CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT03744663Updated Jun 6, 2022

Long Acting Buprenorphine Injection Compared to Sublingual Buprenorphine/Naloxone Films

A Phase 2 interventional study of Suboxone® SL and Sublocade® in Opioid Use, sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences. Withdrawn. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-06-06.

Sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was withdrawn
Funding for uninsured subjects could not be realized and staffing after COVID hit was also a problem.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

While substance use disorders have been found to have relapse rates on part with other chronic illnesses such as hypertension and asthma long term abstinence remains elusive for many. The FDA has recently approve a long acting subcutaneous injectable formulation of buprenorphine. This study aims to determine the feasibility of enrolling and randomizing patients seeking treatment at an outpatient substance abuse clinic to buprenorphine/naloxone films which dissolve under the tongue vs. long acting buprenorphine injection with all other treatment aspects held constant. The study also aims to determine the effectiveness of monthly injections of Sublocade® compared to daily oral Suboxone® SL therapy in the treatment of moderate to severe opioid use disorder after twenty-four weeks of treatment.

Read the detailed description

While substance use disorders have been found to have relapse rates on part with other chronic illnesses such as hypertension and asthma long term abstinence remains elusive for many. Fortunately, the FDA has recently approved a long acting subcutaneous injectable formulation of buprenorphine. While this drug has proven effective in retaining patients in care and decreasing drug cravings as compared to placebo, this drug has not been tested in a real world clinic setting and no studies exist comparing it to the current formulations of buprenorphine. The objective of this study is to perform a randomized pilot study directly comparing sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone to long acting buprenorphine subdermal injection in a standard Office-Based Opioid Agonist Treatment (OBOT) clinic. The study team will compare patient retention, percentage of negative urinary drug screens, and withdrawal scores between the two groups. The findings will provide insight for US providers seeking more effective and efficient ways to treat Opioid use disorder (OUD) in the outpatient setting.

02

Conditions studied

  • Opioid Use

Keywords

  • opioid
  • Opioid Agonist Treatment
  • buprenorphine
  • substance abuse
  • drug
  • abstinence
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Wake Forest University Health Sciences is the lead sponsor of 1,320 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.

Of its 323 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 243 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects who present to the WFBMC Medication-Assisted-Therapy (MAT) clinic seeking OBOT.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those patients who have:
  • history of cirrhosis, >= CKD stage 3
  • congenital long QT syndrome
  • those on antiarrhythmic medications
  • liver enzymes more than 2 times the upper normal value at baseline assessment
  • elevated bilirubin
  • chronic pulmonary condition
  • current unstable and untreated psychiatry comorbid disorder
  • pregnant
  • use of benzodiazepines/other CNS depressant medications
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Suboxone® SL

    Patients assigned to this group will continue with their already established dose of Suboxone ® SL films for 24 weeks along with weekly therapy.

    Drug: Suboxone® SL

  • Experimental
    Sublocade®

    Patients assigned to the Sublocade® group will receive the study drug (300 mg subcutaneously) every 4 weeks for a total of 6 doses along with weekly therapy.

    Drug: Sublocade®

Interventions

  • DrugSuboxone® SL

    Subjects will be started and titrated to optimal Suboxone® SL dose for 14 days. After the 14 day induction phase, the subject will be started on the treatment to which they were randomized to two groups one of which will be Suboxone® SL.

    Also known as: Suboxone® SL films, buprenorphine naloxone

  • DrugSublocade®

    Subjects will be started and titrated to optimal Suboxone® SL dose for 14 days. After the 14 day induction phase, the subject will be started on the treatment to which they were randomized, either Suboxone® SL or Sublocade®. Subjects with significant opioid craving (\> 20 mm on the Opioid Craving Visual Analog Scale) or withdrawal (a score of \> 12 on the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale) after 14 days of treatment will be started on Sublocade® only at the consensus of the research team. Otherwise they will undergo an additional 7 day titration period. Study drug with Sublocade® group: Patients assigned to this group will receive the study drug (300 mg subcutaneously) every 4 weeks for a total of 6 doses along with weekly therapy. The location and specifications of its application will follow the recommendations by the FDA previously published.

    Also known as: buprenorphine extended-release

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Weeks patients continued in treatment during trial period

    Retention in weeks

    Time frame: 26 weeks

  2. Number of Participants that Dropout during the first 28 days of Treatment

    Number of participants that leave the study

    Time frame: first 28 days

  3. Number of participants that complete of the treatment phase

    Number of participants that complete the study

    Time frame: 26 weeks

  4. Number of participants who did not complete the trial in their assigned group

    Total number of participants that changed arms

    Time frame: 26 weeks

  5. Percentage of negative urinary drug screens

    percentage of participants that have a negative drug screen

    Time frame: 26 weeks

  6. Liver enzyme values - ALP, AST, ALT

    Values of liver enzymes will be measured: Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), and Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT). Values will be reported in IU/L

    Time frame: 26 weeks

  7. Liver enzyme values- Total Bilirubin

    Values of liver enzymes will be measured: Total Bilirubin. Values will be reported in mg/dL

    Time frame: 26 weeks

  8. Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) scores trends

    Withdrawal symptoms scale- total score 0-48 with a lower score denoting no symptoms (better Outcomes) and higher score denoting more withdrawal symptoms

    Time frame: 26 weeks

  9. Subjective Opiate Withdrawal Scale (SOWS) score trends

    Participant survey for how they are feeling during withdrawal period, score range from 0 to 64. Low score denotes no/less perceived symptoms (better outcomes) and higher score denotes high/ more personal perceived symptoms.

    Time frame: 26 weeks

  10. Number or patients still in medication assisted therapy (MAT) clinic 6 months after trial period ends.

    Number of patients still in MAT clinics at 6 months

    Time frame: 6 months

  11. Number of participants death

    Number of Participants deaths 6 months after initial participant consent is given.as measured by Vital Statistics database

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Rudd RA, Aleshire N, Zibbell JE, Gladden RM. Increases in Drug and Opioid Overdose Deaths--United States, 2000-2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Jan 1;64(50-51):1378-82. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6450a3. PubMed 26720857 ↗
  • Prevention CfDCa. Heroin Overdose Data. US Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/data/heroin.html. Published Jan 2017. Updated 2018-08-31T12:47:34Z. Accessed September 3 2018.
  • Rudd RA, Seth P, David F, Scholl L. Increases in Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Deaths - United States, 2010-2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Dec 30;65(50-51):1445-1452. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm655051e1. PubMed 28033313 ↗
  • Fleischauer AT, Ruhl L, Rhea S, Barnes E. Hospitalizations for Endocarditis and Associated Health Care Costs Among Persons with Diagnosed Drug Dependence - North Carolina, 2010-2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Jun 9;66(22):569-573. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6622a1. PubMed 28594786 ↗
  • Zibbell JE, Iqbal K, Patel RC, Suryaprasad A, Sanders KJ, Moore-Moravian L, Serrecchia J, Blankenship S, Ward JW, Holtzman D; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Increases in hepatitis C virus infection related to injection drug use among persons aged </=30 years - Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia, 2006-2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015 May 8;64(17):453-8. PubMed 25950251 ↗
  • Peters PJ, Pontones P, Hoover KW, Patel MR, Galang RR, Shields J, Blosser SJ, Spiller MW, Combs B, Switzer WM, Conrad C, Gentry J, Khudyakov Y, Waterhouse D, Owen SM, Chapman E, Roseberry JC, McCants V, Weidle PJ, Broz D, Samandari T, Mermin J, Walthall J, Brooks JT, Duwve JM; Indiana HIV Outbreak Investigation Team. HIV Infection Linked to Injection Use of Oxymorphone in Indiana, 2014-2015. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 21;375(3):229-39. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1515195. PubMed 27468059 ↗
  • Drug Enforcement Administration, Department of Justice.. Implementation of the Provision of the Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act of 2016 Relating to the Dispensing of Narcotic Drugs for Opioid Use Disorder. Final rule. Fed Regist. 2018 Jan 23;83(15):3071-5. PubMed 29359892 ↗
  • Public policy statement on Office-Based Opioid Agonist Treatment (OBOT). J Addict Dis. 2005;24(3):153-61. doi: 10.1300/J069v24n03_12. No abstract available. PubMed 16186090 ↗
  • Hser YI, Saxon AJ, Huang D, Hasson A, Thomas C, Hillhouse M, Jacobs P, Teruya C, McLaughlin P, Wiest K, Cohen A, Ling W. Treatment retention among patients randomized to buprenorphine/naloxone compared to methadone in a multi-site trial. Addiction. 2014 Jan;109(1):79-87. doi: 10.1111/add.12333. Epub 2013 Oct 9. PubMed 23961726 ↗
  • Kakko J, Svanborg KD, Kreek MJ, Heilig M. 1-year retention and social function after buprenorphine-assisted relapse prevention treatment for heroin dependence in Sweden: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2003 Feb 22;361(9358):662-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12600-1. PubMed 12606177 ↗
  • Yokell MA, Zaller ND, Green TC, Rich JD. Buprenorphine and buprenorphine/naloxone diversion, misuse, and illicit use: an international review. Curr Drug Abuse Rev. 2011 Mar;4(1):28-41. doi: 10.2174/1874473711104010028. PubMed 21466501 ↗
  • Winchell C. Cross-Discipline Team Leader Review and Summary Basis for Approval. In: Administration FD, ed: Federal Drug Administration; 2017.
  • (2017) USFDA. Press Announcements - FDA approves first once-monthly buprenorphine injection, a medication-assisted treatment option for opioid use disorder. 2018.
  • Johnson RE, Chutuape MA, Strain EC, Walsh SL, Stitzer ML, Bigelow GE. A comparison of levomethadyl acetate, buprenorphine, and methadone for opioid dependence. N Engl J Med. 2000 Nov 2;343(18):1290-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200011023431802. PubMed 11058673 ↗
  • Surgeon General's Report: Facing Addiction in America. In: Services USDoHaH, ed. 200 Independence Avenue SW Washington DC 20201: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2017.
  • Park-Lee E, Lipari RN, Hedden SL, Kroutil LA, Porter JD. Receipt of Services for Substance Use and Mental Health Issues Among Adults: Results from the 2016 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. 2017 Sep. In: CBHSQ Data Review. Rockville (MD): Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (US); 2012-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK481724/ PubMed 29431966 ↗
  • McLellan AT, Lewis DC, O'Brien CP, Kleber HD. Drug dependence, a chronic medical illness: implications for treatment, insurance, and outcomes evaluation. JAMA. 2000 Oct 4;284(13):1689-95. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.13.1689. PubMed 11015800 ↗
  • Mattick RP, Breen C, Kimber J, Davoli M. Buprenorphine maintenance versus placebo or methadone maintenance for opioid dependence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 6;2014(2):CD002207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002207.pub4. PubMed 24500948 ↗
  • Jones CM, Campopiano M, Baldwin G, McCance-Katz E. National and State Treatment Need and Capacity for Opioid Agonist Medication-Assisted Treatment. Am J Public Health. 2015 Aug;105(8):e55-63. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302664. Epub 2015 Jun 11. PubMed 26066931 ↗
  • Rosenblatt RA, Andrilla CH, Catlin M, Larson EH. Geographic and specialty distribution of US physicians trained to treat opioid use disorder. Ann Fam Med. 2015 Jan-Feb;13(1):23-6. doi: 10.1370/afm.1735. PubMed 25583888 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 6, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03744663
Lead sponsor
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 16, 2018
Start date
Jun 2022 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 6, 2022

Study contacts

Erin Barnes, MD
principal investigator · Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Jun 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion