CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03952104ST-QOLUpdated Jul 16, 2020

Strength Training and Quality of Life in Elderly

An interventional study of Strength training in Quality of Life, sponsored by Cardenal Herrera University. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-07-16.

Sponsored by Cardenal Herrera University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Aim: To evaluate the impact of three different strength training programs on psychological wellbeing of elderly.

Read the detailed description

Background: Physical activity in the elderly has benefits which improve psychological wellbeing. However, the majority of older adults perform less physical activity with advancing age.

Aim: To evaluate the impact of three different 32-week strength training programs (low, moderate and high intensity) on psychological wellbeing of elderly.

Design: Randomized Controlled Trial.

02

Conditions studied

  • Quality of Life
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Cardenal Herrera University is the lead sponsor of 104 studies on the registry; 23 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • age ≥60 years;
  • having the ability to speak and write in Spanish;
  • having the ability to complete the questionnaires independently.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

-the presence of any medical problem or pathology that could hinder physical activity practice

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
80 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental-Low Intensity Strength Training

    Strength training (low intensity)

    Other: Strength training

  • Experimental
    Experimental-Moderate Intensity Strength Training

    Strength training (moderate intensity)

    Other: Strength training

  • Experimental
    Experimental-High Intensity Strength Training

    Strength training (high intensity)

    Other: Strength training

  • No intervention
    Control

    No intervention

Interventions

  • OtherStrength training

    Strength training

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Quality of life, assessed through the Short Form 36 health survey questionnaire.

    This questionnaire measures quality of live. It provides information on 8 scales, scoring from 0 (worst health) to 100 (best health), and on the physical component scale (PCS) and the mental component scale (MCS), normalized scores representing overall physical and mental functioning.

    Time frame: 32 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Emotional wellbeing, assessed through the STAI (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) questionnaire.

    The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) is a commonly used measure of trait and state anxiety (Spielberger, Gorsuch, Lushene, Vagg, \& Jacobs, 1983). It can be used in clinical settings to diagnose anxiety and to distinguish it from depressive syndromes. It also is often used in research as an indicator of caregiver distress. STAI has 20 items for assessing trait anxiety and 20 for state anxiety. All items are rated on a 4-point scale (e.g., from "Almost Never" to "Almost Always"). Higher scores indicate greater anxiety.

    Time frame: 32 weeks

  2. Motivation towards physical activity, assessed through the Behavioural Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-2)

    This questionnaire consists of 19 items measuring stages on the continuum of self-determination. It measures external regulation (4 items), introjected regulation (3 items), identified regulation (4 items), intrinsic regulation (4 items), and it adds amotivation (4 items) on a scale from 1 (Not at all true for me) to 5 (Absolutely true for me). Each of the subscales has a maximum score, with a maximum of 20 for external regulation, identified regulation, intrinsic regulation and amotivation, and 15 for introjected regulation.

    Time frame: 32 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera
    Moncada, Valencia 46113, Spain
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 16, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03952104
Lead sponsor
Cardenal Herrera University
Responsible party
Juan F. Lisón Párraga, Dr (Head of Medicine, Cardenal Herrera University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 16, 2019
Start date
May 22, 2019
Primary completion
Jul 10, 2020
Completion
Jul 10, 2020
Last update
Jul 16, 2020

Study contacts

JF Lisón, PhD
study director · Cardenal Herrera University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion