ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT03860805SALSTERUpdated Jan 17, 2025

SALpingectomy for STERilization (SALSTER)

An interventional study of Laparoscopic tubal ligation and Laparoscopic bilateral salpingectomy in Sterilization Tubal, Salpingectomy and Laparoscopy, sponsored by Göteborg University. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Sweden. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 49 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-17.

Sponsored by Göteborg University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
900
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 49 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The SALSTER study is a register-based randomized clinical trial (R-RCT) that examines if laparoscopic salpingectomy instead of tubal ligation, as a contraceptive method, has no increased risk for complications and has no negative impact on ovarian function.

Read the detailed description

SALSTER Study

In the last years, the management of Fallopian tubes in benign surgery has drawn a lot of attention due to rising evidence showing that some aggressive forms of ovarian cancer may originate from the distal Fallopian tubes. Concerns were raised about the implications of salpingectomy to surgical outcome and function of the ovaries. The SALSTER study attempts to evaluate the effect of salpingectomy, in regards to surgical outcomes and ovarian function, in women seeking permanent contraception with tubal ligation.

The SALSTER study is a register-based randomized clinical trial (R-RCT) that examines if laparoscopic salpingectomy instead of tubal ligation, as a contraceptive method, has no increased risk for complications and has no negative impact on ovarian function. Complications will be assessed primarily at eight weeks post-surgery according to the Clavien-Dindo classification and the existing complications questionnaires in the Swedish National Quality Register of Gynecological Surgery (GynOp). Ovarian function will be primarily assessed by determining the age of natural menopause, measured through questionnaires on bleeding pattern in GynOp every other year. Approximately 900 patients will be recruited.

In a subset of patients, the difference in Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) levels from the time of surgery and 1-year after surgery will be compared between the groups. Approximately 180 patients will be recruited.

The study is expected to start in the beginning of 2019 and the first results are expected in 2021.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sterilization Tubal
  • Salpingectomy
  • Laparoscopy
  • Ovarian Reserve

Keywords

  • Sterilization Tubal
  • Salpingectomy
  • Laparoscopy
  • Ovarian Reserve
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Göteborg University is the lead sponsor of 270 studies on the registry; 47 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 49 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Planned laparoscopic sterilization
  • Willing to be randomized

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women older than 49
  • Not understanding the oral or written study information
  • Previous malignancy involving radiation, chemotherapy or endocrine treatment affecting ovarian function
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
900 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Laparoscopic tubal ligation

    Patients who seek for surgical permanent contraception and randomized to laparoscopic tubal ligation

    Procedure: Laparoscopic tubal ligation

  • Active comparator
    Laparoscopic bilateral salpingectomy

    Patients who seek for surgical permanent contraception and randomized to laparoscopic bilateral salpingectomy

    Procedure: Laparoscopic bilateral salpingectomy

Interventions

  • ProcedureLaparoscopic tubal ligation

    Laparoscopic tubal ligation

  • ProcedureLaparoscopic bilateral salpingectomy

    Laparoscopic bilateral salpingectomy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Complications

    Complication according to the Clavien-Dindo classification or specific questions on complications in GynOp Register (Swedish National Quality Register of Gynecological Surgery). Binary data.

    Time frame: Eight weeks post-operatively

  2. Age at menopause

    Determined from questionnaires on bleeding pattern in GynOp. Continuous data.

    Time frame: Twenty years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Severe complications

    Complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification or the specific questions on complications in GynOp. Binary data.

    Time frame: Eight weeks post-operatively

  2. Operative time

    In minutes. Continous data.

    Time frame: At day of surgery

  3. Perioperative blood loss

    In millilitres. Continous data.

    Time frame: At day of surgery

  4. Length of hospital stay

    In Days. Continous data.

    Time frame: Assessment will be done at discharge from hospital after surgery, including a period up to 8 weeks

  5. Complications according to Clavien-Dindo

    Assessed according to Clavien-Dindo. Binary data.

    Time frame: One year after surgery

  6. Complications

    Assessed according to the existing questions on complications in GynOp. Binary data.

    Time frame: One year after surgery

  7. Age at the start of the perimenopausal state

    Assessed through questionnaires in GynOp. Continous data.

    Time frame: Up to 55 years of age

  8. Length of the perimenopausal state

    Assessed in GynOp. Measured in days. Continous data.

    Time frame: Up to 55 years of age

  9. Change in menopausal symptom score

    Assessed with Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) in GynOp. MRS is a validated scale consisting of 11 questions, each yields a score of 1-4. Total score is reported, ranging from 4 to 44, where 4 indicates no menopausal symptoms and 44 maximum symptoms. Ordered categorical data.

    Time frame: Up to 55 years of age

  10. Use of hormone replacement therapy at any time during follow-up

    Either an answer yes to question in GynOp or prescription in The Drug Prescription Register will give information on the outcome (yes/no). Binary data.

    Time frame: Up to 55 years of age

  11. Subsequent surgery on uterus, salpinges and/or ovaries. Binary data.

    Assessed through GynOp and through The Patient register. Both registers yield the same data (subsequent surgery yes/no). Binary data.

    Time frame: At one year and up to 55 years of age

  12. Pregnancy

    Assessed in GynOp, whether pregnancy has occurred (yes/no). Binary data.

    Time frame: At one year and up to 55 years of age

  13. Epithelial ovarian cancer including histopathological types and grade, primary tubal and peritoneal cancer, as well as clinical stage according to International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO)

    Assessed through The Swedish Cancer Register, The Swedish Quality Register for Gynaecological Cancer, The Swedish Cause of Death Register and The Swedish Population Register. Time-to event data.

    Time frame: 40 years

  14. Secondary expressions of estrogen deficiency

    Measures of fractures related to osteoporosis and cardio-vascular events will be assessed through the Patient register. Binary and time-to-event data.

    Time frame: 40 years

Other outcomes

  1. Absolute change in AMH

    Measured in mg/L. Continous data.

    Time frame: Measured at baseline and 1 year post-operatively

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital
    Gothenburg, 413 45, Sweden
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Collins, E., Strandell, A., Granåsen, G., I. A. (2018). Increased risk of menopausal symptoms one year after opportunistic salpingectomy - A retrospective observational cohort study based on the Swedish National Quality Register of Gynecological Surgery. Paris: EBCOG. Retrieved from http://www.ebcog2018.org/content/detailed-program
  • Dilley SE, Havrilesky LJ, Bakkum-Gamez J, Cohn DE, Michael Straughn J Jr, Caughey AB, Rodriguez MI. Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention. Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Aug;146(2):373-379. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.05.034. Epub 2017 Jun 1. PubMed 28577884 ↗
  • Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae. PubMed 15273542 ↗
  • Falconer H, Yin L, Gronberg H, Altman D. Ovarian cancer risk after salpingectomy: a nationwide population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Jan 27;107(2):dju410. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju410. Print 2015 Feb. PubMed 25628372 ↗
  • Ganer Herman H, Gluck O, Keidar R, Kerner R, Kovo M, Levran D, Bar J, Sagiv R. Ovarian reserve following cesarean section with salpingectomy vs tubal ligation: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;217(4):472.e1-472.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.04.028. Epub 2017 Apr 25. PubMed 28455082 ↗
  • Heinemann K, Ruebig A, Potthoff P, Schneider HP, Strelow F, Heinemann LA, Do MT. The Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) scale: a methodological review. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 Sep 2;2:45. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-2-45. PubMed 15345062 ↗
  • Helden JV, Weiskirchen R. Age-independent anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) standard deviation scores to estimate ovarian function. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Jun;213:64-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.04.029. Epub 2017 Apr 18. PubMed 28437631 ↗
  • Kotlyar A, Gingold J, Shue S, Falcone T. The Effect of Salpingectomy on Ovarian Function. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 May-Jun;24(4):563-578. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.02.014. Epub 2017 Feb 20. PubMed 28223181 ↗
  • Labidi-Galy SI, Papp E, Hallberg D, Niknafs N, Adleff V, Noe M, Bhattacharya R, Novak M, Jones S, Phallen J, Hruban CA, Hirsch MS, Lin DI, Schwartz L, Maire CL, Tille JC, Bowden M, Ayhan A, Wood LD, Scharpf RB, Kurman R, Wang TL, Shih IM, Karchin R, Drapkin R, Velculescu VE. High grade serous ovarian carcinomas originate in the fallopian tube. Nat Commun. 2017 Oct 23;8(1):1093. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00962-1. PubMed 29061967 ↗
  • McKinlay SM, Brambilla DJ, Posner JG. The normal menopause transition. Maturitas. 1992 Jan;14(2):103-15. doi: 10.1016/0378-5122(92)90003-m. PubMed 1565019 ↗
  • Shih IeM, Kurman RJ. Ovarian tumorigenesis: a proposed model based on morphological and molecular genetic analysis. Am J Pathol. 2004 May;164(5):1511-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)63708-x. PubMed 15111296 ↗
  • Shinar S, Blecher Y, Alpern S, Many A, Ashwal E, Amikam U, Cohen A. Total bilateral salpingectomy versus partial bilateral salpingectomy for permanent sterilization during cesarean delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 May;295(5):1185-1189. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4340-x. Epub 2017 Mar 11. PubMed 28285425 ↗
  • Tehrani FR, Mansournia MA, Solaymani-Dodaran M, Azizi F. Age-specific serum anti-Mullerian hormone levels: estimates from a large population-based sample. Climacteric. 2014 Oct;17(5):591-7. doi: 10.3109/13697137.2014.912262. Epub 2014 Jul 9. PubMed 24716733 ↗
  • Trabuco EC, Moorman PG, Algeciras-Schimnich A, Weaver AL, Cliby WA. Association of Ovary-Sparing Hysterectomy With Ovarian Reserve. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 May;127(5):819-827. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001398. PubMed 27054925 ↗
  • Wang Y, Mang M, Wang Y, Wang L, Klein R, Kong B, Zheng W. Tubal origin of ovarian endometriosis and clear cell and endometrioid carcinoma. Am J Cancer Res. 2015 Feb 15;5(3):869-79. eCollection 2015. PubMed 26045974 ↗
  • Strandell A, Magarakis L, Sundfeldt K, Palsson M, Liv P, Idahl A. Salpingectomy versus tubal occlusion in laparoscopic sterilisation (SALSTER): a national register-based randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Aug 11;45:101026. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101026. eCollection 2024 Oct. PubMed 39974774 ↗
  • Magarakis L, Idahl A, Sundfeldt K, Liv P, Palsson M, Strandell A. SALpingectomy for STERilisation (SALSTER): study protocol for a Swedish multicentre register-based randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 4;13(9):e071246. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071246. PubMed 37666548 ↗

Study documents

  • Statistical analysis plan · Jan 12, 2025

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Apr 2019 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2043, 288 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 30, 2018
First posted
Mar 4, 2019
StartActual
Apr 3, 2019
Primary completionEst.
Apr 2043
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2050
Last update
Jan 17, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 17, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03860805
Collaborators
Umeå University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 4, 2019
Start date
Apr 3, 2019
Primary completion
Apr 2043 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2050 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 17, 2025

Study contacts

Annika Strandell
principal investigator · Sahlgrenska Academy

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion