CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03771482Updated Oct 14, 2020

Education of Providers on Prescribing Best Practices

An interventional study of Quiztime modules in Education, sponsored by Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-10-14.

Sponsored by Vanderbilt University Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
369
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to evaluate the impact of spaced education, delivered via a smartphone application, on provider prescribing patterns.

Read the detailed description

As part of a medical center educational initiative at Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC), two educational modules will be sent to prescribing providers through either email or short message service (SMS) text messaging. The first educational module consists of a set of multiple choice questions concerning best practices for prescribing intravenous fluids in the inpatient and perioperative setting. This module is based upon recent literature and specifically derived from the results of the Isotonic Solutions and Major Adverse Renal Events Trial (SMART) and Saline Against Lactated Ringer's or Plasma-Lyte in the Emergency Department (SALT-ED) trial, both published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2018 and led by Vanderbilt investigators. Similarly, a second educational module concerning evidence-based pain management and opioid prescribing practices will be distributed via email or SMS text messaging.

Participants will receive one question per day. If the participant does not answer the question correctly, they will receive the opportunity to attempt the question again after reviewing evidence-based education. All questions have been curated and reviewed by a panel of experts and piloted within VUMC for feasibility and acceptability. Key concepts are repeated in each module and questions are strategically ordered throughout each module to accomplish spaced education.

02

Conditions studied

  • Education
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Vanderbilt University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 824 studies on the registry; 164 are open to participants now.

Of its 122 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 91 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • All inpatient prescribing providers

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
369 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Opioid module first then fluid

    The providers in this arm will first receive daily information and questions related to opioid use for eight weeks and then daily information and questions related to intravenous fluid prescribing for five weeks.

    Behavioral: Quiztime modules

  • Active comparator
    Fluid module first then opioid

    The providers in this arm will first receive daily information and questions related to intravenous fluid prescribing for five weeks and then daily information and questions related to opioid use for eight weeks.

    Behavioral: Quiztime modules

Interventions

  • BehavioralQuiztime modules

    Text Messaging or Email system

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Median morphine milligram equivalents (MME) per opioid prescription

    By extracting prescribing data for opioids from the electronic health records

    Time frame: 8 months

  2. Percentage of orders for balanced intravenous (IV) fluid solutions (i.e. not normal saline)

    By extracting prescribing data for intravenous fluids from the electronic health records

    Time frame: 8 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Chloride levels in patients receiving intravenous fluid orders from a provider enrolled in the study

    By extracting chloride level data from the electronic health records

    Time frame: 8 months

  2. Potassium levels in patients receiving intravenous fluid orders from a provider enrolled in the study

    By extracting potassium level data from the electronic health records

    Time frame: 8 months

  3. Major Adverse Kidney Events by 30 days (MAKE 30) in patients receiving intravenous fluid orders from a provider enrolled in the study

    By extracting data from the electronic health records

    Time frame: 30 days

  4. Length of stay for patients receiving an intravenous fluid order or an opioid prescription from a provider enrolled in the study.

    By extracting length of stay data from the electronic health records

    Time frame: 8 months

  5. Length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) for patients receiving an intravenous fluid order or an opioid prescription from a provider enrolled in the study

    By extracting ICU length of stay from the electronic health records

    Time frame: 8 months

  6. Median number of pills per prescription for patients receiving an opioid prescription from a provider enrolled in the study

    By extracting medication data from the electronic health records

    Time frame: 8 months

  7. Percent of opioid prescriptions (inpatient) that also had a scheduled (not pro re nata (PRN)) non-opioid (APAP, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), gamma-Aminobutyric acid (GABA), muscle relaxant, etc.)

    By extracting medication data from the electronic health records

    Time frame: 8 months

  8. Percent of opioid prescriptions (discharge) that also had a scheduled (not PRN) non-opioid (APAP, NSAIDs, GABA, muscle relaxant, etc.)

    By extracting medication data from the electronic health records

    Time frame: 8 months

  9. Number of Rapid Response Team calls (RRT s) indexed to the number of patients cared for per prescriber (evaluated by level of engagement of the learner with QuizTime)

    By extracting RRT calls from the electronic health records

    Time frame: 8 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • McEvoy MD, Dear ML, Buie R, Edwards DA, Barrett TW, Allen B, Robertson AC, Fowler LC, Hennessy C, Miller BM, Garvey KV, Bland RP 3rd, Fleming GM, Moore D, Rice TW, Bernard GR, Lindsell CJ; Vanderbilt Learning Healthcare System Platform Investigators and the Vanderbilt Committee on Opioid Monitoring and Stewardship. Effect of Smartphone App-Based Education on Clinician Prescribing Habits in a Learning Health Care System: A Randomized Cluster Crossover Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2223099. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.23099. PubMed 35881398 ↗
  • McEvoy MD, Dear ML, Buie R, Fowler LC, Miller B, Fleming GM, Moore D, Rice TW, Bernard GR, Lindsell CJ; Vanderbilt Learning Healthcare System Investigators. Embedding Learning in a Learning Health Care System to Improve Clinical Practice. Acad Med. 2021 Sep 1;96(9):1311-1314. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003969. PubMed 33570841 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data dictionaries and individual participant data that underlie the results reported after de-identification will be available.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Analytic code

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 14, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03771482
Lead sponsor
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Responsible party
Matthew McEvoy (Professor of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 11, 2018
Start date
Dec 30, 2019
Primary completion
Jun 15, 2020
Completion
Jun 15, 2020
Last update
Oct 14, 2020

Study contacts

Matthew McEvoy, MD
principal investigator · Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion