ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03721016Updated May 25, 2023Results posted

MT10109L in the Treatment of Glabellar Lines (GL) With or Without Concurrent Treatment of Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)

A Phase 3 interventional study of MT10109L and Placebo in Glabellar Lines and Lateral Canthal Lines, sponsored by Medy-Tox. Completed at 21 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-05-25.

Sponsored by Medy-Tox · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
415
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of MT10109L for the treatment of glabellar lines (GL) with or without concurrent treatment of lateral canthal lines (LCL) in participants with moderate to severe GL and LCL.

02

Conditions studied

  • Glabellar Lines
  • Lateral Canthal Lines
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Medy-Tox is the lead sponsor of 49 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female participants must not be pregnant or planning to get pregnant and willing to minimize the risk of inducing pregnancy for the duration of the clinical study and follow-up period.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  • Known immunization or to any botulinum toxin serotype.
  • Any medical condition that may put the participant at increased risk with exposure to MT10109L including diagnosed myasthenia gravis, Eaton-Lambert syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or any other condition that might interfere with neuromuscular function.
  • History of facial nerve palsy.
  • Any uncontrolled systemic disease.
  • Anticipated need for treatment with botulinum toxin of any serotype for any reason during the study (other than study intervention).
  • Anticipated need for surgery or overnight hospitalization during the study.
  • Prior exposure to botulinum toxin of any serotype for any reason.
  • Prior periorbital surgery, facial lift (full face or mid-face), thread lift, brow lift, or related procedures (eg, eyelid [blepharoplasty] and/or eyebrow surgery).
  • Prior facial treatment with permanent soft tissue fillers, synthetic implantation (eg, Gore-Tex®), and/or autologous fat transplantation.
  • Current enrollment in an drug or device study or participation in such a study within 30 days of entry into this study.
  • Females who are pregnant, nursing, or planning a pregnancy during the study.
  • Participants who plan for an extended absence away from the immediate area of the study site that would preclude them from returning for all protocol-specified study visits.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
415 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    MT10109L Dose 1 + Placebo

    MT10109L Dose 1 will be injected into the Glabellar Lines (GL) and Placebo into the Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL): initial double-blind treatment on Day 1, and up to 2 additional blinded treatments during the retreatment period.

    Drug: MT10109L · Drug: Placebo

  • Experimental
    MT10109L Dose 1 + MT10109L Dose 2

    MT10109L Dose 1 will be injected into the Glabellar Lines (GL) and MT10109L Dose 2 into the Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL): initial double-blind treatment on Day 1, and up to 2 additional blinded treatments during the retreatment period.

    Drug: MT10109L

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo will be injected into the Glabellar Lines (GL) and into the Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL): initial double-blind treatment on Day 1, and up to 2 additional blinded treatments during the retreatment period.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • MT10109Lwill be injected into either the Glabellar Lines (GL), Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL), or both.

    Also known as: NivobotulinumtoxinA

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo will be injected into either the Glabellar Lines (GL), Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL), or both.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline on the Facial Wrinkle Scale With Photonumeric Guide (FWS)

    The outcome measured is the percentage of participants with a ≥ 2-grade improvement from baseline on the Facial Wrinkle Scale With Photonumeric Guide (FWS) according to investigator and participant assessments of Glabellar Lines (GL) severity at maximum frown at Day 30. The investigator and participant evaluates the participant's GL severity using a Facial Wrinkle Scale With Photonumeric Guide (FWS) at maximum frown on Day 30. The scale ranges from (0 to 3) where 0=none and 3 = severe.

    Time frame: Day 30

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Duration of Glabellar Line (GL) Treatment in Participants Who Achieved a Rating of ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline in GL Severity at Maximum Frown at Day 30 According to Investigator Assessments Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS)

    The investigator evaluates the participant's GL severity using a 4-grade scale (0 to 3) where 0=none and 3 = severe. The outcome is measured as median time to loss of treatment effect (ie, return to moderate or severe GL severity at maximum frown using the FWS).

    Time frame: Day 1 (first treatment) to Day 180

  2. The Percentage of Responders for Investigator Assessments of Glabellar Lines (GL) Severity at Maximum Frown Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS)

    The percentage of Responders for Investigator Assessments of Glabellar Lines (GL) Severity at Maximum Frown Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS), where a Responder was defined as Achieving a ≥2-grade Improvement from Baseline at Maximum Frown at Day 30. The investigator evaluates the participant's GL severity using a 4-point scale (0 to 3) where 0=none and 3=severe.

    Time frame: Day 30

  3. The Percentage of Participants Reporting Mostly Satisfied/Very Satisfied on the Facial Line Satisfaction Questionnaire (FLSQ) Follow-up Version Item 5 for Glabellar Lines (GL)

    The Satisfaction Question 5 grades facial line treatment satisfaction on a 5-point scale (-2 to 2) where -2=Very dissatisfied and 2=Very satisfied.

    Time frame: Day 60

  4. The Percentage of Responders for Investigator Assessments of Glabellar Lines (GL) Severity at Rest Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS)

    The outcome was measured Among Participants Who Were Rated At least Mild at Rest at Baseline, where a Responder was Defined as Achieving a ≥1-grade Improvement from Baseline at Day 30 The investigator evaluates the participant's GL severity using a 4-point scale (0 to 3) where 0=none and 3=severe.

    Time frame: Day 30

  5. Secondary Safety: Number of Patients Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)

    This section focuses primarily on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), i.e., AEs that started or worsened after the first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit. The safety analyses were conducted in the Safety population. Unless otherwise noted, safety results refer to TEAEs.

    Time frame: The time frame for AEs is after the first dose (Day 1) and up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit (Day 360 unless participant exits earlier)

  6. Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (BP)

    Changes in vital signs: Systolic BP

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 360 (Study exit)

  7. Mean Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP)

    Changes in vital signs: Diastolic BP

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 360 (Study exit)

  8. Mean Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate

    Changes in vital signs: Pulse Rate

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 360 (Study exit)

  9. Mean Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate

    Changes in vital signs: Respiratory Rate

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 360 (Study exit)

  10. Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - Heart Rate

    Change from baseline for ECG safety population - Heart Rate

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 360

  11. Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - PR Interval

    Change from baseline for ECG safety population - PR Interval

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 360

  12. Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - QRS Duration

    Change from baseline for ECG safety population - QRS duration

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 360

  13. Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - QT Interval

    Change from baseline for ECG safety population - QT interval

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 360

  14. Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - QTcB Interval

    Change from baseline for ECG safety population - QTcB interval

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 360

  15. Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - QTcF Interval

    Change from baseline for ECG safety population - QTcF interval

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 360

  16. Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - RR Interval

    Change from baseline for ECG safety population - RR interval

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 360

  17. Number of Participants With Binding and Neutralizing Antibodies

    Only samples that tested positive in the binding antibody confirmatory assay were evaluated for neutralizing antibodies. The participants with positive neutralizing antibodies are only shown.

    Time frame: Day 360

07

Results

Posted Apr 21, 2023

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlacebo Into Both Glabellar Lines (GL) and Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL) + Placebo Into and Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL)+ MT10109L Dose 2 Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)
Started82173160
Completed66141133
Not completed163227
Withdrew: Adverse event011
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject81613
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up465
Withdrew: Physician decision012
Withdrew: Protocol violation010
Withdrew: Site terminated by sponsor376
Withdrew: Subject exited early due to covid-19100

Outcome measures

PrimaryThe Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline on the Facial Wrinkle Scale With Photonumeric Guide (FWS)

The outcome measured is the percentage of participants with a ≥ 2-grade improvement from baseline on the Facial Wrinkle Scale With Photonumeric Guide (FWS) according to investigator and participant assessments of Glabellar Lines (GL) severity at maximum frown at Day 30. The investigator and participant evaluates the participant's GL severity using a Facial Wrinkle Scale With Photonumeric Guide (FWS) at maximum frown on Day 30. The scale ranges from (0 to 3) where 0=none and 3 = severe.

Time frame:
Day 30
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
The Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline on the Facial Wrinkle Scale With Photonumeric Guide (FWS)
ParticipantsPlacebo Into Both Glabellar Lines (GL) and Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL) + Placebo Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL)+ MT10109L Dose 2 Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)
The Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline on the Facial Wrinkle Scale With Photonumeric Guide (FWS)07866
SecondaryThe Duration of Glabellar Line (GL) Treatment in Participants Who Achieved a Rating of ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline in GL Severity at Maximum Frown at Day 30 According to Investigator Assessments Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS)

The investigator evaluates the participant's GL severity using a 4-grade scale (0 to 3) where 0=none and 3 = severe. The outcome is measured as median time to loss of treatment effect (ie, return to moderate or severe GL severity at maximum frown using the FWS).

Time frame:
Day 1 (first treatment) to Day 180
Reported as:
Median · days
The Duration of Glabellar Line (GL) Treatment in Participants Who Achieved a Rating of ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline in GL Severity at Maximum Frown at Day 30 According to Investigator Assessments Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS)
daysPlacebo Into Both Glabellar Lines (GL) and Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL) + Placebo Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL)+ MT10109L Dose 2 Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)
The Duration of Glabellar Line (GL) Treatment in Participants Who Achieved a Rating of ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline in GL Severity at Maximum Frown at Day 30 According to Investigator Assessments Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS)—116.0 (92 to 128)118.0 (94 to 132)
SecondaryThe Percentage of Responders for Investigator Assessments of Glabellar Lines (GL) Severity at Maximum Frown Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS)

The percentage of Responders for Investigator Assessments of Glabellar Lines (GL) Severity at Maximum Frown Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS), where a Responder was defined as Achieving a ≥2-grade Improvement from Baseline at Maximum Frown at Day 30. The investigator evaluates the participant's GL severity using a 4-point scale (0 to 3) where 0=none and 3=severe.

Time frame:
Day 30
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
The Percentage of Responders for Investigator Assessments of Glabellar Lines (GL) Severity at Maximum Frown Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS)
ParticipantsPlacebo Into Both Glabellar Lines (GL) and Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL) + Placebo Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL)+ MT10109L Dose 2 Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)
The Percentage of Responders for Investigator Assessments of Glabellar Lines (GL) Severity at Maximum Frown Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS)08383
SecondaryThe Percentage of Participants Reporting Mostly Satisfied/Very Satisfied on the Facial Line Satisfaction Questionnaire (FLSQ) Follow-up Version Item 5 for Glabellar Lines (GL)

The Satisfaction Question 5 grades facial line treatment satisfaction on a 5-point scale (-2 to 2) where -2=Very dissatisfied and 2=Very satisfied.

Time frame:
Day 60
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
The Percentage of Participants Reporting Mostly Satisfied/Very Satisfied on the Facial Line Satisfaction Questionnaire (FLSQ) Follow-up Version Item 5 for Glabellar Lines (GL)
ParticipantsPlacebo Into Both Glabellar Lines (GL) and Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL) + Placebo Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL)+ MT10109L Dose 2 Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)
The Percentage of Participants Reporting Mostly Satisfied/Very Satisfied on the Facial Line Satisfaction Questionnaire (FLSQ) Follow-up Version Item 5 for Glabellar Lines (GL)4116118
SecondaryThe Percentage of Responders for Investigator Assessments of Glabellar Lines (GL) Severity at Rest Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS)

The outcome was measured Among Participants Who Were Rated At least Mild at Rest at Baseline, where a Responder was Defined as Achieving a ≥1-grade Improvement from Baseline at Day 30 The investigator evaluates the participant's GL severity using a 4-point scale (0 to 3) where 0=none and 3=severe.

Time frame:
Day 30
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
The Percentage of Responders for Investigator Assessments of Glabellar Lines (GL) Severity at Rest Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS)
ParticipantsPlacebo Into Both Glabellar Lines (GL) and Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL) + Placebo Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL)+ MT10109L Dose 2 Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)
The Percentage of Responders for Investigator Assessments of Glabellar Lines (GL) Severity at Rest Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS)1184100
SecondarySecondary Safety: Number of Patients Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)

This section focuses primarily on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), i.e., AEs that started or worsened after the first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit. The safety analyses were conducted in the Safety population. Unless otherwise noted, safety results refer to TEAEs.

Time frame:
The time frame for AEs is after the first dose (Day 1) and up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit (Day 360 unless participant exits earlier)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Secondary Safety: Number of Patients Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)
ParticipantsPlacebo Into Both Glabellar Lines (GL) and Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL) + Placebo Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL)+ MT10109L Dose 2 Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)
Secondary Safety: Number of Patients Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)318261
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (BP)

Changes in vital signs: Systolic BP

Time frame:
Baseline to Day 360 (Study exit)
Reported as:
Mean · Change in mmHg
Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (BP)
Change in mmHgPlacebo Into Both Glabellar Lines (GL) and Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL) + Placebo Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL)+ MT10109L Dose 2 Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)
Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (BP)2.5 ± 12.810 ± 12.33-1.7 ± 12.26
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP)

Changes in vital signs: Diastolic BP

Time frame:
Baseline to Day 360 (Study exit)
Reported as:
Mean · Change in mmHg
Mean Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP)
Change in mmHgPlacebo Into Both Glabellar Lines (GL) and Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL) + Placebo Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL)+ MT10109L Dose 2 Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)
Mean Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP)-1.4 ± 7.81-0.9 ± 10.07-0.8 ± 8.64
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate

Changes in vital signs: Pulse Rate

Time frame:
Baseline to Day 360 (Study exit)
Reported as:
Mean · Change in beats/min
Mean Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate
Change in beats/minPlacebo Into Both Glabellar Lines (GL) and Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL) + Placebo Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL)+ MT10109L Dose 2 Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)
Mean Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate-1.7 ± 11.25-1 ± 10.3-1 ± 8.93
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate

Changes in vital signs: Respiratory Rate

Time frame:
Baseline to Day 360 (Study exit)
Reported as:
Mean · Change in breaths/min
Mean Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
Change in breaths/minPlacebo Into Both Glabellar Lines (GL) and Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL) + Placebo Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL)+ MT10109L Dose 2 Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)
Mean Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate0 ± 2.130.1 ± 2.28-0.2 ± 2.21
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - Heart Rate

Change from baseline for ECG safety population - Heart Rate

Time frame:
Baseline to Day 360
Reported as:
Mean · Change from baseline in beats/min
Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - Heart Rate
Change from baseline in beats/minPlacebo Into Both Glabellar Lines (GL) and Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL) + Placebo Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL)+ MT10109L Dose 2 Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)
Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - Heart Rate3.6 ± 9.792.4 ± 8.413.4 ± 9.51
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - PR Interval

Change from baseline for ECG safety population - PR Interval

Time frame:
Baseline to Day 360
Reported as:
Mean · Change from baseline in msec
Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - PR Interval
Change from baseline in msecPlacebo Into Both Glabellar Lines (GL) and Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL) + Placebo Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL)+ MT10109L Dose 2 Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)
Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - PR Interval-3.2 ± 14.41-0.5 ± 12.41-0.7 ± 11.13
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - QRS Duration

Change from baseline for ECG safety population - QRS duration

Time frame:
Baseline to Day 360
Reported as:
Mean · Change from baseline in msec
Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - QRS Duration
Change from baseline in msecPlacebo Into Both Glabellar Lines (GL) and Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL) + Placebo Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL)+ MT10109L Dose 2 Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)
Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - QRS Duration0.9 ± 5.781.1 ± 6.080.8 ± 6.06
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - QT Interval

Change from baseline for ECG safety population - QT interval

Time frame:
Baseline to Day 360
Reported as:
Mean · Change from baseline in msec
Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - QT Interval
Change from baseline in msecPlacebo Into Both Glabellar Lines (GL) and Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL) + Placebo Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL)+ MT10109L Dose 2 Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)
Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - QT Interval-10.4 ± 23.88-5.6 ± 21.0-8.0 ± 22.69
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - QTcB Interval

Change from baseline for ECG safety population - QTcB interval

Time frame:
Baseline to Day 360
Reported as:
Mean · Change from baseline in msec
Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - QTcB Interval
Change from baseline in msecPlacebo Into Both Glabellar Lines (GL) and Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL) + Placebo Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL)+ MT10109L Dose 2 Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)
Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - QTcB Interval0.1 ± 15.51.2 ± 18.921.7 ± 17.65
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - QTcF Interval

Change from baseline for ECG safety population - QTcF interval

Time frame:
Baseline to Day 360
Reported as:
Mean · Change from baseline in msec
Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - QTcF Interval
Change from baseline in msecPlacebo Into Both Glabellar Lines (GL) and Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL) + Placebo Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL)+ MT10109L Dose 2 Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)
Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - QTcF Interval-3.5 ± 14.19-1.2 ± 15.91-1.8 ± 14.47
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - RR Interval

Change from baseline for ECG safety population - RR interval

Time frame:
Baseline to Day 360
Reported as:
Mean · Change from baseline in msec
Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - RR Interval
Change from baseline in msecPlacebo Into Both Glabellar Lines (GL) and Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL) + Placebo Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL)+ MT10109L Dose 2 Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)
Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters - RR Interval-46.0 ± 113.98-31.0 ± 113.11-44.6 ± 122.53
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Binding and Neutralizing Antibodies

Only samples that tested positive in the binding antibody confirmatory assay were evaluated for neutralizing antibodies. The participants with positive neutralizing antibodies are only shown.

Time frame:
Day 360
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Binding and Neutralizing Antibodies
ParticipantsPlacebo Into Both Glabellar Lines (GL) and Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL) + Placebo Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL)+ MT10109L Dose 2 Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)
Number of Participants With Binding and Neutralizing Antibodies001

Adverse events

Collected over This section describes Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) that started or worsened after the first dose of study intervention and within 30 days after the last visit or study exit (Day 360 unless the participant exits earlier). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo Into Both Glabellar Lines (GL) and Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)0/82 (0%)2/82 (2.4%)7/82 (8.5%)
MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL) + Placebo Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)0/174 (0%)3/174 (1.7%)22/174 (12.6%)
MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL)+ MT10109L Dose 2 Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)0/159 (0%)5/159 (3.1%)13/159 (8.2%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 11
Most frequent serious events
EventPlacebo Into Both Glabellar Lines (GL) and Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL) + Placebo Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL)+ MT10109L Dose 2 Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)
AppendicitisInfections and infestations1/820/1740/159
Basal cell carcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/820/1741/159
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders0/820/1741/159
PyrexiaGeneral disorders0/820/1741/159
DiverticulitisInfections and infestations0/820/1741/159
SepsisInfections and infestations0/820/1741/159
Breast cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/820/1741/159
Cerebrovascular accidentNervous system disorders0/820/1741/159
OsteoarthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/821/1740/159
Intraductal proliferative breast lesionNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/821/1740/159
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPlacebo Into Both Glabellar Lines (GL) and Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL) + Placebo Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL)+ MT10109L Dose 2 Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)
HeadacheNervous system disorders4/8214/1746/159
Injection site painGeneral disorders4/829/1747/159

Baseline characteristics

There were 415 participants included in the Intent To Treat (ITT) population (160 participants in the MT10109L Dose 1+2 group, 173 participants in the MT10109L Dose 1 group, and 82 participants in the placebo group).

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Placebo Into Both Glabellar Lines (GL) and Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL) + Placebo Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL)+ MT10109L Dose 2 Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)Total
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years78160156394
>=65 years413421
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Placebo Into Both Glabellar Lines (GL) and Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL) + Placebo Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL)+ MT10109L Dose 2 Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)Total
Mean47.6 ± 10.9147.5 ± 11.4946.2 ± 11.1547 ± 11.23
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Placebo Into Both Glabellar Lines (GL) and Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL) + Placebo Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL)+ MT10109L Dose 2 Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)Total
Female72148143363
Male10251752
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Placebo Into Both Glabellar Lines (GL) and Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL) + Placebo Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL)+ MT10109L Dose 2 Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)Total
Hispanic or Latino13252866
Not Hispanic or Latino69148132349
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Placebo Into Both Glabellar Lines (GL) and Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL) + Placebo Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)MT10109L Dose 1 Into Glabellar Lines (GL)+ MT10109L Dose 2 Into Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)Total
American Indian or Alaska Native0123
Asian2338
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander1001
Black or African American3126
White75168151394
More than one race0000
Unknown or Not Reported1023
08

Study locations

21 sites
  • Advanced Research Associates
    Glendale, Arizona 85308, United States
  • Eye Research Foundation
    Newport Beach, California 92663, United States
  • Skin Research Institute LLC
    Coral Gables, Florida 33146, United States
  • Coleman Center for Cosmetic Dermatologic Surgery
    Metairie, Louisiana 70006, United States
  • MD Laser, Skin, & Vein Institute
    Hunt Valley, Maryland 21030, United States
  • Laser & Skin Surgery Center of New York
    New York, New York 10016, United States
  • Bellaire Dermatology Associates
    Bellaire, Texas 77401, United States
  • SkinDC
    Arlington, Virginia 22209, United States
  • Virginia Clinical Research, Inc.
    Norfolk, Virginia 23502, United States
  • Dr. Shannon Humphrey Inc.
    Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 4E1, Canada
  • Project Skin MD
    Vancouver, British Columbia V6H 1K9, Canada
  • Sweat Clinics of Canada
    Toronto, Ontario M5R 3N8, Canada
  • Bertucci MedSpa Inc.
    Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 8E2, Canada
  • Studienzentrum Theatiner46
    Munich, Bavaria 80333, Germany
  • DRK-Kliniken Nordhessen
    Kassel, Hessen 34121, Germany
  • Privatpraxis Dr. Hilton & Partner
    Düsseldorf, NRW 40212, Germany
  • RZANY & HUND - Privatpraxis fur Dermatologie und Asthetische Medizin
    Berlin, 10707, Germany
  • Saleh Aesthetic Clinic Ltd.
    Cheadle, England SK8 2BD, United Kingdom
  • Cranley Clinic
    London, England W1G 7JE, United Kingdom
  • Bermuda Practice
    Basingstoke, Hampshire RG24 9DT, United Kingdom
  • Meyer Clinic
    Chichester, West Sussex PO18 8AN, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Oct 2018 to primary completion in Mar 2020, 16 months.

Results were first posted in Apr 2023, 3 years 1 month after primary completion. A results delay was requested in Mar 2021.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 24, 2018
First posted
Oct 26, 2018
StartActual
Oct 26, 2018
Primary completionActual
Mar 5, 2020
CompletionActual
Jan 22, 2021
Results delay requested
Mar 3, 2021
Results first posted
Apr 21, 2023
Last update
May 25, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 25, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03721016
Lead sponsor
Medy-Tox
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 26, 2018
Start date
Oct 26, 2018
Primary completion
Mar 5, 2020
Completion
Jan 22, 2021
Results posted
Apr 21, 2023
Last update
May 25, 2023

Study contacts

SangMi Park
study director · Medytox Inc

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Nivobotulinumtoxina

Start the discussion