CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03878602Updated Apr 19, 2021Results posted

Umbilical Cord Clamping: What Are the Benefits

An interventional study of Delayed umbilical cord clamping and Immediate umbilical cord clamping in Delayed Cord Clamping, sponsored by Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 37 Weeks to 42 Weeks. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-04-19.

Sponsored by Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2018, registered Mar 2019).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
142
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
37 Weeks to 42 Weeks
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Umbilical cord clumping consists in the binding of the umbilical cord by nipper to interrupt blood flow from placenta to foetus. Umbilical cord can be clamped within 30s or at least 1 min after birth. A lot of studies have shown that delayed umbilical cord clamping is associated with greater haemoglobin concentration, better iron storage between 3-6 months of life and lower incidence for transfusion and neonatal hypotension compared to immediate umbilical cord clumping. Newborns subjected to Caesarean Section showed greater value of haemoglobin and lower value of red blood cells compared to newborns birth by vaginal delivery. Despite evidence of beneficial effects for delayed umbilical cord clamping after eutocic delivery, this practice is not yet taken into consideration after elective Caesarean Section.

Read the detailed description

Umbilical cord cutting determines the separation of the newborn from mother. Umbilical cord clumping consists in the binding of the umbilical cord by nipper to interrupt blood flow from placenta to foetus. In the spontaneous labor there are two modalities to obtain umbilical cord clamping: the first modality is immediate umbilical cord clamping within 30s from birth. The second modality is delayed umbilical cord clamping at least 1 min after birth. After 1 min, cerebral blood flow is reduced again because of lower cardiac output.

A lot of studies have shown that delayed umbilical cord clamping is better than the early umbilical clamping because delayed umbilical cord clamping is associated with a great haemoglobin concentration in the newborns and best iron storage between 3-6 months of life and less incidence for transfusion and neonatal hypotension. Experimental studies, executed on animals and humans, analysed cardiocirculatory changes in the foetus immediately after birth and the importance of the delayed clamping for the hemodynamic stabilization, particularly in the lowest gestational age.

In a recent randomized study conducted in Nepal on 540 newborns, birth by eutocic delivery with 39.2 weeks of gestational age, showed that delayed umbilical cord clamping after 3 min of life is correlated with a better haemoglobin level and less incidence of anaemia at 8 months of life. Zhou et al. conducted a meta-analysis that included hematologic parameters obtained by umbilical cord, placenta and newborns blood.

Association of Italian Hospital Gynecologists Obstetricians (AOGOI) declared contraindicated conditions to execute a delayed umbilical cord clamping:

Hypoxic-ischemic events: detachment of placenta, prolapse of the funiculus, uterine rupture, shoulder dystocia, premature rupture of fetal membranes, placenta previa, maternal collapse, embolism amniotic, maternal cardiac arrest. Monochorionic twins, Fetal Hydrops, Umbilical cord damaged, Isoimmunization Rh.

Researchers concluded that newborns subjected to Caesarean Section showed greater value of haemoglobin and lower value of red blood cells compared to newborns birth by vaginal delivery. Haematocrit difference was greater between newborns birth by elective Caesarean Section compared to those birth by Caesarean Section in labor. Nowadays, researchers found no side effects of delayed umbilical cord clamping except a slight increase of phototherapy needs.

Despite evidence of beneficial effects for delayed umbilical cord clamping after eutocic delivery, this practice is not yet taken into consideration after elective Caesarean Section. The aim of the study protocol is to investigate the effects of the clamping after 1 min from birth by elective Caesarean Section on heart rate, saturation, body temperature, bilirubin, haematocrit and glycemia.

02

Conditions studied

  • Delayed Cord Clamping

Keywords

  • Newborn
  • Elective Caesaren Section
  • Cord Clamping
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero is the lead sponsor of 19 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
37 Weeks to 42 Weeks
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Birth Body Weight = appropriate for gestational age
  • Delivery mode= Elective Caesarean Section
  • Mothers' BMI = 19-24,9
  • Mothers'age ≤ 37 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Admission in NICU;
  • Neonatal Resuscitation
  • Hypoxic-ischemic events: detachment of placenta, prolapse of the funiculus, uterine rupture, shoulder dystocia, premature rupture of foetal membranes, placenta previa, maternal collapse, embolism amniotic, maternal cardiac arrest
  • Pathologies ;
  • Smoking mothers;
  • Assumption of drugs during pregnancy
  • Mother toxicomaniac
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
142 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control Group

    Newborns will be subjected to umbilical cord immediate clamping

    Procedure: Immediate umbilical cord clamping

  • Experimental
    Study Group

    Newborns will be subjected to umbilical cord delayed clamping

    Procedure: Delayed umbilical cord clamping

Interventions

  • ProcedureDelayed umbilical cord clamping

    Umbilical cord will be clamped after 1 min after the birth of the newborn

  • ProcedureImmediate umbilical cord clamping

    Umbilical cord will be clamped immediately after the birth of the newborn

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change of Heart Rate After Delayed Umbilical Clamping

    It will be measured the change of heart rate (HR)

    Time frame: 5 minutes and 10 minutes after birth

  2. Change of Saturation After Delayed Umbilical Clamping

    Saturation change (SpO2)

    Time frame: 5 minutes and 10 minutes after birth

  3. Change of Temperature After Delayed Umbilical Clamping

    Temperature change (T)

    Time frame: 5 minutes after birth

Secondary outcomes

  1. Misuration of the Hemo Gluco Test After Delayed Umbilical Clamping

    hemo gluco test (HGT)

    Time frame: 120 minutes after birth

  2. Misuration of the Hematocrit After Delayed Umbilical Clamping

    hematocrit (Ht)

    Time frame: 72 hours of life

  3. Misuration of the Bilirubin After Delayed Umbilical Clamping

    bilirubin

    Time frame: 72 hours of life

07

Results

Posted Apr 19, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneImmediate ClampingDelayed Clamping
Started7567
Completed6666
Not completed91
Withdrew: Cord blood donation71
Withdrew: Incomplete data collection20

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange of Heart Rate After Delayed Umbilical Clamping

It will be measured the change of heart rate (HR)

Time frame:
5 minutes and 10 minutes after birth
Reported as:
Mean · bpm
Change of Heart Rate After Delayed Umbilical Clamping
bpmControl GroupStudy Group
5 minutes164 ± 18157 ± 15
10 minutes163 ± 15155 ± 13
PrimaryChange of Saturation After Delayed Umbilical Clamping

Saturation change (SpO2)

Time frame:
5 minutes and 10 minutes after birth
Reported as:
Mean · percent of saturated hemoglobin
Change of Saturation After Delayed Umbilical Clamping
percent of saturated hemoglobinImmediate ClampingDelayed Clamping
5 minutes88.98 ± 7.02789.169 ± 7.453
10 minutes95.238 ± 3.97696.046 ± 3.346
PrimaryChange of Temperature After Delayed Umbilical Clamping

Temperature change (T)

Time frame:
5 minutes after birth
Reported as:
Mean · degrees Celsius
Change of Temperature After Delayed Umbilical Clamping
degrees CelsiusImmediate ClampingDelayed Clamping
Change of Temperature After Delayed Umbilical Clamping36.60 ± 0.6436.64 ± 0.64
SecondaryMisuration of the Hemo Gluco Test After Delayed Umbilical Clamping

hemo gluco test (HGT)

Time frame:
120 minutes after birth
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dl
Misuration of the Hemo Gluco Test After Delayed Umbilical Clamping
mg/dlImmediate ClampingDelayed Clamping
Misuration of the Hemo Gluco Test After Delayed Umbilical Clamping60.32 ± 9.93756.02 ± 17.101
SecondaryMisuration of the Hematocrit After Delayed Umbilical Clamping

hematocrit (Ht)

Time frame:
72 hours of life
Reported as:
Mean · percent of occupied blood volume
Misuration of the Hematocrit After Delayed Umbilical Clamping
percent of occupied blood volumeImmediate ClampingDelayed Clamping
Misuration of the Hematocrit After Delayed Umbilical Clamping51.56 ± 6.92956.71 ± 6.663
SecondaryMisuration of the Bilirubin After Delayed Umbilical Clamping

bilirubin

Time frame:
72 hours of life
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dl
Misuration of the Bilirubin After Delayed Umbilical Clamping
mg/dlImmediate ClampingDelayed Clamping
Misuration of the Bilirubin After Delayed Umbilical Clamping7.06 ± 2.768.54 ± 2.90

Adverse events

Collected over adverse event data were collected through discharge. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Control Group0/66 (0%)0/66 (0%)0/66 (0%)
Study Group0/66 (0%)0/66 (0%)0/66 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Control GroupStudy GroupTotal
<=18 years6666132
Between 18 and 65 years000
>=65 years000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Control GroupStudy GroupTotal
Female323062
Male343670
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants)Control GroupStudy GroupTotal
Caucasian6666132
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Control GroupStudy GroupTotal
Italy6666132
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of mother and child's Health Poliambulanza Foundation
    Brescia, 25124, Italy
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Katheria A, Hosono S, El-Naggar W. A new wrinkle: Umbilical cord management (how, when, who). Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Oct;23(5):321-326. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 20. PubMed 30076109 ↗
  • Bhatt S, Alison BJ, Wallace EM, Crossley KJ, Gill AW, Kluckow M, te Pas AB, Morley CJ, Polglase GR, Hooper SB. Delaying cord clamping until ventilation onset improves cardiovascular function at birth in preterm lambs. J Physiol. 2013 Apr 15;591(8):2113-26. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.250084. Epub 2013 Feb 11. PubMed 23401615 ↗
  • Polglase GR, Dawson JA, Kluckow M, Gill AW, Davis PG, Te Pas AB, Crossley KJ, McDougall A, Wallace EM, Hooper SB. Ventilation onset prior to umbilical cord clamping (physiological-based cord clamping) improves systemic and cerebral oxygenation in preterm lambs. PLoS One. 2015 Feb 17;10(2):e0117504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117504. eCollection 2015. PubMed 25689406 ↗
  • Alzaree F, Elbohoty A, Abdellatif M. Early Versus Delayed Umbilical Cord Clamping on Physiologic Anemia of the Term Newborn Infant. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018 Aug 15;6(8):1399-1404. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.286. eCollection 2018 Aug 20. PubMed 30159064 ↗
  • Ghavam S, Batra D, Mercer J, Kugelman A, Hosono S, Oh W, Rabe H, Kirpalani H. Effects of placental transfusion in extremely low birthweight infants: meta-analysis of long- and short-term outcomes. Transfusion. 2014 Apr;54(4):1192-8. doi: 10.1111/trf.12469. PubMed 24843886 ↗
  • Backes CH, Rivera BK, Haque U, Bridge JA, Smith CV, Hutchon DJR, Mercer JS. Placental transfusion strategies in very preterm neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jul;124(1):47-56. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000324. PubMed 24901269 ↗
  • Nevill E, Meyer MP. Effect of delayed cord clamping (DCC) on breathing and transition at birth in very preterm infants. Early Hum Dev. 2015 Jul;91(7):407-11. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2015.04.013. Epub 2015 May 15. PubMed 25984654 ↗
  • Wafaa Taha Ibrahim Elgzar, Heba Abdel-Fatah Ibrahim, Hanan Heiba Elkhateeb."Effects of Deferred Versus Early Umbilical Cord Clamping on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes" - American Journal of Nursing Research, 2017,5(4), 115-128
  • Valero J, Desantes D, Perales-Puchalt A, Rubio J, Diago Almela VJ, Perales A. Effect of delayed umbilical cord clamping on blood gas analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 May;162(1):21-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.01.020. Epub 2012 Mar 8. PubMed 22405491 ↗
  • Kc A, Rana N, Malqvist M, Jarawka Ranneberg L, Subedi K, Andersson O. Effects of Delayed Umbilical Cord Clamping vs Early Clamping on Anemia in Infants at 8 and 12 Months: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Mar 1;171(3):264-270. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.3971. PubMed 28114607 ↗
  • Zhou YB, Li HT, Zhu LP, Liu JM. Impact of cesarean section on placental transfusion and iron-related hematological indices in term neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Placenta. 2014 Jan;35(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2013.10.011. Epub 2013 Nov 20. PubMed 24290868 ↗
  • McDonald SJ, Middleton P, Dowswell T, Morris PS. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping of term infants on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 11;2013(7):CD004074. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004074.pub3. PubMed 23843134 ↗
  • De Bernardo G, Giordano M, De Santis R, Castelli P, Sordino D, Trevisanuto D, Buonocore G, Perrone S. A randomized controlled study of immediate versus delayed umbilical cord clamping in infants born by elective caesarean section. Ital J Pediatr. 2020 May 24;46(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13052-020-00835-2. PubMed 32448358 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Oct 15, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 19, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03878602
Lead sponsor
Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero
Responsible party
Giuseppe De Bernando (Principal Investigator, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 18, 2019
Start date
Oct 15, 2018
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2019
Completion
Jun 1, 2019
Results posted
Apr 19, 2021
Last update
Apr 19, 2021

Study contacts

Giuseppe De Bernardo, M.D.
principal investigator · Poliambulanza Foundation
Maurizio Giordano, B.Sc.
study chair · University of Naples Federico II, School of Medicine
Laura Linetti, Dr.
study director · Poliambulanza Foundation

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion