CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03728426Updated Mar 8, 2023Results posted

Letermovir Treatment for Refractory or Resistant Cytomegalovirus Infection

A Phase 2 interventional study of Letermovir in Cytomegalovirus Infections, sponsored by Amy C. Sherman, MD. Completed at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 12 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-08.

Sponsored by Amy C. Sherman, MD · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
12 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The trial will evaluate the safety and efficacy of letermovir antiviral treatment of active cytomegalovirus infection or cytomegalovirus disease in patients with infections that are refractory or resistant to available treatments or who are experiencing organ dysfunction that makes unsafe the use of available antiviral treatments.

Read the detailed description

This is a Phase II clinical trial. Phase II clinical trials test the safety and effectiveness of an investigational drug to learn whether the drug works in treating a specific disease. "Investigational" means that the drug is being studied.

The FDA (the U.S. Food and Drug Administration) has not approved letermovir for treatment of cytomegalovirus infection, but it has approved letermovir for the prevention of cytomegalovirus infection in bone-marrow transplantation patients.

This is the first time that letermovir will be administered to children in a clinical trial.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common virus, which a majority of people acquire at some time in their life. CMV remains in your body, but does not cause symptoms in the majority of people. Patients with a weakened immune system (a system that protects you from infections) may be more at risk for the virus becoming active and causing damage to some of your organs, especially in the gut and lungs. If the virus becomes present above a certain quantity, the doctor usually prescribes a drug to treat the infection at this stage to avoid damage to the organs.

In this case, the virus is no longer responding to the prescribed drug, and other drug options will be harmful to the participant's health. Participants are being invited to take part in a research study for an investigational drug called letermovir. The purpose of this study is to find out whether letermovir is as effective and as safe in treating CMV infection in patients who cannot tolerate standard treatments such as ganciclovir or foscarnet.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cytomegalovirus Infections

Keywords

  • Cytomegalovirus Infections
  • CMV
03

In context

Infections

6,687 studies on the registry are indexed under Infections; 807 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 10 is below the median of 120 across 4,200 interventional studies indexed under Infections.

Browse Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Amy C. Sherman, MD as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥12 years
  • Weight ≥30 kg
  • Transplant recipient (HCT, SOT) or other immunocompromised patients including those with HIV infection that require antiviral treatment for CMV.
  • Documented CMV disease or persistent CMV infection (CMV virus load above 500 IU/mL on consecutive measurements, at least one day apart).
  • CMV infection is refractory to treatment (defined as ≥14 days of standard CMV treatment without clinical improvement for CMV disease, or failure to achieve >1 log reduction in CMV VL after ≥14 days of standard treatment for CMV infection)16,17
  • Current CMV infection has documented genotypic resistance to ganciclovir or foscarnet.
  • For patients with any prior CMV infection episode that broke through letermovir prophylaxis, but not during the current CMV infection, documentation of letermovir susceptibility testing should demonstrate absence of letermovir mutations known to confer resistance to letermovir.
  • Severe myelosuppression (ANC \<1000/µL, Hemoglobin \<8g/dL, or Platelets \<25,000/µL)17 or renal dysfunction (estimated creatinine clearance \<60 mL/min by MDRD in adults or \< 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 by bedside Schwartz equation in \< 18 years-old) at baseline or which develops during antiviral treatment.

    --Patients who develop severe myelosuppression or renal dysfunction during antiviral treatment as defined above are eligible without having to meet the refractoriness/antiviral resistance criterion.

  • Combinations of genotypic antiviral resistance and organ dysfunction that lead to eligibility are presented in the full protocol eligibility table.
  • The effects of letermovir on the developing human fetus are unknown. For this reason, women of child-bearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception (barrier method of birth control; abstinence) prior to study entry, for the duration of study participation, and 3 months after completion of letermovir administration. Should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while she or her partner is participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately. Men treated or enrolled on this protocol must also agree to use adequate contraception prior to the study, for the duration of study participation, and 3 months after completion of letermovir administration.

    --Patients of childbearing potential must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test.

  • Able to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to letermovir.
  • Known history of cirrhosis with Child-Pugh Class C hepatic insufficiency at screening.
  • Acute liver injury at baseline meeting Hy's law.
  • Current CMV infection broke through letermovir prophylaxis.
  • Patients with life expectancy of less than a week. Determination of life expectancy will be discussed with the patient's primary treatment physician.
  • Patient taking strong inhibitors or inducers of hepatic CYP enzymes including rifampicin, phenytoin, clarithromycin, ritonavir, or cobicistat.
  • HIV patients who are receiving antiretroviral treatment protease inhibitors (darunavir, lopinavir, etc) whether by themselves or boosted with ritonavir or cobicistat, or HIV patients receiving cyclosporine treatment due to strong drug-drug interactions.
  • Combinations of genotypic antiviral resistance and organ dysfunction that do not meet eligibility criteria are described in the full protocol eligibility table.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Letermovir

    Open label letermovir will be administered daily for up to 12 weeks. The study allows an optional additional 12 weeks of treatment for secondary prophylaxis if clinically indicated.

    Drug: Letermovir

Interventions

  • DrugLetermovir

    Patients will receive intravenous or oral letermovir at a dose of 480mg/day. Patients weighing 40 or more kilograms will receive a second, loading, dose 12 hours after the first dose of letermovir treatment. For patients receiving concomitant cyclosporine treatment, the letermovir dose will be 240mg/day.

    Also known as: Prevymis

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Virological Response on Treatment Week 6

    The virologic response milestones are defined as: 1) Any decrease in CMV DNA from baseline (Week 0), measured on week 3 and 2) A ≥2 log decrease in CMV DNA from baseline, or an undetectable CMV DNA, measured on week 6. For patients with clinical CMV disease, the clinical response milestones are defined as: 1) Stabilization of clinical disease by week 3 (i.e. no worsening signs or symptoms compared to week 1) as assessed by the site investigator and 2) Improvement or resolution of clinical disease by week 6 (i.e., improvement in signs and symptoms of affected organs \[resolution of diarrhea, pneumonia, hepatitis, retinitis, etc.\]) 3) Patients with clinical CMV disease should also meet virological response milestones outlined above to support the continuation of letermovir therapy. Patients who enter the study based solely on documented CMV disease by histopathology in the absence of quantifiable CMV virus load should remain nonquantifiable (less than 137 IU/mL).

    Time frame: 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival

    number of patients alive

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. CMV Progression-free Survival

    Time from study enrollment to CMV progression or death whichever occurs first

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Kinetics of Viral Clearance

    time to undetectable plasma CMV DNA

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Percent of Patients With a Clinically Meaningful Treatment Response to Letermovir Treatment

    Virological response and a concomitant clinical response in patients with CMV disease by Week 6 of treatment. For patients with clinical CMV disease, the clinical response milestones are defined as: 1. Stabilization of clinical disease by week 3 (i.e. no worsening signs or symptoms compared to week 1) as assessed by the site investigator and 2. Improvement or resolution of clinical disease by week 6 (i.e., improvement in signs and symptoms of affected organs \[resolution of diarrhea, pneumonia, hepatitis, retinitis, etc.\]) 3. Patients with clinical CMV disease should also meet virological response milestones outlined above to support the continuation of letermovir therapy. Patients who enter the study based solely on documented CMV disease by histopathology in the absence of quantifiable CMV virus load should remain nonquantifiable (less than 137 IU/mL).

    Time frame: 6 Weeks

  5. Emergence of Letermovir-resistant CMV Virus in Patients Treated in This Setting

    Number of participants with breakthrough letermovir-resistant CMV infection in patients receiving letermovir treatment who experienced an initial virological response.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Results

Posted Mar 8, 2023
Limitations and caveats
This study did not reach the target number of participants needed to achieve target power and statistically reliable results. The study was closed early due to difficulty in recruiting during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Participant flow

163 individuals were screened, 10 were enrolled in the study from Dana-Farber Cancer Institute inpatient and outpatient settings.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLetermovir
Started10
Completed7
Not completed3
Withdrew: Death3

Outcome measures

PrimaryVirological Response on Treatment Week 6

The virologic response milestones are defined as: 1) Any decrease in CMV DNA from baseline (Week 0), measured on week 3 and 2) A ≥2 log decrease in CMV DNA from baseline, or an undetectable CMV DNA, measured on week 6. For patients with clinical CMV disease, the clinical response milestones are defined as: 1) Stabilization of clinical disease by week 3 (i.e. no worsening signs or symptoms compared to week 1) as assessed by the site investigator and 2) Improvement or resolution of clinical disease by week 6 (i.e., improvement in signs and symptoms of affected organs \[resolution of diarrhea, pneumonia, hepatitis, retinitis, etc.\]) 3) Patients with clinical CMV disease should also meet virological response milestones outlined above to support the continuation of letermovir therapy. Patients who enter the study based solely on documented CMV disease by histopathology in the absence of quantifiable CMV virus load should remain nonquantifiable (less than 137 IU/mL).

Time frame:
6 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Virological Response on Treatment Week 6
ParticipantsLetermovir
Virological Response on Treatment Week 65
SecondaryOverall Survival

number of patients alive

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Overall Survival
ParticipantsLetermovir
Overall Survival7
SecondaryCMV Progression-free Survival

Time from study enrollment to CMV progression or death whichever occurs first

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Median · days
CMV Progression-free Survival
daysLetermovir
CMV Progression-free Survival13 (13 to 19)
SecondaryKinetics of Viral Clearance

time to undetectable plasma CMV DNA

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Median · days
Kinetics of Viral Clearance
daysLetermovir
Kinetics of Viral Clearance166 (147 to 168)
SecondaryPercent of Patients With a Clinically Meaningful Treatment Response to Letermovir Treatment

Virological response and a concomitant clinical response in patients with CMV disease by Week 6 of treatment. For patients with clinical CMV disease, the clinical response milestones are defined as: 1. Stabilization of clinical disease by week 3 (i.e. no worsening signs or symptoms compared to week 1) as assessed by the site investigator and 2. Improvement or resolution of clinical disease by week 6 (i.e., improvement in signs and symptoms of affected organs \[resolution of diarrhea, pneumonia, hepatitis, retinitis, etc.\]) 3. Patients with clinical CMV disease should also meet virological response milestones outlined above to support the continuation of letermovir therapy. Patients who enter the study based solely on documented CMV disease by histopathology in the absence of quantifiable CMV virus load should remain nonquantifiable (less than 137 IU/mL).

Time frame:
6 Weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percent of Patients With a Clinically Meaningful Treatment Response to Letermovir Treatment
ParticipantsLetermovir
Percent of Patients With a Clinically Meaningful Treatment Response to Letermovir Treatment0
SecondaryEmergence of Letermovir-resistant CMV Virus in Patients Treated in This Setting

Number of participants with breakthrough letermovir-resistant CMV infection in patients receiving letermovir treatment who experienced an initial virological response.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Emergence of Letermovir-resistant CMV Virus in Patients Treated in This Setting
ParticipantsLetermovir
Emergence of Letermovir-resistant CMV Virus in Patients Treated in This Setting0

Adverse events

Collected over 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Letermovir3/10 (30%)6/10 (60%)10/10 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventLetermovir
Lung InfectionInfections and infestations2/10
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders1/10
Heart FailureCardiac disorders1/10
Immune system disorders - Other, specifyImmune system disorders1/10
Cardiac ArrestCardiac disorders1/10
Pulmonary edemaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/10
EncephalopathyNervous system disorders1/10
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 43
Most frequent other events
EventLetermovir
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders4/10
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders2/10
Alanine aminotransferase increasedHepatobiliary disorders2/10
BacteremiaInfections and infestations2/10
EpistaxisBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/10
Peripheral sensory neuropathyNervous system disorders2/10
PneumothoraxRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/10
Rash maculo-papularSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders2/10
Upper respiratory infectionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/10
Vascular disordersVascular disorders2/10

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Letermovir
Median62.15 (56.32 to 69.87)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Letermovir
Female5
Male5
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Letermovir
Hispanic or Latino0
Not Hispanic or Latino9
Unknown or Not Reported1
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Letermovir
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian1
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American2
White6
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported1
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Letermovir
United States10
Baseline CMV viral load
Baseline CMV viral load(IU/mL)Letermovir
Median1272 (925 to 2546)
08

Study locations

4 sites
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
  • Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02214, United States
  • Boston Children's Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Marty FM, Ljungman P, Chemaly RF, Maertens J, Dadwal SS, Duarte RF, Haider S, Ullmann AJ, Katayama Y, Brown J, Mullane KM, Boeckh M, Blumberg EA, Einsele H, Snydman DR, Kanda Y, DiNubile MJ, Teal VL, Wan H, Murata Y, Kartsonis NA, Leavitt RY, Badshah C. Letermovir Prophylaxis for Cytomegalovirus in Hematopoietic-Cell Transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 21;377(25):2433-2444. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1706640. Epub 2017 Dec 6. PubMed 29211658 ↗
  • Imlay HN, Kaul DR. Letermovir and Maribavir for the Treatment and Prevention of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Solid Organ and Stem Cell Transplant Recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jul 1;73(1):156-160. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1713. PubMed 33197929 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Mar 31, 2021
  • Informed consent form · Jun 10, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 8, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03728426
Lead sponsor
Amy C. Sherman, MD
Collaborators
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Responsible party
Amy C. Sherman, MD (Principal Investigator, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Nov 2, 2018
Start date
Jan 11, 2019
Primary completion
Mar 28, 2022
Completion
Mar 28, 2022
Results posted
Mar 8, 2023
Last update
Mar 8, 2023

Study contacts

Amy C Sherman, MD
principal investigator · Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion