality between hand K-file, H-files, and rotary Kedo-S in root canal treatment of primary teeth: A randomized controlled trial. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2019 Jan-Mar;37(1):75-79. doi: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_72_18. PubMed 30804311 ↗
  • Makarem A, Ravandeh N, Ebrahimi M. Radiographic assessment and chair time of rotary instruments in the pulpectomy of primary second molar teeth: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2014 Spring;8(2):84-9. doi: 10.5681/joddd.2014.015. Epub 2014 Jun 11. PubMed 25093051 ↗
  • Panchal V, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian EMG. Comparison of post-operative pain after root canal instrumentation with hand K-files, H-files and rotary Kedo-S files in primary teeth: a randomised clinical trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2019 Oct;20(5):467-472. doi: 10.1007/s40368-019-00429-5. Epub 2019 Mar 12. PubMed 30864090 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — after thesis defense. the study will be published internationally to be available for everyone

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr, Analytic code

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 19, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03964766
Lead sponsor
Cairo University
Responsible party
Azhar Abdulrahman Ali Saleh Al-wesabi (phD student, Cairo University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 28, 2019
Start date
Dec 2019 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 19, 2019

Study contacts

azhar al-wesabi
Contact
azharali5255@gmail.com
01023725522
Fatma Abdelgawad, PhD
Contact
fatma.abdelgawad@dentistry.cu.edu.eg
Fatma Abdelgawad, PhD
study director · Lecturer of Pediatric Dentistry
Kamal El Motayam, PhD
study chair · Professor of Pediatric Dentistry

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in May 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion