An interventional study of COAST-IS and TF-CBT Learning Collaborative in Psychological Trauma and Mental Health, sponsored by Washington University School of Medicine. Completed at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-04-27.
Sponsored by Washington University School of Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research
The purpose of this study is to partner with the North Carolina Child Treatment Program (NC CTP) and the SAMHSA-funded National Child Traumatic Stress Network (NCTSN) to develop and pilot the Collaborative Organizational Approach to Selecting and Tailoring Implementation Strategies (COAST-IS). The COAST-IS intervention will involve coaching organizational leaders and therapists to use Intervention Mapping to select and tailor strategies. Intervention Mapping is a multistep process that is inherently ecological and incorporates theory, evidence, and stakeholder perspectives to ensure that intervention components effectively address key determinants of change. After collaboratively developing COAST-IS in Year 1, the investigators will conduct a randomized pilot trial of the intervention within an NC CTP learning collaborative, randomly assigning eight organizations to the learning collaborative-only condition or the learning collaborative plus COAST-IS condition. Participants will include organizational leaders (e.g., CEOs/Directors, Clinical Directors, Supervisors) and therapists (e.g., Licensed Clinical Social Workers, Licensed Psychologists, Licensed Professional Counselors). The investigators will evaluate COAST-IS in the following aims: 1) to assess the acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and utility of COAST-IS; 2) to evaluate organizational stakeholders' fidelity to the core elements of Intervention Mapping; and 3) to demonstrate the feasibility of testing COAST-IS in a larger effectiveness trial. This work is significant because it will yield a systematic method that integrates theory, evidence, and stakeholder perspectives to improve the effectiveness and precision of implementation strategies. Ultimately, COAST-IS may have the potential to improve implementation and sustainment of a wide-range of EBPs in mental health and other health sectors.
139 studies on the registry are indexed under Psychological Trauma; 41 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 62 is below the median of 80 across 105 interventional studies indexed under Psychological Trauma.
Browse Psychological Trauma studies →Washington University School of Medicine is the lead sponsor of 1,765 studies on the registry; 271 are open to participants now.
Of its 324 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 212 (65%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
In addition to participating in a learning collaborative for implementing trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (TF-CBT) with periodic coaching calls, organizations will receive additional training and tailored implementation support.
Other: COAST-IS · Other: TF-CBT Learning Collaborative
Organizations will participate in a learning collaborative for implementing trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (TF-CBT) with periodic coaching calls.
Other: TF-CBT Learning Collaborative
COAST-IS has been designed to equip organizations with the knowledge, motivation, and skill needed to thoughtfully match implementation strategies to identified determinants by applying intervention mapping. The COAST-IS intervention will include four different modes of delivery: 1) dissemination of educational materials; 2) five web-based interactive education sessions on the need for tailoring implementation strategies and the application of intervention mapping; 3) site visits to discuss change objectives necessary to successfully implement trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy; and 4) organizational coaching related to using an intervention mapping approach.
The learning collaborative model was adapted from the Breakthrough Series Collaborative model. Leadership of the collaboratives includes experts in evidence-based practices, implementation, and quality improvement. Main components include: 1) three face-to-face learning sessions (2-days each) that provide clinical training; 2) post-learning session action periods structured to facilitate therapists' application of learned skills; 3) a secure website to facilitate faculty-to-participant and peer-to-peer learning and document use of quality improvement methods; 4) fidelity monitoring and coaching; 5) a senior leader track supporting organizational change; 6) monthly outcomes monitoring; and 7) sustainability planning.
Evaluate the acceptability of COAST-IS
This will be assessed with the 4-item measure: Acceptability of Intervention. This measure is rated on a 5 point scale (completely disagree, disagree, neither agree nor disagree, agree, completely agree), with completely disagree having a score of 1 and completely agree having a score of 5. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability.
Time frame: 1 year
Evaluate the appropriateness of COAST-IS
This will be assessed with the 4-item measure: Intervention Appropriateness.This measure is rated on a 5 point scale (completely disagree, disagree, neither agree nor disagree, agree, completely agree), with completely disagree having a score of 1 and completely agree having a score of 5. Higher scores indicate greater appropriateness.
Time frame: 1 year
Evaluate the feasibility of COAST-IS
This will be assessed with the 4-item measure: Feasibility of Intervention.This measure is rated on a 5 point scale (completely disagree, disagree, neither agree nor disagree, agree, completely agree), with completely disagree having a score of 1 and completely agree having a score of 5. Higher scores indicate greater feasibility.
Time frame: 1 year
Evaluate the perceived utility of COAST-IS
Semi-structured interview will focus on the perceived utility of COAST-IS.
Time frame: 1 year
Fidelity to COAST-IS
Fidelity to COAST-IS will be measured with a fidelity assessment tool adapted from the Stages of Implementation Completion measure, which assesses organizations' progression through eight stages of implementation (engagement through competency \[conceptualized as the start of sustainment\]).
Time frame: 1 year
Fidelity to TF-CBT
Therapist fidelity and adherence to TF-CBT will be assessed with the TF-CBT Fidelity Metric. This instrument consists of 12 scales (e.g., gradual exposure, cognitive processing) that allow a trainer to rate (on a 4-point scale) each TF-CBT component applied by a therapist within a session.
Time frame: 6 months
Fidelity to TF-CBT
Therapist fidelity and adherence to TF-CBT will be assessed with the TF-CBT Fidelity Metric. This instrument consists of 12 scales (e.g., gradual exposure, cognitive processing) that allow a trainer to rate (on a 4-point scale) each TF-CBT component applied by a therapist within a session.
Time frame: 1 year
Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC)
The 12 items comprising the ORIC measure will be included in an organizational barrier assessment that will be administered to all enrolled participants and will guide implementation support provided through COAST-IS. This measure assesses whether members of an organization, collectively, are (1) committed to implementing a new practice or process and (2) believe that they have the capacity to do so. For these two subscales and the overall ORIC scale, organizations receive scores between 1 and 5 (higher scores are considered more positive).
Time frame: Baseline, 1 year
Evidence-based Practice Attitudes Scales (EBPAS)
The 15 items comprising the EBPAS measure will be included in an organizational barrier assessment that will be administered to all enrolled participants and will guide implementation support provided through COAST-IS. This measure articulates practitioner willingness to adopt new interventions as a function of four factors: (1) appeal of the new intervention, (2) organizational requirements, (3) practitioner openness, and (4) divergence (perceived incompatibility with practice or limited usefulness of research-based interventions). For these four subscales and the overall EBPAS scale, organizations receive scores between 0 and 4 (higher scores are considered more positive).
Time frame: Baseline, 1 year
Inner Setting of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
This questionnaire assesses factors related to the inner setting of organizations that are believed to be important in influencing the implementation of interventions. Thirty items from this questionnaire will be included in an organizational barrier assessment that will be administered to all enrolled participants and will guide implementation support provided through COAST-IS. These items measure three factors: (1) culture, (2) learning climate, and (3) available resources. Organizations receive scores between 1 and 5 for each of these factors (higher scores are considered more positive).
Time frame: Baseline, 1 year
Scale for Implementation Climate
The six items comprising this measure will be included in an organizational barrier assessment that will be administered to all enrolled participants and will guide implementation support provided through COAST-IS. This measure assesses whether organizations are primed for implementation via three factors: the extent to which employees believe implementation is (1) expected, (2) supported, and (3) rewarded. For these three subscales and the overall ICS scale, organizations receive scores between 1 and 5 (higher scores are considered more positive).
Time frame: Baseline, 1 year
Psychological Safety Scale (PSS)
The seven items comprising the PSS measure will be included in an organizational barrier assessment that will be administered to all enrolled participants and will guide implementation support provided through COAST-IS. This measure assesses how much the environment of a work team makes members feel they can safely engage in learning behavior (e.g., seeking feedback, discussing errors, asking questions, experimenting) without great risk of losing face. Organizations receive a score between 1 and 7 for this scale (higher scores are considered more positive).
Time frame: Baseline, 1 year
Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS)
The 12 items comprising the ILS measure will be included in an organizational barrier assessment that will be administered to all enrolled participants and will guide implementation support provided through COAST-IS. This measure assesses whether leadership is proactive, knowledgeable, supportive, and perseverant based on specific actions leaders take in promoting implementation. For these four subscales and the overall ILS scale, organizations receive scores between 0 and 4 (higher scores are considered more positive).
Time frame: Baseline, 1 year
Implementation Citizenship Behavior Scale (ICBS)
The six items comprising the ICBS measure will be included in an organizational barrier assessment that will be administered to all enrolled participants and will guide implementation support provided through COAST-IS. This measure assesses two critical employee behaviors that go beyond what is required to support the implementation of evidence-based practices: (1) helping their peers with implementation-related activities and (2) keeping informed about issues related to evidence-based practice and implementation efforts. For these two subscales and the overall ICBS scale, organizations receive scores between 0 and 4 (higher scores are considered more positive).
Time frame: Baseline, 1 year
Prior Experiences with Implementation
This questionnaire assesses employees' experiences and judgments toward previous innovation implementation, which may affect their implementation behavior regarding future innovations. Sixteen items from this questionnaire will be included in an organizational barrier assessment that will be administered to all enrolled participants and will guide implementation support provided through COAST-IS. These items measure four subscales: (1) perceived intensity of previous innovations, (2) perceived failure of previous innovations, (3) innovation-targeted helplessness, and (4) innovation fatigue. Organizations receive scores between 1 and 5 for each of these subscales (higher scores are considered more negative).
Time frame: Baseline, 1 year
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Washington University School of Medicine