CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03937232Updated May 3, 2019

Mirrored Movement Compared to Cross-education

An interventional study of Cross-Education and Mirror Visual Feedback in Hand Injuries, sponsored by McMaster University. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 16 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-05-03.

Sponsored by McMaster University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified May 2019), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Recovery after a hand or wrist injury often includes wearing a cast, or limiting daily activities to help with healing, but this may lead to deconditioning. Previous research suggests resistance training with the healthy arm during this period could help improve recovery of the injured arm: this is called cross-education. Mirror visual feedback (e.g. watching the movement of an uninjured hand in front of a mirror hiding the injured hand to create the illusion both hands are moving) is another cross-body method which can improve recovery after stroke, and prevent or reduce pain in complex regional pain syndrome. Both of these treatments may work because they activate a specific area in the brain: using them together might strengthen the effects. However, this has never been studied after injury. The investigators are proposing a pilot study to see if it is possible and helpful to use these treatments in combination to improve recovery of grip strength and reduction of pain and disability. The investigators will use this information as a foundation to tell us how to run the best study to test these ideas in ways to be confident in the results.

Read the detailed description

When someone has an injury to the hand or wrist, often the person's doctor and therapists will ask them to use a cast or a splint to protect the body while it heals. They also may ask the person not to do certain movements, or any activities where it is necessary to use the hand for squeezing or gripping. This is important to allow healing, but the injured arm can become weaker during this period. New research has demonstrated that performing specific forms of exercise on the uninjured side can help speed recovery on the injured side, even when the injured hand is still in a cast.

Two of these types of exercise are called cross-education and mirror visual feedback. Cross-education means doing resistance or strengthening exercises on the uninjured side while the injured side is resting. Mirror visual feedback is performing exercise or movements with the uninjured hand in front of a mirror, hiding the injured hand resting behind the mirror, so it looks like the injured hand is doing the exercises too. The investigators think both of these exercises work because they use the same part of the brain, part of our movement control network that helps us coordinate movements on both sides of the body. Perhaps they might work even better if used together.

This study will test cross-education, mirror visual feedback or cross-education combined with mirror visual feedback added to the usual therapy after a hand or wrist injury. The investigators need to be sure that this is better than usual care, so some people who participate in the study will just have the usual care, and not do any extra exercise. Because limited research has been done on these methods after injury, this will be a small study to test the best ways to run a big study that will provide solid proof about these ideas. That means the investigators will ask participants to keep track of how often they do their exercises, and to tell the study team about any problems or concerns they have when they are doing their exercises.

If it can be demonstrated that cross-exercise and/or mirror visual feedback can speed up or improve recovery after a hand or wrist injury, it might help participants get back to work and their usual activities faster and with less pain. These treatments don't cost a lot of money or need a lot of special equipment, so they could be used in many different countries. If the study can show these exercises help with hand and wrist injuries, they might also be able to be used for therapy after stroke, or with other kinds of injuries like foot and ankle fractures.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hand Injuries

Browse trials for

03

In context

Hand Injuries

108 studies on the registry are indexed under Hand Injuries; 31 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is above the median of 56 across 84 interventional studies indexed under Hand Injuries.

Browse Hand Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

McMaster University is the lead sponsor of 720 studies on the registry; 124 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (33%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 16 or older
  • Acute injury to one hand or wrist requiring protection or immobilization, including fractures (managed conservatively or with surgery), tendon laceration/repairs, burns, and/or ligament injuries/repairs
  • Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to complete study questionnaires in English
  • Traumatic injuries to other limbs or axial skeleton (e.g. whiplash, rib fracture, concurrent lower limb injury)
  • Anticipates difficulty to return for follow-up visits (i.e. out of catchment)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Cross-Education

    Cross education has been defined as the unilateral training of a limb with resisted exercise for the benefit of transferring strength to the contralateral (often injured or immobilized) limb. Participants randomized to cross-education will be provided with a hand-grip strengthener, adjusted to provide resistance at 70-80% of their maximum grip strength. They will be given written, illustrated instructions for performing grip strengthening exercises for their uninjured hand in a seated position with both forearms comfortably supported; this will be demonstrated during the teaching session. The instructions will ask for the participant to complete 3 sets of 10 repetitions twice daily, with additional instructions for appropriate grading of resistance. A diary for tracking exercise completion and attendance for usual care will also be provided.

    Behavioral: Cross-Education · Other: Usual care

  • Active comparator
    Mirror Visual Feedback

    Mirror visual feedback is the performance of movements with an uninjured hand in front of a mirror hiding the injured hand, thus creating the illusion of bilateral movement. Participants randomized to mirror visual feedback will be provided with a portable mirror and stand, and instructed with accompanying demonstration on how to set up on a table for comfortable visualization. They will be given written, illustrated instructions for performing mirror visualization of exercises completed by the uninjured hand only from a position of neutral rotation of the forearm. The instructions will ask for the participant to complete a three sets of 10 repetitions for finger flexion and extension (mimicking the fisting motion of the grip strengthening exercises) twice daily. A diary for tracking exercise completion and attendance for usual care will also be provided.

    Behavioral: Mirror Visual Feedback · Other: Usual care

  • Experimental
    Cross-education + Mirror Visual Feedback

    In this group, participants will perform the cross-education resistance exercise in front of the mirror, visualizing the performance of the resistance exercises. Participants randomized to cross education with mirror visual feedback will be provided with both a hand-grip strengthener and a portable mirror and stand, and instructed with accompanying demonstration on how to set up on a table for comfortable visualization. They will be given written, illustrated instructions for performing mirror visualization hand grip strengthening exercises completed by the uninjured hand only from a position of neutral rotation of the forearm. The instructions will ask for the participant to complete 3 sets of 10 repetitions twice daily, with additional instructions for appropriate grading of resistance. A diary for tracking exercise completion and attendance for usual care will also be provided.

    Behavioral: Mirror Visual Feedback · Other: Usual care

  • Active comparator
    Usual Care

    Participants randomized to usual care will be encouraged to attend the recommended rehabilitation, and provided with a diary for frequency of rehab attendance, and tracking any exercises completed at home.

    Other: Usual care

Interventions

  • BehavioralCross-Education

    Home exercise program + usual care

  • BehavioralMirror Visual Feedback

    Home exercise program + usual care

  • OtherUsual care

    Hand rehabilitation provided by occupational therapists and physiotherapists in a multidisciplinary outpatient setting

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Trial feasibility

    total number of potential participants vs. enrolled participants from the clinic

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Composite finger flexion

    the distance (in cm) from the junction of the nail fold on the fingertip to the distal palmar crease on the hand for the index, middle, ring and small fingers

    Time frame: 1, 2, and 3 months

  2. Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation

    This patient self report measure is scored from 0-100 across two subscales containing 15 items addressing pain and disability in the hand and wrist. Higher scores indicate more pain and disability.

    Time frame: 1,2,and 3 months

  3. Pain Catastrophizing Scale

    This patient self-report measure contains 14 items addressing negative pain beliefs. It is scored from 0-52, with a score of over 30 considered to represent unhelpful beliefs about pain.

    Time frame: 3 months

  4. Hand grip strength

    Grip strength as measured by hand dynamometer (in kilos).

    Time frame: 3 months

  5. Adverse events

    Number of major adverse events defined as need for secondary surgical intervention

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Green LA, Gabriel DA. The cross education of strength and skill following unilateral strength training in the upper and lower limbs. J Neurophysiol. 2018 Aug 1;120(2):468-479. doi: 10.1152/jn.00116.2018. Epub 2018 Apr 18. PubMed 29668382 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 3, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03937232
Lead sponsor
McMaster University
Responsible party
Tara Packham (Assistant Professor, McMaster University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 3, 2019
Start date
Sep 1, 2019 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2020 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2020 (estimated)
Last update
May 3, 2019

Study contacts

Tara Packham, PhD
Contact
packhamt@mcmaster.ca
9055259140 ext. 27812

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in May 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion