CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT03913026Updated Oct 27, 2025

UM171 Expanded Cord Blood In Patients With High-Risk Acute Leukemia/Myelodysplasia

A Phase 2 interventional study of Transplant with an expanded ECT-001 cord blood in High Risk Hematologic Malignancy and Cord Blood Transplant, sponsored by Ciusss de L'Est de l'Île de Montréal. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-27.

Sponsored by Ciusss de L'Est de l'Île de Montréal · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a life-saving procedure in patients with blood cancers. Cord blood (CB) represents an alternative source of stem cells, which is associated with a lower risk of relapse, especially in the presence of minimal residual disease in the setting of acute leukemia and myelodysplasia. Furthermore, CB has the added advantage of being associated with a low risk of chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD). Unfortunately, CB transplants are hampered by a higher risk of transplant related mortality (TRM) when compared to bone marrow/peripheral blood transplants because of the limited cell dose of CB.

In the previous UM171 trial (NCT02668315), the CB expansion protocol using the ECT-001-CB technology (UM171 molecule) has proven to be technically feasible and safe. UM171 expanded CB was associated with a median neutrophil recovery at day (D)+18 post transplant. Amongst 22 patients who received a single UM171 CB transplant with a median follow-up of 18 months, risk of TRM (5%) and grade 3-4 acute GVHD (10%) were low. There was no moderate-severe chronic GVHD. Thus, overall and progression free survival at 12 months were impressive at 90% and 74%, respectively. The UM171 expansion protocol allowed access to smaller, better HLA matched CBs as >80% of patients received a 6-7/8 HLA matched CB. Interestingly there were 5 patients who had already failed an allogeneic transplant and 5 patients with refractory/relapsed acute leukemia/aggressive lymphoma. Despite this high risk population, progression was 20% at 12 months. Hence, in this new trial, investigators are targeting patients with high and very high-risk acute leukemia/myelodysplasia to test the antileukemia effect of this new graft, a UM171 expanded CB.

Read the detailed description

Methodology:

This is a multi-center open label phase II clinical trial. Patients with high and very high-risk acute leukemia/myelodysplasia will receive a single 5-7/8 HLA matched ECT-001 (UM171) expanded cord blood after an ablative conditioning regimen. This group of patients would be expected to have poor progression free survival (PFS) after a conventional allogeneic transplant (bone marrow-peripheral blood).

Investigators key primary and secondary objectives include:

  1. To confirm low Transplant Related Mortality (TRM)
  2. To evaluate relapse free survival (RFS)
  3. To analyze kinetics of hematologic engraftment;
  4. To evaluate the incidence of acute and chronic GVHD
  5. To evaluate the safety of the procedure
  6. To evaluate incidence of infectious complications
  7. To analyze duration of hospitalization
  8. To evaluate the incidence of pre-engraftment/engraftment syndrome (PES/ES)
  9. To analyze the effect of cryopreservation of the expanded CD34+ fraction on safety and efficacy endpoints
02

Conditions studied

  • High Risk Hematologic Malignancy
  • Cord Blood Transplant

Keywords

  • UM171
  • Stem Cell Expansion
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Ciusss de L'Est de l'Île de Montréal is the lead sponsor of 87 studies on the registry; 32 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Presence of high-risk acute leukemia/myelodysplasia defined as one of the following:

    I. Acute Myeloid Leukemia:

    1. Primary induction failure (no CR or CRi after ≥ 2 courses of induction therapy or after ≥ 1 induction containing high dose Ara-C)
    2. Chemorefractory relapse (no CR or CRi after 1 chemointensive treatment)
    3. Relapse after allogeneic or autologous transplant
    4. High risk AML in CR1: i) any adverse genetic abnormality as defined by European Leukemia Net excluding FLT3 mutation; ii) secondary or therapy related AML excluding good risk genetic abnormalities (as defined by ELN); or iii) any other poor risk feature known to be associated with a PFS or DFS ≤40% at 2 years after conventional transplantation.
    5. CR2 excluding good risk genetic abnormalities defined by ELN
    6. ≥CR3

    II. Acute Lymphoid Leukemia

    1. Primary induction failure (≥ 2 inductions)
    2. Chemorefractory relapse (at least 1 intensive induction chemotherapy; blinatumomab, inotuzumab or CAR-T cells may be considered as an equivalent)
    3. Relapse after allogeneic or autologous transplant
    4. High risk ALL in CR1: Ph like ALL or any other poor risk feature known to be associated with an PFS or DFS ≤40% at 2 years after conventional transplantation.
    5. ≥CR2
    6. MRD+ within 1 month of start of conditioning regimen.

    III. Myelodysplastic syndrome

    1. Relapse after allogeneic or autologous transplant
    2. ≥10 % blasts within 1 month of start of conditioning regimen
    3. Very poor cytogenetics (>3 abnormalities)
    4. Any poor risk feature known to be associated with a PFS or DFS ≤40% at 2 years after conventional transplantation
    5. TP53 mutation
    6. ≥40 years old and RAS or JAK2 mutation
    7. CMML with HCT-specific CPSS score high or intermediate-2
    8. Stable disease (absence of CR/PR/HI) after 6 cycles of azacitidine (or another demethylating agent)
    9. Progressive disease while on azacitidine (or another demethylating agent)
  2. 18-70 years old
  3. Availability of 2 CBs ≥ 4/8 HLA match when A, B, C and DRB1 are performed at the allele level.

    I. Cord to be expanded:

    1. CD34+ cell count >0.5 x 105/kg and TNC>1.5 x 107/kg (these numbers are all pre-freeze)
    2. Needs to be erythrodepleted by bank prior to cryopreservation
    3. Must come from a cord bank that is FACT (Foundation for the Accreditation of Cellular Therapy) accredited, FDA approved or eligible for NMDP IND.

    II. Non-expanded CB/back-up cord:

    1. Pre-freeze TNC count ≥ 2.0 x 107/kg with CD34+ cells ≥1.5 x 105/kg or TNC count ≥ 1.5 x 107 TNC/kg with CD34+ cells ≥1.7 x 105/kg. If a single cord does not meet these criteria, 2 back up cords will be an acceptable alternative with a minimum for each of 1.5 x 107/kg TNC and 1 x 105/kg CD34+ cells; another acceptable HSC back up source could be a haploidentical donor with medical clearance prior to starting conditioning regimen.
    2. Must come from a cord bank that is FACT accredited, FDA approved or eligible for NMDP IND
  4. Karnofsky score ≥ 70%
  5. Bilirubin \< 2 x upper limit of normal (ULN) unless felt to be related to Gilbert's disease or hemolysis; AST and ALT ≤ 2.5 x ULN; alkaline phosphatase ≤ 5 x ULN.
  6. Estimated or measured creatinine clearance ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73m2.
  7. Hematopoietic cell transplantation specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI) ≤5 for patients \< 60 years old; HCT-CI ≤3 for patients \< 60 years old and acute leukemia not in CR/CRi; HCT-CI ≤3 for patients 60-65 years old; HCT-CI ≤1 if 66-70 years old.
  8. Left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 40%
  9. Forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and diffusing capacity corrected for hemoglobin (DLCOc) ≥ 50% of predicted
  10. Signed written informed consent
  11. Female patients of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test within 7 days of enrolment and must be willing to use an effective contraceptive method while enrolled in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient never treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy and planned conditioning regimen does not include 12 Gy TBI (exceptions allowed if approved by PI).
  2. Allogeneic myeloablative transplant within 6 months.
  3. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant within 6 months.
  4. Planned use of ATG in conditioning regimen (exceptions allowed if approved by PI in which case ATG must be adjusted for weight/lymphocyte count and given more than 1 week prior to transplant; any patient who receives ATG will have immune recovery studies but will not be counted with rest of patients and will be analyzed separately).
  5. Planned use of an HLA matched CB (8/8 allele matched)
  6. Uncontrolled infection.
  7. Presence of a malignancy other than the one for which the CB transplant is being performed, with an expected survival estimated to be less than 75% at 5 years.
  8. Seropositivity for HIV.
  9. Hepatitis B or C infection with measurable viral load. Patients with chronic hepatitis B or C infection regardless of viral load require clear documentation of absence of cirrhosis by either fibroscan or biopsy. If fibroscan is the method used, the test must be unequivocally negative.
  10. Liver cirrhosis.
  11. Active central nervous system involvement
  12. Chloroma > 2 cm
  13. ≥50% blasts in marrow in an evaluable marrow sample (>25% of normal cellularity for age) collected less than one month prior to start of conditioning regimen.
  14. Peripheral blasts >1000/mm3
  15. Pregnancy, breastfeeding or unwillingness to use appropriate contraception.
  16. Participation in a trial with an investigational agent within 30 days prior to entry in the study.
  17. Patient unable to give informed consent or unable to comply with the treatment protocol including appropriate supportive care, follow-up, and tests.
  18. Any abnormal condition or laboratory result that is considered by the PI capable of altering patient's condition or study outcome.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Main intervention

    Eligible patients will receive an ablative conditioning regimen and be infused with an ECT-001 expanded cord-blood. The ECT-001 expanded CB could be infused fresh, or cryopreserved.

    Biological: Transplant with an expanded ECT-001 cord blood

Interventions

  • BiologicalTransplant with an expanded ECT-001 cord blood

    1. Patients will receive a conditioning regimen (such as: cyclophosphamide 120 mg/kg, fludarabine 75mg/m2 and TBI 12 Gy or cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg, fludarabine 150 mg/m2, thiotepa 10 mg/kg and TBI 4 Gy). 2. The cord to be expanded will undergo CD34+ selection. The CD34- product is cryopreserved and will be thawed and infused on Day +1 post-transplant. The CD34+ product will be placed in a closed culture with UM171 for a 7-day expansion and is infused on Day 0. 3. Patients will receive standard supportive care and GVHD prophylaxis (such as MMF and tacrolimus). Tacrolimus will be discontinued on Day 100 post-transplant unless GVHD arises.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Transplant Related Mortality (TRM)

    TRM is defined as any death of any cause other than malignant relapse, occurring after the commencement of conditioning regimen that could be related to the transplantation procedure.

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Relapse Free survival (RFS)

    RFS will be measured from time of transplant until disease relapse, death or last follow-up.

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. Overall survival (OS)

    OS will be measured from time of transplant until disease relapse, death or last follow-up.

    Time frame: 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Neutrophil Engraftment

    Time to neutrophil engraftment is defined as the first day of attainment of an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥0.5 x 109/L for 3 consecutive days. Time to ANC ≥ 0.1 x 109/L will also be documented as it seems to predict TRM.

    Time frame: 42 days

  2. Graft failure

    Absence of neutrophil engraftment by day 42 or secondary graft failure without any obvious cause.

    Time frame: 42 days

  3. Platelet Engraftment

    Platelet engraftment is defined as the first day of a sustained platelet count ≥ 20 x 109/L with no platelet transfusion in the preceding 7 days as per CIBMTR standards (www.cibmtr.org).

    Time frame: 60 days

  4. Incidence of Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (aGVHD)

    The time to onset and maximal grade will be recorded. Acute GVHD will be defined as classic acute (time of onset of symptoms ≤ 100 days) or persistent, recurrent, or late onset acute GVHD (time of onset of symptoms \> 100 days) as defined by the NIH. Results will be compared to patients at the same institution transplanted with different stem cell sources.

    Time frame: 1 year

  5. Incidence of Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD)

    Defined as per NIH global severity scores for mild, moderate, and severe chronic GVHD.

    Time frame: 2 years

  6. Adverse events grade 3 or higher

    All adverse events occurring during the clinical trial, including the protocol-defined post-treatment follow-up period, qualifying as a grade ≥ 3 toxicity per the revised NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.

    Time frame: 3 years

  7. Incidence of severe infectious complications.

    Any of the following infections requiring systemic therapy will be captured: invasive candidiasis, aspergillus, other invasive fungi, CMV, adenovirus, EBV, HHV-6, HSV, VZV, PCP, toxoplasmosis and mycobacterium.

    Time frame: 3 years

  8. Hospitalization events

    Total number of days admitted to the hospital in the first 100 days following transplant. Last day of fever (≥38.0°C) prior to engraftment, and number of days of parenteral feeding during transplant admission.

    Time frame: 1 year

  9. Incidence of preengraftment/engraftment syndrome (ES) requiring therapy.

    Time frame: 30 days

Other outcomes

  1. Immune reconstitution

    T, B, NK cell evaluation

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Identify markers suggesting escape from the immune system

    If the underlying disease recurs, sequencing will be performed of the leukemias/MDS to identify markers suggesting escape from the immune system: for example down regulation of HLA on cancer cells.

    Time frame: 3 years

  3. Graft composition and evaluation

    To better understand the effect of ECT-001 expansion a sample of the graft will be transplanted into mice before and after expansion. In addition, the different cell populations of the graft will be analyzed by flow cytometry before and after expansion. UM171 appears to increase significantly the proportion of dendritic cell precursors and mast cell precursors. Confirmation of this observation from the 1st trial will be obtained.

    Time frame: 7 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • CIUSSS de l'Est-de-l'île-de Montreal, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
    Montreal, Quebec H1T2M4, Canada
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 27, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03913026
Lead sponsor
Ciusss de L'Est de l'Île de Montréal
Collaborators
Stem Cell Network, ExCellThera inc.
Responsible party
Sandra Cohen (Associate Professor University of Montreal, Ciusss de L'Est de l'Île de Montréal) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 12, 2019
Start date
Apr 1, 2019
Primary completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 27, 2025

Study contacts

Sandra Cohen, MD
principal investigator · Ciusss de L'Est de l'Île de Montréal

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Oct 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion