An interventional study of Passive Vertebral Mobilization and PNF exercise in Mechanical Neck Pain, sponsored by Isra University. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-03-11.
Sponsored by Isra University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
This study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of Passive Vertebral Mobilization (PVM) and Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Techniques (PNF) in reducing pain, disability and improving quality of life in patients with Mechanical Neck Pain.
Neck Pain is very common and is now considered a public health issue. It poses significant health and economic burden, being a frequent cause of disability. A significant proportion of direct health care costs associated with neck disorders are attributable to visits to health care providers, to sick leave, and to the related loss of productive capacity. Mechanical neck pain affects between 45-54% of people in the general population .This can result in severe pain and disability. Mechanical neck pain described as a reduction in the mobility of cervical spinal segment is often the focus of manipulative physical therapy interventions. Most neck pain is not attributed to diseases but rather caused by muscular and postural condition. The cervical pain is a mechanical problem .It is therefore sense that a mechanical treatment works better than pharmacological treatment.
Cervical spine often impairs flexibility of key muscles related to cervical spine . Stretching exercise is beneficial for increasing flexibility as well as muscle performance.
The normal function of cervical spine is complex and requires a large variety of activities to be coordinated in order for an individual to perform daily activities with the least amount of strain and potential injury. When the dysfunction develops in the cervical spine, a chain reaction may develop which can affect the whole neck and even the entire body.
Commonly used approaches to treatment include rest, therapeutic massage, application of physical agents like heat, cold, TENS, and ultrasonic various types of mobilizations, manipulations (by physical therapists, chiropractors, osteopaths and others), therapeutic exercises, postural care and off course medication and surgical interventions. However, studies of their effectiveness have generally been short-term and inconclusive. The aim of the study is to compare which treatment either Passive Vertebral Mobilization or Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation, whether itself or in combination, is more effective and beneficial in the treatment of mechanical neck pain.
Several studies have been reported to determine the effectiveness of manual therapy/ passive vertebral mobilization but with largely inconclusive results. However there are few studies if any to compare PNF exercise with PVM in terms of their effectiveness. PNF are simple and requiring low level expertise as compare to PVM.
Exclusion Criteria:
This group included 30 participants. Passive vertebral mobilization was given along with routine physiotherapy comprising TENS, Hotpack/IRR, Isometric neck exercise and postural care
Other: Passive Vertebral Mobilization · Other: Routine Physiotherapy
This group included 30 participants. PNF exercise in the form of diagonal pattern neck movements was along with routine physiotherapy comprising TENS, Hotpack/IRR, Isometric neck exercise and postural care
Other: PNF exercise · Other: Routine Physiotherapy
This group included 30 participants.Routine physiotherapy comprising TENS, Hotpack/IRR, Isometric neck exercise and postural care.
Other: Routine Physiotherapy
Posteroanterior glides was given to cervical spine using Maitland method along with routine physiotherapy comprising thermotherapy with Hot Packs 15 minutes, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) 15 minutes,Isometric neck exercises,Education on precautions and postural care
Also known as: Spinal mobilization
The subjects was given PNF exercises comprising PNF diagonal patterns for neck along with routine physiotherapy comprising thermotherapy with Hot Packs 15 minutes, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) 15 minutes,Isometric neck exercises,Education on precautions and postural care
Also known as: Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation
Thermotherapy with Hot Packs 15 minutes, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) 15 minutes,Isometric neck exercises,Education on precautions and postural care
Also known as: Routine Physical therapy (RPT)
Visual Analog Scale (PAIN)
changes from baseline. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a 10 cm horizontal line, with 0 presenting No pain and 10 representing Worst Pain.
Time frame: 4 weeks
ROM of Cervical spine (Flexion)
changes from baseline
Time frame: 4 weeks
ROM of Cervical spine (Extension)
changes from baseline.Bubble inclinometer was used to measure ROM in sitting position
Time frame: 4 weeks
ROM of Cervical spine (rotation rightward)
changes from baseline.Bubble inclinometer was used to measure ROM in sitting position
Time frame: 4 weeks
ROM of Cervical spine (rotation leftward)
changes from baseline. Bubble inclinometer was used to measure ROM in sitting position
Time frame: 4 weeks
ROM of Cervical spine (Side bending Right)
changes from baseline.Bubble inclinometer was used to measure ROM in sitting position
Time frame: 4 weeks
ROM of Cervical spine (Side bending Left)
changes from baseline.Bubble inclinometer was used to measure ROM in sitting position
Time frame: 4 weeks
Neck Flexors Muscle endurance
changes from baseline. Neck Flexion holding time in supine lying position was measured in seconds with the help of stop watch.
Time frame: 4 weeks
NDI (neck Disability Index)
changes from baseline NDI is self rated index to measure pain and disability due to neck pain. Neck disability index consists of 10 questions addressing functional activities. There are 6 potential responses for each item, ranging from no disability (0) to total disability (5).The NDI is scored from 0 to 50 with higher score indication greater disability.
Time frame: 4 weeks
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Isra University