CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03741699PRE-LHUpdated Oct 9, 2024

Recombinant LH Prior to Ovarian Stimulation in Poor Ovarian Responders (PRE-LH)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Pre-treatment with rLH (Luveris 75 IU), in Infertility, Female, sponsored by Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, IVI Alicante. Completed at 3 sites in Spain. Open to female participants aged 35 Years to 43 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-09.

Sponsored by Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, IVI Alicante · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
88
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
35 Years to 43 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) is one of the first stages of assisted reproductive treatment. The goal is to mimic the ovarian cycle while stimulating the ovaries to overproduce eggs capable of being fertilized, thus maximizing the chances of reproductive success. The stimulation phase involves the use of different hormonal medications but requires tests to check the development of follicles, and hormonal adjustment to get the optimal ovarian response to stimulation.

However, between 9 to 24% of patients fail to respond adequately to standard stimulation protocols, resulting in Poor Ovarian Response (POR). In addition to the low oocyte production, POR results in a restricted number of good quality embryos with appropriate implantation potential, suggesting a compromised oocyte quality.

POR is one of the most challenging problems in reproductive medicine. Poor responders are difficult to treat since their response to stimulation tend to be deficient even when using different drugs or protocols. In recent years, different therapeutic alternatives have been proposed for these patients. However, to date, the optimal stimulation protocol has not yet been described and oocyte donation is often offered as their only option to achieve pregnancy.

Recently, evidence has emerged that supplementation with a specific hormone, luteinizing hormone (LH), during or prior to COS could lead to improved reproductive outcomes in poor responders by increasing the number of oocytes retrieved and improving their quality.

The present study aims to evaluate the effect of the treatment with LH prior to COS on the ovarian response in patients with POR and advanced maternal age, the worst prognosis but more frequent group of poor responders attending fertility clinics. We will assess whether LH treatment prior to COS increases the number and quality of oocytes retrieved in those patients and, finally, analyse the impact in their chances of getting pregnant and having a baby.

02

Conditions studied

  • Infertility, Female

Keywords

  • Poor ovarian response
  • Recombinant LH
  • Advanced maternal age
  • Oocyte retrieved
03

In context

Infertility

2,506 studies on the registry are indexed under Infertility; 407 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 88 is below the median of 120 across 1,698 interventional studies indexed under Infertility.

Browse Infertility studies →

Lead sponsor

Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, IVI Alicante is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
35 Years to 43 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. -Patients with POR according to specific criteria that are in line with the criteria defined by the ESHRE (Bologna Criteria), according to which a patient is classified as a poor ovarian responder when she meets two of the three of the following criteria: I.- Previous episode of POR (≤3 oocytes) with conventional stimulation protocol II.- Abnormal ovarian reserve test with an antral follicle count (AFC) \<5-7 and/or anti-mullerian hormone values (AMH) \<0.5-1.1 ng/mL.

    III.- Women ≥40 years old and/or who have any other risk factor for POR. In addition, two episodes of POR after maximal stimulation are sufficient to define a patient as poor responder in the absence of advanced maternal age or abnormal ovarian reserve test.

    • Women ≥35 to ≤43 years for COS and assisted reproduction techniques (ART).
    • Couple or single woman, accepting preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGS) after blastocyst biopsy and delayed transfer for selection of euploid embryos.
    • Body Mass Index (BMI) between18 and 30 kg/m 2 , inclusive.
    • Ejaculatory sperm with concentration ≥ 5 mill spermatozoa/mL and ≥ 5 mill total spermatozoa progressive motility. Bank and cryopreserved semen allowed.
    • Informed consent completed, signed and dated.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    • Cases of recurrent spontaneous miscarriage (≥2 clinical miscarriages) or implantation failure (after transfer of 6 good D3 embryos or 4 good blastocysts) will be excluded.
    • Use of testicular or epididymal spermatozoa as well as ejaculate with concentration \< 5 mill spermatozoa/mL and \< 5 mill total spermatozoa progressive motility.
    • Primary ovarian failure, PCOS (in accordance with the Rotterdam criteria) or ovary/s inaccessible for oocyte retrieval.
    • Anatomical uterine abnormalities and any endometrium or myometrium pathology (adenomyosis, polyps, myoma, etc.) that may interfere with implantation or pregnancy. Patients with previous polypectomy, myomectomy or surgery for septate/subseptate/arcuatus uterus should not be excluded.
    • Presence of unilateral or bilateral hydrosalpinx that has not been surgically removed or ligated.
    • Presence of level III-IV endometriosis.
    • History of tumours in the hypothalamus or pituitary gland, or ovarian, uterine or breast cancer.
    • Abnormal bleeding of undetermined origin.
    • Known infection with human immunodeficiency virus, active hepatitis B or C virus in the woman or her partner.
    • Known allergy or hypersensitivity to the drugs administered during the trial.
    • Concurrent significant medical pathologies that would endanger the patient's safety (uncontrolled thyroid or adrenal dysfunction, severe hepatic or renal impairment, etc.) or interfere with the test evaluations or the clinical outcomes (i.e. confirmed thrombophilia).
    • Use of concomitant medication or any other circumstances that, in the opinion of the investigator, interferes with the development of the trial or does not ensure the safety and efficacy of the data.
    • Simultaneous participation in another clinical trial or previous participation in this study.
    • Participation in another clinical study two months before inclusion in the present study that could affect its objectives.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
88 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm 1 - experimental group

    Treatment with 150 IU/day rLH, administered subcutaneously for 4 consecutive days prior to COS (with a starting dose of 225 IU/day rFSH and 75 IU/day rLH for 18 days maximum in a short antagonist protocol).

    Drug: Pre-treatment with rLH (Luveris 75 IU),

  • No intervention
    Arm 2 - control (no pre-treatment) group

    The subjects assigned to this group will not receive any treatment in the four days prior to COS (with a starting dose of 225 IU/day rFSH and 75 IU/day rLH for 18 days maximum in a short antagonist protocol).

Interventions

  • DrugPre-treatment with rLH (Luveris 75 IU),

    Treatment with 150 IU/day rLH (Luveris 75 IU), administered subcutaneously for 4 consecutive days prior to COS (Controlled ovarian stimulation)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. number of oocytes retrieved

    number of oocytes retrieved

    Time frame: 37 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of follicles >17 mm on the previous day or the day of GnRH agonist injection (Decapeptyl)

    Time frame: from day 8-12 to day 33-37

  2. P 4 and E 2 levels on the previous day or the day of GnRH agonist injection

    Time frame: from day 8-12 to day 33-37

  3. Duration of stimulation and total gonadotropin dose during COS

    Time frame: from day 8-12 to day 33-37

  4. Serum hormonal profile before and after IMP treatment and after stimulation

    Time frame: from day 8-12 to day 33-37

  5. Cycle cancellation rates (stimulation cycle cancelled prior to oocyte retrieval if there is no follicular response after 10 days of stimulation or due to premature ovulation at any time before oocyte retrieval)

    Time frame: from day 8-12 to day 33-37

  6. Number of mature or metaphase II (MII) oocytes/number of oocytes retrieved per puncture

    Time frame: Day 37

  7. Number of retrieved oocytes/number of expected oocytes (follicles >15 mm on the day of GnRH agonist injection)

    Time frame: Day 37

  8. Fertilization rate

    Time frame: Day 38

  9. Hormonal profile in follicular fluid on the day of the puncture

    Time frame: Day 37

  10. Gene expression profile in granulosa cells

    Time frame: Day 37

  11. Apoptosis rate in granulosa cells

    Time frame: Day 37

  12. Morphological variables of embryonic quality

    Time frame: Day 38 to 43

  13. Blastocyst rate

    Time frame: Day 43

  14. Number of optimal embryos (type A or B, according to ASEBIR classification)

    Time frame: Day 43

  15. Number of euploid and aneuploid embryos

    Time frame: Day 50

  16. Stimulation cycle yield (number of frozen embryos).

    Time frame: Day 43

  17. Number of cycles with embryo transferred/ number of stimulation cycle started

    Time frame: Day 43

  18. Pregnancy rates (per stimulation cycle and embryo transfer)

    Time frame: Throughout the study, estimate 1 year

  19. Implantation rates

    Time frame: Throughout the study, estimate 1 year

  20. Ongoing pregnancy rates (per stimulation cycle and embryo transfer)

    Time frame: Throughout the study, estimate 1 year

  21. Clinical and biochemical miscarriages rates (per stimulation cycle and embryo transfer)

    Time frame: Throughout the study, estimate 1 year

  22. Ectopic pregnancy rates (per stimulation cycle and embryo transfer)

    Time frame: Throughout the study, estimate 1 year

  23. Live birth rates

    Time frame: Throughout the study, estimate 18 +/-3 months

  24. Assessment and recording of adverse events

    Time frame: Throughout the study, estimate 18 +/-3 months

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • IVI Alicante
    Alicante, Comunidad Valenciana 03015, Spain
  • IVI Madrid
    Madrid, 28023, Spain
  • IVI Murcia
    Murcia, 30007, Spain
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 9, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03741699
Lead sponsor
Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, IVI Alicante
Collaborators
Merck, S.L., Spain, Syntax for Science, S.L, Fundación IVI
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 15, 2018
Start date
Feb 18, 2019
Primary completion
May 11, 2024
Completion
May 11, 2024
Last update
Oct 9, 2024

Study contacts

Manuel Muñoz, Dr.
principal investigator · Physician - Investigator

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion