CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03761537ECZTRA 7Updated Mar 11, 2025Results posted

Tralokinumab in Combination With Topical Corticosteroids in Subjects With Severe Atopic Dermatitis - ECZTRA 7

A Phase 3 interventional study of Tralokinumab and Placebo in Atopic Dermatitis, sponsored by LEO Pharma. Completed at 74 sites in 7 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-11.

Sponsored by LEO Pharma · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
277
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Primary objective:

To demonstrate that tralokinumab in combination with topical corticosteroids (TCS) is superior to placebo in combination with TCS in treating severe AD in subjects who are not adequately controlled with or have contraindications to oral cyclosporine A (CSA).

Secondary objectives:

To evaluate the efficacy of tralokinumab in combination with TCS on severity and extent of AD, itch, and health-related quality of life compared to placebo in combination with TCS.

To evaluate the safety of tralokinumab in combination with TCS when treating severe AD in subjects who are not adequately controlled with or have contraindications to oral CSA compared to placebo in combination with TCS.

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Dermatitis, Atopic

1,419 studies on the registry are indexed under Dermatitis, Atopic; 258 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 277 is above the median of 83 across 1,125 interventional studies indexed under Dermatitis, Atopic.

Browse Dermatitis, Atopic studies →

Lead sponsor

LEO Pharma is the lead sponsor of 221 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Of its 31 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 24 (77%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 and above
  • Diagnosis of AD as defined by the Hanifin and Rajka (1980) criteria for AD
  • History of AD for 1 year or more
  • Subjects with a history within 1 year prior to screening of inadequate response to treatment with topical medications or subjects for whom topical treatments are otherwise medically inadvisable
  • AD involvement of 10% (or more) body surface area at screening and baseline (visit 3) according to component A of SCORAD
  • Documented history of either no previous CSA exposure and not currently a candidate for CSA treatment OR previous exposure to CSA in which case CSA treatment should not be continued or restarted
  • Subjects must have applied a stable dose of emollient twice daily (or more, as needed) for at least 14 days before randomisation

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects for whom TCSs are medically inadvisable in the opinion of the investigator
  • Use of tanning beds or phototherapy (NBUVB, UVB, UVA1, PUVA), within 6 weeks prior to randomisation
  • Treatment with immunomodulatory medications or bleach baths within 4 weeks prior to randomisation
  • Treatment with topical phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE-4) inhibitor within 2 weeks prior to randomisation
  • Receipt of any marketed or investigational biologic agent (e.g. cell-depleting agents or dupilumab) within 6 months prior to randomisation or until cell counts return to normal, whichever is longer
  • History of any active skin infection within 1 week prior to randomisation
  • History of a clinically significant infection (systemic infection or serious skin infection requiring parenteral treatment) within 4 weeks prior to randomisation
  • A helminth parasitic infection within 6 months prior to the date informed consent is obtained that has not been treated with, or has failed to respond to, standard of care therapy
  • Tuberculosis requiring treatment within the 12 months prior to screening. Evaluation will be according to local guidelines as per local standard of care
  • History of any known primary immunodeficiency disorder including a positive HIV test at screening, or the subject taking antiretroviral medications
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
277 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Tralokinumab + TCS

    4 subcutaneous (SC) injections of tralokinumab 150 mg as a loading dose on Day 0, followed by 2 SC injections of tralokinumab 150 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) regimen for 26 weeks. The last administration of the Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) occurred at Week 24. From Day 0 to Week 24, a Topical corticosteroid (TCS) cream was dispensed to the participants at each IMP dosing visit (e.g., Q2W). Participants were instructed to treat active lesions as needed and to discontinue the TCS treatment when control was achieved.

    Drug: Tralokinumab

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo + TCS

    4 subcutaneous (SC) injections of placebo as a loading dose on Day 0, followed by 2 SC injections of placebo every 2 weeks (Q2W) regimen for 26 weeks. The last administration of the Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) occurred at Week 24. From Day 0 to Week 24, a Topical corticosteroid (TCS) cream was dispensed to the participants at each IMP dosing visit (e.g., Q2W). Participants were instructed to treat active lesions as needed and to discontinue the TCS treatment when control was achieved.

    Other: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugTralokinumab

    Tralokinumab is a human recombinant monoclonal antibody of the IgG4 subclass that specifically binds to human IL-13 and blocks interaction with the IL-13 receptors. It is presented as a liquid formulation for subcutaneous (SC) administration.

  • OtherPlacebo

    Placebo contains the same excipients in the same concentration only lacking tralokinumab.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. At Least 75% Reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI75) From Week 0 to Week 16

    EASI (Eczema Area and Severity Index) is a validated measure used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the severity and extent of AD. The EASI is a composite index with scores ranging from 0 to 72, with higher values indicating more severe and/or more extensive condition.

    Time frame: Week 0 to Week 16

Secondary outcomes

  1. Reduction of Worst Daily Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (Weekly Average) of at Least 4 From Week 0 to Week 16

    Subjects will assess their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours using an 11-point NRS ('Worst Daily Pruritus NRS') with 0 indicating 'no itch' and 10 indicating 'worst itch imaginable'.

    Time frame: Week 0 to Week 16

  2. Change in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) From Week 0 to Week 16

    SCORAD is a validated tool to evaluate the extent and severity of AD lesions, along with subjective symptoms. The maximum total score is 103, with higher values indicating more severe disease.

    Time frame: Week 0 to Week 16

  3. Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score From Week 0 to Week 16

    DLQI is a validated questionnaire with content specific to those with dermatology conditions. It consists of 10 items addressing the subject's perception of the impact of their skin disease on different aspects of their health-related quality of life (HRQoL) over the last week such as dermatology-related symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert scale (0 = not at all ∕not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; 3 = very much). The total score is the sum of the 10 items (0 to 30); a high score is indicative of a poor HRQoL.

    Time frame: Week 0 to Week 16

  4. Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 16

    IGA is an instrument used in clinical trials to rate the severity of the subject's global AD and is based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe).

    Time frame: Week 16

  5. At Least 75% Reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI75) From Week 0 to Week 26

    EASI (Eczema Area and Severity Index) is a validated measure used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the severity and extent of AD. The EASI is a composite index with scores ranging from 0 to 72, with higher values indicating more severe and/or more extensive condition.

    Time frame: Week 0 to Week 26

  6. Reduction of Worst Daily Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (Weekly Average) of at Least 4 From Week 0 to Week 26

    Subjects will assess their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours using an 11-point numeric rating scale ('Worst Daily Pruritus NRS') with 0 indicating 'no itch' and 10 indicating 'worst itch imaginable'.

    Time frame: Week 0 to Week 26

  7. Change in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) From Week 0 to Week 26

    SCORAD is a validated tool to evaluate the extent and severity of AD lesions, along with subjective symptoms. The maximum total score is 103, with higher values indicating more severe disease.

    Time frame: Week 0 to Week 26

  8. Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score From Week 0 to Week 26

    DLQI is a validated questionnaire with content specific to those with dermatology conditions. It consists of 10 items addressing the subject's perception of the impact of their skin disease on different aspects of their health-related quality of life (HRQoL) over the last week such as dermatology-related symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert scale (0 = not at all ∕not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; 3 = very much). The total score is the sum of the 10 items (0 to 30); a high score is indicative of a poor HRQoL.

    Time frame: Week 0 to Week 26

  9. Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 26

    IGA is an instrument used in clinical trials to rate the severity of the subject's global AD and is based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe).

    Time frame: Week 26

  10. Frequency of Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) From Week 0 to Week 40

    Presence of ADA from Week 0 to Week 40 was measured. Data were reported in the following categories: positive (presence of ADA at baseline and/or presence of ADA at at least 1 post-baseline assessment), perishing (presence of ADA at baseline and absence of ADA at all post-baseline assessments), negative (absence of ADA at all assessments), no post-baseline ADA assessment.

    Time frame: Week 0 to Week 40

  11. Number of Adverse Events From Week 0 to Week 40

    All adverse events are presented below under Adverse Events

    Time frame: Week 0 to Week 40

07

Results

Posted Oct 26, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTralokinumab + TCSPlacebo + TCS
Started140137
Completed125120
Not completed1517

Outcome measures

PrimaryAt Least 75% Reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI75) From Week 0 to Week 16

EASI (Eczema Area and Severity Index) is a validated measure used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the severity and extent of AD. The EASI is a composite index with scores ranging from 0 to 72, with higher values indicating more severe and/or more extensive condition.

Time frame:
Week 0 to Week 16
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of responders
At Least 75% Reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI75) From Week 0 to Week 16
Percentage of respondersTralokinumab+TCSPlacebo+TCS
At Least 75% Reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI75) From Week 0 to Week 1664.250.5
Statistical analysis
  • Tralokinumab+TCS vs Placebo+TCS · Mantel Haenszel · p = 0.018 (This endpoint was the first endpoint in the sequential testing hierarchy.) · Risk difference (rd): 14.1 · 95% CI 2.5 to 25.7Mantel-Haenszel (MH) test stratified by prior CSA use and baseline disease severity. MH risk differences and standard errors combined by Rubin's rule.
SecondaryReduction of Worst Daily Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (Weekly Average) of at Least 4 From Week 0 to Week 16

Subjects will assess their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours using an 11-point NRS ('Worst Daily Pruritus NRS') with 0 indicating 'no itch' and 10 indicating 'worst itch imaginable'.

Time frame:
Week 0 to Week 16
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of responders
Reduction of Worst Daily Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (Weekly Average) of at Least 4 From Week 0 to Week 16
Percentage of respondersTralokinumab+TCSPlacebo+TCS
Reduction of Worst Daily Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (Weekly Average) of at Least 4 From Week 0 to Week 1645.535.6
Statistical analysis
  • Tralokinumab+TCS vs Placebo+TCS · Mantel Haenszel · p = 0.106 (This endpoint was the second endpoint in the sequential testing hierarchy. Acceptance of this endpoint depends on prior endpoints' acceptance.) · Risk difference (rd): 9.7 · 95% CI -2.0 to 21.4Mantel-Haenszel (MH) test stratified by prior CSA use and baseline disease severity. MH risk differences and standard errors combined by Rubin's rule.
SecondaryChange in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) From Week 0 to Week 16

SCORAD is a validated tool to evaluate the extent and severity of AD lesions, along with subjective symptoms. The maximum total score is 103, with higher values indicating more severe disease.

Time frame:
Week 0 to Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units on a scale
Change in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) From Week 0 to Week 16
Units on a scaleTralokinumab+TCSPlacebo+TCS
Change in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) From Week 0 to Week 16-42.7 ± 1.6-34.1 ± 1.6
Statistical analysis
  • Tralokinumab+TCS vs Placebo+TCS · Repeated measurements model · p = <0.001 (This was the third endpoint in the sequential testing hierarchy. Acceptance of this endpoint depends on prior endpoints' acceptance.) · Difference: -8.6 · 95% CI -13.0 to -4.2Treatment effect at each visit adjusted for baseline SCORAD interacting with each visit, prior CSA, and baseline disease severity (IGA 3 or 4).
SecondaryChange in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score From Week 0 to Week 16

DLQI is a validated questionnaire with content specific to those with dermatology conditions. It consists of 10 items addressing the subject's perception of the impact of their skin disease on different aspects of their health-related quality of life (HRQoL) over the last week such as dermatology-related symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert scale (0 = not at all ∕not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; 3 = very much). The total score is the sum of the 10 items (0 to 30); a high score is indicative of a poor HRQoL.

Time frame:
Week 0 to Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units on a scale
Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score From Week 0 to Week 16
Units on a scaleTralokinumab+TCSPlacebo+TCS
Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score From Week 0 to Week 16-11.2 ± 0.4-9.6 ± 0.4
Statistical analysis
  • Tralokinumab+TCS vs Placebo+TCS · Repeated measurements model · p = 0.009 (This was the fourth endpoint in the sequential testing hierarchy. Acceptance of this endpoint depends on prior endpoints' acceptance.) · Difference: -1.5 · 95% CI -2.6 to -0.4Treatment effect at each visit adjusted for baseline DLQI interacting with each visit, prior CSA, and baseline disease severity (IGA 3 or 4).
SecondaryInvestigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 16

IGA is an instrument used in clinical trials to rate the severity of the subject's global AD and is based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe).

Time frame:
Week 16
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of responders
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 16
Percentage of respondersTralokinumab+TCSPlacebo+TCS
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 1640.926.0
Statistical analysis
  • Tralokinumab+TCS vs Placebo+TCS · Mantel Haenszel · p = 0.005 (This endpoint was the fifth endpoint in the sequential testing hierarchy. Acceptance of this endpoint depends on prior endpoints' acceptance.) · Risk difference (rd): 15.6 · 95% CI 4.8 to 26.3Mantel-Haenszel (MH) test stratified by prior CSA use and baseline disease severity. MH risk differences and standard errors combined by Rubin's rule.
SecondaryAt Least 75% Reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI75) From Week 0 to Week 26

EASI (Eczema Area and Severity Index) is a validated measure used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the severity and extent of AD. The EASI is a composite index with scores ranging from 0 to 72, with higher values indicating more severe and/or more extensive condition.

Time frame:
Week 0 to Week 26
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of responders
At Least 75% Reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI75) From Week 0 to Week 26
Percentage of respondersTralokinumabPlacebo
At Least 75% Reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI75) From Week 0 to Week 2668.855.3
Statistical analysis
  • Tralokinumab vs Placebo · Mantel Haenszel · p = 0.014 (This endpoint was the sixth endpoint in the sequential testing hierarchy. Acceptance of this endpoint depends on prior endpoints' acceptance.) · Risk difference (rd): 14.1 · 95% CI 2.9 to 25.3Mantel-Haenszel (MH) test stratified by prior CSA use and baseline disease severity. MH risk differences and standard errors combined by Rubin's rule.
SecondaryReduction of Worst Daily Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (Weekly Average) of at Least 4 From Week 0 to Week 26

Subjects will assess their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours using an 11-point numeric rating scale ('Worst Daily Pruritus NRS') with 0 indicating 'no itch' and 10 indicating 'worst itch imaginable'.

Time frame:
Week 0 to Week 26
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of responders
Reduction of Worst Daily Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (Weekly Average) of at Least 4 From Week 0 to Week 26
Percentage of respondersTralokinumab+TCSPlacebo+TCS
Reduction of Worst Daily Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (Weekly Average) of at Least 4 From Week 0 to Week 2647.239.7
Statistical analysis
  • Tralokinumab+TCS vs Placebo+TCS · Mantel Haenszel · p = 0.228 (This endpoint was the seventh endpoint in the sequential testing hierarchy. Acceptance of this endpoint depends on prior endpoints' acceptance.) · Risk difference (rd): 7.3 · 95% CI -4.6 to 19.2HaenszMantelel (MH) test stratified by prior CSA use and baseline disease severity. MH risk differences and standard errors combined by Rubin's rule.
SecondaryChange in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) From Week 0 to Week 26

SCORAD is a validated tool to evaluate the extent and severity of AD lesions, along with subjective symptoms. The maximum total score is 103, with higher values indicating more severe disease.

Time frame:
Week 0 to Week 26
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units on a scale
Change in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) From Week 0 to Week 26
Units on a scaleTralokinumabPlacebo
Change in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) From Week 0 to Week 26-46.3 ± 1.5-37.3 ± 1.6
Statistical analysis
  • Tralokinumab vs Placebo · Repeated measurements model · p = <0.001 (This endpoint was the eighth endpoint in the sequential testing hierarchy. Acceptance of this endpoint depends on prior endpoints' acceptance.) · Difference: -8.9 · 95% CI -13.2 to -4.6Unstructured covariance matrix. Adjusted for baseline SCORAD in interaction with each visit, prior CSA use, and baseline disease severity (IGA 3 or 4)
SecondaryChange in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score From Week 0 to Week 26

DLQI is a validated questionnaire with content specific to those with dermatology conditions. It consists of 10 items addressing the subject's perception of the impact of their skin disease on different aspects of their health-related quality of life (HRQoL) over the last week such as dermatology-related symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert scale (0 = not at all ∕not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; 3 = very much). The total score is the sum of the 10 items (0 to 30); a high score is indicative of a poor HRQoL.

Time frame:
Week 0 to Week 26
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units on a scale
Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score From Week 0 to Week 26
Units on a scaleTralokinumabPlacebo
Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score From Week 0 to Week 26-11.5 ± 0.4-9.9 ± 0.4
Statistical analysis
  • Tralokinumab vs Placebo · Repeated measurements model · p = 0.005 (This endpoint was the ninth endpoint in the sequential testing hierarchy. Acceptance of this endpoint depends on prior endpoints' acceptance.) · Difference: -1.6 · 95% CI -2.7 to -0.5Unstructured covariance matrix. Adjusted for baseline DLQI in interaction with each visit, prior CSA use, and baseline disease severity (IGA 3 or 4)
SecondaryInvestigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 26

IGA is an instrument used in clinical trials to rate the severity of the subject's global AD and is based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe).

Time frame:
Week 26
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of responders
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 26
Percentage of respondersTralokinumab+TCSPlacebo+TCS
Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 2647.033.4
Statistical analysis
  • Tralokinumab+TCS vs Placebo+TCS · Mantel Haenszel · p = 0.014 (This endpoint was the tenth endpoint in the sequential testing hierarchy. Acceptance of this endpoint depends on prior endpoints' acceptance.) · Risk difference (rd): 14.3 · 95% CI 2.9 to 25.6Mantel-Haenszel (MH) test stratified by prior CSA use and baseline disease severity. MH risk differences and standard errors combined by Rubin's rule.
SecondaryFrequency of Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) From Week 0 to Week 40

Presence of ADA from Week 0 to Week 40 was measured. Data were reported in the following categories: positive (presence of ADA at baseline and/or presence of ADA at at least 1 post-baseline assessment), perishing (presence of ADA at baseline and absence of ADA at all post-baseline assessments), negative (absence of ADA at all assessments), no post-baseline ADA assessment.

Time frame:
Week 0 to Week 40
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Frequency of Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) From Week 0 to Week 40
ParticipantsTralokinumab+TCSPlacebo+TCS
Positive23
Negative134133
Perishing11
No post-baseline ADA assessment10
SecondaryNumber of Adverse Events From Week 0 to Week 40

All adverse events are presented below under Adverse Events

Time frame:
Week 0 to Week 40
Reported as:
Number · number of adverse events
Number of Adverse Events From Week 0 to Week 40
number of adverse eventsTralokinumab+TCSPlacebo+TCS
Number of Adverse Events From Week 0 to Week 40389435

Adverse events

Collected over Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 26), safety follow-up period (Week 26 to Week 40).. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Treatment Period: Tralokinumab+TCS0/138 (0%)1/138 (0.7%)107/138 (77.5%)
Treatment Period: Placebo+TCS0/137 (0%)5/137 (3.6%)108/137 (78.8%)
Safety Follow-up Period: Tralokinumab+TCS0/75 (0%)0/75 (0%)4/75 (5.3%)
Safety Follow-up Period: Placebo+TCS0/83 (0%)1/83 (1.2%)6/83 (7.2%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 11
Most frequent serious events
EventTreatment Period: Tralokinumab+TCSTreatment Period: Placebo+TCSSafety Follow-up Period: Tralokinumab+TCSSafety Follow-up Period: Placebo+TCS
PyelonephritisInfections and infestations0/1380/1370/751/83
Cerebrovascular accidentNervous system disorders0/1381/1370/750/83
SeizureNervous system disorders0/1381/1370/750/83
Anaphylactic reactionImmune system disorders0/1381/1370/750/83
Peripheral nerve injuryInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/1381/1370/750/83
Squamous cell carcinoma of skinNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/1381/1370/750/83
Depressed moodPsychiatric disorders0/1381/1370/750/83
Suicidal ideationPsychiatric disorders0/1381/1370/750/83
AsthmaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/1381/1370/750/83
Dermatitis atopicSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/1381/1370/750/83
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 44
Most frequent other events
EventTreatment Period: Tralokinumab+TCSTreatment Period: Placebo+TCSSafety Follow-up Period: Tralokinumab+TCSSafety Follow-up Period: Placebo+TCS
Viral upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations37/13835/1372/751/83
HeadacheNervous system disorders21/13813/1370/750/83
Dermatitis atopicSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders7/13816/1370/752/83
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations10/13810/1370/750/83
AsthmaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders4/1388/1370/750/83
Oropharyngeal painRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/1388/1370/750/83
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders4/1387/1370/750/83
HypertensionVascular disorders3/1387/1370/750/83
Oral herpesInfections and infestations5/1386/1370/750/83
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations1/1386/1370/750/83

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Tralokinumab + TCSPlacebo + TCSTotal
Median33.0 (25.5 to 47.0)34.0 (26.0 to 45.0)34.0 (26.0 to 45.0)
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)Tralokinumab + TCSPlacebo + TCSTotal
18-64134131265
65-846612
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Tralokinumab + TCSPlacebo + TCSTotal
Female5854112
Male8283165
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Tralokinumab + TCSPlacebo + TCSTotal
Hispanic or Latino6410
Not Hispanic or Latino134133267
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Tralokinumab + TCSPlacebo + TCSTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian011
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander101
Black or African American011
White137135272
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported202
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Tralokinumab + TCSPlacebo + TCSTotal
Belgium252752
Czechia141226
Poland344377
United Kingdom5914
France12719
Germany221840
Spain282149
Age at onset of atopic dermatitis
Age at onset of atopic dermatitis(Years)Tralokinumab + TCSPlacebo + TCSTotal
Median2.5 (1.0 to 12.5)3.0 (1.0 to 17.0)3.0 (1.0 to 15.0)
Duration of atopic dermatitis
Duration of atopic dermatitis(Years)Tralokinumab + TCSPlacebo + TCSTotal
Median26.0 (18.0 to 35.0)25.0 (17.0 to 34.0)26.0 (18.0 to 34.5)

6 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

74 sites
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Brussels, 1090, Belgium
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Brussels, 1200, Belgium
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Edegem, 2650, Belgium
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Gent, 9000, Belgium
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Gent, B-9000, Belgium
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Herstal, B-4040, Belgium
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Kortrijk, 8500, Belgium
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Leuven, 3000, Belgium
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Liège, 4000, Belgium
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Loverval, 6280, Belgium
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Maldegem, 9990, Belgium
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Karlovy Vary, 36001, Czechia
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Kutna Hora, 284 01, Czechia
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Ostrava, 70852, Czechia
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Pardubice, 53002, Czechia
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Prague 5, 15006, Czechia
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Prague 8, 180 81, Czechia
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Prague, 11000, Czechia
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Prague, 120 00, Czechia
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Praha 3, 130 00, Czechia
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Grenoble, 38000, France
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Nice, 06202, France
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Paris, 75010, France
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Pierre-Bénite, 69495, France
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Valence, 26000, France
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Aachen, 52074, Germany
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Augsburg, 86150, Germany
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Bad Bentheim, 48455, Germany
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Berlin, 10117,, Germany
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Dresden, 01307, Germany
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Dülmen, 48249, Germany
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Frankfurt, 60590, Germany
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Halle, 06097, Germany
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Hanover, 30159, Germany
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Jena, 07743, Germany
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Kiel, 24105, Germany
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Mainz, 55128, Germany
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    München, 80337, Germany
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Osnabrück, 49074, Germany
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Selters, 56242, Germany
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Białystok, 15-375, Poland
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Bochnia, 32-700, Poland
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Bydgoszcz, 85-094, Poland
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Gdańsk, 80-546, Poland
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Kraków, 30-149, Poland
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Kraków, 31-530, Poland
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Kraków, 31-559, Poland
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Lublin, 20-081, Poland
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Poznań, 60-369, Poland
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Rzeszów, 35-312, Poland
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Warszawa, 01-817, Poland
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Warszawa, 02-625, Poland
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Warszawa, 02-953, Poland
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Wrocław, 51-685, Poland
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Łódź, 90-242, Poland
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Łódź, 90-752, Poland
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Granada, Andalucía 18014, Spain
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Alicante, 03010, Spain
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Barcelona, 08036, Spain
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Barcelona, 08041, Spain
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Barcelona, 08907, Spain
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Bilbao, 48013, Spain
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Córdoba, 14004, Spain
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Madrid, 28006, Spain
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Madrid, 28046, Spain
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Madrid, 28942, Spain
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Pamplona, 31008, Spain
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Sevilla, 41007, Spain
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Bradford, BD5 0NA, United Kingdom
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Cottingham, HU16 5JQ, United Kingdom
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Kirkcaldy, KY2 5AH, United Kingdom
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    London, E11 1NR, United Kingdom
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Southampton, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
  • Leo Pharma Investigationel Site
    Wakefield, WF1 4DG, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jun 15, 2020
  • Statistical analysis plan · Oct 21, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 11, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03761537
Lead sponsor
LEO Pharma
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 3, 2018
Start date
Dec 13, 2018
Primary completion
Apr 21, 2020
Completion
Sep 28, 2020
Results posted
Oct 26, 2021
Last update
Mar 11, 2025

Study contacts

Medical Expert
study director · LEO Pharma

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion