An observational study in Heart Failure, Healthcare Associated Infection and Ventricular Assist Device, sponsored by University of Michigan. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-07-14.
Sponsored by University of Michigan · Observational
Annually, more than 250,000 patients in the U.S. with end-stage heart failure stand to benefit from ventricular assist device (VAD) therapy. 60% of patients develop a healthcare-associated infection (HAI) within 90-days of implantation. The investigators long term goal is to develop and subsequently promote wide-scale adoption of evidence-based HAI prevention practices following durable VAD implantation.
This will be done by addressing the following aims:
Aim 1. Identify determinants of center-level variability in HAI rates. Aim 2. Develop a comprehensive understanding of barriers and facilitators for achieving low center HAI rates.
Aim 3. Develop, iteratively enhance, and disseminate a best practices toolkit for preventing HAIs that accommodates various center contexts.
The investigators will use a focused survey of U.S. VAD centers to identify determinants of center variation in 90-day HAI rates:
Understanding the barriers and facilitators within individual centers for maximizing adoption of prevention measures would serve as the foundation for targeted improvement strategies. Without this knowledge, evidence-based, action-oriented recommendations will have limited local adoption and ultimately effectiveness in preventing HAIs after VAD implantation.
Annually, more than 250,000 patients in the U.S. with end-stage heart failure stand to benefit from ventricular assist device (VAD) therapy. Despite VADs providing long-term "durable" support, this therapy is associated with substantial risk (50% mortality at 4 years) and expense ($179,000 for inpatient services). Additionally, 60% of patients develop a healthcare-associated infection (HAI) within 90-days of implantation. Broad adoption of durable VAD therapy is hindered in part by HAIs, given associated sequelae (6-fold increased risk of 1-year mortality) and costs ($264,000 - $869,000 per patient). It is critical to determine how best to prevent HAIs in order to maximize the benefit of VAD therapy. While several studies have reported variation in HAI rates across centers after complex cardiac surgery, less is known in the setting of durable VADs. The average 90-day HAI rate after VAD implantation is as high as 19 events per 100 patient-months and varies (25th - 75th percentile, 9-23) across centers. While some argue that centers with lower HAI rates select healthier patients, others counter that improved practices (e.g., standardizing empirical and targeted antimicrobial therapy) or enhanced provider teamwork are more predictive of improved outcomes.
While evidence-based HAI prevention guidelines and implementation tools (e.g., checklists) exist, these approaches are not comprehensive (e.g., neglecting device-specific determinants) or customizable to local context, thus limiting usability, adoption, and likelihood of significant effectiveness for preventing HAIs. Understanding the barriers and facilitators within individual centers for maximizing adoption of prevention measures would serve as the foundation for targeted improvement strategies. Without this knowledge, evidence-based, action-oriented recommendations will have limited local adoption and ultimately effectiveness in preventing HAIs after VAD implantation.
The investigators long-term goal is to develop and subsequently promote wide-scale adoption of evidence-based HAI prevention practices following durable VAD implantation. The objective of this proposal is to identify prevention recommendations for the most significant HAIs after VAD implantation. To achieve this objective, the investigators will undertake a mixed methods study of adult patients receiving VADs in the U.S. from 2009 - 2017 and develop a modular toolkit of evidence-based recommendations. To determine best practices for preventing HAIs, the investigators will examine center-level differences in HAI rates to identify strategies used by centers with low rates, and potential barriers among centers with high rates.
6,687 studies on the registry are indexed under Infections; 807 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 208 is below the median of 240 across 2,136 observational studies indexed under Infections.
Browse Infections studies →University of Michigan is the lead sponsor of 1,475 studies on the registry; 196 are open to participants now.
Of its 162 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 128 (79%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Healthcare providers involved in the medical management of a Ventricular Assist Device (VAD) recipient during the peri-operative period, specifically surgeons, cardiologist, VAD coordinators.
Healthcare providers involved in the medical management of a Ventricular Assist Device (VAD) recipient during the peri-operative period, including those with the following roles: surgeons, cardiologists and VAD coordinators
Exclusion Criteria:
Healthcare providers not caring for VAD recipient patients.
Adult healthcare providers of VAD therapy recipients.
Other: VAD Infection Prevention Survey
Healthcare providers caring for VAD Therapy recipients will answer questions regarding processes of care at their institutions.
An organization's use of practices associated with center HAI rates.
We will use a survey to identify a center's use of practices that may explain their center's HAI rate
Time frame: March 2019 - March 2020
Plan to share: No — We will not be sharing individual participant data
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Michigan