ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03897465SLALOMUpdated Oct 29, 2025Results posted

Lomatuell Pro® Versus UrgoTul® in the Management of Acute Wounds

An interventional study of Lomatuell Pro and UrgoTul in Acute Wounds, sponsored by Lohmann & Rauscher. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-29.

Sponsored by Lohmann & Rauscher · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
183
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Comparative evaluation of the propertieS of the contact LAyer dressing LOMatuell Pro® versus UrgoTul® in the management of acute wounds

Read the detailed description

National, multicenter, prospective, randomized in parallel groups, non-inferiority, open-label investigation study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Wounds
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Lohmann & Rauscher is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Acute wound: traumatic wound (dermabrasion, skin tears, other), small burns 1st and 2nd degree requiring the use of dressings
  • Acute wound size between 3 cm² and 24 cm² (wound could be covered by 2 products maximum)
  • Wound whose duration is ≤ 3 days
  • Both gender with an age ≥ 18 years
  • Written confirmation from the study nurse that the patient was informed, orally agreed to participate and to comply with study treatment and planned visits
  • Subject able to follow the protocol

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic and acute surgical wound
  • Infected, moderately to strongly exudative and haemorrhagic wound
  • Diagnosed underlying disease (e.g. diabetic neuropathy, stroke, etc.) which as judged by the investigator could interfere with the pain assessment
  • Known allergy/ to any of the components of the products
  • Participation in other clinical investigation within one month prior to start of investigation
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women
  • Person protected by a legal regime (tutorship or guardianship)
  • Patients unable to manifest an oral consent to participate (e.g. dementia) or to understand the use of the VAS (visual analogue scale) tool
  • Patient not covered by health insurance/social security
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
183 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Lomatuell Pro

    Lomatuell Pro® is a wound contact layer consisting of wide-meshed tulle, impregnated with a polymer matrix, which form a gel on contact with wound exudate to facilitate moist wound healing.

    Device: Lomatuell Pro

  • Active comparator
    UrgoTul

    UrgoTul® is a flexible contact layer with TLC (Technology Lipido-Colloid) healing matrix comprised of a conformable polyester mesh impregnated with hydrocolloid and petroleum jelly particles.

    Device: UrgoTul

Interventions

  • DeviceLomatuell Pro

    Patients will receive Lomatuell Pro dressings during 3 weeks. Lomatuell Pro® may be left in place up to 7 days; additional dressing changes can be performed as often as necessary according to the instruction for use.

  • DeviceUrgoTul

    Patients will receive UrgoTul dressings during 3 weeks. UrgoTul® may be left in place up to 7 days; ; additional dressing changes can be performed as often as necessary according to the instruction for use.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Wound Dressing Changes Associated With a Pain <30 mm on Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    To evaluate the main study objective, patients were asked to assess the pain they felt during the first dressing removal (D3±2 days) with a means of visual analog scale (VAS), a 100 mm straight line ranging from 0 to 100, where "0" refers to "no pain" and "100" to the "worst pain imaginable". The VAS score was directly measured by the investigator with a scale in millimetres and the number was entered in the patient's case report from (CRF).

    Time frame: At Visit 2 (Day 3 ± 2 days)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Complete Healing

    Percentage of epithelialization of the wound at V3 calculated based on a blind assessment of wound photographs using W.H.A.T. assessment (W.H.A.T. = Wound Healing Analysing Tool is a program for assessment of the wound photos, which allows to obtain automatically-calculated results for wound area, wound dimensions, % of necrotic, granulation or epithelium tissues in the wound bed). "Complete healing" was defined as 100% of the wound area covered by the epithelium.

    Time frame: At Visit 3 (Day 21 or earlier, as soon as the wound is epithelialized)

07

Results

Posted Feb 7, 2025
Limitations and caveats
Open-label investigation design (nurses and patients knew which dressing was applied); Subjective pain scores assessment (by the patients).

Participant flow

First patient enrolled on 11 February 2019. Last patient enrolled on 16 November 2020.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLomatuell ProUrgoTul
Started7881
Completed7179
Not completed72
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up21
Withdrew: Adverse event20
Withdrew: Complete healing by v210
Withdrew: Occurence of exclusion criterion11
Withdrew: Other10

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Wound Dressing Changes Associated With a Pain <30 mm on Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

To evaluate the main study objective, patients were asked to assess the pain they felt during the first dressing removal (D3±2 days) with a means of visual analog scale (VAS), a 100 mm straight line ranging from 0 to 100, where "0" refers to "no pain" and "100" to the "worst pain imaginable". The VAS score was directly measured by the investigator with a scale in millimetres and the number was entered in the patient's case report from (CRF).

Time frame:
At Visit 2 (Day 3 ± 2 days)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of dressing changes
Percentage of Wound Dressing Changes Associated With a Pain <30 mm on Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
percentage of dressing changesLomatuell ProUrgoTul
Percentage of Wound Dressing Changes Associated With a Pain <30 mm on Visual Analog Scale (VAS)97.4 (97.01 to 98.06)97.5 (97.12 to 98.16)
Statistical analysis
  • Lomatuell Pro vs UrgoTul · Risk difference (rd): 1.4
SecondaryComplete Healing

Percentage of epithelialization of the wound at V3 calculated based on a blind assessment of wound photographs using W.H.A.T. assessment (W.H.A.T. = Wound Healing Analysing Tool is a program for assessment of the wound photos, which allows to obtain automatically-calculated results for wound area, wound dimensions, % of necrotic, granulation or epithelium tissues in the wound bed). "Complete healing" was defined as 100% of the wound area covered by the epithelium.

Time frame:
At Visit 3 (Day 21 or earlier, as soon as the wound is epithelialized)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Complete Healing
ParticipantsLomatuell ProUrgoTul
Complete Healing4855

Adverse events

Collected over For each patient, adverse events were collected for maximum of 23 days from Baseline (D0) till the Final study visit (Day 21+2). There was no follow-up period in the study.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Lomatuell Pro0/78 (0%)3/78 (3.8%)0/78 (0%)
UrgoTul0/81 (0%)0/81 (0%)1/81 (1.2%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventLomatuell ProUrgoTul
INFLAMED DIABETIC FOOT ULCERSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/780/81
NECROSIS DUE TO VASCULAR PROBLEMSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/780/81
WORSENING OF THE WOUNDSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/780/81
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventLomatuell ProUrgoTul
Wound infectionSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/781/81

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Lomatuell ProUrgoTulTotal
Mean73.83 ± 22.77571.28 ± 22.36472.53 ± 22.530
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Lomatuell ProUrgoTulTotal
Female434083
Male354176
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Lomatuell ProUrgoTulTotal
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Lomatuell ProUrgoTulTotal
France7881159
Weight
Weight(kg)Lomatuell ProUrgoTulTotal
Mean67.85 ± 15.82171.85 ± 14.36269.86 ± 15.189
Height
Height(cm)Lomatuell ProUrgoTulTotal
Mean165.97 ± 10.198167.82 ± 9.065166.9 ± 9.658
BMI
BMI(kg/m^2)Lomatuell ProUrgoTulTotal
Mean24.5 ± 5.0725.5 ± 5.3025.0 ± 5.2
08

Study locations

1 site
  • CICA+
    Limonest, France
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Meaume S, Kerihuel JC, Malatesta A, Roux F, Trofimenko D, Abel M. Non-inferiority randomised controlled trial of two contact layer dressings for the treatment of acute wounds (SLALOM). J Wound Care. 2025 Jul 2;34(7):496-505. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2024.0312. PubMed 40632070 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Feb 2019 to primary completion in Dec 2020, 21 months.

Results were first posted in Feb 2025, 4 years 2 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 21, 2019
First posted
Apr 1, 2019
StartActual
Feb 11, 2019
Primary completionActual
Dec 6, 2020
CompletionActual
Dec 6, 2020
Results first posted
Feb 7, 2025
Last update
Oct 29, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 29, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03897465
Lead sponsor
Lohmann & Rauscher
Collaborators
RCTs
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 1, 2019
Start date
Feb 11, 2019
Primary completion
Dec 6, 2020
Completion
Dec 6, 2020
Results posted
Feb 7, 2025
Last update
Oct 29, 2025

Study contacts

Daria TROFIMENKO
study director · Lohmann & Rauscher

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion