CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03894644Updated Apr 1, 2019

Simulation-based Learning for Neurosurgical Instruments in Perioperative Nurses

An interventional study of Simulation technology in Focus of Study: Simulation Technology, sponsored by Nova Scotia Health Authority. Completed. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-04-01.

Sponsored by Nova Scotia Health Authority · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2015, registered Mar 2019).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Rapid technological advances in the last 20 years have led to the exponential adoption of simulation-based learning in nursing education.

Read the detailed description

Simulation-based learning is designed to engage, challenge and enrich the learner's knowledge base and skill set. It presents the opportunity to experience a variety of clinical scenarios, both common and uncommon, in a safe environment allowing repeated skills training and facilitating the transfer of classroom-knowledge to real situations.Research demonstrates that simulation can improve student engagement and learning and is being increasingly used as an educational strategy for nursing students. This prospective randomized controlled study that was undertaken with the following goals:

  1. to investigate the effectiveness of simulation-based training in a large sample of perioperative nurses, measured as nurses' learning progress in the simulation environment;
  2. to determine whether the learning acquired through this training is transferable to recognizing real surgical instruments; and
  3. to evaluate whether simulation-based learning is retained at least one week.
02

Conditions studied

  • Focus of Study: Simulation Technology
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Nova Scotia Health Authority is the lead sponsor of 255 studies on the registry; 76 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Perioperative nurse
  • Employed at Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Center

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

-Unable to provide informed consent

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group A: simulation training before instruments

    Group A performed simulation training before the recognition of real surgical instruments.

    Other: Simulation technology

  • Active comparator
    Group B:instruments before simulation training

    Group B performed the recognition of real surgical instruments without prior simulation training.

    Other: Simulation technology

Interventions

  • OtherSimulation technology

    The intervention involves three consecutive sessions of the PeriopSim™ Instrument Trainer, followed by two consecutive sessions of the PeriopSim™ for Burr Hole Surgery (https://periopsim.com).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in time saved for simulation task

    Time saved is defined as the duration in seconds from the time the participant correctly submits an instrument prior to the maximum allotted time. Change is measured over repeated sessions on Day 1 and Day 7.

    Time frame: Day 1 and Day 7

  2. Change in number of errors for simulation task

    Number of errors are counted as the number of incorrectly selected instruments on the first attempt. Change is measured over repeated sessions on Day 1 and Day 7.

    Time frame: Day 1 and Day 7

  3. Change in total score for simulation task

    Total score is a gamification-based algorithm dependent upon the number of correct responses in the first attempt and time saved. Change is measured over repeated sessions on Day 1 and Day 7.

    Time frame: Day 1 and Day 7

  4. Difference in total score for knowledge transfer task

    Score is defined as the number of correctly identified instruments from the instrument tray during the instrument recognition task. The difference in score is measured between arms.

    Time frame: Day 7

  5. Difference in time for knowledge transfer task

    Time is the number of seconds (to a maximum of 45) taken to complete the real instrument task. The difference in score is measured between arms.

    Time frame: Day 7

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 1, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03894644
Lead sponsor
Nova Scotia Health Authority
Responsible party
David Clarke (Neurosurgeon, Nova Scotia Health Authority) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 28, 2019
Start date
Oct 21, 2015
Primary completion
May 25, 2016
Completion
May 25, 2016
Last update
Apr 1, 2019

Study contacts

David Clarke
principal investigator · NSHA

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion