CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03752281Updated Nov 23, 2018

Long Term Social Assistance Recipient in South Eastern Sweden - a Description of Health, Function, and Activity

An observational study in Vocational Rehabilitation, sponsored by Linkoeping University. Status unknown at 1 site in Sweden. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-11-23.

Sponsored by Linkoeping University · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Nov 2018), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

There is a group of social assistance recipients which have difficulties in entering the labor market and thus remains in a long-term dependency on social assistance. More knowledge about individuals receiving long-term social assistance is needed in order to improve into work interventions for this group. Therefore, this study aims to describe variables of health, function and activity in participants receiving long-term social assistance.

Read the detailed description

There is a group of social assistance recipients who have difficulties in entering the labor market and thus remains in a long-term dependency on social assistance. More knowledge about individuals receiving long-term social assistance is needed in order to improve into-work interventions for this group. Therefore, this study aims to describe variables of health, function and activity in participants receiving long-term social assistance. Individuals who have received social assistance during more than three years, who report physical and/or psychological difficulties, and/or have a complex social situation will be asked for participation in a six months activity-based investigation including contact with social worker, psychologist, occupational therapist, physical therapist and labor market consultant. The intervention aims to clarify the participants hinders and resources for entering the labor market. The participants are going to answer a questionnaire about health, function, and activity before and after the investigation. In addition, the participants function and ability to perform activities will be classified using the International Classification of Functioning (ICF). Data from the questionnaires and from ICF recordings will be used to describe variables of health, function and ability to be active. Participants who manage to get closer to, or enter into, the labor market will be asked to participate in a qualitative interview study about the experiences of the change. In addition, social workers will be asked to participate in focus-group interviews about experiences from the professional contact and work with the participants. The quantitative data will be analysed using traditional statistics and multivariate data analysis. Qualitative data will be analysed using qualitative content analysis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Vocational Rehabilitation

Keywords

  • Health, activity, function and long-term social assistance
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Linkoeping University is the lead sponsor of 189 studies on the registry; 40 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Individuals who have been social assistance recipients for at least three years and who not have a plan how to get closer to the labor market. There may be signs of different kinds of ill-health such as physical, pshychological and/or social ill-health. The social worker responsible for decision about the monetary support identifies a need for establishing the working ability of the individual with the aim to agree on a plan towards self-sufficiency.

Inclusion criteria

  • Long-term social assistance recipient (more than three years)
  • Putative ill-health (physical, psychological and/or social)
  • No present plan how to reach the labor market
  • Need of clarifying the working ability

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Homelessness
  • Severe psychiatric illness
  • Abuse of alcohol or substances
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Health and activity

    The cohort consists of long-term social assistance recipients where there is need to investigate the health status and working ability.

    Other: Investigation of health and activity

Interventions

  • OtherInvestigation of health and activity

    During a six months multidisciplinary investigation of health status, activity and working ability for individuals receiving long-term social assistance, the health and activity status as well as function will be described using established questionnaires and the International Classification of Functioning

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in quality of life

    The change in participants self-rated experience of quality of life is going to be described using EuroQol 5 Dimensions which contains a rating of the ability to perform activities, and also a score of the total quality of life experience.

    Time frame: Change between the beginning and the end of the six months intervention

  2. Change in self-rated function and ability to be active

    The change in participants self-rated function and ability to be active is going to be described using the World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) which contains five-grade ratings of factors including functioning, activity and participation.

    Time frame: Change between the beginning and the end of the six months intervention

  3. Change in objective description of function and ability to be active

    The change in an objective classification of function, activity, participation and environmental factors affecting disability will be described according to the International Classification of Functioning (ICF) in the beginning and at the end of the six month intervention. The ICF contains a number of components, where each component can be scored using a five-grade scale to clarify the magnitude of disability.

    Time frame: Change between the beginning and the end of the six months intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Qualitative description of experiences about an increase in activity ability

    Participants experiences about a change towards higher ability to be active will be described using qualitative interviews.

    Time frame: After the six moths intervention

  2. Qualitative description of social workers experiences from the work with long-term social assistance recipients

    Social workers experiences from their work with helping clients to get closer to the labor market will be described using qualitative interviews.

    Time frame: After the six moths intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University
    Linköping, Östergötland SE 581 85, Sweden
08

References and documents

Publications

  • van Vilsteren M, van Oostrom SH, de Vet HC, Franche RL, Boot CR, Anema JR. Workplace interventions to prevent work disability in workers on sick leave. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 5;2015(10):CD006955. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006955.pub3. PubMed 26436959 ↗
  • Vogel N, Schandelmaier S, Zumbrunn T, Ebrahim S, de Boer WE, Busse JW, Kunz R. Return-to-work coordination programmes for improving return to work in workers on sick leave. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 30;3(3):CD011618. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011618.pub2. PubMed 28358173 ↗
  • Arends I, Bruinvels DJ, Rebergen DS, Nieuwenhuijsen K, Madan I, Neumeyer-Gromen A, Bultmann U, Verbeek JH. Interventions to facilitate return to work in adults with adjustment disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD006389. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006389.pub2. PubMed 23235630 ↗
  • Madden RH, Dune T, Lukersmith S, Hartley S, Kuipers P, Gargett A, Llewellyn G. The relevance of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in monitoring and evaluating Community-based Rehabilitation (CBR). Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(10):826-37. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.821182. Epub 2013 Aug 14. PubMed 23944180 ↗
  • Prodinger B, Stucki G, Coenen M, Tennant A. The measurement of functioning using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: comparing qualifier ratings with existing health status instruments. Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Mar;41(5):541-548. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1381186. Epub 2017 Oct 8. PubMed 28988490 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The co-authors will have access to the underlying interview data for the qualitative analysis. Quantitative data will be coded and not able to identify to any participant for the co-authors. However, it may be necessary for the co-authors to get access to the quantitative (anonymized) raw data.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr, Analytic code

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 23, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03752281
Lead sponsor
Linkoeping University
Collaborators
Linkoeping Municipality
Responsible party
Bjorn Gerdle (Professor, Linkoeping University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 23, 2018
Start date
Dec 2018 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 23, 2018

Study contacts

Linn Karlsson, PhD
Contact
linn.b.karlsson@linkoping.se
+46 13206675
Linn Karlsson, PhD
study chair · Linkoeping Municipality, Linkoeping University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Nov 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion