CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03856021Updated Feb 27, 2019

Microfracture vs. Microfracture and BMAC for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus

An interventional study of Microfracture with Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate and Microfracture in Osteochondral Lesion of Talus, sponsored by Rothman Institute Orthopaedics. Status unknown at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-02-27.

Sponsored by Rothman Institute Orthopaedics · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Feb 2019), so the status shown — last known as Enrolling by invitation — may be out of date.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2018, registered Feb 2019).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Osteochondral lesions of the talus are thought to be due in large part to traumatic events or repetitive microtrauma that causes damage to both the articular cartilage and the subchondral bone. There are several treatment modalities for osteochondral lesions of the talus but there is no consensus as to which is the superior method for repair.

Treatment modalities are aimed at regenerating articular cartilage. Microfracture is a widely accepted and utilized treatment for osteochondral lesions. This procedure results in pluripotent bone marrow stem cells filling the defect and ultimately differentiating into fibrocartilage-producing cells [1]. This technique has shown good results in both short- and medium-term follow-up for smaller lesions. Bone marrow aspirate contains mesenchymal stem cells and growth factors with cartilage regeneration potential. Bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) is a treatment modality that has shown to have to potential to produce hyaline cartilage. This study aims to analyze the effect of adding BMAC to the standard microfracture procedure in terms of clinical and radiographic outcomes in comparison to patients who only underwent microfracture treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Osteochondral Lesion of Talus

Browse trials for

03

In context

Fractures, Stress

168 studies on the registry are indexed under Fractures, Stress; 41 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 70 is close to the median of 66 across 134 interventional studies indexed under Fractures, Stress.

Browse Fractures, Stress studies →

Lead sponsor

Rothman Institute Orthopaedics is the lead sponsor of 118 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Greater than 18 years of age and scheduled for surgery to treat osteochondral lesion of the talus Able and willing to sign informed consent document

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Unwilling to sign informed consent document

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
70 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Microfracture

    Procedure: Microfracture

  • Active comparator
    Microfracture with Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate

    Procedure: Microfracture with Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate

Interventions

  • ProcedureMicrofracture with Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate

    Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate harvested and prepared from the iliac crest

  • ProcedureMicrofracture

    All surgeons will use a 2 mm microfracture pick to perform the microfracture procedure. Using the 2 mm pick, surgeons will make 5 holes per 10 cm2.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)

    validated patient-reported outcome measure

    Time frame: 3 years following surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Rothman Institute
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 27, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03856021
Lead sponsor
Rothman Institute Orthopaedics
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 27, 2019
Start date
Oct 18, 2018
Primary completion
Oct 2020 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2020 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 27, 2019

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Feb 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion