CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03853798Updated Nov 18, 2025Results posted

Extension Study of AG-348 in Adult Participants With Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency Previously Enrolled in AG-348-006 or AG348-C-007

A Phase 3 interventional study of Mitapivat in Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency, sponsored by Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Completed at 42 sites in 16 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-18.

Sponsored by Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
90
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is an open-label, multicenter, extension study to evaluate the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of treatment with mitapivat in participants who were previously enrolled in Study AG348-C-006 or Study AG348-C-007.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 52 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Of its 23 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (17%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Be willing and able to comply with study visits and procedures.
  • Have signed written informed consent prior to participating in this extension study.
  • Have completed either antecedent study AG348-C-006 or AG348-C-007 through the Part 2 Week 24 Visit.
  • Cohorts 2 and 3: Have demonstrated clinical benefit from mitapivat treatment in the antecedent study, in the opinion of the Investigator.
  • For women of reproductive potential, have a negative pregnancy test during screening of this extension study.
  • For women of reproductive potential as well as men with partners who are women of reproductive potential, be abstinent as part of their usual lifestyle, or agree to use 2 forms of contraception, 1 of which must be considered highly effective, from the time of giving informed consent, during the study, and for 28 days following the last dose of study drug for women and 90 days following the last dose of study drug for men.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have a significant medical condition (including clinically significant laboratory abnormality) that developed during his/her antecedent AG- 348 study that confers an unacceptable risk to participating in this extension study, that could confound the interpretation of the study data, and/or that compromises the ability of the participant to complete study visits and procedures.
  • Are currently pregnant or breastfeeding.
  • Have a splenectomy scheduled during the study treatment period.
  • Meet the withdrawal criteria of his/her antecedent mitapivat study during screening of this extension study.
  • Are currently receiving medications that are strong inhibitors of cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4 that have not been stopped for a duration of at least 5 days or a time frame equivalent to 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) before start of study drug; or strong inducers of CYP3A4 that have not been stopped for a duration of at least 28 days or a time frame equivalent to 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) before start of study drug on this extension study.
  • Have received anabolic steroids, including testosterone preparations, within 28 days prior to start of study drug on this extension study.
  • Have received hematopoietic stimulating agents (eg, erythropoietins, granulocyte colony stimulating factors, thrombopoietins) within 28 days prior to start of study drug on this extension study.
  • Have exposure to any investigational drug other than mitapivat, device, or procedure within 3 months prior to start of study drug on this extension study.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
90 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cohort 1

    Participants who received placebo in Study AG348-C-006 and met the eligibility criteria of this extension study were enrolled to receive mitapivat tablets, 5 milligrams (mg), twice daily (BID), administered orally, for 4 weeks as a starting dose, followed by two potential sequential dose level increases to 20 mg and 50 mg BID at Weeks 4 and 8 respectively as determined by the investigator based on safety and efficacy. The optimized dose for each participant was determined at Week 12, and participants then received that optimized dose for a period of 12 weeks (Weeks 13-24) as a fixed dose and from Week 25 to Week 193, until study withdrawal, or the study was closed.

    Drug: Mitapivat

  • Experimental
    Cohort 2

    Participants who received mitapivat at a dose of 5 mg, 20 mg, or 50 mg, BID, in the fixed dose period of Study AG348-C-006 and met the eligibility criteria of this extension study continued to receive the same mitapivat dose up to Week 193 or until study withdrawal, or the study was closed.

    Drug: Mitapivat

  • Experimental
    Cohort 3

    Participants who received mitapivat at a dose of 5 mg, 20 mg, or 50 mg, BID, in the fixed dose period of Study AG348-C-007 and met the eligibility criteria of this extension study continued to receive the same mitapivat dose up to Week 193 or until study withdrawal, or the study was closed.

    Drug: Mitapivat

Interventions

  • DrugMitapivat

    Tablets

    Also known as: AG-348, AG-348 sulfate hydrate, Mitapivat sulfate

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. All Cohorts: Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, Related TEAEs and TEAEs With Severity Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3

    A clinical adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the study drug. TEAEs are AEs with an initial onset date during the on-treatment period or worsening from baseline and include both serious and non-serious TEAEs. Severity of AEs was evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE; Version 4.03): grade 1: mild; grade 2: moderate; grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; grade 4: life threatening or disabling; grade 5: death related to AE.

    Time frame: Up to 197 weeks

  2. All Cohorts: Number of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Dose Reduction, Treatment Interruption and Treatment Discontinuation

    A clinical AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the study drug. TEAEs are AEs with an initial onset date during the on-treatment period or worsening from baseline and include both serious and non-serious TEAEs. Number of participants with TEAEs leading to dose reduction, treatment interruption and treatment discontinuation are reported.

    Time frame: Up to 197 weeks

  3. All Cohorts: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory Parameters Reported as Grade Greater Than or Equal to (≥)3 TEAEs

    Clinical laboratory assessments including hematology, clinical chemistry, triglycerides, urate, coagulation, urinalysis, and liver function tests were performed in the study. Clinically significant treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities were graded according to the NCI CTCAE; Version 4.03: grade 1: mild; grade 2: moderate; grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; grade 4: life threatening or disabling; grade 5: death related to AE. Clinical significance was determined based on the judgment of the Investigator.

    Time frame: Up to 197 weeks

  4. All Cohorts: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs Measurements and Physical Examinations Reported as TEAEs

    Vital signs and physical examinations including height, weight, body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, temperature were assessed. Number of participants who experienced clinically significant abnormalities in vital signs and physical examinations as TEAEs were reported. Clinical significance was determined based on the judgment of the Investigator.

    Time frame: Up to 197 weeks

  5. All Cohorts: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Bone Mineral Density (BMD)

    BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans during the study. Number of participants with clinically significant abnormalities were reported. Clinical significance was determined based on the judgment of the Investigator.

    Time frame: Up to 192 weeks

  6. All Cohorts: Change From Baseline in Adjusted Spine T-score

    T-score of adjusted spine were assessed by DXA scans. The T-score is the number of standard deviations that bone density is above or below the average. A score of ≥ -1 indicates normal bone density; score between \< -1 and \> -2.5 indicates a sign of osteopenia (bone density below normal), and score of ≤ -2.5 indicates a sign of osteoporosis.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 192

  7. All Cohorts: Change From Baseline in Adjusted Spine Z-score

    The Z-score is a statistical measure to describe whether a value was above or below the standard. A Z-score of 0 is equal to the standard. Lower numbers indicate values lower than the standard and higher numbers indicate values higher than the standard.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 192

  8. All Cohorts: Change From Baseline in Femoral Total T-score

    T-score of femoral total were assessed by DXA scans. The T-score is the number of standard deviations that bone density is above or below the average. A score of ≥ -1 indicates normal bone density; score between \< -1 and \> -2.5 indicates a sign of osteopenia (bone density below normal), and score of ≤ -2.5 indicates a sign of osteoporosis.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 192

  9. All Cohorts: Change From Baseline in Femoral Total Z-score

    The Z-score is a statistical measure to describe whether a value was above or below the standard. A Z-score of 0 is equal to the standard. Lower numbers indicate values lower than the standard and higher numbers indicate values higher than the standard.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 192

  10. All Cohorts: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters Reported as TEAEs

    The following ECG parameters including RR, PR, heart rate-corrected QT interval using the Fridericia's formula (QRS), QT, and QTc were assessed during the study. Number of Participants with clinically significant abnormalities in ECG parameters as TEAEs were reported. Clinical significance was determined based on the judgment of the Investigator.

    Time frame: Up to 197 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Hemoglobin (Hb) Response

    The Hb response was defined as a greater than or equal to (≥)1.5 grams per deciliter (g/dL) (0.93 millimoles per liter \[mmol/L\]) increase in Hb concentration from baseline that is sustained at 2 or more scheduled assessments, excluding those within 2 months (61 days) of transfusion. The baseline value for cohort 1 participants was the average of all available measurements from the central laboratory within 45 (42+3) days before start of study treatment in study AG348-C-011, excluding values within 61 days after a transfusion, or the baseline value from study AG348-C-006 if no assessment is available.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

  2. Cohort 1: Average Change From Baseline in Hb Concentration at Weeks 16, 20, and 24

    The baseline value for participants was the average of all available measurements from the central laboratory within 45 (42+3) days before start of study treatment in study AG348-C-011, excluding values within 61 days after a transfusion, or the baseline value from study AG348-C-006 if no assessment is available. The mean of average change from baseline in Hb concentration across Weeks 16, 20 and 24 is reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 16, 20, and 24

  3. Cohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 8-hours Post-dose (AUC0-8) of Mitapivat

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post-dose at Week 12

  4. Cohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-last) of Mitapivat

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post-dose at Week 12

  5. Cohort 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Mitapivat

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post-dose at Week 12

  6. Cohort 1: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Mitapivat

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post-dose at Week 12

  7. Cohort 1: Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (Tlast) of Mitapivat

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post-dose at Week 12

  8. Cohort 1: Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) at the End of a Dosing Interval of Mitapivat

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post-dose at Week 12

  9. Cohort 1: Exposure-response (E-R) Relationship Between Safety Parameters and Mitapivat Concentration and Relevant Mitapivat Pharmacokinetic Parameters

    Time frame: First dose to up to 24 weeks

  10. Cohorts 1 and 2: Change From Baseline in Hb Concentration

    The baseline value for cohort 1 participant was the average of all available measurements from the central laboratory within 45 (42+3) days before start of study treatment in study AG348-C-011, excluding values within 61 days after a transfusion, or the baseline value from study AG348-C-006 if no assessment was available. The baseline value for cohort 2 was from Study AG348-C-006.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 192

  11. Cohorts 1 and 2: Change From Baseline in Indirect Bilirubin

    The baseline value for cohort 1 participant was the average of all available measurements from the central laboratory within 45 (42+3) days before start of study treatment in study AG348-C-011, excluding values within 61 days after a transfusion, or the baseline value from study AG348-C-006 if no assessment is available. The baseline value for cohort 2 was from Study AG348-C-006.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 192

  12. Cohorts 1 and 2: Change From Baseline in Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH)

    The baseline value for cohort 1 participant was the average of all available measurements from the central laboratory within 45 (42+3) days before start of study treatment in study AG348-C-011, excluding values within 61 days after a transfusion, or the baseline value from study AG348-C-006 if no assessment was available. The baseline value for cohort 2 was from Study AG348-C-006.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 192

  13. Cohorts 1 and 2: Change From Baseline in Haptoglobin Levels

    The baseline value for Cohort 1 participant was the average of all available measurements from the central laboratory within 45 (42+3) days before start of study treatment in study AG348-C-011, excluding values within 61 days after a transfusion, or the baseline value from study AG348-C-006 if no assessment was available. The baseline value for Cohort 2 was from Study AG348-C-006.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 192

  14. Cohorts 1 and 2: Change From Baseline in Reticulocytes/Erythrocytes Ratio

    The baseline value for Cohort 1 participants was the average of all available measurements from the central laboratory within 45 (42+3) days before start of study treatment in study AG348-C-011, excluding values within 61 days after a transfusion, or the baseline value from study AG348-C-006 if no assessment was available. The baseline value for Cohort 2 was from Study AG348-C-006.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 192

  15. Cohort 3: Change From Baseline in Number of Transfusion Episodes

    Number of transfusions at baseline was determined based on the transfusion data during the 52 weeks before informed consent for Cohort 3. Number of on-study transfusions was based on transfusions collected up to the end of the fixed dose period and standardized to 52 weeks. The change from baseline in number of transfusions was summarized for Cohort 3.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 192

  16. Cohort 3: Change From Baseline in Number of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Units Transfused

    Annualized total number of RBC units transfused (units/52-week) during the study, including data up to end of study (EOS), was the total number of RBC units transfused during the entire study\*52 / \[(date of EOS - date of start of study treatment + 1)/7\]. Number of RBC units were determined based on the transfusion data during the 52 weeks before informed consent of the antecedent study for Cohort 3. Number of on-study RBC units was based on transfusion data collected up to the end of the fixed dose period and standardized to 52 weeks.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 192

  17. All Cohorts: Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Scores: Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency Diary (PKDD)

    The PKDD is a validated, daily 7-item PRO instrument with a recall period of 24 hours that measures the core signs and symptoms associated with pyruvate kinase deficiency in adults. The symptoms include tiredness, jaundice, bone pain, shortness of breath, and energy level. PKDD daily scores were calculated based on the participant's response to the PKDD questionnaire. Score ranges from 25 to 76, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms and a higher disease burden. The change from baseline in weekly mean scores was summarized. A negative change from baseline indicates a lower disease burden. Baseline of weekly mean score was defined as average of daily scores collected within 7 days before start of study treatment (mitapivat). For Cohort 1, last measurement before the start of study treatment in AG348-C-011 was used as baseline; if baseline was missing, then baseline value from AG348-C-006 was used. For Cohorts 2 \& 3 baseline values from -006 and-007, respectively, were used.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  18. All Cohorts: Change From Baseline in HRQoL PRO Scores: Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency Impact Assessment (PKDIA)

    PKDIA is a 12-item PRO measure of common impacts of PK deficiency on activities of daily living. Participants rated how PK deficiency has impacted aspects of daily living in past 7 days, including impacts on relationships \& leisure and social, mental, and physical activities. PKDIA score at each visit was based on 8 items that were retained after in-trial psychometric validation and calculated at each visit based on participant's response to PKDIA questionnaire. Score ranges from 30 to 76, with higher scores indicating higher disease burden. Negative change from baseline indicates lower disease burden. Baseline was defined as the last complete assessment (with no missing item in response) before start of study treatment. For Cohort 1, last measurement before start of study treatment in AG348-C-011 was used as baseline; if baseline was missing, then baseline value from AG348-C-006 was used. For Cohorts 2 and 3, the baseline values from 006 and 007, respectively, were used.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

07

Results

Posted Nov 18, 2025

Participant flow

Participants were enrolled at 42 investigative sites in Denmark, France, Italy, Spain, Germany, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Ireland, Switzerland, United States, Canada, Japan, Korea, Thailand, Brazil and Turkey from 21 March 2019 to 03 July 2024.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCohort 1: 5 mgCohort 1: 20 mgCohort 1: 50 mgCohort 2: 5 mgCohort 2: 20 mgCohort 2: 50 mgCohort 3: 5 mgCohort 3: 20 mgCohort 3: 50 mg
Started113623300116
Completed002523220110
Not completed1111008006
Withdrew: Death000001000
Withdrew: Adverse event002000000
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject014005004
Withdrew: Physician decision100000001
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy002000001
Withdrew: Approved drug available for indication001001000
Withdrew: Other un-specified002001000

Outcome measures

PrimaryAll Cohorts: Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, Related TEAEs and TEAEs With Severity Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3

A clinical adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the study drug. TEAEs are AEs with an initial onset date during the on-treatment period or worsening from baseline and include both serious and non-serious TEAEs. Severity of AEs was evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE; Version 4.03): grade 1: mild; grade 2: moderate; grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; grade 4: life threatening or disabling; grade 5: death related to AE.

Time frame:
Up to 197 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
All Cohorts: Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, Related TEAEs and TEAEs With Severity Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3
ParticipantsCohort 1Cohort 2Cohort 3
Participants with TEAEs373315
Participants with Serious TEAEs1184
Participants with TEAEs related to study drug22144
Participants with any TEAE of Grade ≥ 316105
PrimaryAll Cohorts: Number of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Dose Reduction, Treatment Interruption and Treatment Discontinuation

A clinical AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the study drug. TEAEs are AEs with an initial onset date during the on-treatment period or worsening from baseline and include both serious and non-serious TEAEs. Number of participants with TEAEs leading to dose reduction, treatment interruption and treatment discontinuation are reported.

Time frame:
Up to 197 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
All Cohorts: Number of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Dose Reduction, Treatment Interruption and Treatment Discontinuation
ParticipantsCohort 1Cohort 2Cohort 3
Participants with TEAEs Leading to Dose Reduction221
Participants with TEAEs Leading to Interruption340
Participants with TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation210
PrimaryAll Cohorts: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory Parameters Reported as Grade Greater Than or Equal to (≥)3 TEAEs

Clinical laboratory assessments including hematology, clinical chemistry, triglycerides, urate, coagulation, urinalysis, and liver function tests were performed in the study. Clinically significant treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities were graded according to the NCI CTCAE; Version 4.03: grade 1: mild; grade 2: moderate; grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; grade 4: life threatening or disabling; grade 5: death related to AE. Clinical significance was determined based on the judgment of the Investigator.

Time frame:
Up to 197 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
All Cohorts: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory Parameters Reported as Grade Greater Than or Equal to (≥)3 TEAEs
ParticipantsCohort 1Cohort 2Cohort 3
Anaemia310
Haemolysis120
Alanine aminotransferase increased001
Aspartate aminotransferase increased211
Blood bilirubin increased001
Blood triglycerides increased100
Hypertriglyceridaemia100
PrimaryAll Cohorts: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs Measurements and Physical Examinations Reported as TEAEs

Vital signs and physical examinations including height, weight, body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, temperature were assessed. Number of participants who experienced clinically significant abnormalities in vital signs and physical examinations as TEAEs were reported. Clinical significance was determined based on the judgment of the Investigator.

Time frame:
Up to 197 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
All Cohorts: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs Measurements and Physical Examinations Reported as TEAEs
ParticipantsCohort 1Cohort 2Cohort 3
Weight decreased011
Hot flush202
Hypotension100
Hypertension120
PrimaryAll Cohorts: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Bone Mineral Density (BMD)

BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans during the study. Number of participants with clinically significant abnormalities were reported. Clinical significance was determined based on the judgment of the Investigator.

Time frame:
Up to 192 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
All Cohorts: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Bone Mineral Density (BMD)
ParticipantsCohort 1Cohort 2Cohort 3
All Cohorts: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Bone Mineral Density (BMD)010
PrimaryAll Cohorts: Change From Baseline in Adjusted Spine T-score

T-score of adjusted spine were assessed by DXA scans. The T-score is the number of standard deviations that bone density is above or below the average. A score of ≥ -1 indicates normal bone density; score between \< -1 and \> -2.5 indicates a sign of osteopenia (bone density below normal), and score of ≤ -2.5 indicates a sign of osteoporosis.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 192
Reported as:
Mean · T-score
All Cohorts: Change From Baseline in Adjusted Spine T-score
T-scoreCohort 1Cohort 2Cohort 3
All Cohorts: Change From Baseline in Adjusted Spine T-score0.046 ± 0.48740.234 ± 0.43830.416 ± 1.1090
PrimaryAll Cohorts: Change From Baseline in Adjusted Spine Z-score

The Z-score is a statistical measure to describe whether a value was above or below the standard. A Z-score of 0 is equal to the standard. Lower numbers indicate values lower than the standard and higher numbers indicate values higher than the standard.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 192
Reported as:
Mean · Z-score
All Cohorts: Change From Baseline in Adjusted Spine Z-score
Z-scoreCohort 1Cohort 2Cohort 3
All Cohorts: Change From Baseline in Adjusted Spine Z-score0.152 ± 0.45850.332 ± 0.40020.530 ± 1.2409
PrimaryAll Cohorts: Change From Baseline in Femoral Total T-score

T-score of femoral total were assessed by DXA scans. The T-score is the number of standard deviations that bone density is above or below the average. A score of ≥ -1 indicates normal bone density; score between \< -1 and \> -2.5 indicates a sign of osteopenia (bone density below normal), and score of ≤ -2.5 indicates a sign of osteoporosis.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 192
Reported as:
Mean · T-score
All Cohorts: Change From Baseline in Femoral Total T-score
T-scoreCohort 1Cohort 2Cohort 3
All Cohorts: Change From Baseline in Femoral Total T-score-0.020 ± 0.26120.047 ± 0.38930.114 ± 0.5050
PrimaryAll Cohorts: Change From Baseline in Femoral Total Z-score

The Z-score is a statistical measure to describe whether a value was above or below the standard. A Z-score of 0 is equal to the standard. Lower numbers indicate values lower than the standard and higher numbers indicate values higher than the standard.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 192
Reported as:
Mean · Z- score
All Cohorts: Change From Baseline in Femoral Total Z-score
Z- scoreCohort 1Cohort 2Cohort 3
All Cohorts: Change From Baseline in Femoral Total Z-score0.054 ± 0.24680.126 ± 0.36310.214 ± 0.5099
PrimaryAll Cohorts: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters Reported as TEAEs

The following ECG parameters including RR, PR, heart rate-corrected QT interval using the Fridericia's formula (QRS), QT, and QTc were assessed during the study. Number of Participants with clinically significant abnormalities in ECG parameters as TEAEs were reported. Clinical significance was determined based on the judgment of the Investigator.

Time frame:
Up to 197 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
All Cohorts: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters Reported as TEAEs
ParticipantsCohort 1Cohort 2Cohort 3
All Cohorts: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters Reported as TEAEs010
SecondaryCohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Hemoglobin (Hb) Response

The Hb response was defined as a greater than or equal to (≥)1.5 grams per deciliter (g/dL) (0.93 millimoles per liter \[mmol/L\]) increase in Hb concentration from baseline that is sustained at 2 or more scheduled assessments, excluding those within 2 months (61 days) of transfusion. The baseline value for cohort 1 participants was the average of all available measurements from the central laboratory within 45 (42+3) days before start of study treatment in study AG348-C-011, excluding values within 61 days after a transfusion, or the baseline value from study AG348-C-006 if no assessment is available.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 24
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Hemoglobin (Hb) Response
percentage of participantsCohort 1
Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Hemoglobin (Hb) Response39.5
SecondaryCohort 1: Average Change From Baseline in Hb Concentration at Weeks 16, 20, and 24

The baseline value for participants was the average of all available measurements from the central laboratory within 45 (42+3) days before start of study treatment in study AG348-C-011, excluding values within 61 days after a transfusion, or the baseline value from study AG348-C-006 if no assessment is available. The mean of average change from baseline in Hb concentration across Weeks 16, 20 and 24 is reported.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 16, 20, and 24
Reported as:
Mean · grams per liter
Cohort 1: Average Change From Baseline in Hb Concentration at Weeks 16, 20, and 24
grams per literCohort 1
Cohort 1: Average Change From Baseline in Hb Concentration at Weeks 16, 20, and 2416.45 ± 15.634
SecondaryCohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 8-hours Post-dose (AUC0-8) of Mitapivat
Time frame:
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post-dose at Week 12
Reported as:
Geometric mean · hour*nanograms per milliliter (hr*ng/mL)
Cohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 8-hours Post-dose (AUC0-8) of Mitapivat
hour*nanograms per milliliter (hr*ng/mL)Cohort 1
Cohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 8-hours Post-dose (AUC0-8) of Mitapivat3016 ± 27.5
SecondaryCohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-last) of Mitapivat
Time frame:
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post-dose at Week 12
Reported as:
Geometric mean · hr*ng/mL
Cohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-last) of Mitapivat
hr*ng/mLCohort 1
Cohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-last) of Mitapivat2990 ± 26.3
SecondaryCohort 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Mitapivat
Time frame:
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post-dose at Week 12
Reported as:
Geometric mean · nanograms/milliliter (ng/mL)
Cohort 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Mitapivat
nanograms/milliliter (ng/mL)Cohort 1
Cohort 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Mitapivat1018 ± 22.5
SecondaryCohort 1: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Mitapivat
Time frame:
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post-dose at Week 12
Reported as:
Median · hours
Cohort 1: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Mitapivat
hoursCohort 1
Cohort 1: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Mitapivat1.00 (0.45 to 4.3)
SecondaryCohort 1: Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (Tlast) of Mitapivat
Time frame:
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post-dose at Week 12
Reported as:
Median · hours
Cohort 1: Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (Tlast) of Mitapivat
hoursCohort 1
Cohort 1: Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (Tlast) of Mitapivat7.61 (3.57 to 8.53)
SecondaryCohort 1: Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) at the End of a Dosing Interval of Mitapivat
Time frame:
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post-dose at Week 12
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng/mL
Cohort 1: Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) at the End of a Dosing Interval of Mitapivat
ng/mLCohort 1
Cohort 1: Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) at the End of a Dosing Interval of Mitapivat62.8 ± 72.7
SecondaryCohort 1: Exposure-response (E-R) Relationship Between Safety Parameters and Mitapivat Concentration and Relevant Mitapivat Pharmacokinetic Parameters
Time frame:
First dose to up to 24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Percent probability
Cohort 1: Exposure-response (E-R) Relationship Between Safety Parameters and Mitapivat Concentration and Relevant Mitapivat Pharmacokinetic Parameters
Percent probabilityCohort 1: 5 mgCohort 1: 20 mgCohort 1: 50 mg
Cohort 1: Exposure-response (E-R) Relationship Between Safety Parameters and Mitapivat Concentration and Relevant Mitapivat Pharmacokinetic ParametersNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
SecondaryCohorts 1 and 2: Change From Baseline in Hb Concentration

The baseline value for cohort 1 participant was the average of all available measurements from the central laboratory within 45 (42+3) days before start of study treatment in study AG348-C-011, excluding values within 61 days after a transfusion, or the baseline value from study AG348-C-006 if no assessment was available. The baseline value for cohort 2 was from Study AG348-C-006.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 192
Reported as:
Mean · grams per liter
Cohorts 1 and 2: Change From Baseline in Hb Concentration
grams per literCohort 1Cohort 2
Cohorts 1 and 2: Change From Baseline in Hb Concentration22.39 ± 21.21121.32 ± 20.721
SecondaryCohorts 1 and 2: Change From Baseline in Indirect Bilirubin

The baseline value for cohort 1 participant was the average of all available measurements from the central laboratory within 45 (42+3) days before start of study treatment in study AG348-C-011, excluding values within 61 days after a transfusion, or the baseline value from study AG348-C-006 if no assessment is available. The baseline value for cohort 2 was from Study AG348-C-006.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 192
Reported as:
Mean · micromoles per liter (μmol/L)
Cohorts 1 and 2: Change From Baseline in Indirect Bilirubin
micromoles per liter (μmol/L)Cohort 1Cohort 2
Cohorts 1 and 2: Change From Baseline in Indirect Bilirubin-57.50 ± 54.542-36.73 ± 35.511
SecondaryCohorts 1 and 2: Change From Baseline in Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH)

The baseline value for cohort 1 participant was the average of all available measurements from the central laboratory within 45 (42+3) days before start of study treatment in study AG348-C-011, excluding values within 61 days after a transfusion, or the baseline value from study AG348-C-006 if no assessment was available. The baseline value for cohort 2 was from Study AG348-C-006.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 192
Reported as:
Mean · Units per Liter (U/L)
Cohorts 1 and 2: Change From Baseline in Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH)
Units per Liter (U/L)Cohort 1Cohort 2
Cohorts 1 and 2: Change From Baseline in Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH)-46.10 ± 75.310-130.80 ± 275.424
SecondaryCohorts 1 and 2: Change From Baseline in Haptoglobin Levels

The baseline value for Cohort 1 participant was the average of all available measurements from the central laboratory within 45 (42+3) days before start of study treatment in study AG348-C-011, excluding values within 61 days after a transfusion, or the baseline value from study AG348-C-006 if no assessment was available. The baseline value for Cohort 2 was from Study AG348-C-006.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 192
Reported as:
Mean · grams per liter
Cohorts 1 and 2: Change From Baseline in Haptoglobin Levels
grams per literCohort 1Cohort 2
Cohorts 1 and 2: Change From Baseline in Haptoglobin Levels0.254 ± 0.43400.250 ± 0.4689
SecondaryCohorts 1 and 2: Change From Baseline in Reticulocytes/Erythrocytes Ratio

The baseline value for Cohort 1 participants was the average of all available measurements from the central laboratory within 45 (42+3) days before start of study treatment in study AG348-C-011, excluding values within 61 days after a transfusion, or the baseline value from study AG348-C-006 if no assessment was available. The baseline value for Cohort 2 was from Study AG348-C-006.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 192
Reported as:
Mean · Reticulocytes/Erythrocytes Ratio
Cohorts 1 and 2: Change From Baseline in Reticulocytes/Erythrocytes Ratio
Reticulocytes/Erythrocytes RatioCohort 1Cohort 2
Cohorts 1 and 2: Change From Baseline in Reticulocytes/Erythrocytes Ratio-0.1696 ± 0.16243-0.1565 ± 0.14631
SecondaryCohort 3: Change From Baseline in Number of Transfusion Episodes

Number of transfusions at baseline was determined based on the transfusion data during the 52 weeks before informed consent for Cohort 3. Number of on-study transfusions was based on transfusions collected up to the end of the fixed dose period and standardized to 52 weeks. The change from baseline in number of transfusions was summarized for Cohort 3.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 192
Reported as:
Mean · number of transfusion episodes
Cohort 3: Change From Baseline in Number of Transfusion Episodes
number of transfusion episodesCohort 3
Cohort 3: Change From Baseline in Number of Transfusion Episodes4.14 ± 5.487
SecondaryCohort 3: Change From Baseline in Number of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Units Transfused

Annualized total number of RBC units transfused (units/52-week) during the study, including data up to end of study (EOS), was the total number of RBC units transfused during the entire study\*52 / \[(date of EOS - date of start of study treatment + 1)/7\]. Number of RBC units were determined based on the transfusion data during the 52 weeks before informed consent of the antecedent study for Cohort 3. Number of on-study RBC units was based on transfusion data collected up to the end of the fixed dose period and standardized to 52 weeks.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 192
Reported as:
Mean · number of RBC units transfused
Cohort 3: Change From Baseline in Number of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Units Transfused
number of RBC units transfusedCohort 3
Cohort 3: Change From Baseline in Number of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Units Transfused7.25 ± 7.915
SecondaryAll Cohorts: Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Scores: Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency Diary (PKDD)

The PKDD is a validated, daily 7-item PRO instrument with a recall period of 24 hours that measures the core signs and symptoms associated with pyruvate kinase deficiency in adults. The symptoms include tiredness, jaundice, bone pain, shortness of breath, and energy level. PKDD daily scores were calculated based on the participant's response to the PKDD questionnaire. Score ranges from 25 to 76, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms and a higher disease burden. The change from baseline in weekly mean scores was summarized. A negative change from baseline indicates a lower disease burden. Baseline of weekly mean score was defined as average of daily scores collected within 7 days before start of study treatment (mitapivat). For Cohort 1, last measurement before the start of study treatment in AG348-C-011 was used as baseline; if baseline was missing, then baseline value from AG348-C-006 was used. For Cohorts 2 \& 3 baseline values from -006 and-007, respectively, were used.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
All Cohorts: Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Scores: Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency Diary (PKDD)
score on a scaleCohort 1Cohort 2Cohort 3
All Cohorts: Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Scores: Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency Diary (PKDD)-3.75 ± 5.805-6.09 ± 7.617-5.04 ± 12.273
SecondaryAll Cohorts: Change From Baseline in HRQoL PRO Scores: Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency Impact Assessment (PKDIA)

PKDIA is a 12-item PRO measure of common impacts of PK deficiency on activities of daily living. Participants rated how PK deficiency has impacted aspects of daily living in past 7 days, including impacts on relationships \& leisure and social, mental, and physical activities. PKDIA score at each visit was based on 8 items that were retained after in-trial psychometric validation and calculated at each visit based on participant's response to PKDIA questionnaire. Score ranges from 30 to 76, with higher scores indicating higher disease burden. Negative change from baseline indicates lower disease burden. Baseline was defined as the last complete assessment (with no missing item in response) before start of study treatment. For Cohort 1, last measurement before start of study treatment in AG348-C-011 was used as baseline; if baseline was missing, then baseline value from AG348-C-006 was used. For Cohorts 2 and 3, the baseline values from 006 and 007, respectively, were used.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
All Cohorts: Change From Baseline in HRQoL PRO Scores: Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency Impact Assessment (PKDIA)
score on a scaleCohort 1Cohort 2Cohort 3
All Cohorts: Change From Baseline in HRQoL PRO Scores: Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency Impact Assessment (PKDIA)-3.9 ± 7.38-6.6 ± 8.75-5.4 ± 12.83

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 197 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Cohort 1: 5 mg0/1 (0%)1/1 (100%)0/1 (0%)
Cohort 1: 20 mg0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)1/1 (100%)
Cohort 1: 50 mg0/36 (0%)10/36 (27.8%)35/36 (97.2%)
Cohort 2: 5 mg0/2 (0%)0/2 (0%)2/2 (100%)
Cohort 2: 20 mg0/3 (0%)2/3 (66.7%)2/3 (66.7%)
Cohort 2: 50 mg1/30 (3.3%)6/30 (20%)27/30 (90%)
Cohort 3: 5 mg———
Cohort 3: 20 mg0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)1/1 (100%)
Cohort 3: 50 mg0/16 (0%)4/16 (25%)14/16 (87.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 32
Most frequent serious events
EventCohort 1: 5 mgCohort 1: 20 mgCohort 1: 50 mgCohort 2: 5 mgCohort 2: 20 mgCohort 2: 50 mgCohort 3: 5 mgCohort 3: 20 mgCohort 3: 50 mg
Cytomegalovirus infectionInfections and infestations1/10/10/360/20/30/30—0/10/16
SyncopeNervous system disorders0/10/11/360/21/30/30—0/10/16
Cholecystitis chronicHepatobiliary disorders0/10/10/360/21/30/30—0/10/16
SepsisInfections and infestations0/10/13/360/20/30/30—0/10/16
COVID-19 pneumoniaInfections and infestations0/10/10/360/20/30/30—0/11/16
Carotid artery aneurysmNervous system disorders0/10/10/360/20/30/30—0/11/16
Intracranial aneurysmNervous system disorders0/10/10/360/20/30/30—0/11/16
Tibia fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/10/10/360/20/31/30—0/11/16
MeningiomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/10/10/360/20/30/30—0/11/16
AsthmaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/10/10/360/20/30/30—0/11/16
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 156
Most frequent other events
EventCohort 1: 5 mgCohort 1: 20 mgCohort 1: 50 mgCohort 2: 5 mgCohort 2: 20 mgCohort 2: 50 mgCohort 3: 5 mgCohort 3: 20 mgCohort 3: 50 mg
COVID-19Infections and infestations0/10/112/361/22/313/30—1/15/16
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations0/10/16/361/20/35/30—1/12/16
AcarodermatitisInfections and infestations0/10/10/360/20/31/30—1/10/16
Infective tenosynovitisInfections and infestations0/10/10/360/20/30/30—1/10/16
FatigueGeneral disorders0/11/110/361/21/36/30—0/14/16
PyrexiaGeneral disorders0/10/110/362/20/37/30—0/13/16
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/10/19/360/22/35/30—1/12/16
MyalgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/10/12/360/20/31/30—1/12/16
Joint effusionMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/10/12/360/20/30/30—1/11/16
Bone painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/10/11/360/20/31/30—1/10/16

Baseline characteristics

Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Due to limited number of participants with optimal dose of 5 mg or 20 mg in antecedent studies AG348-C-006 (NCT03548220) and AG348-C-007 (NCT03559699), it was pre-specified in the statistical analysis plan (SAP) to report data for baseline characteristics by Cohort.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Cohort 1Cohort 2Cohort 3Total
Mean38.0 ± 15.9536.9 ± 15.7736.9 ± 15.0937.4 ± 15.56
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Cohort 1Cohort 2Cohort 3Total
Female23201255
Male1515535
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Cohort 1Cohort 2Cohort 3Total
Hispanic or Latino1203
Not Hispanic or Latino33231268
Unknown or Not Reported410519
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Cohort 1Cohort 2Cohort 3Total
White31231367
Asian35210
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0101
Other1001
Not reported36211
Femoral Total: T-score
Femoral Total: T-score(T-score)Cohort 1Cohort 2Cohort 3Total
Mean-0.834 ± 1.1182-1.139 ± 1.0995-0.813 ± 0.6748-0.946 ± 1.0416
Femoral Total: Z-score
Femoral Total: Z-score(Z-score)Cohort 1Cohort 2Cohort 3Total
Mean-0.548 ± 1.1574-0.916 ± 1.0657-0.529 ± 0.7137-0.685 ± 1.0560
Adjusted Spine: T-Score
Adjusted Spine: T-Score(T-score)Cohort 1Cohort 2Cohort 3Total
Mean-1.143 ± 1.0926-1.808 ± 1.1589-1.161 ± 1.0469-1.400 ± 1.1440
Adjusted Spine: Z-score
Adjusted Spine: Z-score(Z-score)Cohort 1Cohort 2Cohort 3Total
Mean-0.804 ± 1.2529-1.536 ± 1.2469-0.848 ± 1.0420-1.092 ± 1.2506
08

Study locations

42 sites
  • Phoenix Children's Hospital
    Phoenix, Arizona 85016, United States
  • UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital, Oakland
    Oakland, California 95609, United States
  • Emory-Children's Center
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
  • Indiana Hemophilia & Thrombosis Center Inc.
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46260, United States
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • Boston Children's Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
  • Wayne State University School of Medicine
    Detroit, Michigan 48201, United States
  • Duke University Medical Center
    Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, United States
  • Houston Methodist Research Institute
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • University of Utah
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84113, United States
  • Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
    Seattle, Washington 98195, United States
  • UNICAMP - Hemocentro
    São Paulo, 13083-878, Brazil
  • McMaster University
    Hamilton, Ontario L8N3Z5, Canada
  • Herlev University Hospital
    Herlev, 2730, Denmark
  • CHU Hopitaux de Bordeaux - Hôpital Saint-André
    Bordeaux, 33000, France
  • CHU Hôpital Henri Mondor
    Créteil, 94010, France
  • Hospital La Timone
    Marseille, 13385, France
  • Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole
    Toulouse, 31100, France
  • Charite - UB - CVK - Medizinische Klinik
    Berlin, 10117, Germany
  • Universitätsklinik Würzburg
    Würzburg, 97080, Germany
  • St James's Hospital
    Dublin, Ireland
  • Ospedale Galliera
    Genova, 16128, Italy
  • Osp Maggiore Policlinico Milano
    Milan, 20122, Italy
  • AORN Cardarelli
    Naples, 00165, Italy
  • Università della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"
    Naples, 80318, Italy
  • Mie University Hospital
    Tsu, Mie-ken 514-8507, Japan
  • Tohoku University Hospital
    Sendai, Miyagi 980-8574, Japan
  • Kyoto Katsura Hospital
    Kyoto, 615-8256, Japan
  • Kansai Medical University, Dep. of Pediatrics, Hirakata Hospital
    Osaka, 573-1010, Japan
  • Toho University Omori Medical Center
    Tokyo, 8541, Japan
  • Van Creveldkliniek
    Utrecht, 3508 GA, Netherlands
  • Yeungnam University Hospital
    Daegu, 705-703, South Korea
  • Hospital. U. Vall d'Hebron
    Barcelona, 08035, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario La Paz
    Madrid, 28046, Spain
  • Htal Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca.
    Murcia, 30120, Spain
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV)
    Vaud (Lausanne), 1011, Switzerland
  • Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital
    Bangkok, 10700, Thailand
  • Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine
    Ankara, 06100, Turkey (Türkiye)
  • Addenbrooke's Hospital
    Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
  • Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
    London, W2 INY, United Kingdom
  • University College London
    London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • van Beers EJ, Al-Samkari H, Grace RF, Barcellini W, Glenthoj A, DiBacco M, Wind-Rotolo M, Xu R, Beynon V, Patel P, Porter JB, Kuo KHM. Mitapivat improves ineffective erythropoiesis and iron overload in adult patients with pyruvate kinase deficiency. Blood Adv. 2024 May 28;8(10):2433-2441. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023011743. PubMed 38330179 ↗
  • Rab MAE, Van Oirschot BA, Kosinski PA, Hixon J, Johnson K, Chubukov V, Dang L, Pasterkamp G, Van Straaten S, Van Solinge WW, Van Beers EJ, Kung C, Van Wijk R. AG-348 (Mitapivat), an allosteric activator of red blood cell pyruvate kinase, increases enzymatic activity, protein stability, and ATP levels over a broad range of PKLR genotypes. Haematologica. 2021 Jan 1;106(1):238-249. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2019.238865. PubMed 31974203 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jul 19, 2022
  • Statistical analysis plan · Sep 24, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 18, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03853798
Lead sponsor
Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 26, 2019
Start date
Mar 21, 2019
Primary completion
Jul 3, 2024
Completion
Jul 3, 2024
Results posted
Nov 18, 2025
Last update
Nov 18, 2025

Study contacts

Medical Affairs
study chair · Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion