CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03721276EQuIPUpdated Jan 26, 2022Results posted

Project EQuIP: Empowering Queer Identities in Psychotherapy

An interventional study of EQuIP (Empowering Queer Identities in Psychotherapy) in Sexual Minority Stress, sponsored by Yale University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 35 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-01-26.

Sponsored by Yale University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2018, registered Oct 2018).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 35 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to develop an evidence-based psychosocial intervention for sexual minority women. This intervention will specifically target the adverse mental and behavioral health outcomes disproportionately experienced by sexual minority women, including depression, suicidality, and alcohol abuse, which are known to be driven by stigma-related stressors associated with their sexual orientation (i.e., minority stress processes).

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is to adapt ESTEEM (Effective Skills to Empower Effective Men), developed by Dr. John Pachankis, to simultaneously target the multiple adverse health outcomes sexual minority women disproportionately face, including depression, suicidality, and alcohol abuse, that are linked to minority stress processes.

Project EQuIP will adapt the ESTEEM program for sexual minority women in three distinct phases. The focus of this registered protocol will be Phase 3, however Phases 1, 2 and 3 are described below.

Phase 1 will involve conducting interviews with 20 sexual minority women (SMW) who report experiencing depression, suicidality, and alcohol abuse. Information from these interviews will be used to gather insight from participants that can help inform the adaptation of a cognitive-behavioral treatment approach to specifically target sexual minority women's unique experiences with minority stress.

Phase 2 will involve consultation interviews with 10 community-based mental health experts who treat psychosocial health problems among at-risk SMW. Involvement of key community members in intervention design optimizes intervention dissemination and allows frontline professionals to shape the intervention that they would be most willing to implement. Input of mental health experts working with the SMW community will be used in order to translate existing, but largely untapped, clinical wisdom regarding SMW's minority stress experiences, mental health, and alcohol use into the development of the intervention.

Phase 3 will involve pilot testing the adapted cognitive-behavioral treatment through a randomized controlled trial with 60 SMW who report experiencing depression, anxiety, and alcohol abuse.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sexual Minority Stress
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Yale University is the lead sponsor of 1,724 studies on the registry; 298 are open to participants now.

Of its 210 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 126 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 35 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

For Phase 3

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • sexual minority status operationalized as identity (e.g., lesbian, bisexual, pansexual, queer)
  • aged 18-35
  • self-identification as a woman with the option of selecting multiple gender identities
  • symptoms of anxiety or depression within the past 90 days (≥ 2.5 on the BSI-4 for either anxiety or depression)
  • at least one instance of past-90-day heavy drinking (i.e., ≥ 4 drinks in one sitting)
  • 6-month NYC residential stability and availability
  • English fluency

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • active psychosis or active mania
  • active suicidality or active homicidality
  • currently in mental health treatment exceeding one day per month
  • having received any cognitive-behavioral therapy treatment in the past 12 months
  • evidence of gross cognitive impairment
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Therapy

    Individuals assigned to therapy will receive 10 weekly individually-delivered sessions, directly after baseline assessment, that address minority stress mechanisms underlying SMW's depression, anxiety, and alcohol abuse.

    Behavioral: EQuIP (Empowering Queer Identities in Psychotherapy)

  • Other
    Waitlist

    Individuals assigned to waitlist will be put on a waitlist for 3 months after baseline assessment, after which they will also receive the same treatment as the therapy group.

    Behavioral: EQuIP (Empowering Queer Identities in Psychotherapy)

Interventions

  • BehavioralEQuIP (Empowering Queer Identities in Psychotherapy)

    Individuals assigned to therapy will receive 10 weekly individually-delivered sessions, directly after baseline assessment, that address minority stress mechanisms underlying SMW's depression, anxiety, and alcohol abuse.

    Also known as: ESTEEM (Effective Skills to Empower Effective Men) for Women

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Depression

    The measure depression in participants, the Center for Epidemiological Studies - Depression Scale (CES-D) will be used. An overall depression score is computed as the sum of the 20 items, with Items 3, 11, 14, and 16 reversed. In cases with internally missing data (items not answered), the sums were computed after imputation of the missing values: # items on scale / # actually answered, multiplied by the sum obtained from the answered items. A higher score indicates more depressive symptomatology during the past week. Range is 0 - 60.

    Time frame: Three-month pre-intervention, Immediate Pre-intervention, Post-intervention, Three-month Follow-up (Post Intervention)

  2. Brief Symptom Inventory

    The Global Severity Index of the 18-item BSI provides a mean score across depression, anxiety, and somatization subscales, and assesses psychological distress (e.g., "feeling nervousness or shakiness inside") on a 5-point scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) for the past 7 days. Scores range from 0-72, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes (greater symptoms severity).

    Time frame: Three-month pre-intervention, Immediate Pre-intervention, Post-intervention, Three-month Follow-up (Post Intervention)

  3. Alcohol Use

    Alcohol use will be measured using the Short Index of Problems for Alcohol (SIP-A). The SIP-A is a 15-item, binary response (yes/no) measure that has a range of scores from 0-15. The highest score of 15 is an indicator of the greatest amount of alcohol use related problems.

    Time frame: Three-month pre-intervention, Immediate Pre-intervention, Post-intervention, Three-month Follow-up (Post Intervention)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale

    ODSIS is a 5-item scale that asks individuals to rate the severity and impairment associated with past-week symptoms of depression (e.g., "In the past week, when you have felt depressed, how intense or severe was your depression?) from 0 (little or none: Depression was absent or barely noticeable.) to 4 (extreme: Depression was overwhelming.). Scores range from 0-20, with higher scores indicating greater depression and associated impairment in the past week.

    Time frame: Three-month pre-intervention, Immediate Pre-intervention, Post-intervention, Three-month Follow-up (Post Intervention)

  2. Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale

    OASIS is a 5-item scale that asks individuals to rate the severity and impairment associated with past-week anxiety symptoms (e.g., "In the past week, when you have felt anxious, how intense or severe was your anxiety?") from 0 (little or none: Anxiety was absent or barely noticeable.) to 4 (extreme: Anxiety was overwhelming. It was impossible to relax at all. Physical symptoms were unbearable). Scores range from 0-20, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety and associated impairment in the past week.

    Time frame: Three-month pre-intervention, Immediate Pre-intervention, Post-intervention, Three-month Follow-up (Post Intervention)

  3. Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale

    SIDAS is a 5-item scale that assesses past-month frequency and controllability of suicidal thoughts, how close one has come to making an attempt, and distress and impairment associated with thoughts of suicide (e.g., "In the past month, how often have you had thoughts about suicide?"). Responses range from 0 (never or not at all) to 10 (always or extremely) on each item, with item 2 reverse scored. Scale scores range from 0-50, with higher scores indicating more (worse) suicidal ideation.

    Time frame: Three-month pre-intervention, Immediate Pre-intervention, Post-intervention, Three-month Follow-up (Post Intervention)

  4. Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identity Scale-Internalized Homonegativity Subscale

    Internalized stigma was assessed us- ing the mean score on a three-item scale, the Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identity Scale-Internalized Homonegativity Subscale, that asks individuals to rate thoughts and feelings related to their LGBTQ identity (e.g., "If it were possible, I would choose to be straight"). Responses range from 1 (disagree strongly) to 6 (agree strongly). Scores range from 3-18 with higher scores indicating higher internalized stigma.

    Time frame: Three-month pre-intervention, Immediate Pre-intervention, Post-intervention, Three-month Follow-up (Post Intervention)

07

Results

Posted Oct 20, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTherapyWaitlist
Started3030
Three-month pre-intervention030
Immediate pre-intervention3029
Post-intervention2526
Three-month follow-up (post intervention)250
Completed2526
Not completed54
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up53
Withdrew: Adverse event01

Outcome measures

PrimaryDepression

The measure depression in participants, the Center for Epidemiological Studies - Depression Scale (CES-D) will be used. An overall depression score is computed as the sum of the 20 items, with Items 3, 11, 14, and 16 reversed. In cases with internally missing data (items not answered), the sums were computed after imputation of the missing values: # items on scale / # actually answered, multiplied by the sum obtained from the answered items. A higher score indicates more depressive symptomatology during the past week. Range is 0 - 60.

Time frame:
Three-month pre-intervention, Immediate Pre-intervention, Post-intervention, Three-month Follow-up (Post Intervention)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Depression
score on a scaleTherapyWaitlist
Three-month pre-intervention—27.57 ± 1.80
Immediate Pre-intervention29.70 ± 1.8426.86 ± 1.91
Post-intervention20.44 ± 1.8024.83 ± 2.44
Three-month Follow-up (Post Intervention)19.00 ± 2.18—
PrimaryBrief Symptom Inventory

The Global Severity Index of the 18-item BSI provides a mean score across depression, anxiety, and somatization subscales, and assesses psychological distress (e.g., "feeling nervousness or shakiness inside") on a 5-point scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) for the past 7 days. Scores range from 0-72, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes (greater symptoms severity).

Time frame:
Three-month pre-intervention, Immediate Pre-intervention, Post-intervention, Three-month Follow-up (Post Intervention)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Brief Symptom Inventory
units on a scaleTherapyWaitlist
Three-month pre-intervention—1.80 ± 0.10
Immediate Pre-intervention1.74 ± 0.141.85 ± 0.09
Post-intervention1.38 ± 0.111.64 ± 0.11
Three-month Follow-up (Post Intervention)1.16 ± 0.14—
PrimaryAlcohol Use

Alcohol use will be measured using the Short Index of Problems for Alcohol (SIP-A). The SIP-A is a 15-item, binary response (yes/no) measure that has a range of scores from 0-15. The highest score of 15 is an indicator of the greatest amount of alcohol use related problems.

Time frame:
Three-month pre-intervention, Immediate Pre-intervention, Post-intervention, Three-month Follow-up (Post Intervention)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Alcohol Use
score on a scaleTherapyWaitlist
Three-month pre-intervention—3.93 ± 0.54
Immediate Pre-intervention3.63 ± 0.573.34 ± 0.60
Post-intervention2.16 ± 0.372.80 ± 0.64
Three-month Follow-up (Post Intervention)1.92 ± 0.44—
SecondaryOverall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale

ODSIS is a 5-item scale that asks individuals to rate the severity and impairment associated with past-week symptoms of depression (e.g., "In the past week, when you have felt depressed, how intense or severe was your depression?) from 0 (little or none: Depression was absent or barely noticeable.) to 4 (extreme: Depression was overwhelming.). Scores range from 0-20, with higher scores indicating greater depression and associated impairment in the past week.

Time frame:
Three-month pre-intervention, Immediate Pre-intervention, Post-intervention, Three-month Follow-up (Post Intervention)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale
score on a scaleTherapyWaitlist
Three-month pre-intervention—6.17 ± 0.78
Immediate Pre-intervention6.30 ± 0.837.69 ± 0.73
Post-intervention4.09 ± 0.715.85 ± 0.82
Three-month Follow-up (Post Intervention)3.88 ± 0.69—
SecondaryOverall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale

OASIS is a 5-item scale that asks individuals to rate the severity and impairment associated with past-week anxiety symptoms (e.g., "In the past week, when you have felt anxious, how intense or severe was your anxiety?") from 0 (little or none: Anxiety was absent or barely noticeable.) to 4 (extreme: Anxiety was overwhelming. It was impossible to relax at all. Physical symptoms were unbearable). Scores range from 0-20, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety and associated impairment in the past week.

Time frame:
Three-month pre-intervention, Immediate Pre-intervention, Post-intervention, Three-month Follow-up (Post Intervention)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale
score on a scaleTherapyWaitlist
Three-month pre-intervention—8.20 ± 0.46
Immediate Pre-intervention8.80 ± 0.648.03 ± 0.46
Post-intervention6.00 ± 0.706.08 ± 0.60
Three-month Follow-up (Post Intervention)6.17 ± 0.68—
SecondarySuicidal Ideation Attributes Scale

SIDAS is a 5-item scale that assesses past-month frequency and controllability of suicidal thoughts, how close one has come to making an attempt, and distress and impairment associated with thoughts of suicide (e.g., "In the past month, how often have you had thoughts about suicide?"). Responses range from 0 (never or not at all) to 10 (always or extremely) on each item, with item 2 reverse scored. Scale scores range from 0-50, with higher scores indicating more (worse) suicidal ideation.

Time frame:
Three-month pre-intervention, Immediate Pre-intervention, Post-intervention, Three-month Follow-up (Post Intervention)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale
score on a scaleTherapyWaitlist
Three-month pre-intervention—5.03 ± 1.42
Immediate Pre-intervention4.13 ± 1.515.59 ± 1.58
Post-intervention2.09 ± 1.042.73 ± 1.05
Three-month Follow-up (Post Intervention)1.46 ± 0.75—
SecondaryLesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identity Scale-Internalized Homonegativity Subscale

Internalized stigma was assessed us- ing the mean score on a three-item scale, the Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identity Scale-Internalized Homonegativity Subscale, that asks individuals to rate thoughts and feelings related to their LGBTQ identity (e.g., "If it were possible, I would choose to be straight"). Responses range from 1 (disagree strongly) to 6 (agree strongly). Scores range from 3-18 with higher scores indicating higher internalized stigma.

Time frame:
Three-month pre-intervention, Immediate Pre-intervention, Post-intervention, Three-month Follow-up (Post Intervention)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identity Scale-Internalized Homonegativity Subscale
score on a scaleTherapyWaitlist
Three-month pre-intervention—1.49 ± 0.13
Immediate Pre-intervention1.72 ± 0.191.32 ± 0.10
Post-intervention1.63 ± 0.161.36 ± 0.12
Three-month Follow-up (Post Intervention)1.49 ± 0.13—
Post-hocSexual Minority Women's Rejection Sensitivity Scale

The Sexual Minority Women Rejection Sensitivity Scale asks participants to rate 16 vignettes in terms of how concerned or anxious each would make them about being rejected because of their sexual orientation, and their likelihood of attributing the rejection to their sexual orientation. For example, one item states, "You are on a date with a woman at a restaurant. Your waiter provides you and your date with poor service." Responses to the anxiety and likelihood stems range from 1 (very unconcerned/very unlikely) to 7 (very concerned/very likely). Total score is the sum of the products of anxiety and likelihood scores for all items. We adapted the scale to indicate "woman, gender nonconforming, or non-binary partner" and "heterosexual, cisgender" as relevant. Scale scores range from 16-112, with higher scores indicating higher rejection sensitivity.

Time frame:
Three-month pre-intervention, Immediate Pre-intervention, Post-intervention, Three-month Follow-up (Post Intervention)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Sexual Minority Women's Rejection Sensitivity Scale
score on a scaleTherapyWaitlist
Three-month pre-intervention—24.98 ± 1.63
Immediate Pre-intervention25.19 ± 1.3823.03 ± 1.58
Post-intervention22.10 ± 1.5122.12 ± 1.76
Three-month Follow-up (Post Intervention)22.78 ± 1.72—
Post-hocSexual Orientation Concealment

In the Sexual Orientation Concealment Scale, participants rate the degree to which they have disclosed their sexual orientation on a scale from 1 (out to none) to 4 (out to all). The total score is the mean of responses in the following domains: "family," "LGBTQ friends," "straight, cisgender friends," "co- workers", and "health care providers." Scores range from 1-4 with higher scores indicating lower sexual orientation concealment.

Time frame:
Three-month pre-intervention, Immediate Pre-intervention, Post-intervention, Three-month Follow-up (Post Intervention)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Sexual Orientation Concealment
score on a scaleTherapyWaitlist
Three-month pre-intervention—1.89 ± 0.12
Immediate Pre-intervention1.87 ± 0.111.67 ± 0.12
Post-intervention1.74 ± 0.121.77 ± 0.14
Three-month Follow-up (Post Intervention)1.75 ± 0.13—
Post-hocDifficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-Short Form

In the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-Short Form (DERS- SF), an 18-item scale, individuals are asked how much each statement regarding emotion regulation (e.g., "When I'm upset, I acknowledge my emotions") applies to them from 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always). Scores range from 18-90 with higher scores indicating greater difficulties in emotion regulation.

Time frame:
Three-month pre-intervention, Immediate Pre-intervention, Post-intervention, Three-month Follow-up (Post Intervention)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-Short Form
score on a scaleTherapyWaitlist
Three-month pre-intervention—49.37 ± 1.92
Immediate Pre-intervention47.50 ± 1.8247.07 ± 1.74
Post-intervention40.74 ± 1.8945.85 ± 1.72
Three-month Follow-up (Post Intervention)40.58 ± 1.64—
Post-hocMultidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support

The mean score on the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), a 12-item scale, indicates the perceived support that individuals report receiving from family (e.g., "My family really tries to help me"), friends (e.g., "I have friends with whom I can share my joys and sorrows"), and significant others (e.g., "I have a special person who is a real source of comfort to me") on a scale ranging from 0 (very strongly disagree) to 7 (very strongly agree). Scores range from 0-72 with higher scores indicating greater perceived social support.

Time frame:
Three-month pre-intervention, Immediate Pre-intervention, Post-intervention, Three-month Follow-up (Post Intervention)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support
score on a scaleTherapyWaitlist
Three-month pre-intervention—3.39 ± 0.25
Immediate Pre-intervention3.72 ± 0.215.39 ± 0.14
Post-intervention4.31 ± 0.285.35 ± 0.17
Three-month Follow-up (Post Intervention)5.12 ± 0.24—
Post-hocRuminative Responses Scale-Brooding Subscale

The sum of the five items on the Ruminative Responses Scale- Brooding Subscale (RRS) indicates the frequency with which participants experience brooding thoughts in response to depressed mood (e.g., "Think 'what am I doing to deserve this?'") along a scale ranging from 1 (almost never) to 4 (almost always). Scores range from 5-20 with higher scores indicating greater rumination.

Time frame:
Three-month pre-intervention, Immediate Pre-intervention, Post-intervention, Three-month Follow-up (Post Intervention)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Ruminative Responses Scale-Brooding Subscale
score on a scaleTherapyWaitlist
Three-month pre-intervention—13.57 ± 0.55
Immediate Pre-intervention13.80 ± 0.4513.52 ± 0.54
Post-intervention12.91 ± 0.5712.04 ± 0.66
Three-month Follow-up (Post Intervention)11.25 ± 0.48—
Post-hocSimple Rathus Assertiveness Schedule-Short Form

The Simple Rathus Assertiveness Schedule-Short Form (SRAS-SF), a 19-item scale, asks individuals to rate the personal typicality of assertive and unassertive behavior (e.g., "I find it embarrassing to return merchandise," "I have avoided asking questions for fear of sounding stupid") along a scale from 1 (very uncharacteristic of me) to 6 (very characteristic of me), for a summed total score. Scores range from 19-114 with higher scores indicating greater unassertiveness (scale was reverse-scored).

Time frame:
Three-month pre-intervention, Immediate Pre-intervention, Post-intervention, Three-month Follow-up (Post Intervention)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Simple Rathus Assertiveness Schedule-Short Form
score on a scaleTherapyWaitlist
Three-month pre-intervention—62.80 ± 2.67
Immediate Pre-intervention66.87 ± 3.1057.86 ± 2.11
Post-intervention62.43 ± 3.0559.42 ± 2.29
Three-month Follow-up (Post Intervention)62.46 ± 3.13—

Adverse events

Collected over From baseline through study completion (up to 6 months).. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Therapy0/60 (0%)1/60 (1.7%)0/60 (0%)
Waitlist0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventTherapyWaitlist
Active suicidalityPsychiatric disorders1/600/30

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)TherapyWaitlistTotal
Mean25.27 ± 3.3525.90 ± 3.2025.58 ± 3.26
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)TherapyWaitlistTotal
Cisgender women132134
Gender diverse (transgender, gender queer, nonbinary, gender fluid)17926
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)TherapyWaitlistTotal
Hispanic or Latino5510
Not Hispanic or Latino252550
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)TherapyWaitlistTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian224
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American336
White221941
More than one race268
Unknown or Not Reported101
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)TherapyWaitlistTotal
United States303060
Sexual Orientation
Sexual Orientation(Participants)TherapyWaitlistTotal
Lesbian639
Queer151833
Other (asexual, bisexual, pansexual, uncertain)9918
Education level
Education level(Participants)TherapyWaitlistTotal
Some college/currently in college5813
4-year college degree171734
Some graduate school or higher549
Not reported314
Employment status
Employment status(Participants)TherapyWaitlistTotal
Full-time (40+ hours per week)181533
Part-time employment (<40 hours per week)8816
Student347
Unemployed134

2 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • Yale LGBTQ+ Mental Health Initiative - Research Lab
    New York, New York 10010, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385-401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014662167700100306
  • Derogatis LR, Melisaratos N. The Brief Symptom Inventory: an introductory report. Psychol Med. 1983 Aug;13(3):595-605. PubMed 6622612 ↗
  • Alterman AI, Cacciola JS, Ivey MA, Habing B, Lynch KG. Reliability and validity of the alcohol short index of problems and a newly constructed drug short index of problems. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2009 Mar;70(2):304-7. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2009.70.304. PubMed 19261243 ↗
  • Bentley KH, Gallagher MW, Carl JR, Barlow DH. Development and validation of the Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale. Psychol Assess. 2014 Sep;26(3):815-830. doi: 10.1037/a0036216. Epub 2014 Apr 7. PubMed 24708078 ↗
  • Norman SB, Cissell SH, Means-Christensen AJ, Stein MB. Development and validation of an Overall Anxiety Severity And Impairment Scale (OASIS). Depress Anxiety. 2006;23(4):245-9. doi: 10.1002/da.20182. PubMed 16688739 ↗
  • van Spijker BA, Batterham PJ, Calear AL, Farrer L, Christensen H, Reynolds J, Kerkhof AJ. The suicidal ideation attributes scale (SIDAS): Community-based validation study of a new scale for the measurement of suicidal ideation. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2014 Aug;44(4):408-19. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12084. Epub 2014 Feb 24. PubMed 24612048 ↗
  • Dyar C, Feinstein BA, Eaton NR, London B. The Mediating Roles of Rejection Sensitivity and Proximal Stress in the Association Between Discrimination and Internalizing Symptoms Among Sexual Minority Women. Arch Sex Behav. 2018 Jan;47(1):205-218. doi: 10.1007/s10508-016-0869-1. Epub 2016 Oct 17. PubMed 27752853 ↗
  • Meyer IH, Rossano L, Ellis JM, Bradford J. A brief telephone interview to identify lesbian and bisexual women in random digit dialing sampling. J Sex Res. 2002 May;39(2):139-44. doi: 10.1080/00224490209552133. PubMed 12476246 ↗
  • Mohr JJ, Kendra MS. Revision and extension of a multidimensional measure of sexual minority identity: the Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identity Scale. J Couns Psychol. 2011 Apr;58(2):234-245. doi: 10.1037/a0022858. PubMed 21319899 ↗
  • Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26, 41-54. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBA.0000007455.08539.94
  • Zimet GD, Powell SS, Farley GK, Werkman S, Berkoff KA. Psychometric characteristics of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. J Pers Assess. 1990 Winter;55(3-4):610-7. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674095. PubMed 2280326 ↗
  • Treynor, W., Gonzalez, R., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2003). Rumination reconsidered: A psychometric analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Re- search, 27, 247-259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1023910315561
  • Rathus, S. A. (1973). A 30-item schedule for assessing assertive behavior. Behavior Therapy, 4, 398-406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0005- 7894(73)80120-0
  • Pachankis JE, McConocha EM, Clark KA, Wang K, Behari K, Fetzner BK, Brisbin CD, Scheer JR, Lehavot K. A transdiagnostic minority stress intervention for gender diverse sexual minority women's depression, anxiety, and unhealthy alcohol use: A randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020 Jul;88(7):613-630. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000508. Epub 2020 May 21. PubMed 32437174 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jun 25, 2019
  • Statistical analysis plan · Oct 7, 2019
  • Informed consent form · Jul 20, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 26, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03721276
Lead sponsor
Yale University
Collaborators
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 26, 2018
Start date
Jul 18, 2018
Primary completion
Jul 18, 2019
Completion
Jul 18, 2019
Results posted
Oct 20, 2021
Last update
Jan 26, 2022

Study contacts

John Pachankis, PhD
principal investigator · Associate Professor of Public Health (Social and Behavioral Sciences)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion