CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03763097Updated Apr 23, 2019

Sonographic Evaluation of the Single-incision Needleless (Contasure-needleless®) Mini-sling Placement to Predict Success

An observational study in Urinary Incontinence,Stress, sponsored by Bartin State Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-04-23.

Sponsored by Bartin State Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
64
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Transperineal ultrasonography is gaining importance in preoperative and postoperative evaluation of the patient with urinary incontinence with allowing well detailed information about the anterior compartment.

There is little evidence that transperineal sonography can aid surgeons to predict the success or failure after mid-urethral slings.

We aimed to investigate the efficacy of sonography in mini-sling operations to predict the success or failure.

Read the detailed description

Women who are scheduled for anti-incontinence operation due to their stress urinary incontinence will be pre- and postoperatively evaluated by transperineal and introital ultrasound.

Patients will be followed for at least 1 year.

02

Conditions studied

  • Urinary Incontinence,Stress

Keywords

  • pelvic floor ultrasonography
  • transperineal ultrasound
  • introital ultrasound
  • mini-sling
  • needleless
  • Urinary Incontinence,Stress
03

In context

Urinary Incontinence

1,363 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Incontinence; 228 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 64 is below the median of 120 across 305 observational studies indexed under Urinary Incontinence.

Browse Urinary Incontinence studies →

Lead sponsor

Bartin State Hospital is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients who have stress urinary incontinence and who are scheduled for needleless mini-sling operation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with clinically stress urinary incontinence
  • Patients who claim that their condition severely impair their quality of life
  • Patients who are failed on conservative management (life style changes and pelvic floor exercises)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have unregulated diabetes mellitus (they will be included after appropriate and sustainable blood glucose regulation)
  • Patients who have neurological condition that may affect the incontinence
  • Patients who have psychiatric disease that may affect the subjective evaluation.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
64 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • participants

    Patients who are scheduled for single-incision needleless (Contasure-needleless®) mini-sling for their stress urinary incontinence. They will be assessed by Pelvic floor ultrasound

    Diagnostic Test: Pelvic floor ultrasound

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testPelvic floor ultrasound

    Pelvic floor ultrasound will include transperineal and introital ultrasound

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The correlation of failure with the sonographic features of the mesh

    Patients will be accepted as failure if their stress test is positive Sonographic features of the mesh includes the shape of the mesh, the distance to the mid-urethra, the position related to the proximal urethra and the angle between the mesh arms on coronal axis

    Time frame: Evaluation at postoperative 1st and 4th weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Nocturia

    The nocturia episodes will be evaluated by a "non-validated" Likert scale (between 0-3). Minimum and minimum scores are between 0 and 3. "0" will mean no episode of urinating during the sleep. "1" will mean one episode of nocturia. "2" will mean two episodes of nocturia. "3" will mean three or more episodes of nocturia. Higher values represent worse outcome.

    Time frame: Evaluation at postoperative 1st and 4th weeks and preoperatively

  2. Urge symptoms

    Michigan Incontinence Severity Index (M-ISI) scale will be used to assess subjective outcome including urge symptoms. This scale has ten items, consisting of a total M-ISI domain (the sum of items 1-8) and a distinct Bother domain (the sum of items 9 and 10). The total M-ISI score consists of three subdomains (items 1-3 for stress urinary incontinence \[SUI\], items 4-6 for urge urinary incontinence \[UUI\], and items 7 and 8 for Pad usage \[PU\]. The responses for each item range from 0 to 4 on a Likert-type scale, with higher values representing greater symptoms and greater bother. Total domain and subdomain scores are obtained by simply adding the respective answers. The minimally important difference has been determined for the following domains/subdomains: total M-ISI (4 points), SUI (2 points), UUI (2 points), and PU (1 point).

    Time frame: Evaluation at postoperative 1st and 4th weeks and preoperatively

  3. Subjective success

    Patient Global Improvement of Improvement will be used to assess the subjective success

    Time frame: Evaluation at postoperative 1st and 4th weeks

  4. POP-Q

    POP-Q measurements will be assessed to measure the pelvic floor prolapse if exist

    Time frame: Evaluation at postoperative 1st and 4th weeks and preoperatively

  5. Anterior compartment mobility distances

    On maximal Valsalva maneuver: Bladder neck descent (mm), pubourethral distance (mm), urethral thickness (mm, measured at proximal, mid and distal portions) and urethral length (mm)

    Time frame: Evaluation at postoperative 1st and 4th weeks and preoperatively

  6. Anterior compartment mobility angles

    On maximal Valsalva maneuver: Proximal urethral rotation (degree), retrovesical angle (degree)

    Time frame: Evaluation at postoperative 1st and 4th weeks and preoperatively

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Bartin State Hospital
    Bartin, Turkey
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Dogan O, Kaya AE, Pulatoglu C, Basbug A, Yassa M. A randomized comparison of a single-incision needleless (Contasure-needleless(R)) mini-sling versus an inside-out transobturator (Contasure-KIM(R)) mid-urethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 24-month follow-up results. Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Sep;29(9):1387-1395. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3624-4. Epub 2018 Mar 16. PubMed 29549394 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 23, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03763097
Lead sponsor
Bartin State Hospital
Responsible party
Murat Yassa (Principal Investigator, Bartin State Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 4, 2018
Start date
Nov 26, 2018
Primary completion
Apr 21, 2019
Completion
Apr 21, 2019
Last update
Apr 23, 2019

Study contacts

Murat Yassa, MD
principal investigator · Bartin State Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion