CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03762486Updated Dec 3, 2018

The Pain Intensity of the Patients Who Had Undergone Abdominal Surgery With a Midline Incision

An interventional study of TENS and TAES in Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation, sponsored by Yuksek Ihtisas University. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-12-03.

Sponsored by Yuksek Ihtisas University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2015, registered Jan 2018).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
48
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation (TAES) on pain and analgesic drug consumption in patients who had undergone abdominal surgery with a midline incision. Evidence for the effects of and transcutaneous electrical stimulation on pain and analgesic consumption on patients undergoing abdominal surgery with severe pain experience and high levels of neuroendocrine stress response is uncertain.

Read the detailed description

This research was conducted as a randomized controlled trial. 158 patients who had undergone abdominal surgery with diagnosis of gastric and colorectal cancer were assessed for eligibility. This research sample consisted of 48 patients who underwent abdominal surgery with a midline incision. The patients were randomized into three groups, the first intervention group, which used TENS (around the incision), the second intervention group, which used TAES (ST25, P6, ST36, Lİ4 acupuncture points) and the control group, which did not. Electric stimulation was performed at the 30th minute, second, 18th, 21st, 40th, and 45th hours after the operation. Pain scores and analgesic consumption were assessed in the first 48 hours after surgical intervention.

02

Conditions studied

  • Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Postoperative pain
  • Alternative therapy
  • Acupuncture
  • TENS
  • Surgical nursing
  • Randomised controlled trial
03

In context

Pain

2,219 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain; 917 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 48 is below the median of 70 across 1,904 interventional studies indexed under Pain.

Browse Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Yuksek Ihtisas University is the lead sponsor of 21 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who had an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of I-II
  • Patients were aged over 18 years
  • Patients who could read and write Turkish
  • Patients who were scheduled to undergo elective abdominal surgery with a midline incision for a diagnosis of stomach or colorectal cancer
  • Patients without any impairment of vision, hearing or speech

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who had a pacemaker
  • Patients whose skin integrity around the incision was degraded
  • Patients had a cognitive disorder, had a history of chronic pain, or were suffering from neurological, renal, cardiac or pulmonary disorders that could affect the test results
  • Patients with an opioid addiction
  • Patients those who had previously undergone electrical stimulation treatment
  • Morbidly obese subjects
  • Patients using psychoactive drugs
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
48 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    TENS to around the incision

    The Patient Controlled Analgesia infusion was started right after the surgery. TENS was applied to around the incision.

    Other: TENS

  • Active comparator
    TAES to the acupuncture points

    The Patient Controlled Analgesia infusion was started right after the surgery. TAES was applied to acupuncture points.

    Other: TAES

  • No intervention
    No stimulation

    No stimulation was performed to the patients in the control group.

Interventions

  • OtherTENS

    4 electrodes were placed 2-3 cm lateral to the incision of the patients at the 30th minute and 2, 18, 22, 42, and 46th hours after the surgery and electrical stimulation was implemented at varying frequencies of 2-100 Hz for 30 minutes, at a maximum current intensity of 12 milliamperes that would not bother the patient or create muscle contractions, with a pulse duration of 0.25 min

    Also known as: First Intervention Group

  • OtherTAES

    4 electrodes were placed at the ST25, P6, ST36, and LI4 acupuncture points of the patients at the 30th minute and 2, 18, 22, 42, and 46th hours after the surgery and electrical stimulation was implemented at varying frequencies of 2-100 Hz for 30 minutes, at a maximum current intensity of 12 milliamperes that would not bother the patient or create muscle contractions, with a pulse duration of 0.25 min

    Also known as: Second Intervention Group

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative pain intensity

    First Intervention Group: Electrical stimulation was implemented at the 30th minute and 2, 18, 22, 42, and 46th hours after the surgery. Second Intervention Group: Electrical stimulation was implemented at acupuncture points of the patients at the 30th minute and 2, 18, 22, 42, and 46th hours after the surgery. Control Group: No intervention was performed to the patients in the control group. The pain intensity of each groups' patients were recorded and compred at the post-operative 2, 18, 22, 42, and 46th hours. Pain intensity was evaluated with VAS. VAS with a range of 1-10 points was used while evaluating the pain intensity of all patients .The increase of the scale score shows that the pain intensity increases.

