CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03730506Updated Nov 5, 2018

Assessment of the Accuracy of Surgical Guide Designed From Digital Impression, Dental Model Scanning Using CBCT and Desktop Scanner in Computer Guided Implantology:

An interventional study of Intra oral scanner in Computer Guided Implant, sponsored by Cairo University. Status unknown. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-11-05.

Sponsored by Cairo University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Nov 2018), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
9
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Assessment of the Accuracy of Surgical Guide Designed from Digital Impression, Dental Model Scanning using CBCT and Desktop Scanner in Computer Guided Implantology:

Randomized Clinical Trial.

Read the detailed description

Research question:

In computer guided Implantology, are surgical stents designed from scan of dental model by CBCT and from digital impression as accurate as surgical stents designed from desktop scanner?

Statement of the problem:

The role digital dentistry is improved in computer guided implantology especially with development of computer guided implant software, desktop scanner and intra oral scanner development and CBCT machines.

Intra-oral scanner, desktop scanner and CBCT scanner can be used in creation of 3D digital model that can be used with computer guided implant in fabrication of the surgical stent.

And the question, is the accuracy of surgical guide will be affected when designed by one of these different modalities?

Rationale for conducting the research:

Digital 3D dentoginival details are very important in computer guided implantology and designing of surgical stent.nowadays there are many methods to obtain this soft tissue replica as CBCT,desktop scanner and intra oral scanner.this study is conducted to asses the effect of different method of soft tissue digitization on the accuracy of surgical template used in computer guided implantology.

02

Conditions studied

  • Computer Guided Implant
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Cairo University is the lead sponsor of 4,780 studies on the registry; 1,427 are open to participants now.

Of its 36 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (14%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • partially edentulous patient.
  • Patients with bucco-lingual bone thickness more than 6 mm allowing flapless implant placement.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Completely edentulous patient or Free end saddle edentulous area.
  • Patients needing graft or sinus lifting with implant placement.
  • Patients with thin ridges.
  • Patients with systemic disease that may affect bone quality.
  • Patients with poor oral hygiene and active periodontal diseases.
  • Patient with limited mouth opening
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
9 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    CBCT

    Device: Intra oral scanner

  • Experimental
    IOS

    Device: Intra oral scanner

  • Active comparator
    desktop scanner

    Device: Intra oral scanner

Interventions

  • DeviceIntra oral scanner

    computer guided implant

    Also known as: CBCT, desktop scanner

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of angular deviation of virtual implants and actual implant position by 3rd party software in degrees

    Evaluation of angular deviation of virtual implants and actual implant position by 3rd party software in degrees to assess the accuracy of surgical guide

    Time frame: one year

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Oct 4, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 5, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03730506
Lead sponsor
Cairo University
Responsible party
Amr taha Adu el wafa (teaching assistant, Cairo University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 5, 2018
Start date
Nov 2018 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 2019 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2020 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 5, 2018

Study contacts

amr taha
Contact
amrtaha@debtistry.cu.edu.eg
01068904154

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Nov 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion