CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03752788Updated Nov 26, 2018

Dual-Task Training With Different Priority Instructional Sets on the Gait Parameters in Patients With Chronic Stroke

An interventional study of Dual-task Training Fixed Priority and Dual-task Training Variable Priority in Stroke, Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke and Chronic Stroke, sponsored by King Saud University. Completed at 1 site in Saudi Arabia. Open to participants aged 45 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-11-26.

Sponsored by King Saud University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2017, registered Nov 2018).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
45 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Balance is controlled through a complex process involving sensory, visual, vestibular and cerebral functioning which get affected by various neurological disorders such as in stroke. Different types of exercises are designed to target to cope up with the imbalance developed due to these neurological disorders. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of dual-task training using two different priority instructional sets in improving gait parameters such as self-selected velocity, fast speed, step length, and stride length in chronic stroke patients.

Read the detailed description

Balance is controlled through a complex process involving sensory, visual, vestibular and cerebral functioning which get affected by various neurological disorders such as in stroke. Different types of exercises are designed to target to cope up with the imbalance developed due to these neurological disorders. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of dual-task training using two different priority instructional sets in improving gait parameters such as self-selected velocity, fast speed, step length, and stride length in middle cerebral artery chronic stroke patients. A total of thirty middle cerebral artery chronic stroke patients were recruited on the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria and equally allocated into two groups. Group 1 received dual-task training with fixed priority instructional sets for four weeks and group 2 received dual-task training with variable priority instructional sets for four weeks. The outcome was assessed using a 10-meter walk test and the comparison of footprints on the walkway paper before and after training.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke
  • Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke
  • Chronic Stroke

Keywords

  • Stroke
  • Gait velocity
  • Stride length
  • Step length
  • Balance training
  • Dual task
  • Institutional priority sets
03

In context

Stroke

7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,013 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 50 across 5,366 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

King Saud University is the lead sponsor of 164 studies on the registry; 21 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • A diagnosed case of middle cerebral artery chronic stroke made by a neurologist and verified using CT/MRI
  • Exhibited the age between 45 and 65 years
  • Ability to walk 10 meters without assistance
  • Their stroke onset within 12 months prior to the study and
  • Scored greater than 24 on Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants had neurological conditions other than stroke
  • Uncontrolled hearing or visual and vestibular impairment
  • Took more than 15 seconds on Timed Up \& Go (TUG) test
  • Had lower extremity amputation
  • A case of diagnosed speech-language impairment (not able to respond verbally to auditory stimuli) by a speech-language pathologist and noticed their concurrent participation in another clinical trial
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Dual-task Training Fixed Priority

    Dual-task Training with fixed priority instructional set for four weeks. Balance training sessions of 45 minutes per day, 3 times a week for four weeks, so as to complete 9-12 hours of training warm-up improve the balance performance. This included 12 repetitions in each session for 30 minutes after a 10-minutes warm up. Attention was focused on both postural and cognitive tasks throughout this session. In postural tasks, subjects were instructed to perform the following: walk narrow base of support with a cognitive task of counting backward by three walk narrow base of support with cognitive task of count forward by three, walk narrow base of support, step, sideways, backward avoiding the obstacles (holding a basket) with cognitive task to remember words.

    Behavioral: Dual-task Training Fixed Priority

  • Active comparator
    Dual-task Training Variable Priority

    Dual-task Training with variable priority instructional set for four weeks. Balance training sessions of 45 minutes per day, 3 times a week for four weeks, so as to complete 9-12 hours of training warm-up improve the balance performance. This included 12 repetitions in each session for 30 minutes after a 10-minutes warm up. During the first half of the training session, attention was focused on postural tasks, while during the remaining half of the session, attention was focused on cognitive tasks.

    Behavioral: Dual-task Training Variable Priority

Interventions

  • BehavioralDual-task Training Fixed Priority

    Dual-task training fixed priority instructional set for four weeks. Balance training sessions of 45 minutes per day, 3 times a week for four weeks, so as to complete 9-12 hours of training warm-up improve the balance performance. This included 12 repetitions in each session for 30 minutes after a 10-minutes warm up. Attention was focused on both postural and cognitive tasks throughout this session. In postural tasks, subjects were instructed to perform the following: walk narrow base of support with a cognitive task of counting backward by three walk narrow base of support with cognitive task of count forward by three, walk narrow base of support, step, sideways, backward avoiding the obstacles (holding a basket) with cognitive task to remember words.

  • BehavioralDual-task Training Variable Priority

    Dual-task training variable priority instructional set for four weeks. Balance training sessions of 45 minutes per day, 3 times a week for four weeks, so as to complete 9-12 hours of training warm-up improve the balance performance. This included 12 repetitions in each session for 30 minutes after a 10-minutes warm up. During the first half of the training session, attention was focused on postural tasks, while during the remaining half of the session, attention was focused on cognitive tasks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 10-meter walk test

    It is used to evaluate gate parameters such as gait velocity (self-selected velocity and fast velocity, step length and stride length ) in patients with chronic stroke.

    Time frame: Change from Baseline 10-meter Walk Test scores at 4-Weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mini-mental state examination (MMSE) or Folstein test

    It is used to to determine any impaired cognition that would affect the ability of the participant with stroke to follow instructions.

    Time frame: Before the study intervention

  2. Timed Up & Go (TUG) test

    It is used to identify the patient's mobility with respect to healthy elderly subjects, such as the gait parameters and walking endurance in subjects with chronic stroke.The TUG score correlates with gait speed, balance, functional level, ability to go out, and this score can change over time.

    Time frame: Before the study intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Rehabilitation Research Chair
    Riyadh, 11433, Saudi Arabia
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 26, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03752788
Lead sponsor
King Saud University
Responsible party
AMIR IQBAL (Principal Investigator, King Saud University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 26, 2018
Start date
May 15, 2017
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2017
Completion
Apr 23, 2018
Last update
Nov 26, 2018

Study contacts

AMIR IQBAL, MPT
principal investigator · Rehabilitation Research Chair

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion