A Phase 4 interventional study of IGlarLixi and Insulin Glargine 100 UNT/ML in Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, sponsored by University Hospital Tuebingen. Terminated at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-07-10.
Sponsored by University Hospital Tuebingen · Phase 4, Interventional, and Basic science
Background During the last years, the brain has been identified as a major insulin-sensitive organ . The investigators and also other scientists identified hypothalamus, fusiform gyrus and prefrontal cortex as major insulin-sensitivity brain areas in humans . Brain insulin action regulates important physiological functions in humans such as food intake, body weight regulation, and cognition. Furthermore, animal studies suggest that insulin action specifically in the brain is involved in the control of peripheral glucose metabolism via regulation of the sensitivity to insulin in the rest of the body. Recently, the investigators were able to replicate these findings in humans: The investigators measured whole-body insulin sensitivity in combination with the well-established experimental delivery of human insulin to the brain via an intranasal approach. Peripheral insulin sensitivity was profoundly improved by brain insulin action in lean but not in obese healthy volunteers. What determines the effectiveness of this brain-derived pathway is still unknown. Furthermore, insulin resistance of the brain is linked to neurodegenerative diseases possibly explaining the elevated risk for such diseases in patients with type 2 diabetes.
GLP-1 receptor agonists have been shown to acutely modulate appetite- and reward-related brain areas in humans. Research in animals suggest a close interaction between insulin and GLP-1 action especially in homeostatic centers of the hypothalamus. In this context, it is important that GLP-1 sensitivity of the brain is still present in the insulin resistant human brain.
The investigators therefore hypothesized that GLP-1 agonists are able to improve insulin sensitivity of the brain; this might be one mechanism how GLP-1 agonists lead to weight loss and improved glucose metabolism. This might also have beneficial implications for cognitive function.
However, at present, there are no human studies examining the effect of a GLP-1 agonist on brain activity and especially insulin action in the brain in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D).
Furthermore, there is no study in humans examining the effect of newly initiated insulin therapy on brain activity and especially insulin action in the brain in patients with T2D.
9,357 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; 1,318 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 1 is below the median of 80 across 7,523 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.
Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 studies →University Hospital Tuebingen is the lead sponsor of 476 studies on the registry; 104 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Females of childbearing potential (FCBP) must agree
Males must agree
Exclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria for randomization at the end of the screening period:
Subjects will receive premixed Insulin glargine + lixisenatide once daily for 12 weeks
Drug: IGlarLixi
Subjects will receive Insulin glargine once daily for 12 weeks
Drug: Insulin Glargine 100 UNT/ML
Dose titration will be done based on the subjects fasting blood glucose
Dose titration will be done based on the subjects fasting blood glucose
Brain insulin sensitivity
Effect of 12 weeks treatment with iGlarLixi or Glargine on brain insulin sensitivity assessed by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) as change in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) from before to 30 minutes after nasal insulin spray application.
Time frame: Change from baseline brain insulin sensitivity at 12 weeks
Processing of food pictures
Effect of 12 weeks treatment with iGlarLixi or Glargine on resting state brain activity and on brain response to food pictures and control pictures as assessed by functional magnetic resonance imaging.
Time frame: Change from baseline processing of food pictures at 12 weeks
Cognitive function
Effect of 12 weeks treatment with iGlarLixi or Glargine on cognitive function assessed by established Motor Screening Task (MOT). Outcome measures: assess the participant's speed of response and the accuracy of pointing. It is part of Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) to assess neurocognition. All CANTAB tests are evaluated together.
Time frame: Change from baseline participant's speed of response and the accuracy of pointing at 12 weeks
Cognitive function
Effect of 12 weeks treatment with iGlarLixi or Glargine on cognitive function assessed by established Reaction Time (RTI). Outcome measures: Reaction time and movement time for both the simple and five-choice variants. It is part of Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) to assess neurocognition. All CANTAB tests are evaluated together.
Time frame: Change from baseline reaction time and movement time at 12 weeks
Cognitive function
Effect of 12 weeks treatment with iGlarLixi or Glargine on cognitive function assessed by established Rapid Visual Information Processing (RVP). Outcome measures: Latency (speed of response), probability of false alarms and sensitivity. It is part of Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) to assess neurocognition. All CANTAB tests are evaluated together.
Time frame: Change from baseline latency, probability of false alarms and sensitivity at 12 weeks
Cognitive function
Effect of 12 weeks treatment with iGlarLixi or Glargine on cognitive function assessed by established Paired Associates Learning (PAL). Outcome measures: Errors made by the participant, the number of trials required to locate the pattern(s) correctly, memory scores and stages completed. It is part of Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) to assess neurocognition. All CANTAB tests are evaluated together.
Time frame: Change from errors made by the participant, the number of trials required to locate the pattern(s) correctly, memory scores and stages completed baseline at 12 weeks
Cognitive function
Effect of 12 weeks treatment with iGlarLixi or Glargine on cognitive function assessed by established Spatial Working Memory (SWM). Outcome measures: errors (selecting boxes that have already been found to be empty and revisiting boxes which have already been found to contain a token) and strategy. It is part of Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) to assess neurocognition. All CANTAB tests are evaluated together.
Time frame: Change from baseline errors and strategy at 12 weeks
Cognitive function
Effect of 12 weeks treatment with iGlarLixi or Glargine on cognitive function assessed by established Pattern Recognition Memory (PRM). Outcome measures: Number and percentage of correct trials and latency (speed of participant's response) It is part of Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) to assess neurocognition. All CANTAB tests are evaluated together.
Time frame: Change from baseline number and percentage of correct trials and latency at 12 weeks
Cognitive function
Effect of 12 weeks treatment with iGlarLixi or Glargine on cognitive function assessed by established Delayed Matching to Sample (DMS). Outcome measures: Latency (the participant's speed of response), the number of correct patterns selected and a statistical measure giving the probability of an error after a correct or incorrect response. It is part of Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) to assess neurocognition. All CANTAB tests are evaluated together.
Time frame: Change from baseline latency, the number of correct patterns selected and a statistical measure giving the probability of an error after a correct or incorrect response at 12 weeks
Glycemic control
Effect of 12 weeks treatment with iGlarLixi or Glargine on glycemic control (HbA1c change from baseline to week 12.
Time frame: Change from baseline glycemic control at 12 weeks
Liver fat content
Will be assessed by liver MR-spectroscopy change from baseline to 12 weeks.Unit: \[%\]
Time frame: Change from baseline body fat distribution at 12 weeks
Total adipose tissue (TAT)
Will be assessed by whole body MRI as change from baseline to 12 weeks. Unit: \[l\]
Time frame: Change from baseline body fat distribution at 12 weeks
Visceral adipose tissue (VAT)
Will be assessed by whole body MRI as change from baseline to 12 weeks. Unit: \[l\]
Time frame: Change from baseline body fat distribution at 12 weeks
Subcutaneous adipose tissue (SCAT)
Will be assessed by whole body MRI as change from baseline to 12 weeks. Unit: \[l\]
Time frame: Change from baseline body fat distribution at 12 weeks
Body fat
Will be assessed by bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) as change from baseline to 12 weeks. Unit: \[%\]
Time frame: Change from baseline body fat at 12 weeks
Lean body mass
Will be assessed by bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) as change from baseline to 12 weeks. Unit: \[kg\]
Time frame: Change from baseline body fat at 12 weeks
Body weight
Will be assessed as change from baseline to 12 weeks. Unit \[kg\]
Time frame: Change from baseline body weight at 12 weeks
Hypoglycemia
Number of hypoglycemic events be recorded.
Time frame: 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks after randomisation
Hypoglycemia time of day
Time of day for each hypoglycemic event (see therefore outcome 18) be recorded.
Time frame: 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks after randomisation
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is terminated, as verified in May 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University Hospital Tuebingen