    Time frame: The pain levels were evaluated and compared within postoperative first 48 hours.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Nausea severity

    VAS with a range of 1-10 points was used while evaluating the nausea severity of all patients .The increase of the scale score shows that the nausea severity increases.

    Time frame: The nausea severity of the patients were evaluated at the periods of 0-6, 6-24, 24-48 hours. Patients were assessed in postoperative first 48 hours.

  2. Antiemetic drug consumption

    The antiemetic drug amount administered to the patients was recorded in mg.

    Time frame: Antiemetic drug consumption of the patients was evaluated at the periods of 0-24 and 24-48 hours. Patients were assessed in postoperative first 48 hours.

  3. Pulmonary function tests

    The pulmonary functions of the patients were evaluated with a portable spirometer. Peak expiratory flow (PEF) and forced vital capacity (FVC) values were recorded. The measurement of respiratory functions was performed with the patient wrapping the disposable mouthpiece well with the lips during the measurement. The patient was asked to breathe deeply and exhale suddenly and quickly. This process was repeated three times and the best performance was taken as the base value.

    Time frame: Pulmonary function evaluations of the patients were performed at the 24th and 48th hours. Patients were assessed in postoperative first 48 hours.

  4. Vomiting

    Vomiting: The number of times the patients vomited was recorded

    Time frame: Vomiting status of the patients were evaluated at the periods of 0-6, 6-24, 24-48 hours. Patients were assessed in postoperative first 48 hours.

  5. Analgesic drug consumption

    All patients were administered intravenous tramadol hydrochloride infusion with the Patient Controlled Analgesia for the first 48 hours. Dexketoprofen trometamol vial intravenous and/or 50 mg. Pethidine hydrochloride intramuscular was used as the rescue analgesic.

    Time frame: Analgesic drug consumption of the patients was evaluated at the periods of 0-24 and 24-48 hours. Patients were assessed in postoperative first 48 hours.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Breit R, Van der Wall H. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for postoperative pain relief after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004 Jan;19(1):45-8. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(03)00458-3. PubMed 14716650 ↗
  • Wu MS, Chen KH, Chen IF, Huang SK, Tzeng PC, Yeh ML, Lee FP, Lin JG, Chen C. The Efficacy of Acupuncture in Post-Operative Pain Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 9;11(3):e0150367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150367. eCollection 2016. PubMed 26959661 ↗
  • Dias M, Carneiro NM, Guerra LA, Velarde GC, de Souza PA, da Silva LL, de Abreu e Souza RR, Nolasco R, Olej B. Effects of electroacupuncture on local anaesthesia for inguinal hernia repair: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Acupunct Med. 2010 Jun;28(2):65-70. doi: 10.1136/aim.2009.000570. PubMed 20615859 ↗
  • Bjersa K, Andersson T. High frequency TENS as a complement for pain relief in postoperative transition from epidural to general analgesia after pancreatic resection. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2014 Feb;20(1):5-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2013.11.004. Epub 2013 Nov 20. PubMed 24439637 ↗
  • Bjordal JM, Johnson MI, Ljunggreen AE. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) can reduce postoperative analgesic consumption. A meta-analysis with assessment of optimal treatment parameters for postoperative pain. Eur J Pain. 2003;7(2):181-8. doi: 10.1016/S1090-3801(02)00098-8. PubMed 12600800 ↗
  • Chen L, Tang J, White PF, Sloninsky A, Wender RH, Naruse R, Kariger R. The effect of location of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on postoperative opioid analgesic requirement: acupoint versus nonacupoint stimulation. Anesth Analg. 1998 Nov;87(5):1129-34. PubMed 9806695 ↗
  • Chen Y, Yang Y, Yao Y, Dai D, Qian B, Liu P. Does transcutaneous electric acupoint stimulation improve the quality of recovery after thyroidectomy? A prospective randomized controlled trial. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Aug 15;8(8):13622-7. eCollection 2015. PubMed 26550304 ↗
  • da Silva MP, Liebano RE, Rodrigues VA, Abla LE, Ferreira LM. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for pain relief after liposuction: a randomized controlled trial. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015 Apr;39(2):262-9. doi: 10.1007/s00266-015-0451-6. Epub 2015 Feb 10. PubMed 25665520 ↗
  • DeSantana JM, Santana-Filho VJ, Guerra DR, Sluka KA, Gurgel RQ, da Silva WM Jr. Hypoalgesic effect of the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation following inguinal herniorrhaphy: a randomized, controlled trial. J Pain. 2008 Jul;9(7):623-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.01.337. Epub 2008 Apr 3. PubMed 18387854 ↗
  • Engen DJ, Carns PE, Allen MS, Bauer BA, Loehrer LL, Cha SS, Chartrand CM, Eggler EJ, Cutshall SM, Wahner-Roedler DL. Evaluating efficacy and feasibility of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for postoperative pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized pilot trial. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2016 May;23:141-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2015.04.002. Epub 2015 Apr 20. PubMed 25935320 ↗
  • Lan F, Ma YH, Xue JX, Wang TL, Ma DQ. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on acupoints reduces fentanyl requirement for postoperative pain relief after total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012 Aug;78(8):887-95. Epub 2012 Apr 24. PubMed 22531569 ↗
  • Feng X, Ye T, Wang Z, Chen X, Cong W, Chen Y, Chen P, Chen C, Shi B, Xie W. Transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation pain management after surgical abortion: A cohort study. Int J Surg. 2016 Jun;30:104-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.04.042. Epub 2016 Apr 29. PubMed 27142864 ↗
  • Wang H, Xie Y, Zhang Q, Xu N, Zhong H, Dong H, Liu L, Jiang T, Wang Q, Xiong L. Transcutaneous electric acupoint stimulation reduces intra-operative remifentanil consumption and alleviates postoperative side-effects in patients undergoing sinusotomy: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Jun;112(6):1075-82. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu001. Epub 2014 Feb 26. PubMed 24576720 ↗
  • Hong SJ, Lee E. Effect of evidence-based postoperative pain guidelines via web for patients undergoing abdominal surgery in South Korea. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2014 Jun;8(2):135-42. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2014.05.005. Epub 2014 May 21. PubMed 25030646 ↗
  • Kara B, Baskurt F, Acar S, Karadibak D, Ciftci L, Erbayraktar S, Gokmen AN. The effect of TENS on pain, function, depression, and analgesic consumption in the early postoperative period with spinal surgery patients. Turk Neurosurg. 2011;21(4):618-24. PubMed 22194125 ↗
  • Senol Karatas S, Eti Z, Saracoglu KT, Gogus FY. Does perioperative opioid infusion increase postoperative opioid requirement? Agri. 2015;27(1):47-53. doi: 10.5505/agri.2015.71676. PubMed 25867874 ↗
  • Kayman-Kose S, Arioz DT, Toktas H, Koken G, Kanat-Pektas M, Kose M, Yilmazer M. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for pain control after vaginal delivery and cesarean section. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Oct;27(15):1572-5. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.870549. Epub 2014 Jan 8. PubMed 24283391 ↗
  • Kehlet H. Procedure-specific postoperative pain management. Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2005 Mar;23(1):203-10. doi: 10.1016/j.atc.2004.11.001. PubMed 15763419 ↗
  • Kerai S, Saxena KN, Taneja B, Sehrawat L. Role of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in post-operative analgesia. Indian J Anaesth. 2014 Jul;58(4):388-93. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.138966. PubMed 25197104 ↗
  • Hamza MA, White PF, Ahmed HE, Ghoname EA. Effect of the frequency of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on the postoperative opioid analgesic requirement and recovery profile. Anesthesiology. 1999 Nov;91(5):1232-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199911000-00012. PubMed 10551571 ↗
  • Rakel B, Frantz R. Effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on postoperative pain with movement. J Pain. 2003 Oct;4(8):455-64. doi: 10.1067/s1526-5900(03)00780-6. PubMed 14622666 ↗
  • Francis RP, Johnson MI. The characteristics of acupuncture-like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (acupuncture-like TENS): a literature review. Acupunct Electrother Res. 2011;36(3-4):231-58. doi: 10.3727/036012911803634139. PubMed 22443026 ↗
  • Robleda G, Roche-Campo F, Sanchez V, Gich I, Banos JE. Postoperative Discomfort After Abdominal Surgery: An Observational Study. J Perianesth Nurs. 2015 Aug;30(4):272-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2014.06.005. Epub 2015 May 16. PubMed 26210558 ↗
  • Rosen HI, Bergh IH, Oden A, Martensson LB. Patients experiences of pain following day surgery - at 48 hours, seven days and three months. Open Nurs J. 2011;5:52-9. doi: 10.2174/1874434601105010052. Epub 2011 Jul 6. PubMed 21769308 ↗
  • Sbruzzi G, Silveira SA, Silva DV, Coronel CC, Plentz RD. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation after thoracic surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of 11 randomized trials. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2012 Jan-Mar;27(1):75-87. doi: 10.5935/1678-9741.20120012. English, Portuguese. PubMed 22729304 ↗
  • Silva MB, de Melo PR, de Oliveira NM, Crema E, Fernandes LF. Analgesic effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Aug;91(8):652-7. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318246638f. PubMed 22311059 ↗
  • Sluka KA, Walsh D. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: basic science mechanisms and clinical effectiveness. J Pain. 2003 Apr;4(3):109-21. doi: 10.1054/jpai.2003.434. PubMed 14622708 ↗
  • Gavronsky S, Koeniger-Donohue R, Steller J, Hawkins JW. Postoperative pain: acupuncture versus percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Pain Manag Nurs. 2012 Sep;13(3):150-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2009.08.001. Epub 2010 Jan 6. PubMed 22929602 ↗
  • Tokuda M, Tabira K, Masuda T, Nishiwada T, Shomoto K. Effect of modulated-frequency and modulated-intensity transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation after abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Clin J Pain. 2014 Jul;30(7):565-70. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31829ea151. PubMed 24901753 ↗
  • Unterrainer AF, Friedrich C, Krenn MH, Piotrowski WP, Golaszewski SM, Hitzl W. Postoperative and preincisional electrical nerve stimulation TENS reduce postoperative opioid requirement after major spinal surgery. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2010 Jan;22(1):1-5. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e3181b7fef5. PubMed 19779370 ↗
  • Wang B, Tang J, White PF, Naruse R, Sloninsky A, Kariger R, Gold J, Wender RH. Effect of the intensity of transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation on the postoperative analgesic requirement. Anesth Analg. 1997 Aug;85(2):406-13. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199708000-00029. PubMed 9249122 ↗
  • Ward CW. Procedure-specific postoperative pain management. Medsurg Nurs. 2014 Mar-Apr;23(2):107-10. PubMed 24933788 ↗
  • Yeh ML, Chung YC, Chen KM, Tsou MY, Chen HH. Acupoint electrical stimulation reduces acute postoperative pain in surgical patients with patient-controlled analgesia: a randomized controlled study. Altern Ther Health Med. 2010 Nov-Dec;16(6):10-8. PubMed 21280458 ↗
  • Yeh ML, Chung YC, Chen KM, Chen HH. Pain reduction of acupoint electrical stimulation for patients with spinal surgery: a placebo-controlled study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011 Jun;48(6):703-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.10.009. Epub 2010 Nov 30. PubMed 21122849 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · May 1, 2015

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 3, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03762486
Lead sponsor
Yuksek Ihtisas University
Responsible party
Bediye Oztas (Teaching Staff, Yuksek Ihtisas University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 3, 2018
Start date
May 12, 2015
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2016
Completion
Nov 30, 2016
Last update
Dec 3, 2018

Study contacts

Emine Iyigun, Professor
study director · Turkish Nurses Society

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion