CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03827408Updated Jan 22, 2020

Nebulized Midazolam, Dexmedetomidine, and Their Combination in Sedation of Preschoolers Undergoing Dental Treatment

A Phase 2 interventional study of Midazolam group (MDZ) and Dexmedetomidine group (DEX) in Dental Anxiety, sponsored by Nourhan M.Aly. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 4 Years to 6 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-01-22.

Sponsored by Nourhan M.Aly · Phase 2, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 1 month after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2017, registered Jan 2019).
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
72
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
4 Years to 6 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of nebulized Midazolam, Dexmedetomidine, and their combination as procedural, moderate sedative agents in preschoolers undergoing dental treatment.

Read the detailed description

Dental anxiety and fear related behaviors are global problems in Pediatric Dentistry. Preschoolers represent a dental behavior management problem and there is always a debate over the best behavioral management technique for preschoolers undergoing dental treatment. Moderate sedation is considered as an acceptable option.

Children who need treatment under local anesthesia, for thirty minutes will be included in the study. A total of 72 uncooperative pediatric dental patients, of age range 4-6 years, will be selected from the Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt. The participants will be randomly allocated into 3 groups that will undergo a procedural sedation session via a nebulizer. Children of group I will receive nebulized solution of 0.5 mg/kg Midazolam, Group II will receive nebulized solution of 5µg/kg Dexmedetomidine, and Group III will receive a nebulized solution of 0.3 mg/kg Midazolam and 3µg/kg Dexmedetomidine respectively.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dental Anxiety

Keywords

  • Nebulized Dexmedetomidine
  • Nebulized Midazolam
  • Moderate sedation
  • Dental procedural sedation
  • Pediatric dentistry
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Nourhan M.Aly is the lead sponsor of 48 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years to 6 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age range 4-6 years
  • Frankl scale score 2.
  • ASA I or II physical status.
  • Dental intervention under local anesthesia not requiring more than 30 minutes.
  • No previous dental experience.
  • Parent/guardian"s written consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Dental treatment indicated under general anesthesia.
  • Presence of facial deformities.
  • History of neurological or cognitive alterations.
  • Mouth breathers.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
72 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Midazolam group (MDZ)

    Twenty four pediatric dental patients will receive a procedural sedation session, using Nebulized solution of 0.5 mg/kg Midazolam.

    Drug: Midazolam group (MDZ)

  • Experimental
    Dexmedetomidine group (DEX)

    Twenty four pediatric dental patients will receive a procedural sedation session, using Nebulized solution of 5µg/kg Dexmedetomidine.

    Drug: Dexmedetomidine group (DEX)

  • Experimental
    Combination of Midazolam and Dexmedetomidine (MDZ/DEX)

    Twenty four pediatric dental patients will receive a procedural sedation session, using Nebulized solution of 0.3 mg/kg Midazolam, and 3µg/kg Dexmedetomidine respectively.

    Drug: Combination of Midazolam and Dexmedetomidine (MDZ/DEX)

Interventions

  • DrugMidazolam group (MDZ)

    IV Ampules of Dormicum 15mg/ 3ml, Hoffman-La Rouche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland

  • DrugDexmedetomidine group (DEX)

    IV Ampules of Precedex 4mcg/ml, Hospira. Inc., Lake Forest,IL USA.

  • DrugCombination of Midazolam and Dexmedetomidine (MDZ/DEX)

    Combination of Nebulized solution of 0.3 mg/kg Midazolam, and 3µg/kg Dexmedetomidine respectively.(

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Facemask acceptance during drug delivery

    It will be evaluated according to Zanaty \& Metainy as: poor (terrified, crying and combative), fair (moderate fear of mask not calmed with reassurance), good (slight fear of mask, easily reassured) or excellent (unafraid, cooperative and accepts mask readily)

    Time frame: during the sedation procedure

  2. Effect of sedation on children's future behavior

    Each child's behavior will be reassessed in the follow-up sessions and compared to that at baseline (before dental treatment) using Frankl scale (ranges from 0-4)

    Time frame: after one week in the follow-up session

  3. The 'ease of treatment completion' sing separate five-point scales.

    This will be measured using separate five-point scales according to Surendar et al: Score 5 indicates an excellent quiet and cooperative child while score 1 indicates Prohibitive active resistance and crying; treatment cannot be rendered.

    Time frame: immediately after completion of the dental treatment procedures.

  4. Post-operative effects of the sedation

    This will be assessed according to Modified Vernon et al.

    Time frame: immediately after completion of the dental treatment procedures.

  5. Analgo-sedative effect of each drug

    Onset of Sedation from drug administration until the onset of satisfactory sedation

    Time frame: during the sedation procedure (time taken from drug administration till reaching satisfactory sedation)

  6. Analgo-sedative effect of each drug

    Sedation level using Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale. The scale is composed of 4 categories (each has scores ranging from 1-5). The categories are responsiveness, speech, facial expression and eyes. The final score is the sum of scores: the totally awake score is 20/20 and the deeply sedated score is 9/20

    Time frame: during the sedation procedure (after drug administration until reaching satisfactory sedation)

  7. Analgo-sedative effect of each drug

    The analgesic effect of the sedative drugs will be assessed using "Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability" scale (FLACC). The scale is scored in a range of 0-10 with 0 representing no pain. The scale has five criteria, which are each assigned a score of 0, 1 or 2.

    Time frame: during local anesthesia injection to start the operative procedure

  8. Analgo-sedative effect of each drug

    The duration of sedation: defined as the onset of satisfactory sedation until the time of meeting discharge criteria according to the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry.

    Time frame: during the sedation procedure (from its onset till meeting discharge criteria)

  9. Analgo-sedative effect of each drug.

    Assessment of the most common procedural side effects such as (hypoxia, respiratory depression, agitation, arrhythmia, bradycardia, hypotension or hypertension, shivering, nausea and vomiting) will be recorded.

    Time frame: during the sedation procedure (from its onset till meeting discharge criteria)

  10. Amnesic effect of sedative agents.

    Anterograde amnesia: will be assessed according to a modification of Bulach et al.

    Time frame: immediately after completion of the dental treatment procedures.

  11. Hemodynamic response of sedative agents.

    Vital sign: Blood pressure (in mmHg) will be monitored using a sphygmomanometer.

    Time frame: during the sedation procedure (from its onset till meeting discharge criteria)

  12. Hemodynamic response of sedative agents.

    Vital sign: Heart rate will be counted

    Time frame: during the sedation procedure (from its onset till meeting discharge criteria)

  13. Hemodynamic response of sedative agents.

    Vital sign: Oxygen saturation will be monitored using an oximeter

    Time frame: during the sedation procedure (from its onset till meeting discharge criteria)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University
    Alexandria, 21512, Egypt
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Zanaty OM, El Metainy SA. A comparative evaluation of nebulized dexmedetomidine, nebulized ketamine, and their combination as premedication for outpatient pediatric dental surgery. Anesth Analg. 2015 Jul;121(1):167-171. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000728. PubMed 25822924 ↗
  • Gomes HS, Miranda AR, Viana KA, Batista AC, Costa PS, Daher A, Machado GC, Sado-Filho J, Vieira LA, Correa-Faria P, Hosey MT, Costa LR. Intranasal sedation using ketamine and midazolam for pediatric dental treatment (NASO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017 Apr 11;18(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1919-2. PubMed 28399933 ↗
  • Guideline for Monitoring and Management of Pediatric Patients Before, During, and After Sedation for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures: Update 2016. Pediatr Dent. 2016 Oct 15;38(5):77-106. PubMed 28206886 ↗
  • Tobias JD, Leder M. Procedural sedation: A review of sedative agents, monitoring, and management of complications. Saudi J Anaesth. 2011 Oct;5(4):395-410. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.87270. PubMed 22144928 ↗
  • Surendar MN, Pandey RK, Saksena AK, Kumar R, Chandra G. A comparative evaluation of intranasal dexmedetomidine, midazolam and ketamine for their sedative and analgesic properties: a triple blind randomized study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014 Spring;38(3):255-61. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.38.3.l828585807482966. PubMed 25095322 ↗
  • Singh C, Pandey RK, Saksena AK, Chandra G. A comparative evaluation of analgo-sedative effects of oral dexmedetomidine and ketamine: a triple-blind, randomized study. Paediatr Anaesth. 2014 Dec;24(12):1252-9. doi: 10.1111/pan.12493. Epub 2014 Jul 25. PubMed 25065424 ↗
  • Li BL, Zhang N, Huang JX, Qiu QQ, Tian H, Ni J, Song XR, Yuen VM, Irwin MG. A comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine for sedation in children administered either by atomiser or by drops. Anaesthesia. 2016 May;71(5):522-8. doi: 10.1111/anae.13407. Epub 2016 Mar 3. PubMed 26936022 ↗
  • Harbuz DK, O'Halloran M. Techniques to administer oral, inhalational, and IV sedation in dentistry. Australas Med J. 2016 Feb 29;9(2):25-32. doi: 10.4066/AMJ.2015.2543. eCollection 2016. PubMed 26989448 ↗
  • Greaves A. The use of Midazolam as an Intranasal Sedative in Dentistry. SAAD Dig. 2016 Jan;32:46-9. PubMed 27145560 ↗
  • Bulach R, Myles PS, Russnak M. Double-blind randomized controlled trial to determine extent of amnesia with midazolam given immediately before general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Mar;94(3):300-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei040. Epub 2004 Nov 26. PubMed 15567810 ↗
  • Silva FC, Thuler LC. Cross-cultural adaptation and translation of two pain assessment tools in children and adolescents. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2008 Jul-Aug;84(4):344-9. doi: 10.2223/JPED.1809. PubMed 18688551 ↗
  • Vernon DT, Schulman JL, Foley JM. Changes in children's behavior after hospitalization. Some dimensions of response and their correlates. Am J Dis Child. 1966 Jun;111(6):581-93. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1966.02090090053003. No abstract available. PubMed 5939538 ↗
  • Chernik DA, Gillings D, Laine H, Hendler J, Silver JM, Davidson AB, Schwam EM, Siegel JL. Validity and reliability of the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale: study with intravenous midazolam. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1990 Aug;10(4):244-51. PubMed 2286697 ↗
  • Yuen VM, Hui TW, Irwin MG, Yao TJ, Chan L, Wong GL, Shahnaz Hasan M, Shariffuddin II. A randomised comparison of two intranasal dexmedetomidine doses for premedication in children. Anaesthesia. 2012 Nov;67(11):1210-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07309.x. Epub 2012 Sep 5. PubMed 22950484 ↗
  • Canpolat DG, Yildirim MD, Aksu R, Kutuk N, Alkan A, Cantekin K. Intravenous ketamine, propofol and propofol-ketamine combination used for pediatric dental sedation: A randomized clinical study. Pak J Med Sci. 2016 May-Jun;32(3):682-7. doi: 10.12669/pjms.323.9834. PubMed 27375714 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 22, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03827408
Lead sponsor
Nourhan M.Aly
Collaborators
Alexandria University
Responsible party
Nourhan M.Aly (Clinical Instructor, University of Alexandria) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Feb 1, 2019
Start date
Nov 27, 2017
Primary completion
Aug 29, 2019
Completion
Dec 22, 2019
Last update
Jan 22, 2020

Study contacts

Amira A El-Khatib, MSc
principal investigator · Alexandria University
Nadia A Wahba, PhD
study director · Alexandria University
Karin ML Dowidar, PhD
study director · Alexandria University
Tamer AM Ghoneim, PhD
study director · Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria Univerity

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion