CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03758742Updated Jun 10, 2025Results posted

Effect of Whole Fruit on Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes

An interventional study of High-Fruit Diet in Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, sponsored by University of Alabama at Birmingham. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-10.

Sponsored by University of Alabama at Birmingham · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
34
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
20 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Diabetes costs the U.S. healthcare system more than any other disease, and nearly half of Americans will develop either diabetes or prediabetes in their lifetime. It is therefore critical to find new strategies to treat or reverse diabetes.

One such approach is adopting a healthy diet, which can dramatically improve blood sugar levels in adults with type 2 diabetes and even induce diabetes remission. Despite this, not much is known about which food groups are most effective at improving blood sugar levels in patients with diabetes.

Interestingly, of the various food groups, epidemiologic data suggests that whole fruit may be one of the most efficacious at both preventing type 2 diabetes and improving blood sugar in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, few clinical trials have investigated the effects of whole fruit on blood sugar control. This study will therefore be the first to determine the effects of increasing whole fruit as a food group in type 2 diabetes patients. This supervised controlled feeding trial will test whether consuming a diet rich in whole fruit for 12 weeks can improve glycemic control and cardiometabolic health in weight-stable adults with type 2 diabetes. The primary endpoint is glycemic control. Since changes in medication doses can skew the interpretation of glycemic outcomes, glycemic control will be assessed hierarchically (in descending order of importance) using (a) attainment of nondiabetic glycemia without medications (as a proxy for diabetes remission), (b) medication effect scores, (c) mean glucose during an oral glucose tolerance test, and (d) 24-hour mean glucose from continuous glucose monitoring. As secondary aims, this study will also test whether consuming a large amount of fructose in whole food form affects liver fat, pancreatic fat, and cardiovascular disease risk factors.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Keywords

  • type 2 diabetes
  • whole fruit
  • diabetes remission
  • glycemic control
  • liver fat
  • intrahepatic lipid
  • controlled feeding trial
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus

10,923 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,318 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 34 is below the median of 80 across 8,367 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Alabama at Birmingham is the lead sponsor of 1,396 studies on the registry; 284 are open to participants now.

Of its 156 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 124 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • 20-70 years old
  • BMI ≤45.0 kg/m\^2
  • First diagnosed with type 2 diabetes within the past 6 years
  • HbA1c between 6.0-9.5%%

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • On insulin
  • Diagnosis of diabetes before age 18
  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate \< 45 ml/min per 1.732 m\^2
  • Heart attack in the past 6 months or severe or unstable heart failure
  • On weight loss medication
  • Change in the dosage of a chronic medication that may affect study endpoints within the past 3 months
  • Clinically significant laboratory abnormality (e.g. abnormal hemoglobin levels)
  • Significant gastrointestinal disease, major gastrointestinal surgery, or gallstones
  • Significant cardiovascular, renal, cardiac, liver, lung, adrenal, or nervous system disease that might compromise safety or data validity
  • Evidence of cancer (other than non-melanoma skin cancer) within the last 5 years
  • Lost or gained more than 5 kg of weight in the past 6 months
  • Pregnant, planning to become pregnant in the next 12 months, or breastfeeding
  • Major psychiatric condition that would affect the ability to participate in the study
  • Not able to eat the provided study meals
  • Behavioral factors or circumstances that may impede adhering to the dietary intervention
  • Not able to do the MRI/MRS abdominal scan, such as due to claustrophobia, implanted metal objects, or a body girth of 60 cm or greater
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
34 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    High-Fruit Diet

    Whole fruit-rich diet (\~50% of calories from whole fruit)

    Behavioral: High-Fruit Diet

Interventions

  • BehavioralHigh-Fruit Diet

    In this supervised controlled feeding study, participants will consume a diet rich in whole fruit. During the Ramp-Up Phase (Weeks 1-4), participants will gradually increase the amount of whole fruit they consume, eventually reaching 50% of calories from whole fruit. In the Main Phase (Weeks 5-12), participants will consume a whole fruit-rich, eucaloric diet that provides 50% of calories in the form of whole fruit. The non-fruit portion of the diet will be styled as a Mediterranean Diet. Participants will be required to approximately keep their weight stable throughout the intervention.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diabetes Remission Rate

    Percentage of patients who can maintain non-diabetic levels 24-hour mean glucose without the aid of pharmacotherapy at week 12

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 12

  2. Medication Effect Score (MES)

    % (or percentage). This quantity estimates the percentage by which all anithyperglycemic medications taken by a patient would lower HbA1c levels (i.e., percent of glycated hemoglobin molecules). Higher values indicate a higher dose and/or potency of medications.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to Week 12

  3. Mean Glucose During a 3-hour Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT)

    mg/dl

    Time frame: Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints). Change from week 0 to 12 reported.

  4. Mean 24-hour Glucose Levels as Measured by Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM), Adjusted for Any Changes in Medication Doses Via the MES

    mg/dl

    Time frame: Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints). Change from week 0 to 12 reported.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Insulin Sensitivity

    Insulin sensitivity (dl/kg/min/μU/ml) during a 3-hour OGTT, as measured by the Oral C-Peptide Minimal Model.

    Time frame: Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints). Change from week 0 to 12 reported.

  2. Dynamic Beta-Cell Responsivity

    Phi_dynamic during a 3-hour OGTT, as measured by the Oral C-Peptide Minimal Model (which is a set of 5 coupled differential equations; see reference under Citations). Phi_dynamic is a measure of beta-cell responsiveness during first-phase insulin secretion. It is a dimensionless index (arbitrary units), where higher values denote greater insulin secretion.

    Time frame: Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints). Change from week 0 to 12 reported.

  3. Static Beta-Cell Responsivity

    Phi_static during a 3-hour OGTT, as measured by the Oral C-Peptide Minimal Model (which is a set of 5 coupled differential equations; see reference under Citations). Phi_static is a measure of beta-cell responsiveness during second-phase insulin secretion. The units of measure are min\^-1, and higher values denote greater insulin secretion.

    Time frame: Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints). Change from week 0 to 12 reported.

  4. Mean Insulin During a 3-hour OGTT

    mU/l

    Time frame: Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints). Change from week 0 to 12 reported.

  5. Mean C-peptide During a 3-hour OGTT

    ng/ml

    Time frame: Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints). Change from week 0 to 12 reported.

  6. Mean Amplitude of Glycemic Excursions From CGM

    mg/dl

    Time frame: Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)"

  7. Fasting Glucose

    mg/dl

    Time frame: Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

  8. HbA1c

    percentage

    Time frame: Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

  9. Liver Fat (Intrahepatic Lipid)

    Percentage as measured using Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) and 3-point M-Dixon Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

    Time frame: Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

  10. Pancreatic Fat

    Percentage as measured using MRS and 3-point M-Dixon MRI methods

    Time frame: Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

  11. Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure

    mm Hg

    Time frame: Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

  12. Heart Rate

    beats per minute

    Time frame: Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

  13. Time-in-range Metrics From CGM

    Time during which glucose levels are between 70 and 300 mg/dl

    Time frame: Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

  14. Lipids

    Fasting total cholesterol (mg/dl), LDL cholesterol (mg/dl), HDL cholesterol (mg/dl), and triglycerides (mg/dl)

    Time frame: Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

Other outcomes

  1. Body Weight

    kg

    Time frame: Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints); assessed weekly

  2. Waist Circumference

    cm

    Time frame: Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

  3. Visceral Fat

    Visceral fat as measured using MRI (kg)

    Time frame: Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

  4. Subcutaneous Abdominal Fat

    Subcutaneous abdominal fat as measured using MRI (kg)

    Time frame: Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

  5. Gut Microbiome Diversity

    Diversity metrics (i.e., alpha and beta diversity)

    Time frame: Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

  6. Gut Microbiome Composition

    Taxonomic composition and abundances

    Time frame: Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

  7. Preference and Sensitivity to Sweet Tastes

    As measured on a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), using a Sweetness Taste Test

    Time frame: Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

  8. Diet Satisfaction

    As measured on a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS)

    Time frame: Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

  9. Habitual Fruit Consumption

    As estimated using a series of semi-quantitative food frequency questions from the Diet History Questionnaire

    Time frame: Change from baseline to Weeks 4 and 12 and follow-up Months 6, 9, and 12

  10. Food Cravings

    As measured on five-point scales by the Food Craving Inventory-II

    Time frame: Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

  11. Fruit Liking Visual Analog Scales

    As measured by VAS on a 0-100 mm scale

    Time frame: Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

  12. Food Attitudes and Behaviors

    As measured by a modified version of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) 2007 Food Attitudes and Behaviors Survey, which covers constructs including attitudes and beliefs, fruit and vegetable consumption, eating behaviors, and food preferences

    Time frame: Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

  13. General Health Status

    Healthy days (along various dimensions) as measured by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Health-Related Qualify of Life questionnaire

    Time frame: Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

  14. Depression

    As measured on a 0-27 point scale by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9

    Time frame: Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

  15. Mood States

    As measured on a 5-point scale by the Profile of Mood States Short-Form

    Time frame: Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

  16. Intervention Satisfaction and Feedback

    As measured by qualitative exit interview

    Time frame: Week 12

07

Results

Posted May 23, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneHigh-Fruit Diet
Started34
Completed12
Not completed22

Outcome measures

PrimaryDiabetes Remission Rate

Percentage of patients who can maintain non-diabetic levels 24-hour mean glucose without the aid of pharmacotherapy at week 12

Time frame:
Change from baseline to week 12
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Diabetes Remission Rate
ParticipantsFruit-Rich Diet
% Who Maintained Non-Diabetic Glycemia Without Pharmacotherapy3
% Who Weaned Off All Antihyperglycemic Medications6
Statistical analysis
  • Fruit-Rich Diet · Binomial Test · p = <0.0001
PrimaryMedication Effect Score (MES)

% (or percentage). This quantity estimates the percentage by which all anithyperglycemic medications taken by a patient would lower HbA1c levels (i.e., percent of glycated hemoglobin molecules). Higher values indicate a higher dose and/or potency of medications.

Time frame:
Change from baseline to Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · % (see definition under "Description")
Medication Effect Score (MES)
% (see definition under "Description")Fruit-Rich Diet
Medication Effect Score (MES)-0.5 ± 0.5
PrimaryMean Glucose During a 3-hour Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT)

mg/dl

Time frame:
Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints). Change from week 0 to 12 reported.
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dl
Mean Glucose During a 3-hour Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT)
mg/dlHigh-Fruit Diet
All n=10 participants, including those who changed their medication doses11 ± 9
n=4 participants without medication changes-20 ± 12
PrimaryMean 24-hour Glucose Levels as Measured by Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM), Adjusted for Any Changes in Medication Doses Via the MES

mg/dl

Time frame:
Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints). Change from week 0 to 12 reported.
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mg/dl
Mean 24-hour Glucose Levels as Measured by Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM), Adjusted for Any Changes in Medication Doses Via the MES
mg/dlFruit-Rich Diet
Main Analysis-12 ± 7
Post Hoc Analysis Excluding 1 Outlier with Very Low C-peptide Levels-18 ± 6
SecondaryInsulin Sensitivity

Insulin sensitivity (dl/kg/min/μU/ml) during a 3-hour OGTT, as measured by the Oral C-Peptide Minimal Model.

Time frame:
Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints). Change from week 0 to 12 reported.
Reported as:
Mean · dl/kg/min/μU/ml
Insulin Sensitivity
dl/kg/min/μU/mlHigh-Fruit Diet
All n=10 participants, including those who changed their medication doses1.27 ± 0.99
n=4 participants without medication changes3.03 ± 1.61
SecondaryDynamic Beta-Cell Responsivity

Phi_dynamic during a 3-hour OGTT, as measured by the Oral C-Peptide Minimal Model (which is a set of 5 coupled differential equations; see reference under Citations). Phi_dynamic is a measure of beta-cell responsiveness during first-phase insulin secretion. It is a dimensionless index (arbitrary units), where higher values denote greater insulin secretion.

Time frame:
Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints). Change from week 0 to 12 reported.
Reported as:
Mean · arbitrary units * 10^9
Dynamic Beta-Cell Responsivity
arbitrary units * 10^9High-Fruit Diet
All n=10 participants, including those who changed their medication doses135 ± 60
n=4 participants without medication changes122 ± 133
SecondaryStatic Beta-Cell Responsivity

Phi_static during a 3-hour OGTT, as measured by the Oral C-Peptide Minimal Model (which is a set of 5 coupled differential equations; see reference under Citations). Phi_static is a measure of beta-cell responsiveness during second-phase insulin secretion. The units of measure are min\^-1, and higher values denote greater insulin secretion.

Time frame:
Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints). Change from week 0 to 12 reported.
Reported as:
Mean · 10^9/min
Static Beta-Cell Responsivity
10^9/minHigh-Fruit Diet
All n=10 participants, including those who changed their medication doses-3.0 ± 4.0
n=4 participants without medication changes0.9 ± 10.6
SecondaryMean Insulin During a 3-hour OGTT

mU/l

Time frame:
Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints). Change from week 0 to 12 reported.
Reported as:
Mean · mU/l
Mean Insulin During a 3-hour OGTT
mU/lHigh-Fruit Diet
All n=10 participants, including those who changed their medication doses-17.1 ± 4.7
n=4 participants without medication changes-38.1 ± 6.7
SecondaryMean C-peptide During a 3-hour OGTT

ng/ml

Time frame:
Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints). Change from week 0 to 12 reported.
Reported as:
Mean · ng/ml
Mean C-peptide During a 3-hour OGTT
ng/mlHigh-Fruit Diet
All n=10 participants, including those who changed their medication doses-0.4 ± 0.4
n=4 participants without medication changes-1.7 ± 0.5
SecondaryMean Amplitude of Glycemic Excursions From CGM

mg/dl

Time frame:
Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)"

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryFasting Glucose

mg/dl

Time frame:
Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryHbA1c

percentage

Time frame:
Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryLiver Fat (Intrahepatic Lipid)

Percentage as measured using Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) and 3-point M-Dixon Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Time frame:
Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryPancreatic Fat

Percentage as measured using MRS and 3-point M-Dixon MRI methods

Time frame:
Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondarySystolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure

mm Hg

Time frame:
Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryHeart Rate

beats per minute

Time frame:
Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryTime-in-range Metrics From CGM

Time during which glucose levels are between 70 and 300 mg/dl

Time frame:
Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryLipids

Fasting total cholesterol (mg/dl), LDL cholesterol (mg/dl), HDL cholesterol (mg/dl), and triglycerides (mg/dl)

Time frame:
Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedBody Weight

kg

Time frame:
Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints); assessed weekly

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedWaist Circumference

cm

Time frame:
Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedVisceral Fat

Visceral fat as measured using MRI (kg)

Time frame:
Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedSubcutaneous Abdominal Fat

Subcutaneous abdominal fat as measured using MRI (kg)

Time frame:
Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedGut Microbiome Diversity

Diversity metrics (i.e., alpha and beta diversity)

Time frame:
Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedGut Microbiome Composition

Taxonomic composition and abundances

Time frame:
Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedPreference and Sensitivity to Sweet Tastes

As measured on a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), using a Sweetness Taste Test

Time frame:
Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedDiet Satisfaction

As measured on a 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS)

Time frame:
Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedHabitual Fruit Consumption

As estimated using a series of semi-quantitative food frequency questions from the Diet History Questionnaire

Time frame:
Change from baseline to Weeks 4 and 12 and follow-up Months 6, 9, and 12

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedFood Cravings

As measured on five-point scales by the Food Craving Inventory-II

Time frame:
Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedFruit Liking Visual Analog Scales

As measured by VAS on a 0-100 mm scale

Time frame:
Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedFood Attitudes and Behaviors

As measured by a modified version of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) 2007 Food Attitudes and Behaviors Survey, which covers constructs including attitudes and beliefs, fruit and vegetable consumption, eating behaviors, and food preferences

Time frame:
Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedGeneral Health Status

Healthy days (along various dimensions) as measured by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Health-Related Qualify of Life questionnaire

Time frame:
Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedDepression

As measured on a 0-27 point scale by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9

Time frame:
Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedMood States

As measured on a 5-point scale by the Profile of Mood States Short-Form

Time frame:
Changes from weeks 0 to 12 (primary timepoint) and weeks 0 to 4 and 4 to 12 (secondary timepoints)

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Other pre-specifiedIntervention Satisfaction and Feedback

As measured by qualitative exit interview

Time frame:
Week 12

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected at baseline (~1 week) and during Weeks 1 through 12.. Non-serious events are listed at a 4% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
High-Fruit Diet0/34 (0%)0/34 (0%)18/34 (52.9%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventHigh-Fruit Diet
HypoglycemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders18/34
HyperglycemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders15/34
Mild Stomach PainGastrointestinal disorders4/34
Mild TremorNervous system disorders3/34
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders3/34
DizzinessNervous system disorders3/34
FatigueGeneral disorders2/34
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders2/34
Peripheral Sensory NeuropathyNervous system disorders2/34

Baseline characteristics

Results were analyzed only per-protocol, as is the norm for controlled feeding trials. In our study, per-protocol was defined as (a) completing the study with \>=80% adherence and (b) meeting the weight stability criterion. Twelve participants completed the study, and of these, ten also met the weight stability criterion.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)High-Fruit Diet
Mean56 ± 8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)High-Fruit Diet
Female8
Male2
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)High-Fruit Diet
Hispanic or Latino0
Not Hispanic or Latino10
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)High-Fruit Diet
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian1
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American5
White4
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)High-Fruit Diet
United States10
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabamam at Birmingham
    Birmingham, Alabama 35233, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Cobelli C, Dalla Man C, Toffolo G, Basu R, Vella A, Rizza R. The oral minimal model method. Diabetes. 2014 Apr;63(4):1203-13. doi: 10.2337/db13-1198. PubMed 24651807 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Mar 19, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 10, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03758742
Lead sponsor
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Collaborators
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
Responsible party
Courtney M Peterson (Associate Professor, University of Alabama at Birmingham) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 29, 2018
Start date
Sep 10, 2019
Primary completion
Sep 5, 2023
Completion
Sep 5, 2023
Results posted
May 23, 2025
Last update
Jun 10, 2025

Study contacts

Courtney M. Peterson, Ph.D.
principal investigator · University of Alabama at Birmingham

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion