CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03794388CAPTRANEUpdated May 5, 2026Results posted

Evaluation in the Treatment of Neuropathic Pain Post Breast Surgery

A Phase 3 interventional study of Capsaicin and Pregabalin in Breast Cancer Patient, sponsored by Institut Cancerologie de l'Ouest. Completed at 11 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-05.

Sponsored by Institut Cancerologie de l'Ouest · Phase 3, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
140
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women in Europe. Therefore, breast cancer has become a chronic disease and patients need to learn to live with it as well as with the adverse effects related to the disease itself or to the therapies used.

As noted in the third "Plan cancer", pain is a major criterion in the quality of life of patients treated for breast cancer.

Neuropathic pain was defined in 2011 by the international Association for the Study of Pain (I.A.S.P.) as the direct result of a lesion or disease affecting the somato-sensory system.

Surgical treatment is often the first treatment of breast cancer. It can be conservative by performing a partial mastectomy (lumpectomy or quadrantectomy) or non-preservative by total mastectomy.

Intercostobrachial neuralgia (NICB) or Post mastectomy painful Syndrome (MPRR) was first described by Wood in 1978 as "chronic pain beginning immediately or early after a mastectomy" Or a lumpectomy affecting the anterior thorax, armpit and/or arm in its upper half. These post-surgical pains are related to a lesion of the nerves in the breast area.

In particular, the intercostobrachial nerve can be severed, stretched or crushed during surgery.

Post-operative neuropathic pain in patients with breast cancer is underdiagnosed either by general practitioner or in a specialized environment.

The diagnosis of neuropathic pain is performed during examination and clinical examination. Several scales allow to detect neuropathic pain but only the DN4 is recognized to be the most specific and sensitive scale.

Patients do not always express this pain. They do not always reconcile with the surgery. Either because the pain occurs a long time after the surgery, or they find it normal to get hurt. These diagnostic difficulties cause a delay in setting up a suitable analgesic treatment.

However, neuropathic pain responds poorly to common analgesics. Diagnosis, evaluation and early management of neuropathic pain are a priority in order to avoid their chronicization, to improve the quality of life of patients with breast cancer and to enable them to return to work quickly.

We therefore assume that the diagnosis of early neuropathic pain at 2 months of surgery associated with initiation of appropriate topical treatment without the systemic effects of conventional oral treatments, would reduce the incidence of Chronic neuropathic pain 6 months after surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer Patient

Keywords

  • Breast cancer patient
  • Surgery
  • Inter Costobrachial Neuralgia
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Institut Cancerologie de l'Ouest is the lead sponsor of 105 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female who had first breast cancer surgery, regardless of the type of surgery
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Healthy, non-irritated skin on painful areas to treat
  • During the inclusion visit to M4 post surgery, neuropathic pain of the breast and / or axillary area corresponding to inter-brachial neuralgia with a DN4≥4 score.
  • Obtaining the signed written consent of the patient
  • Major patient affiliated to a social security scheme

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications specific to the treatments studied : capsaicine and pregabalin
  • Diabetic patient
  • Previous treatment with capsaicin or pregabalin
  • Opioid treatment> 80 mg / day (oral morphine equivalent) in progress- Topical treatment of pain between surgery and inclusion visit
  • Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥ 180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg) or recent history (\<3 months) of cardiovascular events (stroke, heart attack, pulmonary embolism)
  • Creatinine clearance (CLcr) \<60mL / min according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula
  • Pregnant woman, likely to be pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Persons deprived of their liberty or guardianship (including curators),
  • Impossibility of submitting to the medical follow-up of the test for geographical, social or psychological reasons
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
140 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm CAPSAICINE topical

    Application of capsaicin patches at 8% on the painful area 1 to 2 patches will be administered during the consultation. If necessary, a second application will be realized 3 months later.

    Drug: Capsaicin

  • Active comparator
    Arm PREGABALINE

    Pregabalin tablets will be initiated at a dose of 50 mg / day taken in 2 doses Depending on the tolerance, the dose will be increased to 100 mg / day and then to 150 mg / day to reach a maximum dose of 600 mg / day. An interval of 3 to 7 days must be observed between each dose increase.

    Drug: Pregabalin

Interventions

  • DrugCapsaicin

    Application of capsaicin patches at 8% on painful area

    Also known as: qutenza EU/1/09/524/001

  • DrugPregabalin

    Taking Pregabalin tablets

    Also known as: Lyrica

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Neuropathic Pain Score at 2 Months (Numeric Rating Scale 0-10)

    Pain intensity was assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 to 10, where: * 0 indicates no pain, * 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Higher scores represent worse pain. The score was collected at 2 months

    Time frame: 2 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to 6 Months in Neuropathic Pain Score (Numeric Rating Scale 0-10)

    Neuropathic pain intensity was assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. The outcome measure represents the change in NRS score from baseline to 6 months, calculated as the score at 6 months minus the score at baseline. Negative values indicate an improvement in pain, and positive values indicate worsening of pain.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Results

Posted May 5, 2026

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneArm CAPSAICINE TopicalArm PREGABALINE
Started7070
Completed6551
Not completed519

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Neuropathic Pain Score at 2 Months (Numeric Rating Scale 0-10)

Pain intensity was assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 to 10, where: * 0 indicates no pain, * 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Higher scores represent worse pain. The score was collected at 2 months

Time frame:
2 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in Neuropathic Pain Score at 2 Months (Numeric Rating Scale 0-10)
units on a scaleArm CAPSAICINE TopicalArm PREGABALINE
Change in Neuropathic Pain Score at 2 Months (Numeric Rating Scale 0-10)4.1 ± 2.54.6 ± 2.9
SecondaryChange From Baseline to 6 Months in Neuropathic Pain Score (Numeric Rating Scale 0-10)

Neuropathic pain intensity was assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. The outcome measure represents the change in NRS score from baseline to 6 months, calculated as the score at 6 months minus the score at baseline. Negative values indicate an improvement in pain, and positive values indicate worsening of pain.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · units
Change From Baseline to 6 Months in Neuropathic Pain Score (Numeric Rating Scale 0-10)
unitsExperimental ARMControl ARM
Change From Baseline to 6 Months in Neuropathic Pain Score (Numeric Rating Scale 0-10)-2.2 ± 2.5-2.7 ± 2.9

Adverse events

Collected over 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Arm CAPSAICINE Topical0/65 (0%)0/65 (0%)8/65 (12.3%)
Arm PREGABALINE0/51 (0%)0/51 (0%)29/51 (56.9%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventArm CAPSAICINE TopicalArm PREGABALINE
VertigoNervous system disorders0/658/51
Application site burningInjury, poisoning and procedural complications8/654/51
HeadacheNervous system disorders0/655/51
SomnolenceNervous system disorders0/655/51
ConfusionNervous system disorders0/654/51
InsomniaNervous system disorders0/653/51

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Arm CAPSAICINE TopicalArm PREGABALINETotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years493988
>=65 years161228
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Arm CAPSAICINE TopicalArm PREGABALINETotal
Female6551116
Male000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Arm CAPSAICINE TopicalArm PREGABALINETotal
Not Reported6551116
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Arm CAPSAICINE TopicalArm PREGABALINETotal
France6551116
08

Study locations

11 sites
  • Institut de Cancerologie de L'Ouest
    Angers, 49000, France
  • Chu Grenoble
    Grenoble, 38700, France
  • Chd Vendee
    La Roche-sur-Yon, 85025, France
  • Centre Oscar Lambret
    Lille, 59020, France
  • Hopital Saint Vincent de Paul
    Lille, 59020, France
  • Centre Leon Berard
    Lyon, 69008, France
  • CHU NICE
    Nice, 06003, France
  • Institut Jean Godinot
    Reims, 51100, France
  • Institut Curie
    Saint-Cloud, 92210, France
  • Iuct Oncopole
    Toulouse, 31052, France
  • Ch Valenciennes
    Valenciennes, 53322, France
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Apr 10, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 5, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03794388
Lead sponsor
Institut Cancerologie de l'Ouest
Collaborators
Grünenthal GmbH
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 7, 2019
Start date
Mar 19, 2019
Primary completion
Nov 18, 2022
Completion
Nov 18, 2022
Results posted
May 5, 2026
Last update
May 5, 2026

Study contacts

DENIS DUPOIRON, MD
study director · Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion