CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03831100BRIGHTUpdated Aug 9, 2023Results posted

Building a Renewed ImaGe After Head & Neck Cancer Treatment (BRIGHT) 2.0

An interventional study of BRIGHT and Active Control in Head and Neck Cancer, sponsored by Medical University of South Carolina. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-08-09.

Sponsored by Medical University of South Carolina · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
54
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors with body image-related distress (BID) will be randomized to 5-weeks of tablet-based BRIGHT or tablet-based active control (AC; electronic information about HNC recovery). Participants will complete validated measures of BID and psychological, social, and emotional wellbeing to assess the preliminary clinical impact of BRIGHT on BID in HNC survivors. Participants will also complete validated measures of body image coping behavior to assess the role of image coping behavior as the behavioral mechanism of BRIGHT.

Read the detailed description

Following screening and informed consent, eligible participants will complete baseline questionnaires measuring BID and psychological, social, and emotional wellbeing. Participants (n=44) will then be randomized 1:1 to BRIGHT or AC and undergo weekly, tablet-based BRIGHT or AC for 5 weeks.

The BRIGHT intervention consists of 5 weekly, 60-minute, tablet-based, one-one telehealth sessions with a licensed therapist. The control intervention will be matched to replicate the frequency, intensity, and delivery method of BRIGHT. Participants in the AC arm will thus undergo 5 weekly, 60-minute, tablet-based video sessions in which they undergo non-manualized discussions with a non-trained member of the study team.

Following randomization, patients in each arm will receive a study-issued, cellular-enabled iPad loaded with Vidyo, a video teleconference platform that allows the participant to connect to the study psychologist (BRIGHT) or AC. Vidyo allows face-face communication for tele-cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for HNC patients who can articulate well, but also includes a within-video text message feature for aphonic (due to surgical removal of the larynx) or severely dysarthric (due to surgical removal of a significant amount of the tongue) HNC patients who are unable to participate in tele-CBT by speaking. The study iPads are locked to prevent downloading of additional applications. Participants receive a pictorial instructional booklet for logging on to Vidyo. No user names, logins, or web addresses are necessary to connect to the BRIGHT session. The participant simply clicks on the Vidyo application which takes the participant to the assigned teleconference room. At the conclusion of the 5-week intervention, participants return iPads to the study team in pre-addressed, stamped, padded mailers that are provided to the patient.

02

Conditions studied

  • Head and Neck Cancer
03

In context

Head and Neck Neoplasms

2,344 studies on the registry are indexed under Head and Neck Neoplasms; 551 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 54 is above the median of 47 across 1,751 interventional studies indexed under Head and Neck Neoplasms.

Browse Head and Neck Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical University of South Carolina is the lead sponsor of 852 studies on the registry; 165 are open to participants now.

Of its 128 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 101 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age > 18 years at the time of screening
  2. History of pathologically confirmed invasive squamous cell carcinoma (or histologic variant) of the upper aerodigestive tract (oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, nose/paranasal sinuses), carcinoma of a major or minor salivary gland, or cutaneous malignancy of the face or neck
  3. History of curative intent surgery with or without adjuvant therapy, with or without reconstruction
  4. American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th Edition pathologic stage grouping I-IV
  5. Completion of oncologic treatment within 12 months of study enrollment (but no sooner than 6 weeks post-treatment completion)
  6. No planned significant HNC ablative or reconstructive surgery (defined by a postoperative inpatient stay of at least three days) during the study intervention or follow-up period as determined by the HNC oncologic surgeon at the time of study accrual
  7. Willingness to be randomized to either BRIGHT or AC
  8. Body Image Scale (BIS) score >/= 10

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inability to speak or write English
  2. Pre-existing, ongoing CBT services for other disorders and the participant is not willing to discontinue the prior therapy for the duration of the proposed trial.
  3. Initiation or adjustment (\< 3 months of baseline) of psychotropic medication.
  4. Severe psychiatric comorbidity (e.g. suicidal ideation, psychosis)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
54 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    BRIGHT

    The BRIGHT intervention consists of 5 weekly, 60-minute, tablet-based, one-one telehealth sessions with a licensed therapist. BRIGHT Therapist: A licensed clinical psychologist with extensive experience managing pyscho-oncologic concerns in patients with HNC will deliver BRIGHT.

    Behavioral: BRIGHT

  • Placebo comparator
    Active Control

    The control intervention in this study will be matched to replicate the frequency, intensity, and delivery method of BRIGHT. AC consists of 5 weekly sessions of videos about HNC survivorship that are delivered using a telemedicine platform. Each AC session is a compilation of shorter videos featuring HNC survivors, caregivers, and oncologists discussing non-body image aspects of HNC survivorship.

    Behavioral: Active Control

Interventions

  • BehavioralBRIGHT

    The BRIGHT intervention consists of 5 weekly, 60-minute, tablet-based, one-one telehealth sessions with a licensed therapist. BRIGHT Therapist: A licensed clinical psychologist with extensive experience managing pyscho-oncologic concerns in patients with HNC will deliver BRIGHT.

  • BehavioralActive Control

    AC consists of 5 weekly sessions of videos about HNC survivorship that are delivered using a telemedicine platform. Each AC session (Table 5) is a compilation of shorter videos featuring HNC survivors, caregivers, and oncologists discussing non-body image aspects of HNC survivorship.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Body Image Scale Score From Baseline to 1-month Post-intervention

    The Body Image Scale (BIS) is a validated, 10-item patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) that assesses the affective, cognitive, and emotional aspects of body image due to cancer or its treatment over the prior 7 days. Responses include 'not at all', 'a little', 'quite a bit', and 'very much', and are scored from 0-3, respectively. Total BIS scores can range from 0-30, with higher scores indicating greater body image dissatisfaction.

    Time frame: 1 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Body Image Scale Score From Baseline to 3-months Post-intervention

    The BIS is a validated, 10-item patient-reported outcome measure that assesses the affective, cognitive, and emotional aspects of body image due to cancer or its treatment over the prior 7 days. Responses include 'not at all', 'a little', 'quite a bit', and 'very much', and are scored from 0-3, respectively. Total BIS scores can range from 0-30, with higher scores indicating greater body image dissatisfaction.

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Change in IMAGE-HN Score From Baseline to 1-month Post-intervention

    The IMAGE-HN is a psychometrically sound, 24-item, multi-domain PROM consisting of 4 sub-scales and a global scale that can be used to measure key aspects of HNC-related body image distress (BID) due to HNC or its treatment. Responses include 'Never', 'Rarely', 'Sometimes', 'Often', 'Always', corresponding to a Likert scale of 0-4, respectively. Total IMAGE-HN scores on the global domain (21 questions) range from 0-84, with higher scores indicated greater HNC-related body image dissatisfaction.

    Time frame: 1 month

  3. Change in IMAGE-HN Score From Baseline to 3-months Post-intervention

    The IMAGE-HN is a psychometrically sound, 24-item, multi-domain PROM consisting of 4 sub-scales and a global scale that can be used to measure key aspects of HNC-related BID due to HNC or its treatment. Responses include 'Never', 'Rarely', 'Sometimes', 'Often', 'Always', corresponding to a Likert scale of 0-4, respectively. Total IMAGE-HN scores on the global domain (21 questions) range from 0-84, with higher scores indicated greater HNC-related body image dissatisfaction.

    Time frame: 3 months

  4. Change in Shame and Stigma Scale Score From Baseline to 1-month Post-intervention

    The Shame and Stigma Scale is a 20-item, validated, unidimensional PROM that measures four domains (shame with appearance, stigma, regret, and social/speech concerns) in patients with HNC over the prior 7 days. Responses include 'never', 'seldom', 'sometimes', 'often', and 'all the time' and are scored 0-4, respectively. The total score is calculated by summing the individual responses (except for 4 questions which are reverse scored) and thus ranges from 0-80. Higher scores reflect greater shame and stigma from HNC.

    Time frame: 1 month

  5. Change in Shame and Stigma Scale Score From Baseline to 3-months Post-intervention

    The Shame and Stigma Scale is a 20-item, validated, unidimensional PROM that measures four domains (shame with appearance, stigma, regret, and social/speech concerns) in patients with HNC over the prior 7 days. Responses include 'never', 'seldom', 'sometimes', 'often', and 'all the time' and are scored 0-4, respectively. The total score is calculated by summing the individual responses (except for 4 questions which are reverse scored) and thus ranges from 0-80. Higher scores reflect greater shame and stigma from HNC.

    Time frame: 3 months

  6. Change in PROMIS SF v1.0-Depression 8a Score From Baseline to 1-month Post-intervention

    PROMIS SF v1.0-Depression 8a is a validated, 8-item measure developed by the NIH to assess self-reported negative mood, views of self, and decreased positive affect and engagement. Items are scored using a 5-point Likert scale from 'never' to 'always' (1-5). Higher scores reflect more severe depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: 1 month

  7. Change in PROMIS SF v1.0-Depression 8a Score From Baseline to 3-months Post-intervention

    PROMIS SF v1.0-Depression 8a is a validated, 8-item measure developed by the NIH to assess self-reported negative mood, views of self, and decreased positive affect and engagement. Items are scored using a 5-point Likert scale from 'never' to 'always' (1-5). Higher scores reflect more severe depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: 3 months

  8. Change in PROMIS SF v1.0-Anxiety 8a Score From Baseline to 1-month Post-intervention

    The PROMIS SF v1.0-Anxiety 8a is a validated, 8-item measure developed by the NIH to assess self-reported fear, worry, and hyperarousal46. Items are scored using a 5-point Likert scale from 'never' to 'always' (1-5). The total score is calculated by summing the individual responses and thus ranges from 8-40. Higher scores reflect more severe anxiety.

    Time frame: 1 month

  9. Change in PROMIS SF v1.0-Anxiety 8a Score From Baseline to 3-months Post-intervention

    The PROMIS SF v1.0-Anxiety 8a is a validated, 8-item measure developed by the NIH to assess self-reported fear, worry, and hyperarousal46. Items are scored using a 5-point Likert scale from 'never' to 'always' (1-5). The total score is calculated by summing the individual responses and thus ranges from 8-40. Higher scores reflect more severe anxiety.

    Time frame: 3 months

  10. Change in PROMIS SF v2.0- Satisfaction With Social Roles and Activities 8a Score From Baseline to 1-month Post-intervention

    PROMIS SF v2.0-Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities 8a is a validated, 8-item, measure developed by the NIH to assess self-reported satisfaction with performing one's usual social roles and activities. Items are scored using a 5-point Likert scale from 'not at all' to 'very much' (1-5). The total score is calculated by summing the individual responses and thus ranges from 8-40. Higher scores reflect greater satisfaction with social roles and activities.

    Time frame: 1 month

  11. Change in PROMIS SF v2.0- Satisfaction With Social Roles and Activities 8a Score From Baseline to 3-months Post-intervention

    PROMIS SF v2.0-Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities 8a is a validated, 8-item, measure developed by the NIH to assess self-reported satisfaction with performing one's usual social roles and activities. Items are scored using a 5-point Likert scale from 'not at all' to 'very much' (1-5). The total score is calculated by summing the individual responses and thus ranges from 8-40. Higher scores reflect greater satisfaction with social roles and activities.

    Time frame: 3 months

  12. Change in PROMIS SF v2.0-Social Isolation 8a Score From Baseline to 1-month Post-intervention

    PROMIS SF v2.0-Social Isolation 8a is a validated, 8-item, measure developed by the NIH to assess self-reported perceptions of being avoided, excluded or unknown by others. Items are scored using a 5-point Likert scale from 'never' to 'always' (1-5). The total score is calculated by summing the individual responses and thus ranges from 8-40. Higher scores reflect more severe social isolation.

    Time frame: 1 month

  13. Change in PROMIS SF v2.0-Social Isolation 8a Score From Baseline to 3-months Post-intervention

    PROMIS SF v2.0-Social Isolation 8a is a validated, 8-item, measure developed by the NIH to assess self-reported perceptions of being avoided, excluded or unknown by others. Items are scored using a 5-point Likert scale from 'never' to 'always' (1-5). The total score is calculated by summing the individual responses and thus ranges from 8-40. Higher scores reflect more severe social isolation.

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Results

Posted Aug 9, 2023

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBRIGHTActive Control
Started2628
Completed2024
Not completed64
Withdrew: Patients who developed a recurrent or new primary cancer went off study per protocol64

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Body Image Scale Score From Baseline to 1-month Post-intervention

The Body Image Scale (BIS) is a validated, 10-item patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) that assesses the affective, cognitive, and emotional aspects of body image due to cancer or its treatment over the prior 7 days. Responses include 'not at all', 'a little', 'quite a bit', and 'very much', and are scored from 0-3, respectively. Total BIS scores can range from 0-30, with higher scores indicating greater body image dissatisfaction.

Time frame:
1 month
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Body Image Scale Score From Baseline to 1-month Post-intervention
score on a scaleBRIGHTActive Control
Change in Body Image Scale Score From Baseline to 1-month Post-intervention-3.5 (-5.4 to -1.5)-0.7 (-2.8 to 1.5)
Statistical analysis
  • BRIGHT vs Active Control · Regression, Linear · p = 0.25 (A two-sided P \< .10 indicates the a priori threshold for statistical significance. P-values are not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (net): -2.1 · 90% CI -5.0 to 0.9The mean for each study arm represents the mean difference in the score at the post-treatment timepoint relative to the score at baseline. The mean difference (net) represents the mean model-based difference between study arms.
SecondaryChange in Body Image Scale Score From Baseline to 3-months Post-intervention

The BIS is a validated, 10-item patient-reported outcome measure that assesses the affective, cognitive, and emotional aspects of body image due to cancer or its treatment over the prior 7 days. Responses include 'not at all', 'a little', 'quite a bit', and 'very much', and are scored from 0-3, respectively. Total BIS scores can range from 0-30, with higher scores indicating greater body image dissatisfaction.

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Body Image Scale Score From Baseline to 3-months Post-intervention
score on a scaleBRIGHTActive Control
Change in Body Image Scale Score From Baseline to 3-months Post-intervention-7.3 (-9.7 to -4.8)-1.6 (-3.9 to 0.7)
Statistical analysis
  • BRIGHT vs Active Control · Regression, Linear · p = .006 (A two-sided P \< .10 indicates the a priori threshold for statistical significance. P-values are not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (net): -5.8 · 90% CI -9.1 to -2.5The mean for each study arm represents the mean difference in the score at the post-treatment timepoint relative to the score at baseline. The mean difference (net) represents the mean model-based difference between study arms.
SecondaryChange in IMAGE-HN Score From Baseline to 1-month Post-intervention

The IMAGE-HN is a psychometrically sound, 24-item, multi-domain PROM consisting of 4 sub-scales and a global scale that can be used to measure key aspects of HNC-related body image distress (BID) due to HNC or its treatment. Responses include 'Never', 'Rarely', 'Sometimes', 'Often', 'Always', corresponding to a Likert scale of 0-4, respectively. Total IMAGE-HN scores on the global domain (21 questions) range from 0-84, with higher scores indicated greater HNC-related body image dissatisfaction.

Time frame:
1 month
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in IMAGE-HN Score From Baseline to 1-month Post-intervention
score on a scaleBRIGHTActive Control
Change in IMAGE-HN Score From Baseline to 1-month Post-intervention-8.1 (-13.4 to -2.8)0.5 (-5.3 to 6.4)
Statistical analysis
  • BRIGHT vs Active Control · Regression, Linear · p = .10 (A two-sided P \< .10 indicates the a priori threshold for statistical significance. P-values are not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (net): -7.9 · 90% CI -15.9 to 0.0The mean for each study arm represents the mean difference in the score at the post-treatment timepoint relative to the score at baseline. The mean difference (net) represents the mean model-based difference between study arms.
SecondaryChange in IMAGE-HN Score From Baseline to 3-months Post-intervention

The IMAGE-HN is a psychometrically sound, 24-item, multi-domain PROM consisting of 4 sub-scales and a global scale that can be used to measure key aspects of HNC-related BID due to HNC or its treatment. Responses include 'Never', 'Rarely', 'Sometimes', 'Often', 'Always', corresponding to a Likert scale of 0-4, respectively. Total IMAGE-HN scores on the global domain (21 questions) range from 0-84, with higher scores indicated greater HNC-related body image dissatisfaction.

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in IMAGE-HN Score From Baseline to 3-months Post-intervention
score on a scaleBRIGHTActive Control
Change in IMAGE-HN Score From Baseline to 3-months Post-intervention-17.8 (-24.5 to -11.1)-1.6 (-7.8 to 4.6)
Statistical analysis
  • BRIGHT vs Active Control · Regression, Linear · p = .002 (A two-sided P \< .10 indicates the a priori threshold for statistical significance. P-values are not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (net): -17.1 · 90% CI -25.6 to -8.6
SecondaryChange in Shame and Stigma Scale Score From Baseline to 1-month Post-intervention

The Shame and Stigma Scale is a 20-item, validated, unidimensional PROM that measures four domains (shame with appearance, stigma, regret, and social/speech concerns) in patients with HNC over the prior 7 days. Responses include 'never', 'seldom', 'sometimes', 'often', and 'all the time' and are scored 0-4, respectively. The total score is calculated by summing the individual responses (except for 4 questions which are reverse scored) and thus ranges from 0-80. Higher scores reflect greater shame and stigma from HNC.

Time frame:
1 month
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Shame and Stigma Scale Score From Baseline to 1-month Post-intervention
score on a scaleBRIGHTActive Control
Change in Shame and Stigma Scale Score From Baseline to 1-month Post-intervention-4.8 (-8.9 to 0.6)-1.8 (-5.6 to 1.9)
Statistical analysis
  • BRIGHT vs Active Control · ANCOVA · p = 0.30 (A two-sided P \< .10 indicates the a priori threshold for statistical significance. P-values are not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (net): -3.4 · 90% CI -8.8 to 2.0Model-based treatment effect estimated using ANCOVA with change score modeled as a function of treatment group (AC, BRIGHT/Therapist A, BRIGHT/Therapist B), with adjustment for baseline scores
SecondaryChange in Shame and Stigma Scale Score From Baseline to 3-months Post-intervention

The Shame and Stigma Scale is a 20-item, validated, unidimensional PROM that measures four domains (shame with appearance, stigma, regret, and social/speech concerns) in patients with HNC over the prior 7 days. Responses include 'never', 'seldom', 'sometimes', 'often', and 'all the time' and are scored 0-4, respectively. The total score is calculated by summing the individual responses (except for 4 questions which are reverse scored) and thus ranges from 0-80. Higher scores reflect greater shame and stigma from HNC.

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Shame and Stigma Scale Score From Baseline to 3-months Post-intervention
score on a scaleBRIGHTActive Control
Change in Shame and Stigma Scale Score From Baseline to 3-months Post-intervention-10.6 (-15.3 to -5.8)-1.8 (-6.1 to 2.6)
Statistical analysis
  • BRIGHT vs Active Control · ANCOVA · p = 0.005 (A two-sided P \< .10 indicates the a priori threshold for statistical significance. P-values are not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Median difference (net): -9.7 · 90% CI -15.2 to -4.2Model-based treatment effect estimated using ANCOVA with change score modeled as a function of treatment group (AC, BRIGHT/Therapist A, BRIGHT/Therapist B), with adjustment for baseline scores.
SecondaryChange in PROMIS SF v1.0-Depression 8a Score From Baseline to 1-month Post-intervention

PROMIS SF v1.0-Depression 8a is a validated, 8-item measure developed by the NIH to assess self-reported negative mood, views of self, and decreased positive affect and engagement. Items are scored using a 5-point Likert scale from 'never' to 'always' (1-5). Higher scores reflect more severe depressive symptoms.

Time frame:
1 month
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in PROMIS SF v1.0-Depression 8a Score From Baseline to 1-month Post-intervention
score on a scaleBRIGHTActive Control
Change in PROMIS SF v1.0-Depression 8a Score From Baseline to 1-month Post-intervention-2.7 (-5.1 to 0.2)0.5 (-1.7 to 2.8)
Statistical analysis
  • BRIGHT vs Active Control · ANCOVA · p = 0.064 (A two-sided P \< .10 indicates the a priori threshold for statistical significance. P-values are not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (net): -3.4 · 90% CI -6.4 to 0.4Model-based treatment effect estimated using ANCOVA with change score modeled as a function of treatment group (AC, BRIGHT/Therapist A, BRIGHT/Therapist B), with adjustment for baseline scores.
SecondaryChange in PROMIS SF v1.0-Depression 8a Score From Baseline to 3-months Post-intervention

PROMIS SF v1.0-Depression 8a is a validated, 8-item measure developed by the NIH to assess self-reported negative mood, views of self, and decreased positive affect and engagement. Items are scored using a 5-point Likert scale from 'never' to 'always' (1-5). Higher scores reflect more severe depressive symptoms.

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in PROMIS SF v1.0-Depression 8a Score From Baseline to 3-months Post-intervention
score on a scaleBRIGHTActive Control
Change in PROMIS SF v1.0-Depression 8a Score From Baseline to 3-months Post-intervention-3.1 (-6.1 to -0.1)0.9 (-1.8 to 3.6)
Statistical analysis
  • BRIGHT vs Active Control · ANCOVA · p = 0.046 (A two-sided P \< .10 indicates the a priori threshold for statistical significance. P-values are not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (net): -4.3 · 90% CI -7.8 to -0.8Model-based treatment effect estimated using ANCOVA with change score modeled as a function of treatment group (AC, BRIGHT/Therapist A, BRIGHT/Therapist B), with adjustment for baseline scores.
SecondaryChange in PROMIS SF v1.0-Anxiety 8a Score From Baseline to 1-month Post-intervention

The PROMIS SF v1.0-Anxiety 8a is a validated, 8-item measure developed by the NIH to assess self-reported fear, worry, and hyperarousal46. Items are scored using a 5-point Likert scale from 'never' to 'always' (1-5). The total score is calculated by summing the individual responses and thus ranges from 8-40. Higher scores reflect more severe anxiety.

Time frame:
1 month
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in PROMIS SF v1.0-Anxiety 8a Score From Baseline to 1-month Post-intervention
score on a scaleBRIGHTActive Control
Change in PROMIS SF v1.0-Anxiety 8a Score From Baseline to 1-month Post-intervention-1.6 (-4.3 to 1.1)-0.3 (-2.8 to 2.2)
Statistical analysis
  • BRIGHT vs Active Control · ANCOVA · p = 0.49 (A two-sided P \< .10 indicates the a priori threshold for statistical significance. P-values are not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (net): -1.5 · 90% CI -5.2 to 2.1Model-based treatment effect estimated using ANCOVA with change score modeled as a function of treatment group (AC, BRIGHT/Therapist A, BRIGHT/Therapist B), with adjustment for baseline scores.
SecondaryChange in PROMIS SF v1.0-Anxiety 8a Score From Baseline to 3-months Post-intervention

The PROMIS SF v1.0-Anxiety 8a is a validated, 8-item measure developed by the NIH to assess self-reported fear, worry, and hyperarousal46. Items are scored using a 5-point Likert scale from 'never' to 'always' (1-5). The total score is calculated by summing the individual responses and thus ranges from 8-40. Higher scores reflect more severe anxiety.

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in PROMIS SF v1.0-Anxiety 8a Score From Baseline to 3-months Post-intervention
score on a scaleBRIGHTActive Control
Change in PROMIS SF v1.0-Anxiety 8a Score From Baseline to 3-months Post-intervention-3.1 (-5.6 to -0.5)-0.2 (-2.5 to 2.1)
Statistical analysis
  • BRIGHT vs Active Control · ANCOVA · p = 0.14 (A two-sided P \< .10 indicates the a priori threshold for statistical significance. P-values are not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (net): -3.1 · 90% CI -6.5 to 0.3Model-based treatment effect estimated using ANCOVA with change score modeled as a function of treatment group (AC, BRIGHT/Therapist A, BRIGHT/Therapist B), with adjustment for baseline scores.
SecondaryChange in PROMIS SF v2.0- Satisfaction With Social Roles and Activities 8a Score From Baseline to 1-month Post-intervention

PROMIS SF v2.0-Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities 8a is a validated, 8-item, measure developed by the NIH to assess self-reported satisfaction with performing one's usual social roles and activities. Items are scored using a 5-point Likert scale from 'not at all' to 'very much' (1-5). The total score is calculated by summing the individual responses and thus ranges from 8-40. Higher scores reflect greater satisfaction with social roles and activities.

Time frame:
1 month
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in PROMIS SF v2.0- Satisfaction With Social Roles and Activities 8a Score From Baseline to 1-month Post-intervention
score on a scaleBRIGHTActive Control
Change in PROMIS SF v2.0- Satisfaction With Social Roles and Activities 8a Score From Baseline to 1-month Post-intervention3.0 (0.6 to 5.5)-1.0 (-3.3 to 1.3)
Statistical analysis
  • BRIGHT vs Active Control · ANCOVA · p = 0.082 (A two-sided P \< .10 indicates the a priori threshold for statistical significance. P-values are not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (net): 3.2 · 90% CI 0.2 to 6.3Model-based treatment effect estimated using ANCOVA with change score modeled as a function of treatment group (AC, BRIGHT/Therapist A, BRIGHT/Therapist B), with adjustment for baseline scores.
SecondaryChange in PROMIS SF v2.0- Satisfaction With Social Roles and Activities 8a Score From Baseline to 3-months Post-intervention

PROMIS SF v2.0-Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities 8a is a validated, 8-item, measure developed by the NIH to assess self-reported satisfaction with performing one's usual social roles and activities. Items are scored using a 5-point Likert scale from 'not at all' to 'very much' (1-5). The total score is calculated by summing the individual responses and thus ranges from 8-40. Higher scores reflect greater satisfaction with social roles and activities.

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in PROMIS SF v2.0- Satisfaction With Social Roles and Activities 8a Score From Baseline to 3-months Post-intervention
score on a scaleBRIGHTActive Control
Change in PROMIS SF v2.0- Satisfaction With Social Roles and Activities 8a Score From Baseline to 3-months Post-intervention6.2 (3.4 to 9.0)2.2 (-0.4 to 4.8)
Statistical analysis
  • BRIGHT vs Active Control · ANCOVA · p = 0.15 (A two-sided P \< .10 indicates the a priori threshold for statistical significance. P-values are not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (net): 2.7 · 90% CI -0.4 to 5.7Model-based treatment effect estimated using ANCOVA with change score modeled as a function of treatment group (AC, BRIGHT/Therapist A, BRIGHT/Therapist B), with adjustment for baseline scores.
SecondaryChange in PROMIS SF v2.0-Social Isolation 8a Score From Baseline to 1-month Post-intervention

PROMIS SF v2.0-Social Isolation 8a is a validated, 8-item, measure developed by the NIH to assess self-reported perceptions of being avoided, excluded or unknown by others. Items are scored using a 5-point Likert scale from 'never' to 'always' (1-5). The total score is calculated by summing the individual responses and thus ranges from 8-40. Higher scores reflect more severe social isolation.

Time frame:
1 month
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in PROMIS SF v2.0-Social Isolation 8a Score From Baseline to 1-month Post-intervention
score on a scaleBRIGHTActive Control
Change in PROMIS SF v2.0-Social Isolation 8a Score From Baseline to 1-month Post-intervention-2.9 (-5.3 to -0.4)-1.3 (-3.4 to 0.9)
Statistical analysis
  • BRIGHT vs Active Control · ANCOVA · p = 0.22 (A two-sided P \< .10 indicates the a priori threshold for statistical significance. P-values are not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (net): -2.2 · 90% CI -5.2 to -0.7Model-based treatment effect estimated using ANCOVA with change score modeled as a function of treatment group (AC, BRIGHT/Therapist A, BRIGHT/Therapist B), with adjustment for baseline scores.
SecondaryChange in PROMIS SF v2.0-Social Isolation 8a Score From Baseline to 3-months Post-intervention

PROMIS SF v2.0-Social Isolation 8a is a validated, 8-item, measure developed by the NIH to assess self-reported perceptions of being avoided, excluded or unknown by others. Items are scored using a 5-point Likert scale from 'never' to 'always' (1-5). The total score is calculated by summing the individual responses and thus ranges from 8-40. Higher scores reflect more severe social isolation.

Time frame:
3 months
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in PROMIS SF v2.0-Social Isolation 8a Score From Baseline to 3-months Post-intervention
score on a scaleBRIGHTActive Control
Change in PROMIS SF v2.0-Social Isolation 8a Score From Baseline to 3-months Post-intervention-3.3 (-5.7 to -0.9)-1.0 (-3.3 to 1.2)
Statistical analysis
  • BRIGHT vs Active Control · ANCOVA · p = 0.093 (A two-sided P \< .10 indicates the a priori threshold for statistical significance. P-values are not adjusted for multiple comparisons.) · Mean difference (net): -2.9 · 90% CI -5.8 to -0.1Model-based treatment effect estimated using ANCOVA with change score modeled as a function of treatment group (AC, BRIGHT/Therapist A, BRIGHT/Therapist B), with adjustment for baseline scores.

Adverse events

Collected over 4 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
BRIGHT0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)
Active Control0/24 (0%)0/24 (0%)0/24 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

The efficacy analysis population consisted of all eligible, randomized, evaluable patients. Patients who developed a recurrent or new primary cancer went off study per protocol and were not evaluable.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)BRIGHTActive ControlTotal
Median63 (31 to 83)62.5 (41 to 76)63 (31 to 83)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)BRIGHTActive ControlTotal
Female131629
Male131225
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)BRIGHTActive ControlTotal
Hispanic or Latino000
Not Hispanic or Latino262854
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)BRIGHTActive ControlTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American369
White232245
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)BRIGHTActive ControlTotal
United States262854
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Medical University of South Carolina
    Charleston, South Carolina 29425, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Oct 1, 2021
  • Informed consent form · Mar 26, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 9, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03831100
Lead sponsor
Medical University of South Carolina
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Responsible party
Evan Graboyes (Associate Professor, Department of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 5, 2019
Start date
Jul 13, 2020
Primary completion
Feb 22, 2022
Completion
Apr 20, 2022
Results posted
Aug 9, 2023
Last update
Aug 9, 2023

Study contacts

Evan M Graboyes, MD, MPH
principal investigator · Medical University of South Carolina

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion