CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03787901Updated Jun 14, 2022

Comparing the Ongoing Pregnancy Rate for Vitrification of Day-4 Morula With Day-5 Blast

An interventional study of Morula Vitrification in Infertility, sponsored by Egyptian Foundation of Reproductive Endocrinology. Terminated at 4 sites in Egypt. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-06-14.

Sponsored by Egyptian Foundation of Reproductive Endocrinology · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Why this study was terminated
Failed to achieve sample size due to COVID19 pandemic
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
53
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Comparing the vitrification at Day-4 (morula stage) with the blastocyst stage vitrification outcomes with the transfer of all day 5 after warming seems need evaluation. To the best of our knowledge, there has been no random-controlled trial conducted such comparison. Altogether, this trial is to evaluate the morula stage vitrification to blastocyst vitrification on the ongoing pregnancy rate after ICSI.

Read the detailed description

Vitrification of human embryos has been a paradigm-shifting procedure for higher survival rate compared with the slow freezing protocol. The evidence is scarce to support superior results for vitrifying certain stages of preimplantation embryos. Anecdotal evidence suggests that blastocyst vitrification is more forgiving than cleavage stages. However, data obtained from the procedure of assisted shrinkage of blastocysts before vitrification show a higher survival rate, suggesting that fluid accumulation insides the blastocyst can be a barrier for cryoprotectant to reach the cells. Although reassuring, whether facilitating the cryoprotectants transfer to cells by the laser-assisted shrinkage or other modalities is completely safe remains elusive. Moreover, other claims compare between day-3 embryos vitrification and blastocyst stage, suggesting no difference exists.

One of the most critical stages in embryo development is the maternal to zygotic genome activation (MZA), which occurs at the 4 to 8 cell stages. Therefore, it seems the morula stage is still cleavage but passed the MZA. Morula in the most grading system has compaction for all or the majority of cells so if vitrified, the morula stage can bypass the earlier stage of vitrification as well as the need for the artificial shrinkage for blastocyst stage. Therefore, comparing the vitrification at Day-4 (morula stage) with the blastocyst stage vitrification outcomes with the transfer of all day 5 after warming seems need evaluation. To the best of our knowledge, there has been no random-controlled trial conducted such comparison. Altogether, this trial is to evaluate the morula stage vitrification to blastocyst vitrification on the ongoing pregnancy rate after ICSI.

02

Conditions studied

  • Infertility

Browse trials for

03

In context

Infertility

2,506 studies on the registry are indexed under Infertility; 407 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 53 is below the median of 120 across 1,698 interventional studies indexed under Infertility.

Browse Infertility studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Egyptian Foundation of Reproductive Endocrinology as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Women age of ≥ 18 to ≤ 40
  2. BMI of ≤ 31
  3. Normal responder (≥ 12 antral follicle count (AFC) during basal ultrasound examination) or hyper responder
  4. The freeze-all groups including PCOS, OHSS, or high Progesterone at trigger day
  5. Women who have ≥ 1 year of primary or secondary infertility
  6. Tubal factor (unilateral, bilateral obstruction or salpingectomy)
  7. Fresh semen ejaculates but not frozen or surgically retrieved sperm
  8. Male factor: oligoasthenozoospermia but not globozoospermia or pinhead sperm
  9. Women who are undergoing their first or second ICSI attempts with a previously successful attempt
  10. Women who undergo only freeze-all embryo
  11. Freeze-all for poor endometrium at the fresh cycle
  12. Freeze-all due to abnormal endometrial findings such as polyp or myoma with a decision for freeze all for surgical correction.
  13. Women who have normal endometrial thickness (≥ 8) and echo-pattern at the time of progesterone start in the proposed vitrified warmed cycle

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Women who have uncorrectable uterine pathology or abnormality including submucous myoma
  2. Women or their husbands who have abnormal karyotyping
  3. Women with a history of recurrent abortions or repeated implantation failures
  4. Women who have uncontrolled diabetes
  5. Women with diagnosed or undiagnosed liver or renal disease
  6. Women who had a history of malignancy or borderline pathology
  7. Women who will not meet the inclusion criteria
  8. Women who will refuse to participate in the study
  9. Women with endometriosis
  10. Patient undergoing PGS or PGD
  11. Surgically retrieved, frozen-thawed and pinpoint sperm or globozoospermia
  12. Adenomyosis
  13. Severe medical condition
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
53 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Morula Vitrification Arm

    Other: Morula Vitrification

  • Active comparator
    Blastocyst Vitrification Arm

    Other: Morula Vitrification

Interventions

  • OtherMorula Vitrification

    Evaluating the ongoing pregnancy rate following Morula vitrification compared with Blastocyst Vitrification.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The ongoing pregnancy rate

    Continued pregnancy at \> gestational week 12 or more per initiated cycle

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Biochemical pregnancy rate

    positive b-hCG at ≥ 14 days following embryo transfer per initiated cycle

    Time frame: 14 days

  2. Implantation rate

    Sacs with a heartbeat on ultrasound per embryo transferred

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  3. Cumulative implantation rate

    Sacs with a heartbeat on ultrasound per embryo transferred within one year from randomization

    Time frame: One year

  4. Clinical pregnancy rate

    Sacs with a positive heartbeat on ultrasound at ≥ 7 weeks of gestation per initiated cycle

    Time frame: 7 weeks

  5. Cumulative clinical pregnancy rate

    Sacs with a positive heartbeat on ultrasound at ≥ 7 weeks of gestation per initiated cycle within one year from randomization

    Time frame: One year

  6. Cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate

    continued pregnancy after gestational week 12 per initiated cycle within one year from randomization

    Time frame: One year

  7. Twin pregnancy rate

    ≥ two foetuses with a heartbeat per initiated cycle

    Time frame: One year

  8. Embryo survival rate after thawing

    Blastocyst re-expansion for day 5 vitrified embryo after two hours and blastocyst formation on day 5 for embryo vitrified on day 4

    Time frame: Five days of culture

07

Study locations

4 sites
  • Agial
    Alexandria, 12345, Egypt
  • Al Hayat ICSI Centre of Alexandria
    Alexandria, 12345, Egypt
  • AlMadina IVF and ICSI Centre
    Alexandria, 12345, Egypt
  • Rahem Fertility Centre of Zagazig
    Zagazig, 12345, Egypt
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 14, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03787901
Lead sponsor
Egyptian Foundation of Reproductive Endocrinology
Collaborators
Al Hayat ICSI Centre of Alexandria, Egypt, Agial IVF/ICSI Unit of Alexandria, Egypt, Al Madina Fertility centre of Alexandria, Egypt, Rahem Fertility Center of Zagazig, Egypt
Responsible party
Hassan Maghraby (MD, Director, Al Hayat ICSI Centre of Alexandria, Egypt, Egyptian Foundation of Reproductive Endocrinology) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 26, 2018
Start date
Jan 15, 2019
Primary completion
May 31, 2020
Completion
Jun 1, 2020
Last update
Jun 14, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jun 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion