CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03810456Updated Aug 28, 2023Results posted

Transdiagnostic Cognitive Behavioral Treatment for Anxiety

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Intensive Cognitive Behavior Therapy (iCBT) and Standard Cognitive Behavior Therapy (sCBT) in Anxiety Disorders, sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-08-28.

Sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Aug 2018, registered Jan 2019).
Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
359
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is a randomized controlled trial examining the effectiveness of a transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral treatment (CBT) in improving Veterans' community reintegration and quality of life. Veterans with anxiety-based disorders, including posttraumatic stress, panic, social anxiety, and generalized anxiety disorders (with or without co-occurring depression) will be randomized to an intensive CBT (iCBT) treatment delivered over one weekend, standard CBT (sCBT) delivered over 12 weeks or treatment as usual (TAU). The study will also evaluate the potential of the compressed weekend format of iCBT in producing more rapid improvement in outcomes and increasing psychotherapy engagement compared with a standard psychotherapy format. Qualitative interviews will be conducted with Veterans who receive iCBT and their family members to examine how iCBT and environmental factors impacted their process of recovery.

Read the detailed description

The current project proposes to evaluate a brief but intensive transdiagnostic CBT that simultaneously targets multiple anxiety disorders with or without co-occurring depression. This will be accomplished by evaluating an innovative treatment delivery method that directly addresses barriers associated with standard psychotherapy delivery. The main objectives are to (1) determine if an intensive CBT protocol (iCBT) delivered over one weekend can improve community reintegration, quality of life, and emotional functioning compared with standard CBT (sCBT) and treatment as usual (TAU); (2) examine the rates of psychotherapy engagement in iCBT compared with sCBT; and (3) obtain a deeper understanding, through qualitative interviews with Veterans and their family members, of how iCBT and environmental factors may impact the process of reintegration and quality of life.

The proposed study is a randomized controlled trial with 3 treatment arms. A transdiagnostic group CBT protocol will be compared in a compressed weekend format (iCBT) with a standard group delivery format involving 3 months of weekly sessions (sCBT). A treatment as usual (TAU) condition will be included to compare outcomes. Veterans with one or more anxiety-based disorder(s) (with or without co-occurring depression) will be randomized to one of the three treatment arms. Veterans will be asked to attend a total of four assessments during the study including a baseline evaluation, 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month follow-ups. Qualitative interviews will be conducted with Veterans who completed iCBT and family members.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anxiety Disorders

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Cognitive Behavior Therapy
03

In context

Anxiety Disorders

4,868 studies on the registry are indexed under Anxiety Disorders; 1,390 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 359 is above the median of 80 across 4,174 interventional studies indexed under Anxiety Disorders.

Browse Anxiety Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development is the lead sponsor of 1,733 studies on the registry; 396 are open to participants now.

Of its 206 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 180 (87%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Veterans enrolled to receive VA medical care
  • Current diagnosis of at least one anxiety-based disorder
  • Moderate-to-poor life enjoyment and satisfaction
  • Stable on psychotropic medication 4 weeks prior to participation
  • Willing to be randomized to treatment condition

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active symptoms of mania or psychosis at baseline
  • Depression with active suicidal ideation/intent
  • Moderate-to-severe cognitive impairment
  • Active drug/alcohol abuse during initial 3 months of study enrollment
  • Undergoing concurrent transdiagnostic CBT for anxiety
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
359 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    iCBT

    Patients in this arm will receive transdiagnostic CBT delivered in an intensive format over one weekend.

    Behavioral: Intensive Cognitive Behavior Therapy (iCBT)

  • Active comparator
    sCBT

    Patients in this arm will receive transdiagnostic CBT delivered in a standard weekly format for 12 weeks.

    Behavioral: Standard Cognitive Behavior Therapy (sCBT)

  • No intervention
    TAU

    Patients in this arm will not receive transdiagnostic CBT but will receive treatment as usual.

Interventions

  • BehavioralIntensive Cognitive Behavior Therapy (iCBT)

    Participants randomized to iCBT will receive 16 hours of cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety over one weekend. The treatment entails psychoeducation, cognitive restructuring and exposure exercises.

  • BehavioralStandard Cognitive Behavior Therapy (sCBT)

    Participants randomized to sCBT will receive 16 hours of cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety weekly over a period of 12 weeks. The treatment entails psychoeducation, cognitive restructuring and exposure exercises.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. CRIS-EPS: Comparison of Extent of Participation Scores Among iCBT, sCBT, and TAU Groups From Baseline to 1, 3, and 6 Month Follow Ups

    The Community Reintegration of Service Members (CRIS) is a commonly used measure of community reintegration in service members and participation in life roles following deployment. The Extent of Participation Subscale (EPS) asks how often an individual experiences/participates in specific activities. Scores on this subscale range from 1 - 7, with higher scores indicating greater degrees of participation in life roles.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month, 3 Month, 6 Month Follow Ups

  2. CRIS-PLS: Comparison of Perceived Limitation Scores Among iCBT, sCBT, and TAU Groups From Baseline to 1, 3, and 6 Month Follow Ups

    The Community Reintegration in Service Members (CRIS) scale is a commonly used measure of community reintegration in service members and participation in life roles following deployment. The Perceived Limitations Subscale (PLS) asks an individual their perceived limitations in participation. Scores on this subscale range from 1 - 7, with higher scores indicating fewer limitations in participation.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month, 3 Month, 6 Month Follow Ups

  3. CRIS-SPS: Comparison of Satisfaction With Participation Scores Among iCBT, sCBT, and TAU Groups From Baseline to 1, 3, and 6 Month Follow Ups

    The Community Reintegration Service Members (CRIS) scale is a commonly used measure of community reintegration in service members and participation in life roles following deployment. The Satisfaction with Participation Subscale (SPS) asks an individual their degree of satisfaction with participation. Scores on this subscale range from 1 - 7, with higher scores indicating greater levels of satisfaction with their participation.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month, 3 Month, 6 Month Follow Ups

  4. BAI: Comparison of Beck Anxiety Inventory Scores Among iCBT, sCBT, and TAU Groups From Baseline to 1, 3, and 6 Month Follow Ups

    The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) assesses the severity of anxiety symptoms across 21 items, minimizing those that overlap with depression. The BAI assesses cognitive and somatic components of anxiety. The cognitive subscale provides a measure of fearful thoughts and impaired cognitive functioning, whereas the somatic subscale measures the symptoms of physiological arousal. The total score on the BAI ranges from 0 - 63, with higher scores reflecting higher levels of anxiety.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month, 3 Month, 6 Month Follow Ups

Secondary outcomes

  1. QLES-SF: Comparison of Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Scores Among iCBT, sCBT, and TAU Groups From Baseline to 1, 3, and 6 Month Follow Ups

    The Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (QLES-Q-SF) measures subjective functioning and satisfaction across a range of life domains including work, leisure activities, social relationships, and physical health. Satisfaction scores on this measure range from 14 (very poor) to 70 (very good). Higher scores indicate greater overall life satisfaction/functioning.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month, 3 Month, 6 Month Follow Ups

  2. BDI-II: Comparison of Beck Depression Inventory Scores Among iCBT, sCBT, and TAU Groups From Baseline to 1, 3, and 6 Month Follow Ups

    The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) is a well-validated 21-item measure that assesses symptoms of depression. The total score on the BDI-II ranges from 0 - 63, with higher scores reflecting higher levels of depression.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 Month, 3 Month, 6 Month Follow Ups

07

Results

Posted Aug 28, 2023
Limitations and caveats
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, all research was placed on hold for several months. All study procedures for this project had to be converted to virtual telehealth delivery. This change in modality (including intervention delivery) may have impacted study outcomes and resulted in underpowered analyses.

Participant flow

Veterans at the Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center and affiliated community based outpatient clinics were enrolled in this study from 08/1/2018 to 05/31/2021. Veterans were recruited through direct referrals and advertisements.

Enrolled and Randomized
Participant flow — Enrolled and Randomized
MilestoneiCBT (Intensive Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)sCBT (Standard Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)TAU (Treatment as Usual)
Started999967
Completed697967
Not completed30200
Treatment
Participant flow — Treatment
MilestoneiCBT (Intensive Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)sCBT (Standard Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)TAU (Treatment as Usual)
Started697967
Completed665567
Not completed3240
Withdrew: Urgent family matters300
Withdrew: Scheduling conflicts0110
Withdrew: No longer interested0120
Withdrew: Transportation issues010
1 Month Follow-Up
Participant flow — 1 Month Follow-Up
MilestoneiCBT (Intensive Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)sCBT (Standard Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)TAU (Treatment as Usual)
Started665567
Completed575151
Not completed9416
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up7415
Withdrew: Relocated to different state101
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject100
3 Month Follow-Up
Participant flow — 3 Month Follow-Up
MilestoneiCBT (Intensive Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)sCBT (Standard Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)TAU (Treatment as Usual)
Started665567
Completed544453
Not completed121114
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up111114
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject100
6 Month Follow-Up
Participant flow — 6 Month Follow-Up
MilestoneiCBT (Intensive Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)sCBT (Standard Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)TAU (Treatment as Usual)
Started665567
Completed534649
Not completed13918
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up12918
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject100

Outcome measures

PrimaryCRIS-EPS: Comparison of Extent of Participation Scores Among iCBT, sCBT, and TAU Groups From Baseline to 1, 3, and 6 Month Follow Ups

The Community Reintegration of Service Members (CRIS) is a commonly used measure of community reintegration in service members and participation in life roles following deployment. The Extent of Participation Subscale (EPS) asks how often an individual experiences/participates in specific activities. Scores on this subscale range from 1 - 7, with higher scores indicating greater degrees of participation in life roles.

Time frame:
Baseline, 1 Month, 3 Month, 6 Month Follow Ups
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
CRIS-EPS: Comparison of Extent of Participation Scores Among iCBT, sCBT, and TAU Groups From Baseline to 1, 3, and 6 Month Follow Ups
score on a scaleiCBT (Intensive Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)sCBT (Standard Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)TAU (Treatment as Usual)
Baseline4.21 ± 0.74.18 ± 0.64.17 ± 0.8
1 Month Follow Up4.52 ± 0.94.44 ± .84.18 ± 0.8
3 Month Follow Up4.57 ± .74.54 ± .94.34 ± 0.8
6 Month Follow Up4.70 ± 0.74.52 ± 0.84.36 ± 0.8
PrimaryCRIS-PLS: Comparison of Perceived Limitation Scores Among iCBT, sCBT, and TAU Groups From Baseline to 1, 3, and 6 Month Follow Ups

The Community Reintegration in Service Members (CRIS) scale is a commonly used measure of community reintegration in service members and participation in life roles following deployment. The Perceived Limitations Subscale (PLS) asks an individual their perceived limitations in participation. Scores on this subscale range from 1 - 7, with higher scores indicating fewer limitations in participation.

Time frame:
Baseline, 1 Month, 3 Month, 6 Month Follow Ups
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
CRIS-PLS: Comparison of Perceived Limitation Scores Among iCBT, sCBT, and TAU Groups From Baseline to 1, 3, and 6 Month Follow Ups
score on a scaleiCBT (Intensive Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)sCBT (Standard Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)TAU (Treatment as Usual)
Baseline4.40 ± 0.84.34 ± 0.74.36 ± 0.9
1 Month Follow Up4.52 ± 0.94.44 ± 0.84.18 ± 0.8
3 Month Follow Up4.86 ± 0.94.52 ± 0.94.40 ± 0.9
6 Month Follow Up4.70 ± 0.74.52 ± 0.84.36 ± 0.8
PrimaryCRIS-SPS: Comparison of Satisfaction With Participation Scores Among iCBT, sCBT, and TAU Groups From Baseline to 1, 3, and 6 Month Follow Ups

The Community Reintegration Service Members (CRIS) scale is a commonly used measure of community reintegration in service members and participation in life roles following deployment. The Satisfaction with Participation Subscale (SPS) asks an individual their degree of satisfaction with participation. Scores on this subscale range from 1 - 7, with higher scores indicating greater levels of satisfaction with their participation.

Time frame:
Baseline, 1 Month, 3 Month, 6 Month Follow Ups
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
CRIS-SPS: Comparison of Satisfaction With Participation Scores Among iCBT, sCBT, and TAU Groups From Baseline to 1, 3, and 6 Month Follow Ups
score on a scaleiCBT (Intensive Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)sCBT (Standard Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)TAU (Treatment as Usual)
Baseline4.28 ± 1.04.26 ± 1.24.15 ± 1.0
1 Month Follow Up4.80 ± 1.14.51 ± 1.04.31 ± 1.0
3 Month Follow Up4.86 ± 0.94.60 ± 1.04.40 ± 0.9
6 Month Follow Up4.96 ± 0.84.63 ± 1.04.45 ± 0.9
PrimaryBAI: Comparison of Beck Anxiety Inventory Scores Among iCBT, sCBT, and TAU Groups From Baseline to 1, 3, and 6 Month Follow Ups

The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) assesses the severity of anxiety symptoms across 21 items, minimizing those that overlap with depression. The BAI assesses cognitive and somatic components of anxiety. The cognitive subscale provides a measure of fearful thoughts and impaired cognitive functioning, whereas the somatic subscale measures the symptoms of physiological arousal. The total score on the BAI ranges from 0 - 63, with higher scores reflecting higher levels of anxiety.

Time frame:
Baseline, 1 Month, 3 Month, 6 Month Follow Ups
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
BAI: Comparison of Beck Anxiety Inventory Scores Among iCBT, sCBT, and TAU Groups From Baseline to 1, 3, and 6 Month Follow Ups
score on a scaleiCBT (Intensive Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)sCBT (Standard Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)TAU (Treatment as Usual)
Baseline31.8 ± 11.231.7 ± 10.932.0 ± 12.1
1 Month Follow Up24.0 ± 12.625.9 ± 10.326.3 ± 12.6
3 Month Follow Up24.3 ± 12.225.6 ± 11.826.7 ± 12.4
6 Month Follow Up21.6 ± 11.624.1 ± 11.427.0 ± 12.1
SecondaryQLES-SF: Comparison of Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Scores Among iCBT, sCBT, and TAU Groups From Baseline to 1, 3, and 6 Month Follow Ups

The Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (QLES-Q-SF) measures subjective functioning and satisfaction across a range of life domains including work, leisure activities, social relationships, and physical health. Satisfaction scores on this measure range from 14 (very poor) to 70 (very good). Higher scores indicate greater overall life satisfaction/functioning.

Time frame:
Baseline, 1 Month, 3 Month, 6 Month Follow Ups
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
QLES-SF: Comparison of Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Scores Among iCBT, sCBT, and TAU Groups From Baseline to 1, 3, and 6 Month Follow Ups
score on a scaleiCBT (Intensive Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)sCBT (Standard Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)TAU (Treatment as Usual)
Baseline34.4 ± 7.034.8 ± 5.533.6 ± 7.0
1 Month Follow Up42.9 ± 9.740.7 ± 8.437.4 ± 8.3
3 Month Follow Up42.9 ± 10.642.0 ± 8.938.3 ± 9.6
6 Month Follow Up43.7 ± 10.142.5 ± 8.838.0 ± 8.0
SecondaryBDI-II: Comparison of Beck Depression Inventory Scores Among iCBT, sCBT, and TAU Groups From Baseline to 1, 3, and 6 Month Follow Ups

The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) is a well-validated 21-item measure that assesses symptoms of depression. The total score on the BDI-II ranges from 0 - 63, with higher scores reflecting higher levels of depression.

Time frame:
Baseline, 1 Month, 3 Month, 6 Month Follow Ups
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
BDI-II: Comparison of Beck Depression Inventory Scores Among iCBT, sCBT, and TAU Groups From Baseline to 1, 3, and 6 Month Follow Ups
score on a scaleiCBT (Intensive Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)sCBT (Standard Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)TAU (Treatment as Usual)
Baseline31.0 ± 10.731.0 ± 10.632.7 ± 11.1
1 Month Follow Up23.5 ± 13.424.6 ± 11.829.8 ± 12.9
3 Month Follow Up25.1 ± 12.724.8 ± 13.228.5 ± 13.1
6 Month Follow Up22.5 ± 12.024.4 ± 13.528.8 ± 12.8

Adverse events

Collected over 3 years, 7 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
iCBT (Intensive Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)0/99 (0%)0/99 (0%)0/99 (0%)
sCBT (Standard Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)0/98 (0%)0/98 (0%)0/98 (0%)
TAU (Treatment as Usual)0/67 (0%)0/67 (0%)0/67 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

One participant randomized to the sCBT arm was excluded from analyses due to not meeting study inclusion criteria.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)iCBT (Intensive Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)sCBT (Standard Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)TAU (Treatment a Usual)Total
Mean42.7 ± 11.243.9 ± 12.243.6 ± 11.943.4 ± 11.7
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)iCBT (Intensive Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)sCBT (Standard Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)TAU (Treatment a Usual)Total
Female35342392
Male646444172
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)iCBT (Intensive Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)sCBT (Standard Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)TAU (Treatment a Usual)Total
Hispanic or Latino25241463
Not Hispanic or Latino737250195
Unknown or Not Reported1236
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)iCBT (Intensive Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)sCBT (Standard Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)TAU (Treatment a Usual)Total
American Indian or Alaska Native2204
Asian2305
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander6107
Black or African American464637129
White35362495
More than one race56213
Unknown or Not Reported34411
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)iCBT (Intensive Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)sCBT (Standard Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)TAU (Treatment a Usual)Total
United States999867264
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jan 18, 2018
  • Statistical analysis plan · Jan 18, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 28, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03810456
Lead sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 18, 2019
Start date
Aug 1, 2018
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2021
Completion
Aug 31, 2022
Results posted
Aug 28, 2023
Last update
Aug 28, 2023

Study contacts

Ellen Teng, PhD
principal investigator · Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion