ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03852498Updated May 24, 2024Results posted

A Clinical Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Gene Therapy for the Treatment of Cerebral Adrenoleukodystrophy (CALD)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Lenti-D in Cerebral Adrenoleukodystrophy (CALD), sponsored by bluebird bio. Completed at 8 sites in 6 countries. Open to male participants aged Up to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-24.

Sponsored by bluebird bio · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
35
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
Up to 17 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Lenti-D Drug Product (also known as elivaldogene autotemcel or Skysona, hereafter referred to as eli-cel) after myeloablative conditioning with busulfan and fludarabine in participants with CALD. A participant's blood stem cells will be collected and modified (transduced) using the Lenti-D lentiviral vector encoding human adrenoleukodystrophy protein. After modification (transduction) with the Lenti-D lentiviral vector, the cells will be transplanted back into the participant following myeloablative conditioning. Enrollment and treatment in Study ALD-104 have been completed and further enrollment in this study is not expected, although participants follow-up remains ongoing in the long-term follow-up Study LTF-304 (NCT02698579).

02

Conditions studied

  • Cerebral Adrenoleukodystrophy (CALD)

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Adrenoleukodystrophy
  • X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy
  • Gene therapy
  • Hematopoietic stem cell
03

In context

Adrenoleukodystrophy

68 studies on the registry are indexed under Adrenoleukodystrophy; 19 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 35 is above the median of 31 across 40 interventional studies indexed under Adrenoleukodystrophy.

Browse Adrenoleukodystrophy studies →

Lead sponsor

bluebird bio is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. is obtained from a competent custodial parent or guardian with legal capacity to execute a local Institutional Review Board (IRB)/independent ethics committee (IEC) approved consent. Informed assent will be sought from capable participants, in accordance with the directive of the IRB/IEC and with local requirements.
  2. Males aged 17 years and younger, at the time of parental/guardian consent and, where appropriate, participant assent.
  3. Active CALD as defined by:

    1. Elevated very long chain fatty acids (VLCFA) values, and
    2. Active central nervous system (CNS) disease established by central radiographic review of brain MRI demonstrating: i) Loes score between 0.5 and 9 (inclusive) on the 34-point scale, and ii) Gadolinium enhancement (GdE) on MRI of demyelinating lesions.
  4. NFS \< or = 1.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prior receipt of an transplant or gene therapy.
  2. Use of statins, Lorenzo's Oil, or dietary regimens used to lower VLCFA levels. Note: participants must discontinue use of these medications at time of consent.
  3. Receipt of an study drug or procedure within 3 months before Screening that might confound study outcomes. Use of investigational study drugs is prohibited throughout the course of the study.
  4. Any conditions that make it impossible to perform MRI studies (including allergies to anesthetics or contrast agents).
  5. Hematological compromise as evidenced by:

    1. Peripheral blood (ANC) count \<1500 cells/ cubic millimeter (mm\^3), and either
    2. count \<100,000 cells/mm\^3, or
    3. \<10 gram per deciliter (g/dL).
  6. Hepatic compromise as evidenced by:

    1. (AST) value greater than (>) 2.5 × (ULN)
    2. Alanine transaminase (ALT) value >2.5 × ULN
    3. Total value >3.0 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL), except if there is a diagnosis of Gilbert's Syndrome and the participant is otherwise stable
  7. Baseline estimated \<70 milliliter per minute (mL/min)/1.73 square meter (m\^2).
  8. Cardiac compromise as evidenced by \<40 percent (%).
  9. Immediate family member with a known or suspected Familial Cancer Syndrome.
  10. uncontrolled, active bacterial, viral, fungal, parasitic, or prion associated infection.
  11. Positive for type 1 or 2 (HIV-1, HIV-2); virus (HBV); virus (HCV); human T lymphotrophic virus 1 (HTLV-1). (Note that participants who have been vaccinated against HBV [positive for HBV surface antibodies] who are negative for other markers of prior HBV infection [e.g., negative for HBV core Ab] are eligible. Participants with past exposure to HBV [hepatitis B core antibody [HBcAb] -positive and/or hepatitis B e-antigen antibody [HBeAb]-positive] are also eligible for the study provided they have a negative test for HBV DNA. Also note that participants who are positive for anti-hepatitis C Ab are eligible as long as they have a negative hepatitis C viral load).
  12. Any clinically significant cardiovascular, hematological, or pulmonary disease, or other disease or condition that would be for any of the other study procedures.
  13. Absence of adequate for fertile participants.
  14. Any contraindications to the use of Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or plerixafor during the mobilization of HSCs, and any contraindications to the use of busulfan or fludarabine, including known to the active substances or to any of the in their formulations.
  15. Known hypersensitivity to protamine sulfate.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(19)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Allogeneic and autologous transplant

Stem cell (bone marrow) transplants. Allogeneic uses cells from a donor; autologous uses your own cells, collected earlier and given back.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
35 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Lenti-D Drug Product

    Participants received a single intravenous (IV) infusion of eli-cel (also referred to as Lenti-D Drug Product) on Day 1 at a dose of \> or = 5.0\*10\^6 CD34+ cells/kilogram (kg). All participants received myeloablative conditioning with busulfan and fludarabine over a number of days prior to drug product infusion.

    Genetic: Lenti-D

Interventions

  • GeneticLenti-D

    Participants received a single IV infusion of Lenti-D Drug Product.

    Also known as: elivaldogene autotemcel, eli-cel

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Were Alive and Have None of the 6 Major Functional Disabilities (MFDs) at Month 24

    The MFDs consisted of loss of communication, cortical blindness, tube feeding, total incontinence, wheelchair dependence, complete loss of voluntary movement. Month-24 MFD-Free survival criteria defined as: alive at 24 months post infusion; have not developed any of the MFDs by 24 months post infusion; have not received rescue cell administration or allo-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) by 24 months post infusion; and have not withdrawn from the study or have not been lost to follow-up by 24 months post infusion.

    Time frame: At Month 24

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Neutrophil Engraftment After Drug Product Infusion

    Neutrophil engraftment is defined as achieving 3 consecutive absolute neutrophil count (ANC) laboratory values of \>= 0.5x10\^9 cells/liter (L) (after initial post-infusion nadir) obtained on different days by 42 days postinfusion of eli-cel (Rel Day 43).

    Time frame: By 42 days post-drug infusion

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Without Gadolinium Enhancement (i.e. GdE-) on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) at Month 24

    Percentage of participants without Gadolinium Enhancement (i.e. GdE-) on MRI at Month 24 were reported.

    Time frame: At Month 24

  2. Number of Participants With Change in Neurologic Function Score (NFS) From Baseline to Month 24

    NFS was a 25-point score used to evaluate the severity of gross neurologic dysfunction in cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy (CALD) by scoring 15 symptoms (functional domains) across 6 categories. Listed here are the 15 symptoms followed by their maximal score out of 25 points: a) Hearing/auditory processing problems-1, b) Aphasia/apraxia-1, c) Loss of communication-3, d) Vision impairment/field cut-1, e) Cortical blindness- 2, f) Swallowing/other central nervous system (CNS) dysfunctions-2, g) Tube feeding-2, h) Running difficulties/hyperreflexia-1, i) Walking difficulties/spasticity/spastic gait (no assistance)-1, j) Spastic gait (needs assistance)-2, k) Wheelchair dependence-2, l) Complete loss of voluntary movement-3, m) Episodes of incontinence -1, n) Total incontinence-2, o) Nonfebrile seizures-1. A score of "0"= absence of clinical signs of cerebral disease.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Month 24

  3. Number of Participants Who Achieved Stable NFS at Month 24

    Stable NFS was defined as maintaining an NFS \<=4 without an increase of \>3 from Baseline. Number of participants who achieved stable NFS at Month 24 were reported.

    Time frame: At Month 24

  4. Major Functional Disability (MFD)-Free Survival Rate

    MFD-free survival rate was defined as percentage of participants from drug product infusion to either second transplant, MFD, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. MFD-free survival rate was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier Analysis. Kaplan-Meier estimated MFD-free survival rate at 24 months after Lenti-D drug infusion was reported.

    Time frame: At 24 months after Lenti-D drug infusion

  5. Overall Survival Rate

    Overall survival rate was defined as percentage of participants alive from date of Lenti-D drug product infusion (Day 1) to date of death of all causes. Overall survival rate was censored at the date of last visit if the subject were alive. Participants who are alive were censored at the date of last contact. Overall survival rate was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier Analysis.

    Time frame: At 24 months after Lenti-D drug infusion

  6. Median Detectable Vector Copy Number (VCN) in Peripheral Blood Cells by Month 6

    Presence of vector sequences in the genome of cells derived from the originally transduced HSC indicates the presence of transduced cells amongst the HSC precursors. The presence of vector sequences was evaluated throughout the study in whole blood, in selected subpopulations of blood cells (including CD14+ cells), and in bone marrow when indicated. The presence of vector sequences in the genomic DNA of cells was detected using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), and results were expressed as vector copy number (VCN; vector copies per diploid genome, c/dg).

    Time frame: By Month 6 post-transplant

  7. Time to Neutrophil Engraftment (NE) After Drug Product Infusion

    Neutrophil engraftment is defined as achieving 3 consecutive absolute neutrophil count (ANC) laboratory values of \>= 0.5 x 10\^9 cells/liter (L) (after initial post-infusion nadir) obtained on different days by 42 days post-infusion of eli-cel (Rel Day 43). Time to neutrophil engraftment after drug product infusion was reported.

    Time frame: By 42 days post-drug infusion

  8. Percentage of Participants With Platelet Engraftment by Month 24

    Platelet engraftment was defined as achieving 3 consecutive unsupported platelet counts of \>=20 x 10\^9 cells/L (after initial post-infusion nadir) obtained on different days while no platelet transfusions were administered for 7 days immediately preceding and during the evaluation period. The first Day of 3 consecutive platelet counts \>=20 x 10\^9 cells/L was considered the Day of platelet engraftment.

    Time frame: By Month 24

  9. Time to Platelet Engraftment Post-drug Product Infusion

    Platelet Engraftment was defined as achieving 3 consecutive unsupported platelet counts of \> or =20 x 10\^9 cells/L (after initial post-infusion nadir) obtained on different days while no platelet transfusions were administered for 7 days immediately preceding and during the evaluation period. The first day of 3 consecutive platelet counts \>=20 x 10\^9 cells/L was the day of PE. Time to platelet engraftment post-drug product infusion by Month 24 was reported.

    Time frame: By Month 24

  10. Percentage of Participants With Loss of Neutrophil Engraftment Post-drug Product Infusion by Month 24

    Participants were considered to have primary engraftment failure if they did not achieve NE by Relative Day 43. A participant was considered to have secondary engraftment failure if they achieved and then subsequently lost NE by the Month 24, i.e., if they met both the conditions; Achieved NE by Relative Day 43 as defined above and had sustained decline in ANC to \< 0.5 x 10\^9 cells/L for 3 consecutive measurements on different days after Relative Day 43, without alternate etiology. First day of the 3 consecutive ANC decline to \< 0.5 x 10\^9 cells/L was considered the day of secondary engraftment failure. Percentage of participants with both primary or secondary loss of neutrophil engraftment at Month 24 were reported.

    Time frame: By Month 24

  11. Percentage of Participants Who Underwent a Subsequent Allo- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) Infusion by Month 24

    Percentage of participants who have undergone a subsequent allo-HSCT infusion by Month 24 were reported.

    Time frame: By Month 24

  12. Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Either Acute (>= Grade 2) or Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) at Month 24

    Acute GVHD graded on the Acute GVHD Grading Scale (1-4): Grade 1 is characterized as mild disease, Grade 2 as moderate, Grade 3 as severe (involvement of any organ system), and Grade 4 as life-threatening; chronic GVHD was determined by the Investigator. GVHD was seen after an eli-cel participant received a subsequent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. No GVHD was seen in participants who did not receive allogeneic stem cell transplants. Grade 2 non-serious GVHD was reported in a participant who received allogeneic transplant post eli-cel infusion. Percentage of participants who experienced either acute (\>= Grade 2) or chronic GVHD at Month 24 were reported.

    Time frame: At Month 24

  13. Percentage of Participants Who Experienced >= Grade 2 Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) by Month 24

    Acute GVHD graded on the Acute GVHD Grading Scale (1-4): Grade 1 is characterized as mild disease, Grade 2 as moderate, Grade 3 as severe (involvement of any organ system), and Grade 4 as life-threatening; Acute GVHD was determined by the Investigator. GVHD was seen after an eli-cel participant received a subsequent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. No GVHD was seen in participants who did not receive allogeneic stem cell transplants. Grade 2 non-serious GVHD was reported in a participant who received allogeneic transplant post eli-cel infusion. Percentage of participants who experienced \>= Grade 2 Acute GVHD at Month 24 were reported.

    Time frame: By Month 24

  14. Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Chronic GVHD by Month 24

    Chronic GVHD graded on the Chronic GVHD Grading Scale as limited or extensive. Chronic GVHD was determined by the Investigator. No chronic GVHD was observed in any participants. Acute GVHD was seen after an eli-cel participant received a subsequent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. No GVHD was seen in participants who did not receive allogeneic stem cell transplants. Grade 2 non-serious GVHD was reported in a participant who received allogeneic transplant post eli-cel infusion. Percentage of participants who experienced chronic GVHD by Month 24 were reported.

    Time frame: By Month 24

  15. Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Transplant-related Mortality Through 100 and 365 Days Post-drug Product Infusion

    Transplant-related mortality was determined by the investigator and summarized for the following intervals: from Rel Day 1 through 100 days post-drug product infusion (Rel Day 101) and from Rel Day 1 through 365 days post-drug product infusion (Rel Day 366). Percentage of participants who experienced transplant-related mortality through 100 and 365 days post-drug product infusion were reported.

    Time frame: From time of drug product infusion through 100 and 365 days post-drug product infusion

  16. Percentage of Participants With Clinical >= Grade 3 Adverse Events (AEs), All Investigational Medicinal Product-related AEs, All Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and >= Grade 3 Infections

    Adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug product in participants, whether or not considered drug related. SAE was any AE, occurring at any dose and regardless of causality, that resulted in death, was life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or was considered an important medical event that may jeopardize the subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent an outcome listed previously. Percentage of participants with clinical \>= Grade 3 AEs, all investigational medicinal product-related AEs, all serious adverse events (SAEs), and \>= Grade 3 infections were reported.

    Time frame: From date of informed consent up to Month 24

  17. Number of Participants With >= Grade 3 Prolonged Cytopenia on or After Rel Day 60 And Rel Day 100

    Number of participants with \>= Grade 3 prolonged cytopenia (i.e., decreased platelet counts, decreased neutrophil counts, and/or decreased hemoglobin counts) on or after Rel Day 60 and Rel Day 100 were reported.

    Time frame: Prolonged cytopenias occurring on or after Rel Day 60 and Rel Day 100 following drug product infusion

  18. Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Changes in Laboratory Parameters by Month 24

    Laboratory parameters included Hematology (Leukocytes \[with a threshold range \<4.0 x 10\^9/L, \>=18 x 10\^9/L\], Neutrophils \[\<1.0 x 10\^9/L\], Erythrocytes \[\<=3.0 x 10\^12/L\], Platelets \[\<=75 x 10\^9/L\]); Clinical chemistry (Sodium \[\<=126 millimoles per liter (mmol/L), \>=156 mmol/L\], Potassium \[\<=3 mmol/L, \>=6 mmol/L\], Glucose \[\<=3.0 mmol/L\]), Renal (Urea Nitrogen \[\>=10.7 mmol/L\], Creatinine \[\>=150 umol/L\]) and liver (Alanine Aminotransferase \[ALA\]. Aspartate Aminotransferase \[ASA\], Alkaline Phosphatase \[AP\] with threshold range of \>=3 x upper limit of normal (ULN), Bilirubin \[\>=34.2 micromoles per liter (umol/L)\]). Clinical significance was decided by investigator.

    Time frame: From Day 1 to Month 24

  19. Number of Emergency Room Visits (Post-Neutrophil Engraftment) by Month 24

    Number of emergency room visits (post-neutrophil engraftment) up to Month 24 were reported.

    Time frame: From Post-Neutrophil Engraftment up to Month 24

  20. Median Number of Emergency Room Visits (Post-Neutrophil Engraftment) by Month 24

    Median number of emergency room visits (post-neutrophil engraftment) up to Month 24 were reported.

    Time frame: From Post-Neutrophil Engraftment up to Month 24

  21. Number of In-patient Hospitalizations (Post-Neutrophil Engraftment) by Month 24

    Number of In-patient hospitalizations (post-neutrophil engraftment) by Month 24 were reported.

    Time frame: From Post-Neutrophil Engraftment up to Month 24

  22. Median Number of In-patient Hospitalizations (Post-Neutrophil Engraftment) by Month 24

    Median number of In-patient hospitalizations (post-neutrophil engraftment) by Month 24 were reported.

    Time frame: From post-neutrophil engraftment up to Month 24

  23. Duration of In-patient Hospitalizations (Post-Neutrophil Engraftment) up to Month 24

    Duration of in-patient hospitalizations was calculated as: Duration = (Date of hospital discharge) - (Date of hospital admission before NE) + 1. Duration of In-patient hospitalizations (post-neutrophil engraftment) up to Month 24 was reported. The range of in-patient hospitalizations is influenced by hospital stays for participants who received allogeneic stem cell transplants.

    Time frame: From post-neutrophil engraftment up to Month 24

  24. Number of Intensive Care Units (ICU) Stays (Post-neutrophil Engraftment) by Month 24

    Number of ICU Stays (Post-neutrophil Engraftment) By Month 24 were reported.

    Time frame: From post-neutrophil engraftment up to Month 24

  25. Duration of ICU Stays (Post-neutrophil Engraftment) by Month 24

    Duration of ICU Stays was calculated as: Duration = (Date of hospital discharge) - (Date of hospital admission before NE) + 1. Duration of ICU Stays (Post-neutrophil Engraftment) by Month 24 was reported.

    Time frame: From post-neutrophil engraftment up to Month 24

  26. Number of Participants Who Tested Positive and Negative for Vector-Derived Replication Competent Lentivirus (RCL) Detected by Month 24

    Number of participants who tested positive and negative for vector-derived RCL detected at Month 24 were reported. Screening of participant's blood samples for RCL at Month 24 following Lenti-D Drug infusion was performed, with the more rigorous co-culture assays used to distinguish any false positives as applicable.

    Time frame: By Month 24

  27. Number of Participants With Insertional Oncogenesis by Month 24

    Insertional oncogenesis included myelodysplastic syndrome, leukemia, lymphoma. Number of participants with insertional oncogenesis at Month 24 were reported.

    Time frame: By Month 24 post-transplant

07

Results

Posted May 24, 2024

Participant flow

This study was conducted at 8 study centers in France, Italy, Germany, the Netherlands, United Kingdom, and United States of America from 24 January 2019 to 24 July 2023.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLenti-D Drug Product
Started35
Completed35
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants Who Were Alive and Have None of the 6 Major Functional Disabilities (MFDs) at Month 24

The MFDs consisted of loss of communication, cortical blindness, tube feeding, total incontinence, wheelchair dependence, complete loss of voluntary movement. Month-24 MFD-Free survival criteria defined as: alive at 24 months post infusion; have not developed any of the MFDs by 24 months post infusion; have not received rescue cell administration or allo-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) by 24 months post infusion; and have not withdrawn from the study or have not been lost to follow-up by 24 months post infusion.

Time frame:
At Month 24
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Were Alive and Have None of the 6 Major Functional Disabilities (MFDs) at Month 24
Percentage of participantsLenti-D Drug Product
Percentage of Participants Who Were Alive and Have None of the 6 Major Functional Disabilities (MFDs) at Month 2485.7 (69.7 to 95.2)
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Neutrophil Engraftment After Drug Product Infusion

Neutrophil engraftment is defined as achieving 3 consecutive absolute neutrophil count (ANC) laboratory values of \>= 0.5x10\^9 cells/liter (L) (after initial post-infusion nadir) obtained on different days by 42 days postinfusion of eli-cel (Rel Day 43).

Time frame:
By 42 days post-drug infusion
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Neutrophil Engraftment After Drug Product Infusion
Percentage of participantsLenti-D Drug Product
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Neutrophil Engraftment After Drug Product Infusion100.0 (90.0 to 100.0)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Without Gadolinium Enhancement (i.e. GdE-) on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) at Month 24

Percentage of participants without Gadolinium Enhancement (i.e. GdE-) on MRI at Month 24 were reported.

Time frame:
At Month 24
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Without Gadolinium Enhancement (i.e. GdE-) on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) at Month 24
Percentage of participantsLenti-D Drug Product
Percentage of Participants Without Gadolinium Enhancement (i.e. GdE-) on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) at Month 2494.3 (80.8 to 99.3)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Change in Neurologic Function Score (NFS) From Baseline to Month 24

NFS was a 25-point score used to evaluate the severity of gross neurologic dysfunction in cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy (CALD) by scoring 15 symptoms (functional domains) across 6 categories. Listed here are the 15 symptoms followed by their maximal score out of 25 points: a) Hearing/auditory processing problems-1, b) Aphasia/apraxia-1, c) Loss of communication-3, d) Vision impairment/field cut-1, e) Cortical blindness- 2, f) Swallowing/other central nervous system (CNS) dysfunctions-2, g) Tube feeding-2, h) Running difficulties/hyperreflexia-1, i) Walking difficulties/spasticity/spastic gait (no assistance)-1, j) Spastic gait (needs assistance)-2, k) Wheelchair dependence-2, l) Complete loss of voluntary movement-3, m) Episodes of incontinence -1, n) Total incontinence-2, o) Nonfebrile seizures-1. A score of "0"= absence of clinical signs of cerebral disease.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Month 24
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Change in Neurologic Function Score (NFS) From Baseline to Month 24
ParticipantsLenti-D Drug Product
Change at Month 24: Increased <=34
Change at Month 24: Increased > 32
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Achieved Stable NFS at Month 24

Stable NFS was defined as maintaining an NFS \<=4 without an increase of \>3 from Baseline. Number of participants who achieved stable NFS at Month 24 were reported.

Time frame:
At Month 24
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Achieved Stable NFS at Month 24
ParticipantsLenti-D Drug Product
Number of Participants Who Achieved Stable NFS at Month 2433
SecondaryMajor Functional Disability (MFD)-Free Survival Rate

MFD-free survival rate was defined as percentage of participants from drug product infusion to either second transplant, MFD, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. MFD-free survival rate was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier Analysis. Kaplan-Meier estimated MFD-free survival rate at 24 months after Lenti-D drug infusion was reported.

Time frame:
At 24 months after Lenti-D drug infusion
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Major Functional Disability (MFD)-Free Survival Rate
Percentage of participantsLenti-D Drug Product
Major Functional Disability (MFD)-Free Survival Rate88.6 (72.4 to 95.5)
SecondaryOverall Survival Rate

Overall survival rate was defined as percentage of participants alive from date of Lenti-D drug product infusion (Day 1) to date of death of all causes. Overall survival rate was censored at the date of last visit if the subject were alive. Participants who are alive were censored at the date of last contact. Overall survival rate was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier Analysis.

Time frame:
At 24 months after Lenti-D drug infusion
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Overall Survival Rate
Percentage of participantsLenti-D Drug Product
Overall Survival Rate100.0 (100.0 to 100.0)
SecondaryMedian Detectable Vector Copy Number (VCN) in Peripheral Blood Cells by Month 6

Presence of vector sequences in the genome of cells derived from the originally transduced HSC indicates the presence of transduced cells amongst the HSC precursors. The presence of vector sequences was evaluated throughout the study in whole blood, in selected subpopulations of blood cells (including CD14+ cells), and in bone marrow when indicated. The presence of vector sequences in the genomic DNA of cells was detected using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), and results were expressed as vector copy number (VCN; vector copies per diploid genome, c/dg).

Time frame:
By Month 6 post-transplant
Reported as:
Median · copies per diploid genome (c/dg)
Median Detectable Vector Copy Number (VCN) in Peripheral Blood Cells by Month 6
copies per diploid genome (c/dg)Lenti-D Drug Product
Median Detectable Vector Copy Number (VCN) in Peripheral Blood Cells by Month 61.05 (0.03 to 3.13)
SecondaryTime to Neutrophil Engraftment (NE) After Drug Product Infusion

Neutrophil engraftment is defined as achieving 3 consecutive absolute neutrophil count (ANC) laboratory values of \>= 0.5 x 10\^9 cells/liter (L) (after initial post-infusion nadir) obtained on different days by 42 days post-infusion of eli-cel (Rel Day 43). Time to neutrophil engraftment after drug product infusion was reported.

Time frame:
By 42 days post-drug infusion
Reported as:
Median · Days
Time to Neutrophil Engraftment (NE) After Drug Product Infusion
DaysLenti-D Drug Product
Time to Neutrophil Engraftment (NE) After Drug Product Infusion14.0 (12 to 31)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Platelet Engraftment by Month 24

Platelet engraftment was defined as achieving 3 consecutive unsupported platelet counts of \>=20 x 10\^9 cells/L (after initial post-infusion nadir) obtained on different days while no platelet transfusions were administered for 7 days immediately preceding and during the evaluation period. The first Day of 3 consecutive platelet counts \>=20 x 10\^9 cells/L was considered the Day of platelet engraftment.

Time frame:
By Month 24
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Platelet Engraftment by Month 24
Percentage of participantsLenti-D Drug Product
Percentage of Participants With Platelet Engraftment by Month 24100.0 (90.0 to 100.0)
SecondaryTime to Platelet Engraftment Post-drug Product Infusion

Platelet Engraftment was defined as achieving 3 consecutive unsupported platelet counts of \> or =20 x 10\^9 cells/L (after initial post-infusion nadir) obtained on different days while no platelet transfusions were administered for 7 days immediately preceding and during the evaluation period. The first day of 3 consecutive platelet counts \>=20 x 10\^9 cells/L was the day of PE. Time to platelet engraftment post-drug product infusion by Month 24 was reported.

Time frame:
By Month 24
Reported as:
Median · Days
Time to Platelet Engraftment Post-drug Product Infusion
DaysLenti-D Drug Product
Time to Platelet Engraftment Post-drug Product Infusion29.0 (14 to 108)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Loss of Neutrophil Engraftment Post-drug Product Infusion by Month 24

Participants were considered to have primary engraftment failure if they did not achieve NE by Relative Day 43. A participant was considered to have secondary engraftment failure if they achieved and then subsequently lost NE by the Month 24, i.e., if they met both the conditions; Achieved NE by Relative Day 43 as defined above and had sustained decline in ANC to \< 0.5 x 10\^9 cells/L for 3 consecutive measurements on different days after Relative Day 43, without alternate etiology. First day of the 3 consecutive ANC decline to \< 0.5 x 10\^9 cells/L was considered the day of secondary engraftment failure. Percentage of participants with both primary or secondary loss of neutrophil engraftment at Month 24 were reported.

Time frame:
By Month 24
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Loss of Neutrophil Engraftment Post-drug Product Infusion by Month 24
Percentage of participantsLenti-D Drug Product
Percentage of Participants With Loss of Neutrophil Engraftment Post-drug Product Infusion by Month 240 (0.0 to 10.0)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Underwent a Subsequent Allo- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) Infusion by Month 24

Percentage of participants who have undergone a subsequent allo-HSCT infusion by Month 24 were reported.

Time frame:
By Month 24
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Underwent a Subsequent Allo- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) Infusion by Month 24
Percentage of participantsLenti-D Drug Product
Percentage of Participants Who Underwent a Subsequent Allo- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) Infusion by Month 248.6 (1.8 to 23.1)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Experienced Either Acute (>= Grade 2) or Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) at Month 24

Acute GVHD graded on the Acute GVHD Grading Scale (1-4): Grade 1 is characterized as mild disease, Grade 2 as moderate, Grade 3 as severe (involvement of any organ system), and Grade 4 as life-threatening; chronic GVHD was determined by the Investigator. GVHD was seen after an eli-cel participant received a subsequent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. No GVHD was seen in participants who did not receive allogeneic stem cell transplants. Grade 2 non-serious GVHD was reported in a participant who received allogeneic transplant post eli-cel infusion. Percentage of participants who experienced either acute (\>= Grade 2) or chronic GVHD at Month 24 were reported.

Time frame:
At Month 24
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Either Acute (>= Grade 2) or Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) at Month 24
Percentage of participantsLenti-D Drug Product
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Either Acute (>= Grade 2) or Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) at Month 242.9 (0.1 to 14.9)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Experienced >= Grade 2 Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) by Month 24

Acute GVHD graded on the Acute GVHD Grading Scale (1-4): Grade 1 is characterized as mild disease, Grade 2 as moderate, Grade 3 as severe (involvement of any organ system), and Grade 4 as life-threatening; Acute GVHD was determined by the Investigator. GVHD was seen after an eli-cel participant received a subsequent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. No GVHD was seen in participants who did not receive allogeneic stem cell transplants. Grade 2 non-serious GVHD was reported in a participant who received allogeneic transplant post eli-cel infusion. Percentage of participants who experienced \>= Grade 2 Acute GVHD at Month 24 were reported.

Time frame:
By Month 24
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced >= Grade 2 Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) by Month 24
Percentage of participantsLenti-D Drug Product
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced >= Grade 2 Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) by Month 242.9 (0.1 to 14.9)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Experienced Chronic GVHD by Month 24

Chronic GVHD graded on the Chronic GVHD Grading Scale as limited or extensive. Chronic GVHD was determined by the Investigator. No chronic GVHD was observed in any participants. Acute GVHD was seen after an eli-cel participant received a subsequent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. No GVHD was seen in participants who did not receive allogeneic stem cell transplants. Grade 2 non-serious GVHD was reported in a participant who received allogeneic transplant post eli-cel infusion. Percentage of participants who experienced chronic GVHD by Month 24 were reported.

Time frame:
By Month 24
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Chronic GVHD by Month 24
Percentage of participantsLenti-D Drug Product
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Chronic GVHD by Month 240 (0.0 to 10.0)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Experienced Transplant-related Mortality Through 100 and 365 Days Post-drug Product Infusion

Transplant-related mortality was determined by the investigator and summarized for the following intervals: from Rel Day 1 through 100 days post-drug product infusion (Rel Day 101) and from Rel Day 1 through 365 days post-drug product infusion (Rel Day 366). Percentage of participants who experienced transplant-related mortality through 100 and 365 days post-drug product infusion were reported.

Time frame:
From time of drug product infusion through 100 and 365 days post-drug product infusion
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Transplant-related Mortality Through 100 and 365 Days Post-drug Product Infusion
Percentage of participantsLenti-D Drug Product
Transplant related mortality within 100 days0 (0.0 to 10.0)
Transplant related mortality within 365 days0 (0.0 to 10.0)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Clinical >= Grade 3 Adverse Events (AEs), All Investigational Medicinal Product-related AEs, All Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and >= Grade 3 Infections

Adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug product in participants, whether or not considered drug related. SAE was any AE, occurring at any dose and regardless of causality, that resulted in death, was life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or was considered an important medical event that may jeopardize the subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent an outcome listed previously. Percentage of participants with clinical \>= Grade 3 AEs, all investigational medicinal product-related AEs, all serious adverse events (SAEs), and \>= Grade 3 infections were reported.

Time frame:
From date of informed consent up to Month 24
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Clinical >= Grade 3 Adverse Events (AEs), All Investigational Medicinal Product-related AEs, All Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and >= Grade 3 Infections
Percentage of participantsLenti-D Drug Product
Participants with at least 1 >= Grade 3 AE100.0
Participants with at least 1 AE related to Eli-cel20.0
Participants with at least 1 SAE62.9
Participants with >= Grade 3 infections28.6
SecondaryNumber of Participants With >= Grade 3 Prolonged Cytopenia on or After Rel Day 60 And Rel Day 100

Number of participants with \>= Grade 3 prolonged cytopenia (i.e., decreased platelet counts, decreased neutrophil counts, and/or decreased hemoglobin counts) on or after Rel Day 60 and Rel Day 100 were reported.

Time frame:
Prolonged cytopenias occurring on or after Rel Day 60 and Rel Day 100 following drug product infusion
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With >= Grade 3 Prolonged Cytopenia on or After Rel Day 60 And Rel Day 100
ParticipantsLenti-D Drug Product
On or after Rel Day 6014
On or after Rel Day 1007
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Changes in Laboratory Parameters by Month 24

Laboratory parameters included Hematology (Leukocytes \[with a threshold range \<4.0 x 10\^9/L, \>=18 x 10\^9/L\], Neutrophils \[\<1.0 x 10\^9/L\], Erythrocytes \[\<=3.0 x 10\^12/L\], Platelets \[\<=75 x 10\^9/L\]); Clinical chemistry (Sodium \[\<=126 millimoles per liter (mmol/L), \>=156 mmol/L\], Potassium \[\<=3 mmol/L, \>=6 mmol/L\], Glucose \[\<=3.0 mmol/L\]), Renal (Urea Nitrogen \[\>=10.7 mmol/L\], Creatinine \[\>=150 umol/L\]) and liver (Alanine Aminotransferase \[ALA\]. Aspartate Aminotransferase \[ASA\], Alkaline Phosphatase \[AP\] with threshold range of \>=3 x upper limit of normal (ULN), Bilirubin \[\>=34.2 micromoles per liter (umol/L)\]). Clinical significance was decided by investigator.

Time frame:
From Day 1 to Month 24
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Changes in Laboratory Parameters by Month 24
Percentage of participantsLenti-D Drug Product
Hematology: Leukocytes (<4.0 x 10^9/L)100.0
Hematology: Leukocytes (>=18 x 10^9/L)2.9
Hematology: Neutrophils (<1.0 x 10^9/L)97.1
Hematology: Erythrocytes (<=3.0 x 10^12/L)71.4
Hematology: Platelets (<=75 x 10^9/L)100.0
Hematology: Hemoglobin (<=8.0 g/dL)77.1
Liver: ALA (>=3 x ULN)11.4
Liver: ASA (>=3 x ULN)5.7
Liver: AP (>=3 x ULN)0.0
Liver: Bilirubin (>=34.2 umol/L)0.0
Renal: Urea Nitrogen (>=10.7 mmol/L)0.0
Renal: Creatinine (>=150 umol/L)0.0
Chemistry: Sodium (<=126 mmol/L)0.0
Chemistry: Sodium (>=156 mmol/L)0.0
Chemistry: Potassium (<=3 mmol/L)25.7
Chemistry: Potassium (>=6 mmol/L)0.0
Chemistry: Glucose (<=3.0 mmol/L)0.0
SecondaryNumber of Emergency Room Visits (Post-Neutrophil Engraftment) by Month 24

Number of emergency room visits (post-neutrophil engraftment) up to Month 24 were reported.

Time frame:
From Post-Neutrophil Engraftment up to Month 24
Reported as:
Number · Emergency room visits
Number of Emergency Room Visits (Post-Neutrophil Engraftment) by Month 24
Emergency room visitsLenti-D Drug Product
Number of Emergency Room Visits (Post-Neutrophil Engraftment) by Month 249
SecondaryMedian Number of Emergency Room Visits (Post-Neutrophil Engraftment) by Month 24

Median number of emergency room visits (post-neutrophil engraftment) up to Month 24 were reported.

Time frame:
From Post-Neutrophil Engraftment up to Month 24
Reported as:
Median · Median number of emergency room visits
Median Number of Emergency Room Visits (Post-Neutrophil Engraftment) by Month 24
Median number of emergency room visitsLenti-D Drug Product
Median Number of Emergency Room Visits (Post-Neutrophil Engraftment) by Month 241.0 (1 to 4)
SecondaryNumber of In-patient Hospitalizations (Post-Neutrophil Engraftment) by Month 24

Number of In-patient hospitalizations (post-neutrophil engraftment) by Month 24 were reported.

Time frame:
From Post-Neutrophil Engraftment up to Month 24
Reported as:
Number · Hospitalizations
Number of In-patient Hospitalizations (Post-Neutrophil Engraftment) by Month 24
HospitalizationsLenti-D Drug Product
Number of In-patient Hospitalizations (Post-Neutrophil Engraftment) by Month 2417
SecondaryMedian Number of In-patient Hospitalizations (Post-Neutrophil Engraftment) by Month 24

Median number of In-patient hospitalizations (post-neutrophil engraftment) by Month 24 were reported.

Time frame:
From post-neutrophil engraftment up to Month 24
Reported as:
Median · Median number of hospitalization
Median Number of In-patient Hospitalizations (Post-Neutrophil Engraftment) by Month 24
Median number of hospitalizationLenti-D Drug Product
Median Number of In-patient Hospitalizations (Post-Neutrophil Engraftment) by Month 241.0 (1 to 4)
SecondaryDuration of In-patient Hospitalizations (Post-Neutrophil Engraftment) up to Month 24

Duration of in-patient hospitalizations was calculated as: Duration = (Date of hospital discharge) - (Date of hospital admission before NE) + 1. Duration of In-patient hospitalizations (post-neutrophil engraftment) up to Month 24 was reported. The range of in-patient hospitalizations is influenced by hospital stays for participants who received allogeneic stem cell transplants.

Time frame:
From post-neutrophil engraftment up to Month 24
Reported as:
Median · Days
Duration of In-patient Hospitalizations (Post-Neutrophil Engraftment) up to Month 24
DaysLenti-D Drug Product
Duration of In-patient Hospitalizations (Post-Neutrophil Engraftment) up to Month 244.0 (2 to 56)
SecondaryNumber of Intensive Care Units (ICU) Stays (Post-neutrophil Engraftment) by Month 24

Number of ICU Stays (Post-neutrophil Engraftment) By Month 24 were reported.

Time frame:
From post-neutrophil engraftment up to Month 24
Reported as:
Number · ICU Stays
Number of Intensive Care Units (ICU) Stays (Post-neutrophil Engraftment) by Month 24
ICU StaysLenti-D Drug Product
Number of Intensive Care Units (ICU) Stays (Post-neutrophil Engraftment) by Month 240
SecondaryDuration of ICU Stays (Post-neutrophil Engraftment) by Month 24

Duration of ICU Stays was calculated as: Duration = (Date of hospital discharge) - (Date of hospital admission before NE) + 1. Duration of ICU Stays (Post-neutrophil Engraftment) by Month 24 was reported.

Time frame:
From post-neutrophil engraftment up to Month 24

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Tested Positive and Negative for Vector-Derived Replication Competent Lentivirus (RCL) Detected by Month 24

Number of participants who tested positive and negative for vector-derived RCL detected at Month 24 were reported. Screening of participant's blood samples for RCL at Month 24 following Lenti-D Drug infusion was performed, with the more rigorous co-culture assays used to distinguish any false positives as applicable.

Time frame:
By Month 24
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Tested Positive and Negative for Vector-Derived Replication Competent Lentivirus (RCL) Detected by Month 24
ParticipantsLenti-D Drug Product
Participants tested positive for RCL0
Participants tested negative for RCL35
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Insertional Oncogenesis by Month 24

Insertional oncogenesis included myelodysplastic syndrome, leukemia, lymphoma. Number of participants with insertional oncogenesis at Month 24 were reported.

Time frame:
By Month 24 post-transplant
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Insertional Oncogenesis by Month 24
ParticipantsLenti-D Drug Product
Number of Participants With Insertional Oncogenesis by Month 241

Adverse events

Collected over From date of informed consent up to Month 24. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Lenti-D Drug Product0/35 (0%)22/35 (62.9%)35/35 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 30
Most frequent serious events
EventLenti-D Drug Product
PyrexiaGeneral disorders5/35
Febrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders4/35
Neurological decompensationNervous system disorders2/35
PancytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/35
Disease progressionGeneral disorders2/35
Pseudomonal bacteraemiaInfections and infestations2/35
Transaminases increasedInvestigations1/35
Myelodysplastic syndromeNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/35
Anaphylactic transfusion reactionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/35
Cytogenetic abnormalityCongenital, familial and genetic disorders1/35
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 100
Most frequent other events
EventLenti-D Drug Product
ThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders34/35
StomatitisGastrointestinal disorders34/35
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders29/35
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders29/35
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders28/35
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders26/35
AlopeciaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders25/35
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders22/35
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders20/35
Febrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders19/35

Baseline characteristics

Transplant Population (TP) consisted of participants who received Lenti-D Drug Product infusion.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Lenti-D Drug Product
Mean7 ± 2.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Lenti-D Drug Product
Female0
Male35
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Lenti-D Drug Product
Hispanic or Latino5
Not Hispanic or Latino24
Unknown or Not Reported6
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Lenti-D Drug Product
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American2
White21
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported12
08

Study locations

8 sites
  • Lucile Packard Children's Hospital
    Palo Alto, California 94304, United States
  • Boston Children's Hospital/Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
  • University of Minnesota
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
  • Hôpital Robert Debré
    Paris, 75019, France
  • Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR
    Leipzig, 04103, Germany
  • Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù
    Rome, 00165, Italy
  • Prinses Maxima Center
    Utrecht, 3508AB, Netherlands
  • UCL-ICH/Great Ormond Street Hospital
    London, WC1N3JH, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Bluebird bio is committed to transparency. Appropriately de-identified patient-level datasets and supporting documents may be shared following attainment of applicable marketing approvals associated with this study and consistent with criteria established by bluebird bio and/or industry best practices in order to maintain the privacy of study participants. For enquiries, please contact bluebird bio at datasharing@bluebirdbio.com.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 24, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03852498
Lead sponsor
bluebird bio
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 25, 2019
Start date
Jan 24, 2019
Primary completion
Jul 24, 2023
Completion
Jul 24, 2023
Results posted
May 24, 2024
Last update
May 24, 2024

Study contacts

Himal Lal Thakar, MD
study director · bluebird bio, Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion