CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03957590Updated Apr 13, 2026Results posted

A Study to Investigate Tislelizumab (BGB-A317) Versus Placebo in Combination With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Participants With Localized Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

A Phase 3 interventional study of Tislelizumab and Placebo in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC), sponsored by BeiGene. Completed at 33 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-13.

Sponsored by BeiGene · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
370
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to compare the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab (BGB-A317) versus placebo in combination with chemoradiotherapy in participants with localized esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

02

Conditions studied

  • Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC)
03

In context

Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

645 studies on the registry are indexed under Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma; 275 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 370 is above the median of 65 across 539 interventional studies indexed under Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Browse Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma studies →

Lead sponsor

BeiGene is the lead sponsor of 122 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Of its 52 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 31 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically confirmed diagnosis of localized ESCC and suitable for concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT)
  • Measurable and/or non-measurable disease defined per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status ≤ 1
  • Adequate organ function

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Indicators of severe malnutrition
  • Clinically uncontrolled pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, or ascites requiring frequent drainage or medical intervention within 2 weeks prior to randomization
  • Known to be intolerable or resistant to treatment with the protocol-specified chemotherapy
  • Received prior radiotherapy or therapies targeting programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), programmed cell death protein ligand-1 (PD-L1), PD-L2 or other immune-oncology therapies
  • Active autoimmune diseases or history of autoimmune diseases that may relapse

NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
370 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Tislelizumab + Chemoradiotherapy

    Participants received 200 mg tislelizumab administered intravenously (IV) once every 3 weeks in combination with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for up to approximately 6 weeks followed by 200 mg tislelizumab for a total of up to 24 months (about 35 cycles), or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or another treatment discontinuation criterion was met, whichever occurred first. Concurrent chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin (25 mg/m² IV; Days 1-3 of each 3-week cycle) in combination with paclitaxel (135 mg/m² IV; Day 1 of each 3-week cycle) and radiotherapy was delivered in 28 fractions (total dose, 50.4 Gy).

    Drug: Tislelizumab · Drug: Paclitaxel · Drug: Cisplatin · Radiation: Radiotherapy

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo + Chemoradiotherapy

    Participants received placebo IV once every 3 weeks in combination with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for up to approximately 6 weeks followed by placebo for a total of up to 24 months (about 35 cycles), or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or another treatment discontinuation criterion was met, whichever occurred first. Concurrent chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin (25 mg/m² IV; Days 1-3 of each 3-week cycle) in combination with paclitaxel (135 mg/m² IV; Day 1 of each 3-week cycle) and radiotherapy was delivered in 28 fractions (total dose, 50.4 Gy).

    Drug: Placebo · Drug: Paclitaxel · Drug: Cisplatin · Radiation: Radiotherapy

Interventions

  • DrugTislelizumab

    Administered intravenously (IV)

    Also known as: BGB-A317, Tevimbra

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo to match tislelizumab administered intravenously

  • DrugPaclitaxel

    Administered as 135 mg/m² IV injection

  • DrugCisplatin

    Administered as 25 mg/m² IV injection

  • RadiationRadiotherapy

    Administered at a total dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Progression-free Survival (PFS)

    PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression, as determined by the Blinded Independent Review Committee (BIRC) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm, and/or unequivocal progression of existing nontarget lesions. or the appearance of one or more new lesions.

    Time frame: From randomization to the prespecified primary analysis data cut-off date of 08 January 2025; maximum time on study was 67 months.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival (OS)

    OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

    Time frame: From randomization to the prespecified analysis data cut-off date of 08 January 2025; maximum time on study was 67 months.

  2. Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Oesophageal Cancer Module (OES18) Dysphagia, Reflux, Pain, and Eating Scales

    The EORTC-QLQ-OES18 is the specific esophageal symptoms module of the QLQ-C30. QLQ-OES18 is comprised of 18 questions grouped into 4 multi-item subscales: Dysphagia (3 items), Eating (4 items), Reflux (2 items), and Pain (3 items) and 6 single item subscales (saliva swallowing, choking, dry mouth, taste, coughing, and talking). Participants indicate the extent to which they have experienced symptoms on a scale from 1 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). Scores are calculated and transformed to a scale from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate a higher level of symptomatology or problems.

    Time frame: Baseline and Cycle 6 and Cycle 10 (each cycle was 21 days)

  3. Change From Baseline in EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QOL), Physical Functioning, and Fatigue Scores

    The EORTC QLQ-30 contains 30 questions that incorporate 5 functional scales (physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and social functioning), 1 global health status scale, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). The participant answers questions about their health during the past week. There are 28 questions answered on a 4-point scale where 1 = Not at all (best) and 4 = Very Much (worst) and 2 global health quality of life (QOL) questions answered on a 7-point scale where 1 = Very poor and 7 = Excellent. Raw scores are transformed into a 0 to 100 scale via linear transformation. Higher scores in GHS and functional scales indicate better quality of life. Lower scores in symptom scales indicate better quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline and Cycle 6 and Cycle 10 (each cycle was 21 days)

  4. Overall Response Rate (ORR)

    ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who had complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as assessed by BIRC per RECIST v1.1. Tumor assessments were made using computed tomography (CT) scans or using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). CR: Disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions, no new lesions, and normalization of tumor marker level. All lymph nodes must be nonpathological in size (\<10 mm short axis). PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters and/or persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits.

    Time frame: Tumor assessments occurred every 9 weeks for the first 54 weeks, and every 12 weeks during the next 2 years and every 24 weeks thereafter until radiographic disease progression or death; up to 67 months

  5. Duration of Response (DOR)

    DOR is defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented objective response to the time of relapse, as determined by the BIRC per RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

    Time frame: Up to 67 months

  6. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    An adverse event (AE) is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether considered related to study treatment or not. A TEAE is an AE that had an onset date or a worsening in severity from baseline on or after the first dose of study treatment and up to 30 days following study treatment discontinuation or initiation of new anticancer therapy, whichever occurred first. A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: * Resulted in death * Was life-threatening * Required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization * Resulted in disability/incapacity * Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect * Was considered a significant medical AE by the investigator based on medical judgement.

    Time frame: From first dose of study drug to 30 days after last dose, maximum time on treatment was 57.5 months

07

Results

Posted Apr 13, 2026

Participant flow

This study was conducted at 32 centers in China.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTislelizumab + ChemoradiotherapyPlacebo + Chemoradiotherapy
Started185185
Received study drug185184
Completed00
Not completed185185
Withdrew: Death10093
Withdrew: Sponsor ended study8391
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject21

Outcome measures

PrimaryProgression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression, as determined by the Blinded Independent Review Committee (BIRC) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm, and/or unequivocal progression of existing nontarget lesions. or the appearance of one or more new lesions.

Time frame:
From randomization to the prespecified primary analysis data cut-off date of 08 January 2025; maximum time on study was 67 months.
Reported as:
Median · months
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
monthsTislelizumab + ChemoradiotherapyPlacebo + Chemoradiotherapy
Progression-free Survival (PFS)29.0 (18.8 to NA)28.9 (18.0 to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Tislelizumab + Chemoradiotherapy vs Placebo + Chemoradiotherapy · Log Rank · p = 0.3016 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.92 · 95% CI 0.68 to 1.25Hazard ratio was estimated from Cox regression model with Placebo + CRT group as reference group, adjusted for stratification factors: ECOG performance status (0 versus 1) and clinical stages (II/III versus IVa).
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS)

OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame:
From randomization to the prespecified analysis data cut-off date of 08 January 2025; maximum time on study was 67 months.
Reported as:
Median · months
Overall Survival (OS)
monthsTislelizumab + ChemoradiotherapyPlacebo + Chemoradiotherapy
Overall Survival (OS)39.2 (28.3 to NA)48.2 (30.2 to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Tislelizumab + Chemoradiotherapy vs Placebo + Chemoradiotherapy · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.10 · 95% CI 0.83 to 1.46Hazard ratio was estimated from a stratified Cox regression model stratified by stratification factors, ECOG performance status (0 versus 1) and clinical stages (II/III versus IVa).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Oesophageal Cancer Module (OES18) Dysphagia, Reflux, Pain, and Eating Scales

The EORTC-QLQ-OES18 is the specific esophageal symptoms module of the QLQ-C30. QLQ-OES18 is comprised of 18 questions grouped into 4 multi-item subscales: Dysphagia (3 items), Eating (4 items), Reflux (2 items), and Pain (3 items) and 6 single item subscales (saliva swallowing, choking, dry mouth, taste, coughing, and talking). Participants indicate the extent to which they have experienced symptoms on a scale from 1 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). Scores are calculated and transformed to a scale from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate a higher level of symptomatology or problems.

Time frame:
Baseline and Cycle 6 and Cycle 10 (each cycle was 21 days)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Oesophageal Cancer Module (OES18) Dysphagia, Reflux, Pain, and Eating Scales
score on a scaleTislelizumab + ChemoradiotherapyPlacebo + Chemoradiotherapy
Dysphagia at Cycle 64.2 (0.1 to 8.3)7.1 (3.1 to 11.1)
Dysphagia at Cycle 108.8 (4.6 to 13.0)7.6 (3.5 to 11.7)
Reflux at Cycle 6-4.3 (-5.9 to -2.7)-4.5 (-6.1 to -3.0)
Reflux at Cycle 10-4.9 (-6.7 to -3.1)-4.2 (-5.9 to -2.4)
Pain at Cycle 6-3.7 (-5.5 to -2.0)-3.4 (-5.1 to -1.6)
Pain at Cycle 10-5.4 (-6.9 to -3.9)-4.8 (-6.2 to -3.3)
Eating at Cycle 6-5.3 (-7.4 to -3.3)-6.3 (-8.3 to -4.3)
Eating at Cycle 10-5.8 (-8.0 to -3.6)-7.8 (-9.9 to -5.7)
Statistical analysis
  • Tislelizumab + Chemoradiotherapy vs Placebo + Chemoradiotherapy · Least squares (ls) mean difference: -2.9 · 95% CI -8.5 to 2.6
  • Tislelizumab + Chemoradiotherapy vs Placebo + Chemoradiotherapy · Ls mean difference: 1.2 · 95% CI -4.5 to 6.8
  • Tislelizumab + Chemoradiotherapy vs Placebo + Chemoradiotherapy · Slope: 0.2 · 95% CI -1.9 to 2.3
  • Tislelizumab + Chemoradiotherapy vs Placebo + Chemoradiotherapy · Ls mean difference: -0.7 · 95% CI -3.1 to 1.7
  • Tislelizumab + Chemoradiotherapy vs Placebo + Chemoradiotherapy · Ls mean difference: -0.4 · 95% CI -2.7 to 2.0
  • Tislelizumab + Chemoradiotherapy vs Placebo + Chemoradiotherapy · Ls mean difference: -0.6 · 95% CI -2.6 to 1.3
  • Tislelizumab + Chemoradiotherapy vs Placebo + Chemoradiotherapy · Ls mean difference: 0.9 · 95% CI -1.8 to 3.7
  • Tislelizumab + Chemoradiotherapy vs Placebo + Chemoradiotherapy · Ls mean difference: 2.0 · 95% CI -0.9 to 4.9
SecondaryChange From Baseline in EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QOL), Physical Functioning, and Fatigue Scores

The EORTC QLQ-30 contains 30 questions that incorporate 5 functional scales (physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and social functioning), 1 global health status scale, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). The participant answers questions about their health during the past week. There are 28 questions answered on a 4-point scale where 1 = Not at all (best) and 4 = Very Much (worst) and 2 global health quality of life (QOL) questions answered on a 7-point scale where 1 = Very poor and 7 = Excellent. Raw scores are transformed into a 0 to 100 scale via linear transformation. Higher scores in GHS and functional scales indicate better quality of life. Lower scores in symptom scales indicate better quality of life.

Time frame:
Baseline and Cycle 6 and Cycle 10 (each cycle was 21 days)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QOL), Physical Functioning, and Fatigue Scores
score on a scaleTislelizumab + ChemoradiotherapyPlacebo + Chemoradiotherapy
GHS/QoL at Cycle 62.461 ± 17.61131.572 ± 18.6143
GHS/QoL at Cycle 104.104 ± 16.00122.778 ± 19.2278
Physical Functioning at Cycle 6-2.864 ± 15.05260.294 ± 12.1488
Physical Functioning at Cycle 100.101 ± 9.60582.506 ± 10.6470
Fatigue at Cycle 62.013 ± 17.6655-0.280 ± 15.8101
Fatigue at Cycle 100.926 ± 15.9540-2.679 ± 17.4119
SecondaryOverall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who had complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as assessed by BIRC per RECIST v1.1. Tumor assessments were made using computed tomography (CT) scans or using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). CR: Disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions, no new lesions, and normalization of tumor marker level. All lymph nodes must be nonpathological in size (\<10 mm short axis). PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters and/or persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits.

Time frame:
Tumor assessments occurred every 9 weeks for the first 54 weeks, and every 12 weeks during the next 2 years and every 24 weeks thereafter until radiographic disease progression or death; up to 67 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
percentage of participantsTislelizumab + ChemoradiotherapyPlacebo + Chemoradiotherapy
Overall Response Rate (ORR)27.6 (21.3 to 34.6)38.9 (31.9 to 46.3)
SecondaryDuration of Response (DOR)

DOR is defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented objective response to the time of relapse, as determined by the BIRC per RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame:
Up to 67 months
Reported as:
Median · months
Duration of Response (DOR)
monthsTislelizumab + ChemoradiotherapyPlacebo + Chemoradiotherapy
Duration of Response (DOR)NA (NA to NA)NA (41.4 to NA)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether considered related to study treatment or not. A TEAE is an AE that had an onset date or a worsening in severity from baseline on or after the first dose of study treatment and up to 30 days following study treatment discontinuation or initiation of new anticancer therapy, whichever occurred first. A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: * Resulted in death * Was life-threatening * Required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization * Resulted in disability/incapacity * Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect * Was considered a significant medical AE by the investigator based on medical judgement.

Time frame:
From first dose of study drug to 30 days after last dose, maximum time on treatment was 57.5 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
ParticipantsTislelizumab + ChemoradiotherapyPlacebo + Chemoradiotherapy
Any adverse event185184
Serious Adverse events8463

Adverse events

Collected over Deaths are reported up to the end of the study, maximum time on study was 68.5 months. Adverse events were collected from first dose of study drug to 30 days after last dose, maximum time on treatment was 57.5 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 3% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Tislelizumab + Chemoradiotherapy100/185 (54.1%)84/185 (45.4%)185/185 (100%)
Placebo + Chemoradiotherapy93/185 (50.3%)63/184 (34.2%)184/184 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 102
Most frequent serious events
EventTislelizumab + ChemoradiotherapyPlacebo + Chemoradiotherapy
PneumoniaInfections and infestations20/1858/184
Immune-mediated lung diseaseRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders14/1852/184
Platelet count decreasedInvestigations6/1853/184
Oesophageal fistulaGastrointestinal disorders1/1855/184
Oesophageal obstructionGastrointestinal disorders5/1855/184
Radiation oesophagitisInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/1855/184
White blood cell count decreasedInvestigations3/1855/184
Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders2/1854/184
Cerebral infarctionNervous system disorders1/1854/184
DysphagiaGastrointestinal disorders4/1851/184
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 81
Most frequent other events
EventTislelizumab + ChemoradiotherapyPlacebo + Chemoradiotherapy
White blood cell count decreasedInvestigations147/185150/184
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders139/185138/184
Neutrophil count decreasedInvestigations126/185136/184
Radiation oesophagitisInjury, poisoning and procedural complications86/18593/184
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders89/18575/184
Platelet count decreasedInvestigations89/18584/184
Weight decreasedInvestigations84/18559/184
Lymphocyte count decreasedInvestigations65/18570/184
HypoalbuminaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders66/18569/184
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders67/18566/184

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Tislelizumab + ChemoradiotherapyPlacebo + ChemoradiotherapyTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years8684170
>=65 years99101200
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Tislelizumab + ChemoradiotherapyPlacebo + ChemoradiotherapyTotal
Median65.0 (46 to 75)65.0 (46 to 75)65.0 (46 to 75)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Tislelizumab + ChemoradiotherapyPlacebo + ChemoradiotherapyTotal
Female322456
Male153161314
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Tislelizumab + ChemoradiotherapyPlacebo + ChemoradiotherapyTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian185185370
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White000
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status(Participants)Tislelizumab + ChemoradiotherapyPlacebo + ChemoradiotherapyTotal
0 (Fully Active)7878156
1 (Ambulatory with Restricted Activity)107107214
Clinical Stage
Clinical Stage(Participants)Tislelizumab + ChemoradiotherapyPlacebo + ChemoradiotherapyTotal
Stage II444286
Stage III9697193
Stage IVa454590
Stage IVb011
08

Study locations

33 sites
  • Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
    Beijing, Beijing Municipality 100021, China
  • Beijing Cancer Hospital
    Beijing, Beijing Municipality 100142, China
  • Chongqing Cancer Hospital
    Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality 400030, China
  • Fujian Cancer Hospital
    Fuzhou, Fujian 350014, China
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University
    Xiamen, Fujian 361003, China
  • The First Affiliated Hospitalschool of Clinical Medicine of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University
    Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, China
  • Jieyang Peoples Hospital (Jieyang Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat Sen University )
    Jieyang, Guangdong 522000, China
  • Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital
    Harbin, Heilongjiang 150000, China
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University
    Xinxiang, Henan 453100, China
  • Henan Cancer Hospital
    Zhengzhou, Henan 450000, China
  • Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
    Wuhan, Hubei 430022, China
  • Hubei Cancer Hospital
    Wuhan, Hubei 430079, China
  • Hunan Cancer Hospital
    Changsha, Hunan 410013, China
  • Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Cancer Hospital
    Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010028, China
  • Changzhou Tumor(Fourth Peoples)Hospital
    Changzhou, Jiangsu 213000, China
  • The First Peoples Hospital of Lianyungang
    Lianyungang, Jiangsu 222002, China
  • Jiangsu Province Hospital
    Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, China
  • The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University
    Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221000, China
  • Northern Jiangsu Peoples Hospital
    Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225001, China
  • Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University
    Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212001, China
  • Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute
    Shenyang, Liaoning 110042, China
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Xian Jiaotong University
    Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China
  • Shandong Cancer Hospital
    Jinan, Shandong 250117, China
  • Weifang Peoples Hospital
    Weifang, Shandong 261000, China
  • Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center
    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality 200000, China
  • Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College
    Changzhi, Shanxi 046000, China
  • Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute
    Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
  • West China Hospital, Sichuan University
    Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
  • Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital
    Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality 300060, China
  • Hangzhou Cancer Hospital
    Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310002, China
  • The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
    Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, China
  • Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
    Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310016, China
  • Jinhua Municipal Central Hospital
    Jinhua, Zhejiang 321000, China
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Yu R, Wang W, Li T, Li J, Zhao K, Wang W, Liang L, Wu H, Ai T, Huang W, Li L, Yu W, Wei C, Wang Y, Shen W, Xiao Z. RATIONALE 311: tislelizumab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for localized esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Future Oncol. 2021 Nov;17(31):4081-4089. doi: 10.2217/fon-2021-0632. Epub 2021 Jul 16. PubMed 34269067 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Sep 30, 2024
  • Statistical analysis plan · Nov 14, 2024

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — BeiGene shares data on completed studies responsibly and provides qualified scientific and medical researchers access to data and supporting documentation for clinical trials in dossiers for medicines and indications after submission and approval in the United States, China, and Europe. Clinical trials supporting subsequent local approvals, new indications, or combination products are eligible for sharing once corresponding regulatory approvals are achieved. BeiGene shares data only when permitted by applicable data privacy and security laws and regulations, when it is feasible to do so without compromising the privacy of study participants, and other considerations. Qualified researchers with appropriate competencies who are engaged in novel scientific research may submit a request for participant-level data with a research proposal for BeiGene review. Research teams must include a biostatistician and sign a Data Sharing Agreement prior to receiving access to clinical trial data.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Csr

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 13, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03957590
Lead sponsor
BeiGene
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 21, 2019
Start date
Jun 11, 2019
Primary completion
Jan 8, 2025
Completion
Mar 31, 2025
Results posted
Apr 13, 2026
Last update
Apr 13, 2026

Study contacts

Weihu Wang, MD
principal investigator · Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute
Zefen Xiao, MD
principal investigator · Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion