ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03720470JADE CompareUpdated Jan 19, 2021Results posted

Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of PF-04965842 and Dupilumab in Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis on Background Topical Therapy

A Phase 3 interventional study of PF-04965842 100 mg and PF-04965842 200 mg in Dermatitis, Dermatitis, Atopic and Eczema, sponsored by Pfizer. Completed at 216 sites in 18 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-01-19.

Sponsored by Pfizer · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
838
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

B7451029 is a Phase 3 study to investigate PF-04965842 in adult patients who have moderate to severe atopic dermatitis and use background topical therapy. The efficacy of two dosage strengths of PF-04965842, 100 mg and 200 mg taken orally once daily will be evaluated relative to placebo over 12 weeks. The efficacy of the two dosage strengths of PF-04965842 will be compared with dupilumab in terms of pruritus relief at 2 weeks. The two dosage strengths of PF-04965842 and dupilumab 300 mg injected subcutaneously once every two weeks (with a loading dose of 600 mg injected on the first day) will also be evaluated relative to placebo over 16 weeks. The safety of the investigational products will be evaluated over the duration of the study. Subjects will use non-medicated emollient at least twice a day and medicated topical therapy such as corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors or PDE4 inhibitors, as per protocol guidance, to treat active lesions during the study. Subjects who are randomized to receive one of the two dosage strengths of PF-04965842 will also receive placebo injectable study drug every two weeks until Week 16 and then will continue on receiving only the oral study drug for 4 weeks. Subjects who are randomized to receive dupilumab injections every two weeks will also receive oral placebo to be taken once daily until Week 16 and will then continue to receive only the oral placebo for 4 weeks. Subjects who are randomized to the placebo arms, will receive both daily oral placebo and injectable placebo every two weeks until Week 16, after which they will receive either 100 mg or 200 mg of PF-04965842 taken orally once daily for 4 weeks, dependent upon which arm they have been allocated to. Eligible subjects will have an option to enter a long-term extension study after completing 20 weeks of treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dermatitis
  • Dermatitis, Atopic
  • Eczema
  • Skin Diseases
  • Skin Diseases, Genetic
  • Genetic Diseases, Inborn
  • Skin Diseases, Eczematous
  • Hypersensitivity
  • Hypersensitivity, Immediate
  • Immune System Diseases

Keywords

  • atopic dermatitis
  • atopic eczema
  • eczema
  • JAK
  • janus kinase
03

In context

Dermatitis

238 studies on the registry are indexed under Dermatitis; 34 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 838 is above the median of 68 across 191 interventional studies indexed under Dermatitis.

Browse Dermatitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Pfizer is the lead sponsor of 3,334 studies on the registry; 149 are open to participants now.

Of its 601 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 391 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female subjects aged 18 years or older at the time of
  • Diagnosis of atopic dermatitis (AD) for at least 1 year and current status of moderate to severe disease (>= the following scores: BSA 10%, IGA 3, EASI 16, Pruritus NRS severity 4)
  • Documented recent history (within 6 months before the screening visit) of inadequate response to treatment with medicated topical therapy for AD for at least 4 weeks, or who have required systemic therapies for control of their disease.
  • Must be willing and able to comply with standardized background topical therapy, as per protocol guidelines throughout the study
  • Female subjects who are of must not be intending to become pregnant, currently pregnant, or lactating. The following conditions apply:

    1. Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a confirmed negative pregnancy test prior to randomization;
    2. Female subjects of childbearing potential must agree to use a highly effective method of for the duration of the active treatment period and for at least 28 days after the last dose of product.
  • Female subjects of non-childbearing potential must meet at least 1 of the following criteria:

    • Have undergone a documented hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy;
    • Have medically confirmed ovarian failure; or
    • Achieved status, defined as follows: cessation of regular menses for at least 12 consecutive months with no alternative pathological or physiological cause and have a serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level confirming the postmenopausal state.

All other female subjects (including female subjects with tubal ligations) are considered to be of childbearing potential.

-If receiving concomitant medications for any reason other than AD, must be on a stable regimen prior to Day 1 and through the duration of the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition including recent (within the past year) or active suicidal ideation or behavior or laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk associated with study participation or product administration or may interfere with the interpretation of study results and, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the subject inappropriate for entry into this study
  • Medical history including thrombocytopenia, coagulopathy or dysfunction, Q wave interval abnormalities, current or history of certain infections, cancer, lymphoproliferative disorders and other medical conditions at the discretion of the investigator
  • Unwilling to discontinue current AD medications prior to the study or require treatment with prohibited medications during the study
  • Other active nonAD inflammatory skin diseases or conditions affecting skin
  • Prior treatment with JAK inhibitors
  • Previous treatment with dupilumab
  • Unwilling to discontinue current AD medications prior to the study or require treatment with prohibited medications during the study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
838 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Inj followed by PF-04965842 100mg

    Once-daily oral PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo injected subcutaneously once every 2 weeks from Day 1 until Week 16 followed by once-daily oral PF-04965842 100 mg from Week 16 to Week 20

    Drug: PF-04965842 100 mg · Drug: Injectable Placebo

  • Experimental
    PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Inj followed by PF-04965842 200mg

    Once-daily oral PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo injected subcutaneously once every 2 weeks from Day 1 until Week 16 followed by once-daily oral PF-04965842 200 mg from Week 16 to Week 20

    Drug: PF-04965842 200 mg · Drug: Injectable Placebo

  • Active comparator
    Dupilumab Injection + Oral Placebo followed by Oral Placebo

    Dupilumab injected subcutaneously once every 2 weeks + once-daily oral Placebo from Day 1 until Week 16 followed by once-daily oral Placebo from Week 16 to Week 20

    Drug: Dupilumab · Drug: Oral Placebo

  • Placebo comparator
    Oral Placebo + Placebo Inj followed by 100 mg PF-04965842

    Once-daily oral Placebo + Placebo injected subcutaneously once every 2 weeks from Day 1 until Week 16 followed by once-daily oral 100 mg PF-04965842 from Week 16 to Week 20

    Drug: PF-04965842 100 mg · Drug: Oral Placebo · Drug: Injectable Placebo

  • Placebo comparator
    Oral Placebo + Placebo Inj followed by 200 mg PF-04965842

    Once-daily oral Placebo + Placebo injected subcutaneously once every 2 weeks from Day 1 until Week 16 followed by once-daily oral 200 mg PF-04965842 from Week 16 to Week 20

    Drug: PF-04965842 200 mg · Drug: Oral Placebo · Drug: Injectable Placebo

Interventions

  • PF-04965842 100 mg, administered as two tablets to be taken orally once daily as follows: 1. In the arm "PF-04965842 100 mg + Injectable Placebo followed by PF-04965842 100 mg," PF-04965842 100 mg is taken together with Injectable Placebo from Day 1 until Week 16, then by itself from Week 16 to Week 20; 2. In the arm "Oral Placebo + Injectable Placebo followed by 100 mg PF-04965842" subjects take PF-04965842 100 mg from Week 16 to Week 20.

  • PF-04965842 200 mg, administered as two tablets to be taken orally once daily as follows: 1. In the arm "PF-04965842 200 mg + Injectable Placebo followed by PF-04965842 100 mg," PF-04965842 200 mg is taken together with Injectable Placebo from Day 1 until Week 16, then by itself from Week 16 to Week 20; 2. In the arm "Oral Placebo + Injectable Placebo followed by 200 mg PF-04965842" subjects take PF-04965842 200 mg from Week 16 to Week 20.

  • Two subcutaneous injections of Dupilumab 300 mg as a loading dose administered on Day 1 (for a total of 600 mg) followed by one injection once every two weeks (q2w) until Week 16.

  • DrugOral Placebo

    Oral placebo (for PF-04965842) administered as two tablets to be taken orally once daily as follows: 1. In the arm "Dupilumab Injection + Oral Placebo followed by Oral Placebo," the Oral Placebo is taken together with Dupilumab from Day 1 until Week 16, then by itself to Week 20; 2. In the arms "Oral Placebo + Injectable Placebo followed by 100 mg PF-04965842" and "Oral Placebo + Injectable Placebo followed by 200 mg PF-04965842," subjects, take Oral Placebo from Day 1 until Week 16.

  • DrugInjectable Placebo

    Two subcutaneous injections of Placebo (for Dupilumab) administered as a loading dose on Day 1 followed by one injection every other week (q2w) until Week 16.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Response of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) and a Reduction of Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 2 Points From Baseline at Week 12

    IGA assessed severity of atopic dermatitis (AD) on a 5 point scale (0 to 4, higher scores indicate more severity). Scores: 0= clear, no inflammatory signs of AD; 1= almost clear, AD not fully cleared- light pink residual lesions (except post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation), just perceptible erythema, papulation/induration lichenification, excoriation, and no oozing/crusting; 2= mild AD with light red lesions, slight but definite erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and no oozing/crusting; 3= moderate AD with red lesions, moderate erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and slight oozing/crusting; 4= severe AD with deep dark red lesions, severe erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and moderate to severe oozing/crusting. Assessment excluded scalp, palms and sole.

    Time frame: Baseline (the last measurement prior to first dosing on Day 1), Week 12

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Response >=75 Percent (%) Improvement From Baseline at Week 12

    EASI evaluates severity of participants with AD (excluded scalp, palms, soles) based on severity of AD clinical signs and % of body surface area (BSA) affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\] and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]) on 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based upon % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (\>0 to \<10%), 2 (10 to \<30%), 3 (30 to \<50%), 4 (50 to \<70%), 5 (70 to \<90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score =0.1\*Ah\*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2\*Au\*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3\*At\*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4\*Al\*(El+Il+Exl+Ll); A = EASI area score; E = erythema; I = induration/papulation; Ex = excoriation; L = lichenification; h = head and neck; u = upper limbs; t = trunk; l = lower limbs. Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, higher scores = greater severity of AD.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With at Least 4 Points Improvement in the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for Severity of Pruritus From Baseline at Day 2-15, Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

    Participants were asked to assess their worst pruritus/itching due to AD over the past 24 hours on an NRS scale ranged from 0 (no itching) to 10 (worst possible itching), where higher scores indicated greater severity.

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA Response of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) and a Reduction of >=2 Points From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8 and 16

    IGA assessed severity of AD on a 5 point scale (0 to 4, higher scores indicate more severity). Scores: 0= clear, no inflammatory signs of AD; 1= almost clear, AD not fully cleared- light pink residual lesions (except post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation), just perceptible erythema, papulation/induration lichenification, excoriation, and no oozing/crusting; 2= mild AD with light red lesions, slight but definite erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and no oozing/crusting; 3= moderate AD with red lesions, moderate erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and slight oozing/crusting; 4= severe AD with deep dark red lesions, severe erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and moderate to severe oozing/crusting. Assessment excluded sole, palms and scalp.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8 and 16

  3. Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response >=75% Improvement From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8 and 16

    EASI evaluates severity of participants' AD (excluded scalp, palms, soles) based on severity of AD clinical signs and % of body surface area (BSA) affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\] and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]) on 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based upon % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (\>0 to \<10%), 2 (10 to \<30%), 3 (30 to \<50%), 4 (50 to \<70%), 5 (70 to \<90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score =0.1\*Ah\*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2\*Au\*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3\*At\*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4\*Al\*(El+Il+Exl+Ll); A = EASI area score; E = erythema; I = induration/papulation; Ex = excoriation; L = lichenification; h = head and neck; u = upper limbs; t = trunk; l = lower limbs. Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, higher scores = greater severity of AD.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8 and 16

  4. Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response >=50% Improvement From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

    EASI evaluates severity of participants' AD (excluded scalp, palms, soles) based on severity of AD clinical signs and % of BSA affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\] and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]) on 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based upon % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (\>0 to \<10%), 2 (10 to \<30%), 3 (30 to \<50%), 4 (50 to \<70%), 5 (70 to \<90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score =0.1\*Ah\*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2\*Au\*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3\*At\*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4\*Al\*(El+Il+Exl+Ll); A = EASI area score; E = erythema; I = induration/papulation; Ex = excoriation; L = lichenification; h = head and neck; u = upper limbs; t = trunk; l = lower limbs. Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, higher scores = greater severity of AD.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

  5. Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response >=90% Improvement From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

    EASI evaluates severity of participants' AD (excluded scalp, palms, soles) based on severity of AD clinical signs and % of BSA affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\] and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]) on 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based upon % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (\>0 to \<10%), 2 (10 to \<30%), 3 (30 to \<50%), 4 (50 to \<70%), 5 (70 to \<90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score =0.1\*Ah\*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2\*Au\*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3\*At\*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4\*Al\*(El+Il+Exl+Ll); A = EASI area score; E = erythema; I = induration/papulation; Ex = excoriation; L = lichenification; h = head and neck; u = upper limbs; t = trunk; l = lower limbs. Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, higher scores = greater severity of AD.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8,12 and 16

  6. Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response =100% Improvement From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

    EASI evaluates severity of participants' AD (excluded scalp, palms, soles) based on severity of AD clinical signs and % of BSA affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\] and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]) on 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based upon % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (\>0 to \<10%), 2 (10 to \<30%), 3 (30 to \<50%), 4 (50 to \<70%), 5 (70 to \<90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score =0.1\*Ah\*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2\*Au\*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3\*At\*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4\*Al\*(El+Il+Exl+Ll); A = EASI area score; E = erythema; I = induration/papulation; Ex = excoriation; L = lichenification; h = head and neck; u = upper limbs; t = trunk; l = lower limbs. Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, higher scores = greater severity of AD.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

  7. Time From Baseline to First Achieve at Least 4 Points Improvement in the Severity of Pruritus NRS

    Participants were asked to assess their worst pruritus/itching due to AD over the past 24 hours on an NRS scale ranged from 0 (no itching) to 10 (worst possible itching), where higher scores indicated greater severity.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16

  8. Change From Baseline in Percentage Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

    4 body regions were evaluated: head and neck, upper limbs, trunk (including axillae and groin) and lower limbs (including buttocks). Scalp, palms and soles were excluded. BSA was calculated using handprint method. Number of handprints (size of participant's hand with fingers in a closed position) fitting in the affected area of a body region was estimated. Maximum number of handprints were 10 for head and neck, 20 for upper limbs, 30 for trunk and 40 for lower limbs. Surface area of body region equivalent to 1 handprint: 1 handprint was equal to 10% for head and neck, 5% for upper limbs, 3.33% for trunk and 2.5% for lower limbs. Percent BSA for a body region was calculated as = total number of handprints in a body region \* % surface area equivalent to 1 handprint. Overall % BSA for an individual: arithmetic mean of % BSA of all 4 body regions, ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

  9. Percentage BSA at Week 18 and 20

    4 body regions were evaluated: head and neck, upper limbs, trunk (including axillae and groin) and lower limbs (including buttocks). Scalp, palms and soles were excluded. BSA was calculated using handprint method. Number of handprints (size of participant's hand with fingers in a closed position) fitting in the affected area of a body region was estimated. Maximum number of handprints were 10 for head and neck, 20 for upper limbs, 30 for trunk and 40 for lower limbs. Surface area of body region equivalent to 1 handprint: 1 handprint was equal to 10% for head and neck, 5% for upper limbs, 3.33% for trunk and 2.5% for lower limbs. Percent BSA for a body region was calculated as = total number of handprints in a body region \* % surface area equivalent to 1 handprint. Overall % BSA for an individual: arithmetic mean of % BSA of all 4 body regions, ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD.

    Time frame: Week 18 and 20

  10. Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

    Participant responded to the following question: "Overall, how would you describe your Atopic Dermatitis right now?" on a scale: 0= clear; 1= almost clear; 2= mild; 3= moderate; and 4= severe. Higher scores indicated more severity.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

  11. Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 2, 12 and 16

    DLQI is a 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life. Scores from all 10 questions added up to give DLQI total score range from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much). Higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life of participants.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 12 and 16

  12. DLQI at Week 20

    DLQI is a 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life. Scores from all 10 questions added up to give DLQI total score range from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much). Higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life of participants.

    Time frame: Week 20

  13. Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life 5-Dimension 5-Level Scale (EQ-5D-5L) Index Value at Week 12 and 16

    EQ-5D-5L: standardized participant completed questionnaire consisted of 2 components: a health state profile and an optional VAS. EQ-5D health state profile had 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1= no problems, 2= slight problems, 3= moderate problems, 4= severe problems, and 5= extreme problems. Responses to 5 dimensions comprised a health state/a single utility index value. E.g. if a participant responded "no problems" for each 5 dimensions, then health state was coded as "11111" with a predefined index value to it. Every health state (coded as combination of responses on each of 5 dimensions) had a unique predefined utility index value assigned to it, by EuroQol. US value sets (with all possible health states) was used for adults in the study, range from 1 to -0.109. Higher (positive) scores = better health state.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and 16

  14. Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score at Week 12 and 16

    EQ-5D-5L consists of two components: a health state profile and an optional VAS. EQ-5D VAS was used to record a participant's rating for his/her current health-related quality of life state and captured on a vertical VAS (0-100), where 0 = worst imaginable health state and 100 = best imaginable health state.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and 16

  15. EQ-5D-5L- Index Value at Week 20

    EQ-5D-5L: standardized participant completed questionnaire consisted of 2 components: a health state profile and an optional VAS. EQ-5D health state profile had 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1= no problems, 2= slight problems, 3= moderate problems, 4= severe problems, and 5= extreme problems. Responses to 5 dimensions comprised a health state/a single utility index value. E.g. if a participant responded "no problems" for each 5 dimensions, then health state was coded as "11111" with a predefined index value to it. Every health state (coded as combination of responses on each of 5 dimensions) had a unique predefined utility index value assigned to it, by EuroQol. US value sets (with all possible health states) was used for adults in the study, range from 1 to -0.109. Higher (positive) scores = better health state.

    Time frame: Week 20

  16. EQ-5D-5L- VAS Score at Week 20

    EQ-5D-5L consists of two components: a health state profile and an optional VAS. EQ-5D VAS was used to record a participant's rating for his/her current health-related quality of life state and captured on a vertical VAS (0-100), where 0 = worst imaginable health state and 100 = best imaginable health state.

    Time frame: Week 20

  17. Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Anxiety Scale at Week 12 and 16

    HADS: participant rated 14-item questionnaire. HADS consisted of 2 subscales: HADS-Anxiety (HADS-A) scale and HADS-Depression (HADS-D) scale, both of these subscales comprised of 7 items each. Each item was rated on a 4-point scale, score range from 0 to 3, where higher scores indicates more anxiety/depression symptoms. HADS-A assesses state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks). HADS-D assesses state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). HADS-A: sum of all 7 items resulted in score range of 0 (no presence of anxiety) to 21 (severe feeling of anxiety); higher score indicating greater severity of anxiety.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 16

  18. Change From Baseline in HADS - Depression Scale at Week 12 and 16

    HADS: participant rated 14-item questionnaire. HADS consisted of 2 subscales: HADS-A scale and HADS-D scale, both of these subscales comprised of 7 items each. Each item was rated on a 4-point scale, score range from 0 to 3, where higher scores indicates more anxiety/depression symptoms. HADS-A assesses state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks). HADS-D assesses state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). HADS-D: sum of all 7 items resulted in score range of 0 (no presence of depression) to 21 (severe feeling of depression); higher score indicating greater severity of depression symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and 16

  19. HADS - Anxiety Scale at Week 20

    HADS: participant rated 14-item questionnaire. HADS consisted of 2 subscales: HADS-A scale and HADS-D scale, both of these subscales comprised of 7 items each. Each item was rated on a 4-point scale, score range from 0 to 3, where higher scores indicates more anxiety/depression symptoms. HADS-A assesses state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks). HADS-D assesses state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). HADS-A: sum of all 7 items resulted in score range of 0 (no presence of anxiety) to 21 (severe feeling of anxiety); higher score indicating greater severity of anxiety.

    Time frame: Week 20

  20. HADS - Depression Scale at Week 20

    HADS: participant rated 14-item questionnaire. HADS consisted of 2 subscales: HADS-A scale and HADS-D scale, both of these subscales comprised of 7 items each. Each item was rated on a 4-point scale, score range from 0 to 3, where higher scores indicates more anxiety/depression symptoms. HADS-A assesses state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks). HADS-D assesses state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). HADS-D: sum of all 7 items resulted in score range of 0 (no presence of depression) to 21 (severe feeling of depression); higher score indicating greater severity of depression symptoms.

    Time frame: Week 20

  21. Change From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) at Week 12 and 16

    POEM is a 7-item participant reported outcome (PRO) measure used to assess the impact of AD (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) over the past week. Each item is scored as following: "no days (0)", "1-2 days (1)", "3-4 days (2)", "5-6 days (3)" and "every day (4)". The score ranges from 0 to 28, where higher score indicated greater severity.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and 16

  22. POEM at Week 20

    POEM is a 7-item participant reported outcome (PRO) measure used to assess the impact of AD (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) over the past week. Each item is scored as following: "no days (0)", "1-2 days (1)", "3-4 days (2)", "5-6 days (3)" and "every day (4)". The score ranges from 0 to 28, where higher score indicated greater severity.

    Time frame: Week 20

  23. Change From Baseline in Pruritus and Symptoms Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (PSAAD) Total Score Week 1 to Week 16

    PSAAD is a daily participant reported symptom electronic diary. Participants rated their symptoms of AD over the past 24 hours, using 11 items (itchy skin, painful skin, dry skin, flaky skin, cracked skin, bumpy skin, red skin, discolored skin \[lighter or darker\], bleeding from skin, seeping or oozing fluid from skin \[other than blood\], and skin swelling). Participant had to think about all the areas of their body affected by their skin condition and chose the number that best described their experience for each of the 11 items, from 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (extreme symptoms), higher scores signified worse skin condition. Total PSAAD score = arithmetic mean of 11 items, 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (extreme symptoms), where higher score = worse skin condition.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 to Week 16

  24. PSAAD Total Score at Week 18 and 20

    PSAAD is a daily participant reported symptom electronic diary. Participants rated their symptoms of AD over the past 24 hours, using 11 items (itchy skin, painful skin, dry skin, flaky skin, cracked skin, bumpy skin, red skin, discolored skin \[lighter or darker\], bleeding from skin, seeping or oozing fluid from skin \[other than blood\], and skin swelling). Participant had to think about all the areas of their body affected by their skin condition and chose the number that best described their experience for each of the 11 items, from 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (extreme symptoms), higher scores signified worse skin condition. Total PSAAD score = arithmetic mean of 11 items, 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (extreme symptoms), where higher score = worse skin condition.

    Time frame: Week 18 and 20

  25. Percentage of Participants With Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Response >=50% Improvement From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

    SCORAD: scoring index for AD combining extent, severity, subjective symptoms. Extent (A): rule of 9 was used to calculate BSA affected by AD as a % of whole BSA for each body region- head and neck 9%; upper limbs 9% each; lower limbs 18% each; anterior trunk 18%; back 18%; 1% for genitals. The score for each body region was added to determine A (0-100). Severity (B): severity of each sign (erythema; edema; oozing; excoriation; skin thickening; dryness) was assessed as none=0, mild=1, moderate=2,severe=3. The severity scores were summed to give B (0-18). Subjective symptoms (C): pruritus and sleep, each of these 2 were scored by participant/caregiver using visual analogue scale (VAS) where "0" = no itch/no sleeplessness and "10" = the worst imaginable itch/sleeplessness, higher scores=worse symptoms. Scores for itch and sleeplessness were added to give 'C' (0-20). The SCORAD for an individual was calculated: A/5 + 7\*B/2 + C; range from 0 to 103; higher values of SCORAD=worse outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8 12 and 16

  26. Percentage of Participants With SCORAD Response >=75% Improvement From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8 12 and 16

    SCORAD: scoring index for AD combining extent, severity, subjective symptoms. Extent (A): rule of 9 was used to calculate BSA affected by AD as a % of whole BSA for each body region- head and neck 9%; upper limbs 9% each; lower limbs 18% each; anterior trunk 18%; back 18%; 1% for genitals. The score for each body region was added to determine A (0-100). Severity (B): severity of each sign (erythema; edema; oozing; excoriation; skin thickening; dryness) was assessed as none=0, mild=1, moderate=2,severe=3. The severity scores were summed to give B (0-18). Subjective symptoms (C): pruritus and sleep, each of these 2 were scored by participant/caregiver using visual analogue scale (VAS) where "0" = no itch/no sleeplessness and "10" = the worst imaginable itch/sleeplessness, higher scores=worse symptoms. Scores for itch and sleeplessness were added to give 'C' (0-20). The SCORAD for an individual was calculated: A/5 + 7\*B/2 + C; range from 0 to 103; higher values of SCORAD=worse outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8 12 and 16

  27. Change From Baseline in SCORAD Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Itch and Sleep Loss at Week 2, 4, 8 12 and 16

    SCORAD: scoring index for AD combining extent, severity, subjective symptoms. Extent (A): rule of 9 was used to calculate BSA affected by AD as a % of whole BSA for each body region- head and neck 9%; upper limbs 9% each; lower limbs 18% each; anterior trunk 18%; back 18%; 1% for genitals. The score for each body region was added to determine A (0-100). Severity (B): severity of each sign (erythema; edema; oozing; excoriation; skin thickening; dryness) was assessed as none=0, mild=1, moderate=2,severe=3. The severity scores were summed to give B (0-18). Subjective symptoms (C): pruritus and sleep, each of these 2 were scored by participant/caregiver using visual analogue scale (VAS) where "0" = no itch/no sleeplessness and "10" = the worst imaginable itch/sleeplessness, higher scores=worse symptoms. Scores for itch and sleeplessness were added to give 'C' (0-20). The SCORAD for an individual was calculated: A/5 + 7\*B/2 + C; range from 0 to 103; higher values of SCORAD=worse outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8 12 and 16

  28. SCORAD VAS of Itch and Sleep Loss at Week 18 and 20

    SCORAD: scoring index for AD combining extent, severity, subjective symptoms. Extent (A): rule of 9 was used to calculate BSA affected by AD as a % of whole BSA for each body region- head and neck 9%; upper limbs 9% each; lower limbs 18% each; anterior trunk 18%; back 18%; 1% for genitals. The score for each body region was added to determine A (0-100). Severity (B): severity of each sign (erythema; edema; oozing; excoriation; skin thickening; dryness) was assessed as none=0, mild=1, moderate=2,severe=3. The severity scores were summed to give B (0-18). Subjective symptoms (C): pruritus and sleep, each of these 2 were scored by participant/caregiver using visual analogue scale (VAS) where "0" = no itch/no sleeplessness and "10" = the worst imaginable itch/sleeplessness, higher scores=worse symptoms. Scores for itch and sleeplessness were added to give 'C' (0-20). The SCORAD for an individual was calculated: A/5 + 7\*B/2 + C; range from 0 to 103; higher values of SCORAD=worse outcome.

    Time frame: Week 18 and 20

  29. Least Square Mean of Number of Steroid-free Days From Baseline up to Week 16

    Number of days when a corticosteroid as a concomitant medication was not used up to Week 16 is reported as Least square mean in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16

07

Results

Posted Jan 19, 2021

Participant flow

Treatment Period: First Part 16 Weeks
Participant flow — Treatment Period: First Part 16 Weeks
MilestonePlacebo up to Week 16Placebo up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 100 mg Week 16 to 20Placebo up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 200 mg Week 16 to 20PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 100 mg Week 16 to 20PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 200 mg Week 16 to 20Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16 Then Oral Placebo Week 16 to 20
Started13100238226243
Treated/ safety analysis set13100238226242
Full analysis set13100238226242
Completed11700217208223
Not completed1400211820
Withdrew: Adverse event500586
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy000101
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up100212
Withdrew: Pregnancy000011
Withdrew: Protocol deviation200221
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject500936
Withdrew: Medication error without associated adverse event000110
Withdrew: Other100122
Withdrew: Randomized but not treated000001
Treatment Period: Final 4 Weeks
Participant flow — Treatment Period: Final 4 Weeks
MilestonePlacebo up to Week 16Placebo up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 100 mg Week 16 to 20Placebo up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 200 mg Week 16 to 20PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 100 mg Week 16 to 20PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 200 mg Week 16 to 20Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16 Then Oral Placebo Week 16 to 20
Started06057217208223
Treated/ safety analysis set06057217208223
Full analysis set06057217208223
Completed05855210204218
Not completed022745
Withdrew: Adverse event000211
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy001000
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up000101
Withdrew: Pregnancy000001
Withdrew: Protocol deviation001000
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject010222
Withdrew: Other010210

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Response of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) and a Reduction of Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 2 Points From Baseline at Week 12

IGA assessed severity of atopic dermatitis (AD) on a 5 point scale (0 to 4, higher scores indicate more severity). Scores: 0= clear, no inflammatory signs of AD; 1= almost clear, AD not fully cleared- light pink residual lesions (except post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation), just perceptible erythema, papulation/induration lichenification, excoriation, and no oozing/crusting; 2= mild AD with light red lesions, slight but definite erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and no oozing/crusting; 3= moderate AD with red lesions, moderate erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and slight oozing/crusting; 4= severe AD with deep dark red lesions, severe erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and moderate to severe oozing/crusting. Assessment excluded scalp, palms and sole.

Time frame:
Baseline (the last measurement prior to first dosing on Day 1), Week 12
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Response of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) and a Reduction of Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 2 Points From Baseline at Week 12
Percentage of participantsPlacebo up to Week 16PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Response of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) and a Reduction of Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 2 Points From Baseline at Week 1214.0 (8.0 to 19.9)36.6 (30.4 to 42.8)48.4 (41.8 to 55.0)36.5 (30.4 to 42.6)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo up to Week 16 vs PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.0001 · Difference in percentage: 23.1 · 95% CI 14.7 to 31.4
  • Placebo up to Week 16 vs PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.0001 · Difference in percentage: 34.8 · 95% CI 26.1 to 43.5
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Response >=75 Percent (%) Improvement From Baseline at Week 12

EASI evaluates severity of participants with AD (excluded scalp, palms, soles) based on severity of AD clinical signs and % of body surface area (BSA) affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\] and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]) on 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based upon % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (\>0 to \<10%), 2 (10 to \<30%), 3 (30 to \<50%), 4 (50 to \<70%), 5 (70 to \<90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score =0.1\*Ah\*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2\*Au\*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3\*At\*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4\*Al\*(El+Il+Exl+Ll); A = EASI area score; E = erythema; I = induration/papulation; Ex = excoriation; L = lichenification; h = head and neck; u = upper limbs; t = trunk; l = lower limbs. Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, higher scores = greater severity of AD.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Response >=75 Percent (%) Improvement From Baseline at Week 12
Percentage of participantsPlacebo up to Week 16PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Response >=75 Percent (%) Improvement From Baseline at Week 1227.1 (19.5 to 34.8)58.7 (52.4 to 65.0)70.3 (64.3 to 76.4)58.1 (51.9 to 64.3)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo up to Week 16 vs PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.0001 · Difference in percentage: 31.9 · 95% CI 22.2 to 41.6
  • Placebo up to Week 16 vs PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.0001 · Difference in percentage: 43.2 · 95% CI 33.7 to 52.7
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With at Least 4 Points Improvement in the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for Severity of Pruritus From Baseline at Day 2-15, Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

Participants were asked to assess their worst pruritus/itching due to AD over the past 24 hours on an NRS scale ranged from 0 (no itching) to 10 (worst possible itching), where higher scores indicated greater severity.

Time frame:
Baseline, Day 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With at Least 4 Points Improvement in the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for Severity of Pruritus From Baseline at Day 2-15, Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Percentage of participantsPlacebo up to Week 16PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16
Day 25.1 (1.1 to 9.1)5.9 (2.8 to 9.0)7.4 (3.8 to 11.0)2.4 (0.3 to 4.5)
Day 37.9 (2.9 to 12.8)8.4 (4.7 to 12.1)14.8 (9.9 to 19.7)3.3 (0.9 to 5.7)
Day 46.0 (1.7 to 10.4)11.6 (7.3 to 15.8)18.6 (13.2 to 24.0)5.6 (2.5 to 8.6)
Day 57.6 (2.8 to 12.3)14.2 (9.5 to 18.9)26.5 (20.3 to 32.7)9.5 (5.6 to 13.5)
Day 610.9 (5.3 to 16.5)15.0 (10.2 to 19.8)25.1 (19.2 to 31.0)14.0 (9.4 to 18.7)
Day 711.1 (5.2 to 17.0)20.1 (14.7 to 25.5)28.8 (22.7 to 35.0)13.4 (8.9 to 18.0)
Day 814.4 (8.1 to 20.7)21.4 (15.9 to 27.0)33.3 (26.9 to 39.8)16.5 (11.5 to 21.5)
Day 913.0 (6.9 to 19.2)24.0 (18.2 to 29.9)34.1 (27.7 to 40.6)14.8 (10.0 to 19.7)
Day 1013.2 (7.0 to 19.4)25.6 (19.6 to 31.6)34.3 (27.8 to 40.8)17.1 (12.0 to 22.2)
Day 1112.7 (6.7 to 18.7)25.4 (19.4 to 31.4)39.5 (32.9 to 46.1)20.5 (15.0 to 25.9)
Day 1212.0 (6.1 to 17.8)25.5 (19.5 to 31.5)44.1 (37.2 to 50.9)21.9 (16.3 to 27.4)
Day 1313.2 (7.0 to 19.4)30.6 (24.2 to 37.1)43.8 (37.0 to 50.7)23.6 (17.9 to 29.3)
Day 1415.7 (9.2 to 22.2)31.4 (25.1 to 37.7)45.7 (38.8 to 52.7)24.5 (18.7 to 30.3)
Day 1511.1 (5.4 to 16.8)30.4 (24.2 to 36.7)49.0 (42.2 to 55.8)26.5 (20.6 to 32.5)
Week 213.8 (7.9 to 19.8)31.8 (25.8 to 37.7)49.1 (42.6 to 55.6)26.4 (20.8 to 31.9)
Week 420.2 (13.1 to 27.2)44.6 (38.1 to 51.2)59.3 (52.8 to 65.9)45.3 (38.9 to 51.7)
Week 827.0 (19.2 to 34.9)47.5 (40.9 to 54.1)64.0 (57.6 to 70.4)50.7 (44.2 to 57.1)
Week 1228.9 (20.8 to 37.0)47.5 (40.9 to 54.1)63.1 (56.7 to 69.6)54.5 (47.9 to 61.0)
Week 1628.7 (19.6 to 37.9)47.0 (39.5 to 54.6)62.8 (55.6 to 70.0)57.1 (50.1 to 64.2)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo up to Week 16 vs PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0002 · Difference in percentage: 17.9 · 95% CI 9.5 to 26.3
  • Placebo up to Week 16 vs PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <.0001 · Difference in percentage: 34.9 · 95% CI 26.0 to 43.7
  • PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 vs Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16 · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.2084 · Difference in percentage: 5.2 · 95% CI -2.9 to 13.4
  • PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 vs Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16 · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.0001 · Difference in percentage: 22.1 · 95% CI 13.5 to 30.7
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving IGA Response of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) and a Reduction of >=2 Points From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8 and 16

IGA assessed severity of AD on a 5 point scale (0 to 4, higher scores indicate more severity). Scores: 0= clear, no inflammatory signs of AD; 1= almost clear, AD not fully cleared- light pink residual lesions (except post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation), just perceptible erythema, papulation/induration lichenification, excoriation, and no oozing/crusting; 2= mild AD with light red lesions, slight but definite erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and no oozing/crusting; 3= moderate AD with red lesions, moderate erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and slight oozing/crusting; 4= severe AD with deep dark red lesions, severe erythema, papulation/induration, lichenification, excoriation and moderate to severe oozing/crusting. Assessment excluded sole, palms and scalp.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8 and 16
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA Response of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) and a Reduction of >=2 Points From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8 and 16
Percentage of participantsPlacebo up to Week 16PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16
Week 26.3 (2.1 to 10.4)15.2 (10.6 to 19.9)18.4 (13.3 to 23.5)4.7 (2.0 to 7.4)
Week 46.2 (2.0 to 10.4)25.2 (19.6 to 30.8)31.4 (25.3 to 37.5)18.9 (13.9 to 23.9)
Week 810.1 (4.9 to 15.3)35.8 (29.6 to 41.9)50.7 (44.1 to 57.2)28.5 (22.7 to 34.2)
Week 1612.9 (7.0 to 18.8)34.8 (28.6 to 40.9)47.5 (40.9 to 54.1)38.8 (32.5 to 45.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo up to Week 16 vs PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.0001 · Difference in percentage: 22.1 · 95% CI 13.7 to 30.5
  • Placebo up to Week 16 vs PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.0001 · Difference in percentage: 35.0 · 95% CI 26.3 to 43.7
  • PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 vs Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16 · Difference in percentage: -3.5 · 95% CI -12.2 to 5.2
  • PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 vs Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16 · Difference in percentage: 9.4 · 95% CI 0.4 to 18.5
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response >=75% Improvement From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8 and 16

EASI evaluates severity of participants' AD (excluded scalp, palms, soles) based on severity of AD clinical signs and % of body surface area (BSA) affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\] and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]) on 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based upon % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (\>0 to \<10%), 2 (10 to \<30%), 3 (30 to \<50%), 4 (50 to \<70%), 5 (70 to \<90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score =0.1\*Ah\*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2\*Au\*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3\*At\*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4\*Al\*(El+Il+Exl+Ll); A = EASI area score; E = erythema; I = induration/papulation; Ex = excoriation; L = lichenification; h = head and neck; u = upper limbs; t = trunk; l = lower limbs. Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, higher scores = greater severity of AD.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8 and 16
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response >=75% Improvement From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8 and 16
Percentage of participantsPlacebo up to Week 16PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16
Week 210.9 (5.5 to 16.3)25.4 (19.8 to 31.1)30.0 (24.0 to 36.1)14.0 (9.6 to 18.5)
Week 415.6 (9.3 to 21.9)44.6 (38.3 to 51.0)57.4 (50.9 to 63.9)38.2 (32.1 to 44.4)
Week 818.6 (11.9 to 25.3)55.6 (49.2 to 62.0)67.9 (61.7 to 74.0)52.7 (46.4 to 59.0)
Week 1630.6 (22.5 to 38.8)60.3 (53.9 to 66.6)71.0 (65.1 to 77.0)65.5 (59.4 to 71.6)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo up to Week 16 vs PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.0001 · Difference in percentage: 24.1 · 95% CI 14.0 to 34.1
  • Placebo up to Week 16 vs PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.0001 · Difference in percentage: 30.1 · 95% CI 20.3 to 39.8
  • Placebo up to Week 16 vs Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16 · Difference in percentage: -2.7 · 95% CI -9.6 to 4.2
  • PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 vs Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16 · Difference in percentage: 3.1 · 95% CI -3.3 to 9.6
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response >=50% Improvement From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

EASI evaluates severity of participants' AD (excluded scalp, palms, soles) based on severity of AD clinical signs and % of BSA affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\] and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]) on 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based upon % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (\>0 to \<10%), 2 (10 to \<30%), 3 (30 to \<50%), 4 (50 to \<70%), 5 (70 to \<90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score =0.1\*Ah\*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2\*Au\*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3\*At\*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4\*Al\*(El+Il+Exl+Ll); A = EASI area score; E = erythema; I = induration/papulation; Ex = excoriation; L = lichenification; h = head and neck; u = upper limbs; t = trunk; l = lower limbs. Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, higher scores = greater severity of AD.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response >=50% Improvement From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Percentage of participantsPlacebo up to Week 16PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16
Week 221.9 (14.7 to 29.0)53.1 (46.6 to 59.5)60.5 (54.1 to 67.0)35.7 (29.6 to 41.9)
Week 439.8 (31.4 to 48.3)73.4 (67.7 to 79.1)78.5 (73.1 to 83.9)66.8 (60.8 to 72.8)
Week 848.8 (40.2 to 57.5)78.9 (73.6 to 84.1)88.4 (84.2 to 92.6)77.4 (72.1 to 82.7)
Week 1252.7 (44.1 to 61.3)75.3 (69.8 to 80.8)86.3 (81.7 to 90.9)80.9 (76.0 to 85.9)
Week 1657.3 (48.6 to 66.0)81.2 (76.2 to 86.3)87.3 (82.9 to 91.7)84.1 (79.3 to 88.8)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response >=90% Improvement From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

EASI evaluates severity of participants' AD (excluded scalp, palms, soles) based on severity of AD clinical signs and % of BSA affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\] and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]) on 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based upon % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (\>0 to \<10%), 2 (10 to \<30%), 3 (30 to \<50%), 4 (50 to \<70%), 5 (70 to \<90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score =0.1\*Ah\*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2\*Au\*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3\*At\*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4\*Al\*(El+Il+Exl+Ll); A = EASI area score; E = erythema; I = induration/papulation; Ex = excoriation; L = lichenification; h = head and neck; u = upper limbs; t = trunk; l = lower limbs. Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, higher scores = greater severity of AD.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8,12 and 16
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response >=90% Improvement From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Percentage of participantsPlacebo up to Week 16PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16
Week 22.3 (0.0 to 5.0)8.3 (4.7 to 11.9)11.2 (7.1 to 15.4)2.6 (0.5 to 4.6)
Week 46.3 (2.1 to 10.4)20.2 (15.0 to 25.3)32.3 (26.2 to 38.4)12.2 (8.0 to 16.3)
Week 87.8 (3.1 to 12.4)30.6 (24.7 to 36.5)47.3 (40.8 to 53.9)24.3 (18.8 to 29.7)
Week 1210.1 (4.9 to 15.3)36.6 (30.4 to 42.8)46.1 (39.5 to 52.7)34.9 (28.8 to 40.9)
Week 1611.3 (5.7 to 16.9)38.0 (31.7 to 44.3)48.9 (42.3 to 55.5)38.8 (32.5 to 45.1)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response =100% Improvement From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

EASI evaluates severity of participants' AD (excluded scalp, palms, soles) based on severity of AD clinical signs and % of BSA affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\] and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]) on 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based upon % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (\>0 to \<10%), 2 (10 to \<30%), 3 (30 to \<50%), 4 (50 to \<70%), 5 (70 to \<90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score =0.1\*Ah\*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2\*Au\*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3\*At\*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4\*Al\*(El+Il+Exl+Ll); A = EASI area score; E = erythema; I = induration/papulation; Ex = excoriation; L = lichenification; h = head and neck; u = upper limbs; t = trunk; l = lower limbs. Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, higher scores = greater severity of AD.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response =100% Improvement From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Percentage of participantsPlacebo up to Week 16PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16
Week 20 (0.0 to 2.8)1.3 (0.0 to 2.8)4.5 (1.8 to 7.2)0.4 (0.0 to 1.3)
Week 40 (0.0 to 2.8)2.6 (0.5 to 4.6)7.2 (3.8 to 10.6)2.5 (0.5 to 4.5)
Week 80 (0.0 to 2.8)6.0 (3.0 to 9.1)11.6 (7.4 to 15.8)2.1 (0.3 to 3.9)
Week 121.6 (0.0 to 3.7)8.1 (4.6 to 11.6)12.3 (8.0 to 16.7)6.6 (3.5 to 9.8)
Week 164.0 (0.6 to 7.5)12.7 (8.4 to 17.0)13.6 (9.1 to 18.1)5.2 (2.3 to 8.0)
SecondaryTime From Baseline to First Achieve at Least 4 Points Improvement in the Severity of Pruritus NRS

Participants were asked to assess their worst pruritus/itching due to AD over the past 24 hours on an NRS scale ranged from 0 (no itching) to 10 (worst possible itching), where higher scores indicated greater severity.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 16
Reported as:
Median · Days
Time From Baseline to First Achieve at Least 4 Points Improvement in the Severity of Pruritus NRS
DaysPlacebo up to Week 16PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16
Time From Baseline to First Achieve at Least 4 Points Improvement in the Severity of Pruritus NRSNA (84.0 to NA)29.0 (16.0 to 56.0)13.0 (10.0 to 16.0)31.0 (29.0 to 57.0)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Percentage Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

4 body regions were evaluated: head and neck, upper limbs, trunk (including axillae and groin) and lower limbs (including buttocks). Scalp, palms and soles were excluded. BSA was calculated using handprint method. Number of handprints (size of participant's hand with fingers in a closed position) fitting in the affected area of a body region was estimated. Maximum number of handprints were 10 for head and neck, 20 for upper limbs, 30 for trunk and 40 for lower limbs. Surface area of body region equivalent to 1 handprint: 1 handprint was equal to 10% for head and neck, 5% for upper limbs, 3.33% for trunk and 2.5% for lower limbs. Percent BSA for a body region was calculated as = total number of handprints in a body region \* % surface area equivalent to 1 handprint. Overall % BSA for an individual: arithmetic mean of % BSA of all 4 body regions, ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Percentage BSA
Change From Baseline in Percentage Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Percentage BSAPlacebo up to Week 16PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16
Change at Week 2-7.6 (-10.4 to -4.8)-19.5 (-21.6 to -17.4)-21.4 (-23.5 to -19.3)-14.0 (-16.1 to -11.9)
Change at Week 4-14.3 (-17.2 to -11.4)-26.8 (-29.0 to -24.7)-30.7 (-32.9 to -28.4)-24.0 (-26.2 to -21.9)
Change at Week 8-16.2 (-19.0 to -13.4)-30.3 (-32.4 to -28.2)-36.4 (-38.6 to -34.3)-29.8 (-31.8 to -27.7)
Change at Week 12-17.1 (-20.1 to -14.1)-31.6 (-33.8 to -29.4)-37.4 (-39.6 to -35.1)-32.5 (-34.7 to -30.3)
Change at Week 16-19.6 (-22.6 to -16.6)-32.9 (-35.1 to -30.7)-39.0 (-41.3 to -36.8)-34.4 (-36.6 to -32.2)
SecondaryPercentage BSA at Week 18 and 20

4 body regions were evaluated: head and neck, upper limbs, trunk (including axillae and groin) and lower limbs (including buttocks). Scalp, palms and soles were excluded. BSA was calculated using handprint method. Number of handprints (size of participant's hand with fingers in a closed position) fitting in the affected area of a body region was estimated. Maximum number of handprints were 10 for head and neck, 20 for upper limbs, 30 for trunk and 40 for lower limbs. Surface area of body region equivalent to 1 handprint: 1 handprint was equal to 10% for head and neck, 5% for upper limbs, 3.33% for trunk and 2.5% for lower limbs. Percent BSA for a body region was calculated as = total number of handprints in a body region \* % surface area equivalent to 1 handprint. Overall % BSA for an individual: arithmetic mean of % BSA of all 4 body regions, ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD.

Time frame:
Week 18 and 20
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage BSA
Percentage BSA at Week 18 and 20
Percentage BSAPlacebo up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 100 mg Week 16 to 20Placebo up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 200 mg Week 16 to 20PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 100 mg Week 16 to 20PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 200 mg Week 16 to 20Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16 Then Oral Placebo Week 16 to 20
Week 1822.0 ± 23.6720.8 ± 22.714.8 ± 19.39.8 ± 13.613.2 ± 16.4
Week 2018.0 ± 21.216.0 ± 19.714.2 ± 19.010.3 ± 14.213.2 ± 16.3
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

Participant responded to the following question: "Overall, how would you describe your Atopic Dermatitis right now?" on a scale: 0= clear; 1= almost clear; 2= mild; 3= moderate; and 4= severe. Higher scores indicated more severity.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
units on a scalePlacebo up to Week 16PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16
Change at Week 2-0.5 (-0.6 to -0.3)-0.8 (-0.9 to -0.7)-1.0 (-1.1 to -0.9)-0.7 (-0.8 to -0.6)
Change at Week 4-0.5 (-0.7 to -0.4)-1.0 (-1.1 to -0.9)-1.4 (-1.5 to -1.3)-1.1 (-1.2 to -0.9)
Change at Week 8-0.6 (-0.7 to -0.4)-1.1 (-1.3 to -1.0)-1.5 (-1.6 to -1.4)-1.3 (-1.4 to -1.1)
Change at Week 12-0.7 (-0.8 to -0.5)-1.2 (-1.3 to -1.1)-1.6 (-1.7 to -1.5)-1.3 (-1.4 to -1.2)
Change at Week 16-0.7 (-0.9 to -0.6)-1.2 (-1.3 to -1.0)-1.6 (-1.7 to -1.5)-1.4 (-1.5 to -1.2)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 2, 12 and 16

DLQI is a 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life. Scores from all 10 questions added up to give DLQI total score range from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much). Higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life of participants.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 2, 12 and 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 2, 12 and 16
units on a scalePlacebo up to Week 16PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16
Change at Week 2-4.5 (-5.5 to -3.5)-6.7 (-7.5 to -6.0)-8.5 (-9.2 to -7.8)-6.7 (-7.4 to -5.9)
Change at Week 12-6.2 (-7.1 to -5.3)-8.7 (-9.4 to -8.0)-11.0 (-11.7 to -10.3)-9.9 (-10.6 to -9.2)
Change at Week 16-6.2 (-7.1 to -5.3)-9.0 (-9.7 to -8.4)-11.7 (-12.4 to -11.1)-10.8 (-11.4 to -10.1)
SecondaryDLQI at Week 20

DLQI is a 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); where higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life. Scores from all 10 questions added up to give DLQI total score range from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much). Higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life of participants.

Time frame:
Week 20
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
DLQI at Week 20
units on a scalePlacebo up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 100 mg Week 16 to 20Placebo up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 200 mg Week 16 to 20PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 100 mg Week 16 to 20PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 200 mg Week 16 to 20Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16 Then Oral Placebo Week 16 to 20
DLQI at Week 205.3 ± 5.35.8 ± 5.76.3 ± 5.84.3 ± 4.75.6 ± 4.8
SecondaryChange From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life 5-Dimension 5-Level Scale (EQ-5D-5L) Index Value at Week 12 and 16

EQ-5D-5L: standardized participant completed questionnaire consisted of 2 components: a health state profile and an optional VAS. EQ-5D health state profile had 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1= no problems, 2= slight problems, 3= moderate problems, 4= severe problems, and 5= extreme problems. Responses to 5 dimensions comprised a health state/a single utility index value. E.g. if a participant responded "no problems" for each 5 dimensions, then health state was coded as "11111" with a predefined index value to it. Every health state (coded as combination of responses on each of 5 dimensions) had a unique predefined utility index value assigned to it, by EuroQol. US value sets (with all possible health states) was used for adults in the study, range from 1 to -0.109. Higher (positive) scores = better health state.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12 and 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life 5-Dimension 5-Level Scale (EQ-5D-5L) Index Value at Week 12 and 16
units on a scalePlacebo up to Week 16PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16
Change at Week 120.051 (0.032 to 0.070)0.101 (0.087 to 0.115)0.127 (0.113 to 0.141)0.104 (0.091 to 0.118)
Change at Week 160.067 (0.047 to 0.087)0.093 (0.079 to 0.107)0.133 (0.119 to 0.148)0.113 (0.099 to 0.127)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score at Week 12 and 16

EQ-5D-5L consists of two components: a health state profile and an optional VAS. EQ-5D VAS was used to record a participant's rating for his/her current health-related quality of life state and captured on a vertical VAS (0-100), where 0 = worst imaginable health state and 100 = best imaginable health state.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12 and 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score at Week 12 and 16
units on a scalePlacebo up to Week 16PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16
Change at Week 127.975 (5.161 to 10.789)11.337 (9.272 to 13.401)17.373 (15.270 to 19.476)14.939 (12.900 to 16.978)
Change at Week 167.840 (4.952 to 10.727)11.223 (9.129 to 13.318)16.711 (14.581 to 18.841)14.405 (12.315 to 16.496)
SecondaryEQ-5D-5L- Index Value at Week 20

EQ-5D-5L: standardized participant completed questionnaire consisted of 2 components: a health state profile and an optional VAS. EQ-5D health state profile had 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1= no problems, 2= slight problems, 3= moderate problems, 4= severe problems, and 5= extreme problems. Responses to 5 dimensions comprised a health state/a single utility index value. E.g. if a participant responded "no problems" for each 5 dimensions, then health state was coded as "11111" with a predefined index value to it. Every health state (coded as combination of responses on each of 5 dimensions) had a unique predefined utility index value assigned to it, by EuroQol. US value sets (with all possible health states) was used for adults in the study, range from 1 to -0.109. Higher (positive) scores = better health state.

Time frame:
Week 20
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
EQ-5D-5L- Index Value at Week 20
units on a scalePlacebo up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 100 mg Week 16 to 20Placebo up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 200 mg Week 16 to 20PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 100 mg Week 16 to 20PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 200 mg Week 16 to 20Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16 Then Oral Placebo Week 16 to 20
EQ-5D-5L- Index Value at Week 200.905 ± 0.0970.894 ± 0.1220.883 ± 0.1240.917 ± 0.1090.890 ± 0.109
SecondaryEQ-5D-5L- VAS Score at Week 20

EQ-5D-5L consists of two components: a health state profile and an optional VAS. EQ-5D VAS was used to record a participant's rating for his/her current health-related quality of life state and captured on a vertical VAS (0-100), where 0 = worst imaginable health state and 100 = best imaginable health state.

Time frame:
Week 20
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
EQ-5D-5L- VAS Score at Week 20
units on a scalePlacebo up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 100 mg Week 16 to 20Placebo up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 200 mg Week 16 to 20PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 100 mg Week 16 to 20PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 200 mg Week 16 to 20Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16 Then Oral Placebo Week 16 to 20
EQ-5D-5L- VAS Score at Week 2078.2 ± 16.378.5 ± 20.276.7 ± 19.582.1 ± 17.179.6 ± 18.0
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Anxiety Scale at Week 12 and 16

HADS: participant rated 14-item questionnaire. HADS consisted of 2 subscales: HADS-Anxiety (HADS-A) scale and HADS-Depression (HADS-D) scale, both of these subscales comprised of 7 items each. Each item was rated on a 4-point scale, score range from 0 to 3, where higher scores indicates more anxiety/depression symptoms. HADS-A assesses state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks). HADS-D assesses state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). HADS-A: sum of all 7 items resulted in score range of 0 (no presence of anxiety) to 21 (severe feeling of anxiety); higher score indicating greater severity of anxiety.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 12 and 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Anxiety Scale at Week 12 and 16
units on a scalePlacebo up to Week 16PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16
Change at Week 12-0.4 (-0.9 to 0.1)-1.2 (-1.5 to -0.8)-1.6 (-2.0 to -1.2)-1.4 (-1.7 to -1.0)
Change at Week 16-0.4 (-0.9 to 0.1)-1.2 (-1.6 to -0.8)-2.0 (-2.4 to -1.6)-1.5 (-1.9 to -1.1)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in HADS - Depression Scale at Week 12 and 16

HADS: participant rated 14-item questionnaire. HADS consisted of 2 subscales: HADS-A scale and HADS-D scale, both of these subscales comprised of 7 items each. Each item was rated on a 4-point scale, score range from 0 to 3, where higher scores indicates more anxiety/depression symptoms. HADS-A assesses state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks). HADS-D assesses state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). HADS-D: sum of all 7 items resulted in score range of 0 (no presence of depression) to 21 (severe feeling of depression); higher score indicating greater severity of depression symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12 and 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in HADS - Depression Scale at Week 12 and 16
units on a scalePlacebo up to Week 16PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16
Change at Week 12-0.3 (-0.7 to 0.2)-1.3 (-1.6 to -0.9)-1.6 (-1.9 to -1.2)-1.3 (-1.6 to -0.9)
Change at Week 16-0.3 (-0.8 to 0.2)-1.0 (-1.4 to -0.7)-1.6 (-1.9 to -1.2)-1.2 (-1.5 to -0.8)
SecondaryHADS - Anxiety Scale at Week 20

HADS: participant rated 14-item questionnaire. HADS consisted of 2 subscales: HADS-A scale and HADS-D scale, both of these subscales comprised of 7 items each. Each item was rated on a 4-point scale, score range from 0 to 3, where higher scores indicates more anxiety/depression symptoms. HADS-A assesses state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks). HADS-D assesses state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). HADS-A: sum of all 7 items resulted in score range of 0 (no presence of anxiety) to 21 (severe feeling of anxiety); higher score indicating greater severity of anxiety.

Time frame:
Week 20
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
HADS - Anxiety Scale at Week 20
units on a scalePlacebo up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 100 mg Week 16 to 20Placebo up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 200 mg Week 16 to 20PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 100 mg Week 16 to 20PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 200 mg Week 16 to 20Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16 Then Oral Placebo Week 16 to 20
HADS - Anxiety Scale at Week 203.4 ± 3.24.5 ± 4.54.0 ± 3.83.1 ± 3.13.7 ± 3.5
SecondaryHADS - Depression Scale at Week 20

HADS: participant rated 14-item questionnaire. HADS consisted of 2 subscales: HADS-A scale and HADS-D scale, both of these subscales comprised of 7 items each. Each item was rated on a 4-point scale, score range from 0 to 3, where higher scores indicates more anxiety/depression symptoms. HADS-A assesses state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks). HADS-D assesses state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). HADS-D: sum of all 7 items resulted in score range of 0 (no presence of depression) to 21 (severe feeling of depression); higher score indicating greater severity of depression symptoms.

Time frame:
Week 20
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
HADS - Depression Scale at Week 20
units on a scalePlacebo up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 100 mg Week 16 to 20Placebo up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 200 mg Week 16 to 20PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 100 mg Week 16 to 20PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 200 mg Week 16 to 20Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16 Then Oral Placebo Week 16 to 20
HADS - Depression Scale at Week 202.6 ± 3.43.6 ± 3.72.8 ± 3.22.2 ± 3.12.7 ± 3.3
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) at Week 12 and 16

POEM is a 7-item participant reported outcome (PRO) measure used to assess the impact of AD (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) over the past week. Each item is scored as following: "no days (0)", "1-2 days (1)", "3-4 days (2)", "5-6 days (3)" and "every day (4)". The score ranges from 0 to 28, where higher score indicated greater severity.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12 and 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) at Week 12 and 16
units on a scalePlacebo up to Week 16PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16
Change at Week 12-5.1 (-6.3 to -3.9)-9.6 (-10.5 to -8.6)-12.6 (-13.6 to -11.7)-10.8 (-11.7 to -9.9)
Change at Week 16-5.0 (-6.3 to -3.8)-9.2 (-10.1 to -8.2)-12.5 (-13.4 to -11.6)-10.8 (-11.8 to -9.9)
SecondaryPOEM at Week 20

POEM is a 7-item participant reported outcome (PRO) measure used to assess the impact of AD (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) over the past week. Each item is scored as following: "no days (0)", "1-2 days (1)", "3-4 days (2)", "5-6 days (3)" and "every day (4)". The score ranges from 0 to 28, where higher score indicated greater severity.

Time frame:
Week 20
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
POEM at Week 20
units on a scalePlacebo up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 100 mg Week 16 to 20Placebo up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 200 mg Week 16 to 20PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 100 mg Week 16 to 20PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 200 mg Week 16 to 20Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16 Then Oral Placebo Week 16 to 20
POEM at Week 2010.7 ± 6.89.6 ± 7.811.6 ± 7.78.6 ± 7.011.0 ± 6.9
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Pruritus and Symptoms Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (PSAAD) Total Score Week 1 to Week 16

PSAAD is a daily participant reported symptom electronic diary. Participants rated their symptoms of AD over the past 24 hours, using 11 items (itchy skin, painful skin, dry skin, flaky skin, cracked skin, bumpy skin, red skin, discolored skin \[lighter or darker\], bleeding from skin, seeping or oozing fluid from skin \[other than blood\], and skin swelling). Participant had to think about all the areas of their body affected by their skin condition and chose the number that best described their experience for each of the 11 items, from 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (extreme symptoms), higher scores signified worse skin condition. Total PSAAD score = arithmetic mean of 11 items, 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (extreme symptoms), where higher score = worse skin condition.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 1 to Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Pruritus and Symptoms Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (PSAAD) Total Score Week 1 to Week 16
units on a scalePlacebo up to Week 16PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16
Change at Week 1-0.5 (-0.8 to -0.3)-1.1 (-1.3 to -0.9)-1.3 (-1.5 to -1.2)-0.9 (-1.1 to -0.8)
Change at Week 2-0.9 (-1.2 to -0.7)-1.8 (-2.0 to -1.6)-2.3 (-2.5 to -2.1)-1.6 (-1.8 to -1.4)
Change at Week 3-1.1 (-1.4 to -0.8)-2.2 (-2.4 to -2.0)-2.8 (-3.0 to -2.6)-2.1 (-2.3 to -1.9)
Change at Week 4-1.4 (-1.7 to -1.1)-2.4 (-2.6 to -2.2)-3.0 (-3.3 to -2.8)-2.4 (-2.7 to -2.2)
Change at Week 5-1.5 (-1.8 to -1.2)-2.6 (-2.8 to -2.4)-3.2 (-3.5 to -3.0)-2.7 (-2.9 to -2.5)
Change at Week 6-1.5 (-1.8 to -1.2)-2.6 (-2.8 to -2.4)-3.3 (-3.6 to -3.1)-2.8 (-3.1 to -2.6)
Change at Week 7-1.6 (-1.9 to -1.2)-2.7 (-2.9 to -2.4)-3.4 (-3.6 to -3.1)-2.9 (-3.2 to -2.7)
Change at Week 8-1.5 (-1.9 to -1.2)-2.7 (-2.9 to -2.4)-3.4 (-3.7 to -3.2)-3.0 (-3.2 to -2.7)
Change at Week 9-1.7 (-2.0 to -1.4)-2.7 (-2.9 to -2.4)-3.5 (-3.8 to -3.3)-3.1 (-3.3 to -2.8)
Change at Week 10-1.7 (-2.0 to -1.4)-2.7 (-2.9 to -2.4)-3.5 (-3.8 to -3.3)-3.1 (-3.4 to -2.9)
Change at Week 11-1.6 (-1.9 to -1.3)-2.7 (-2.9 to -2.4)-3.5 (-3.8 to -3.3)-3.2 (-3.4 to -2.9)
Change at Week 12-1.6 (-2.0 to -1.3)-2.7 (-3.0 to -2.5)-3.6 (-3.8 to -3.3)-3.2 (-3.5 to -3.0)
Change at Week 13-1.7 (-2.0 to -1.4)-2.8 (-3.1 to -2.6)-3.7 (-3.9 to -3.4)-3.3 (-3.6 to -3.1)
Change at Week 14-1.6 (-1.9 to -1.3)-2.8 (-3.1 to -2.6)-3.6 (-3.9 to -3.4)-3.4 (-3.6 to -3.2)
Change at Week 15-1.7 (-2.0 to -1.4)-2.9 (-3.1 to -2.6)-3.6 (-3.8 to -3.4)-3.4 (-3.6 to -3.1)
Change at Week 16-1.7 (-2.0 to -1.3)-2.8 (-3.1 to -2.6)-3.6 (-3.8 to -3.4)-3.4 (-3.6 to -3.2)
SecondaryPSAAD Total Score at Week 18 and 20

PSAAD is a daily participant reported symptom electronic diary. Participants rated their symptoms of AD over the past 24 hours, using 11 items (itchy skin, painful skin, dry skin, flaky skin, cracked skin, bumpy skin, red skin, discolored skin \[lighter or darker\], bleeding from skin, seeping or oozing fluid from skin \[other than blood\], and skin swelling). Participant had to think about all the areas of their body affected by their skin condition and chose the number that best described their experience for each of the 11 items, from 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (extreme symptoms), higher scores signified worse skin condition. Total PSAAD score = arithmetic mean of 11 items, 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (extreme symptoms), where higher score = worse skin condition.

Time frame:
Week 18 and 20
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
PSAAD Total Score at Week 18 and 20
units on a scalePlacebo up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 100 mg Week 16 to 20Placebo up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 200 mg Week 16 to 20PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 100 mg Week 16 to 20PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 200 mg Week 16 to 20Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16 Then Oral Placebo Week 16 to 20
Week 182.6 ± 1.93.0 ± 2.42.2 ± 1.91.7 ± 1.71.8 ± 1.5
Week 202.5 ± 2.02.6 ± 2.32.2 ± 1.91.8 ± 1.82.0 ± 1.6
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Response >=50% Improvement From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

SCORAD: scoring index for AD combining extent, severity, subjective symptoms. Extent (A): rule of 9 was used to calculate BSA affected by AD as a % of whole BSA for each body region- head and neck 9%; upper limbs 9% each; lower limbs 18% each; anterior trunk 18%; back 18%; 1% for genitals. The score for each body region was added to determine A (0-100). Severity (B): severity of each sign (erythema; edema; oozing; excoriation; skin thickening; dryness) was assessed as none=0, mild=1, moderate=2,severe=3. The severity scores were summed to give B (0-18). Subjective symptoms (C): pruritus and sleep, each of these 2 were scored by participant/caregiver using visual analogue scale (VAS) where "0" = no itch/no sleeplessness and "10" = the worst imaginable itch/sleeplessness, higher scores=worse symptoms. Scores for itch and sleeplessness were added to give 'C' (0-20). The SCORAD for an individual was calculated: A/5 + 7\*B/2 + C; range from 0 to 103; higher values of SCORAD=worse outcome.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8 12 and 16
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Response >=50% Improvement From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Percentage of participantsPlacebo up to Week 16PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16
Week 210.2 (4.9 to 15.4)23.6 (18.2 to 29.1)38.4 (32.0 to 44.8)15.6 (11.0 to 20.2)
Week 418.6 (11.9 to 25.3)45.7 (39.3 to 52.1)61.6 (55.2 to 68.0)45.8 (39.5 to 52.1)
Week 820.2 (13.2 to 27.1)53.4 (47.0 to 59.8)71.6 (65.7 to 77.5)56.9 (50.6 to 63.2)
Week 1227.3 (19.6 to 35.1)56.8 (50.5 to 63.2)72.3 (66.5 to 78.2)64.3 (58.2 to 70.4)
Week 1633.3 (25.0 to 41.7)56.1 (49.7 to 62.6)68.8 (62.7 to 74.9)67.5 (61.5 to 73.6)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With SCORAD Response >=75% Improvement From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8 12 and 16

SCORAD: scoring index for AD combining extent, severity, subjective symptoms. Extent (A): rule of 9 was used to calculate BSA affected by AD as a % of whole BSA for each body region- head and neck 9%; upper limbs 9% each; lower limbs 18% each; anterior trunk 18%; back 18%; 1% for genitals. The score for each body region was added to determine A (0-100). Severity (B): severity of each sign (erythema; edema; oozing; excoriation; skin thickening; dryness) was assessed as none=0, mild=1, moderate=2,severe=3. The severity scores were summed to give B (0-18). Subjective symptoms (C): pruritus and sleep, each of these 2 were scored by participant/caregiver using visual analogue scale (VAS) where "0" = no itch/no sleeplessness and "10" = the worst imaginable itch/sleeplessness, higher scores=worse symptoms. Scores for itch and sleeplessness were added to give 'C' (0-20). The SCORAD for an individual was calculated: A/5 + 7\*B/2 + C; range from 0 to 103; higher values of SCORAD=worse outcome.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8 12 and 16
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With SCORAD Response >=75% Improvement From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8 12 and 16
Percentage of participantsPlacebo up to Week 16PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16
Week 21.6 (0.0 to 3.7)6.4 (3.3 to 9.6)8.5 (4.8 to 12.1)0.8 (0.0 to 2.0)
Week 43.1 (0.1 to 6.1)12.4 (8.2 to 16.6)25.4 (19.7 to 31.2)7.1 (3.9 to 10.4)
Week 83.1 (0.1 to 6.1)19.2 (14.2 to 24.3)41.3 (34.9 to 47.8)16.3 (11.6 to 21.0)
Week 126.3 (2.1 to 10.4)25.6 (20.0 to 31.2)39.3 (32.9 to 45.7)26.1 (20.5 to 31.6)
Week 1610.6 (5.1 to 16.0)26.8 (21.0 to 32.5)40.3 (33.8 to 46.7)29.4 (23.6 to 35.3)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in SCORAD Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Itch and Sleep Loss at Week 2, 4, 8 12 and 16

SCORAD: scoring index for AD combining extent, severity, subjective symptoms. Extent (A): rule of 9 was used to calculate BSA affected by AD as a % of whole BSA for each body region- head and neck 9%; upper limbs 9% each; lower limbs 18% each; anterior trunk 18%; back 18%; 1% for genitals. The score for each body region was added to determine A (0-100). Severity (B): severity of each sign (erythema; edema; oozing; excoriation; skin thickening; dryness) was assessed as none=0, mild=1, moderate=2,severe=3. The severity scores were summed to give B (0-18). Subjective symptoms (C): pruritus and sleep, each of these 2 were scored by participant/caregiver using visual analogue scale (VAS) where "0" = no itch/no sleeplessness and "10" = the worst imaginable itch/sleeplessness, higher scores=worse symptoms. Scores for itch and sleeplessness were added to give 'C' (0-20). The SCORAD for an individual was calculated: A/5 + 7\*B/2 + C; range from 0 to 103; higher values of SCORAD=worse outcome.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8 12 and 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in SCORAD Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Itch and Sleep Loss at Week 2, 4, 8 12 and 16
units on a scalePlacebo up to Week 16PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16
Itch: Change at Week 2-1.5 (-1.9 to -1.2)-2.9 (-3.2 to -2.7)-3.7 (-4.0 to -3.4)-2.4 (-2.7 to -2.1)
Itch: Change at Week 4-2.2 (-2.6 to -1.8)-3.7 (-4.0 to -3.4)-4.6 (-4.9 to -4.3)-3.7 (-4.0 to -3.4)
Itch: Change at Week 8-2.3 (-2.7 to -1.9)-3.9 (-4.2 to -3.6)-4.9 (-5.2 to -4.6)-4.2 (-4.5 to -3.9)
Itch: Change at Week 12-2.4 (-2.9 to -2.0)-3.9 (-4.3 to -3.6)-5.0 (-5.3 to -4.7)-4.4 (-4.7 to -4.1)
Itch: Change at Week 16-2.7 (-3.1 to -2.3)-3.8 (-4.1 to -3.5)-4.8 (-5.1 to -4.5)-4.5 (-4.8 to -4.2)
Sleep loss: Change at Week 2-1.6 (-2.0 to -1.2)-2.6 (-2.9 to -2.3)-3.3 (-3.6 to -3.0)-2.3 (-2.6 to -1.9)
Sleep loss: Change at Week 4-2.3 (-2.7 to -1.9)-3.4 (-3.7 to -3.1)-4.2 (-4.5 to -3.9)-3.4 (-3.7 to -3.1)
Sleep loss: Change at Week 8-2.3 (-2.7 to -1.9)-3.6 (-3.9 to -3.3)-4.4 (-4.7 to -4.1)-3.9 (-4.2 to -3.6)
Sleep loss: Change at Week 12-2.4 (-2.8 to -2.0)-3.7 (-4.0 to -3.4)-4.6 (-4.9 to -4.3)-4.2 (-4.5 to -3.9)
Sleep loss: Change at Week 16-2.6 (-3.0 to -2.2)-3.7 (-4.0 to -3.4)-4.8 (-5.1 to -4.5)-4.3 (-4.6 to -4.0)
SecondarySCORAD VAS of Itch and Sleep Loss at Week 18 and 20

SCORAD: scoring index for AD combining extent, severity, subjective symptoms. Extent (A): rule of 9 was used to calculate BSA affected by AD as a % of whole BSA for each body region- head and neck 9%; upper limbs 9% each; lower limbs 18% each; anterior trunk 18%; back 18%; 1% for genitals. The score for each body region was added to determine A (0-100). Severity (B): severity of each sign (erythema; edema; oozing; excoriation; skin thickening; dryness) was assessed as none=0, mild=1, moderate=2,severe=3. The severity scores were summed to give B (0-18). Subjective symptoms (C): pruritus and sleep, each of these 2 were scored by participant/caregiver using visual analogue scale (VAS) where "0" = no itch/no sleeplessness and "10" = the worst imaginable itch/sleeplessness, higher scores=worse symptoms. Scores for itch and sleeplessness were added to give 'C' (0-20). The SCORAD for an individual was calculated: A/5 + 7\*B/2 + C; range from 0 to 103; higher values of SCORAD=worse outcome.

Time frame:
Week 18 and 20
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
SCORAD VAS of Itch and Sleep Loss at Week 18 and 20
units on a scalePlacebo up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 100 mg Week 16 to 20Placebo up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 200 mg Week 16 to 20PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 100 mg Week 16 to 20PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 200 mg Week 16 to 20Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16 Then Oral Placebo Week 16 to 20
Itch: Week 183.2 ± 2.62.7 ± 2.23.0 ± 2.52.3 ± 2.22.7 ± 2.2
Itch: Week 202.9 ± 2.42.6 ± 2.43.2 ± 2.62.3 ± 2.32.8 ± 2.2
Sleep loss: Week 182.2 ± 2.32.3 ± 2.32.1 ± 2.31.6 ± 2.11.8 ± 2.0
Sleep loss: Week 202.1 ± 2.22.0 ± 2.32.4 ± 2.61.5 ± 2.11.7 ± 2.1
SecondaryLeast Square Mean of Number of Steroid-free Days From Baseline up to Week 16

Number of days when a corticosteroid as a concomitant medication was not used up to Week 16 is reported as Least square mean in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 16
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Days
Least Square Mean of Number of Steroid-free Days From Baseline up to Week 16
DaysPlacebo up to Week 16PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16
Least Square Mean of Number of Steroid-free Days From Baseline up to Week 1621.8 (14.9 to 28.8)30.2 (25.1 to 35.4)33.6 (28.3 to 38.9)28.1 (23.0 to 33.2)

Adverse events

Collected over For reporting arms till Week 16 analysis: Baseline up to Week 16; For reporting arms post Week 16 analysis: Week 16 to Week 24 (28 days after last dose of study drug). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo up to Week 160/131 (0%)5/131 (3.8%)68/131 (51.9%)
PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 160/238 (0%)6/238 (2.5%)121/238 (50.8%)
PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 160/226 (0%)2/226 (0.9%)140/226 (61.9%)
Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 160/242 (0%)2/242 (0.8%)120/242 (49.6%)
Placebo up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 100 mg Week 16 to 200/60 (0%)0/60 (0%)13/60 (21.7%)
Placebo up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 200 mg Week 16 to 200/57 (0%)0/57 (0%)16/57 (28.1%)
PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 100 mg Week 16 to 200/217 (0%)1/217 (0.5%)50/217 (23%)
PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 200 mg Week 16 to 200/208 (0%)0/208 (0%)45/208 (21.6%)
Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16 Then Oral Placebo Week 16 to 200/223 (0%)1/223 (0.4%)31/223 (13.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 27
Most frequent serious events
EventPlacebo up to Week 16PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16Placebo up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 100 mg Week 16 to 20Placebo up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 200 mg Week 16 to 20PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 100 mg Week 16 to 20PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 200 mg Week 16 to 20Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16 Then Oral Placebo Week 16 to 20
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders1/1310/2380/2260/2420/600/570/2170/2080/223
ChillsGeneral disorders1/1310/2380/2260/2420/600/570/2170/2080/223
PyrexiaGeneral disorders1/1310/2380/2260/2420/600/570/2170/2080/223
Anaphylactic reactionImmune system disorders1/1310/2380/2260/2420/600/570/2170/2080/223
Aspartate aminotransferase increasedInvestigations1/1310/2380/2260/2420/600/570/2170/2080/223
Breast massReproductive system and breast disorders1/1310/2380/2260/2420/600/570/2170/2080/223
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/1310/2380/2260/2420/600/570/2170/2080/223
Dermatitis atopicSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/1310/2380/2260/2420/600/570/2170/2080/223
Night sweatsSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/1310/2380/2260/2420/600/570/2170/2080/223
Enteritis infectiousInfections and infestations0/1310/2380/2260/2420/600/571/2170/2080/223
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 366
Most frequent other events
EventPlacebo up to Week 16PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16Placebo up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 100 mg Week 16 to 20Placebo up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 200 mg Week 16 to 20PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 100 mg Week 16 to 20PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 200 mg Week 16 to 20Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16 Then Oral Placebo Week 16 to 20
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders2/13110/23825/2267/2420/605/570/2170/2080/223
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations9/13122/23815/22623/2423/602/573/2179/2085/223
HeadacheNervous system disorders6/13110/23815/22613/2421/601/572/2170/2082/223
AcneSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/1317/23815/2263/2421/600/572/2170/2080/223
ConjunctivitisInfections and infestations3/1312/2383/22615/2420/600/570/2170/2082/223
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations6/13112/2389/2269/2421/600/576/2175/2087/223
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders5/1310/2381/2267/2420/600/571/2170/2081/223
Herpes simplexInfections and infestations1/1315/2388/2262/2420/600/571/2174/2081/223
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders4/1314/2384/2263/2420/602/573/2171/2080/223
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations2/1314/2387/2264/2422/600/572/2170/2081/223

Baseline characteristics

Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Placebo up to Week 16PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 100 mg Week 16 to 20PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 200 mg Week 16 to 20Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16 Then Oral Placebo Week 16 to 20Total
<=18 years00000
Between 18 and 65 years121224211227783
>=65 years1014151554
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Placebo up to Week 16PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 100 mg Week 16 to 20PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 200 mg Week 16 to 20Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16 Then Oral Placebo Week 16 to 20Total
Female54118122134428
Male77120104108409
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Placebo up to Week 16PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 100 mg Week 16 to 20PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 200 mg Week 16 to 20Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16 Then Oral Placebo Week 16 to 20Total
Hispanic or Latino16353637124
Not Hispanic or Latino113200187201701
Unknown or Not Reported233412
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Placebo up to Week 16PF-04965842 100 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 100 mg Week 16 to 20PF-04965842 200 mg + Placebo Injection up to Week 16 Then PF-04965842 200 mg Week 16 to 20Dupilumab 300 mg + Oral Placebo up to Week 16 Then Oral Placebo Week 16 to 20Total
American Indian or Alaska Native21025
Asian31485346178
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander10102
Black or African American6691435
White87182161176606
More than one race11125
Unknown or Not Reported30126
08

Study locations

216 sites
  • Clinical Research Center of Alabama, LLC
    Birmingham, Alabama 35209, United States
  • The University Of Alabama At Birmingham
    Birmingham, Alabama 35233, United States
  • Marvel Research, LLC
    Huntington Beach, California 92647, United States
  • Alliance Research Centers
    Laguna Hills, California 92653, United States
  • Allergy & Asthma Care Center of Southern California
    Long Beach, California 90808, United States
  • Allergy & Asthma Associates of Southern California dba Southern California Research
    Mission Viejo, California 92691, United States
  • Dermatology Specialists, Inc.
    Murrieta, California 92562, United States
  • MedDerm Associates
    San Diego, California 92103, United States
  • Clinical Science Institute
    Santa Monica, California 90404, United States
  • Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc.
    Santa Rosa, California 95405, United States
  • IMMUNOe Research Centers
    Centennial, Colorado 80112, United States
  • Renaissance Research and Medical Group, Inc
    Cape Coral, Florida 33991, United States
  • C & R Research Services USA, Inc
    Coral Gables, Florida 33134, United States
  • Florida Academic Centers Research and Education, LLC
    Coral Gables, Florida 33134, United States
  • Moonshine Research Center, Inc.
    Doral, Florida 33166, United States
  • Solutions Through Advanced Research, Inc.
    Jacksonville, Florida 32256, United States
  • Olympian Clinical Research
    Largo, Florida 33770, United States
  • Wellness Clinical Research, LLC
    Miami Lakes, Florida 33016, United States
  • Savin Medical Group LLC
    Miami, Florida 33126, United States
  • ForCare Clinical Research
    Tampa, Florida 33613, United States
  • Research Institute of Southeast, LLC
    West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, United States
  • Research Institute of the Southeast, LLC
    West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, United States
  • Columbus Regional Research Institute
    Columbus, Georgia 31904, United States
  • Idaho Allergy and Research
    Eagle, Idaho 83616, United States
  • ASR, LLC
    Nampa, Idaho 83687, United States
  • Great Lakes Clinical Trials
    Chicago, Illinois 60640, United States
  • Midwest Allergy Sinus Asthma, SC
    Normal, Illinois 61761, United States
  • NorthShore University HealthSystem
    Skokie, Illinois 60077, United States
  • Southern Illinois University School of Medicine
    Springfield, Illinois 62702, United States
  • Dundee Dermatology
    West Dundee, Illinois 60118, United States
  • The Indiana Clinical Trials Center
    Plainfield, Indiana 46168, United States
  • Forefront Dermatology, S.C.
    Louisville, Kentucky 40202, United States
  • Meridian Clinical Research, LLC
    Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808, United States
  • Clinical Research Institute, Inc.
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402, United States
  • Skin Laser and Surgery Specialists of NY and NJ
    Hackensack, New Jersey 07601, United States
  • Forest Hills Dermatology Group
    Kew Gardens, New York 11374, United States
  • Juva Skin and Laser Center
    New York, New York 10022, United States
  • TrialSpark, Inc (Russell Cohen)
    Oceanside, New York 11572, United States
  • Cary Dermatology Center, PA
    Cary, North Carolina 27511, United States
  • PMG Research of Raleigh, LLC d/b/a PMG Research of Cary
    Cary, North Carolina 27518, United States
  • Medication Management, LLC
    Greensboro, North Carolina 27408, United States
  • PMG Research Inc., d/b/a PMG Research of Piedmont HealthCare
    Statesville, North Carolina 28625, United States
  • Winston-Salem Dermatology and Surgery Center, PLLC
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103, United States
  • University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
    Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States
  • Newton Clinical Research
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73120, United States
  • Vital Prospects Clinical Research Institute, P.C.
    Tulsa, Oklahoma 74136, United States
  • Portland Clinical Research dba Columbia Allergy & Asthma Clinic
    Clackamas, Oregon 97015, United States
  • Crisor, LLC
    Medford, Oregon 97504, United States
  • Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU)
    Portland, Oregon 97239, United States
  • Paddington Testing Co, Inc.
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103, United States
  • Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc.
    Anderson, South Carolina 29621, United States
  • Synexus Clinical Research US. Inc.
    Greer, South Carolina 29651, United States
  • Health Concepts
    Rapid City, South Dakota 57702, United States
  • Arlington Research Center, Inc.
    Arlington, Texas 76011, United States
  • Austin Institute for Clinical Research, Inc.
    Austin, Texas 78705, United States
  • Center for Clinical Studies, LTD. LLP
    Houston, Texas 77004, United States
  • Center for Clinical Studies, LTD. LLP
    Webster, Texas 77598, United States
  • Jordan Valley Dermatology Center
    West Jordan, Utah 84088, United States
  • Virginia Dermatology and Skin Cancer Center
    Norfolk, Virginia 23502, United States
  • Velocity Urgent Care
    Norfolk, Virginia 23518, United States
  • Woden Dermatology
    Phillip, Australian Capital Territory 2606, Australia
  • Australian Clinical Research Network
    Maroubra, New South Wales 2035, Australia
  • The Skin Centre
    Benowa, Queensland 4217, Australia
  • Veracity Clinical Research Pty Ltd
    Woolloongabba, Queensland 4102, Australia
  • North Eastern Health Specialists
    Hectorville, South Australia 5073, Australia
  • Box Hill Hospital
    Box Hill, Victoria 3128, Australia
  • Emeritus Research
    Camberwell, Victoria 3124, Australia
  • Skin and Cancer Foundation Inc
    Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia
  • Sinclair Dermatology
    East Melbourne, Victoria 3002, Australia
  • Royal Melbourne Hospital
    Parkville, Victoria 3050, Australia
  • DCC 2/Sofia EOOD
    Sofia, 1000, Bulgaria
  • "DCC Aleksandrovska" EOOD
    Sofia, 1431, Bulgaria
  • Dermatology Clinic "Sofia" Ltd
    Sofia, 1756, Bulgaria
  • "Mc Synexus Sofia" Eood
    Sofia, 1784, Bulgaria
  • Medical Centre Synexus Sofia EOOD-branch Stara Zagora
    Stara Zagora, 6000, Bulgaria
  • "DCC "Mladost-M Varna" OOD
    Varna, 9000, Bulgaria
  • Pacific Dermaesthetics Inc.
    Vancouver, British Columbia V6H4E1, Canada
  • Wiseman Dermatology Research Inc.
    Winnipeg, Manitoba R3M3Z4, Canada
  • DermEffects
    London, Ontario N6H 5L5, Canada
  • Lynderm Research Inc.
    Markham, Ontario L3P 1X2, Canada
  • North Bay Dermatology Centre
    North Bay, Ontario P1B 3Z7, Canada
  • SKiN Centre for Dermatology
    Peterborough, Ontario K9J5K2, Canada
  • Toronto Research Centre
    Toronto, Ontario M3H5Y8, Canada
  • AvantDerm Clinical Research
    Toronto, Ontario M5A 3R6, Canada
  • Manna Research (Toronto)
    Toronto, Ontario M9W 4L6, Canada
  • Innovaderm Research Inc.
    Montréal, Quebec H2X 2V1, Canada
  • Dr. Rachel Asiniwasis Medical Prof Corp
    Regina, Saskatchewan S4V1R9, Canada
  • Centro Medico SkinMed Limitada
    Santiago, Region Metropolitana 7580206, Chile
  • Clinica Dermacross S.A.
    Santiago, Region Metropolitana 7640881, Chile
  • Centro Internacional de Estudios Clinicos - CIEC
    Santiago, Region Metropolitana 8420383, Chile
  • MIRES (M y F Estudios Clínicos Limitada)
    Santiago, Región Metropolitana 7750495, Chile
  • Dermamedica S.R.O.
    Nachod, 547 01, Czechia
  • CCR Ostrava, s.r.o.
    Ostrava, 702 00, Czechia
  • BENU Lekarna
    Pardubice, 530 02, Czechia
  • CCR Czech, a.s.
    Pardubice, 530 02, Czechia
  • Nemocnice Pardubickeho kraje a.s., Pardubicka nemocnice, odd Dermatologie
    Pardubice, 532 03, Czechia
  • Sanatorium profesora Arenbergera
    Praha 1, 11000, Czechia
  • Lekarna U sv. Ignace
    Praha 2, 120 00, Czechia
  • Synexus Czech, s.r.o.
    Praha 2, 120 00, Czechia
  • CCR Prague, s.r.o.
    Praha 3, 130 00, Czechia

Showing the first 100 of 216 sites across 18 countries. Choose a country and city above to see the rest.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Reich K, Lio PA, Bissonnette R, Alexis AF, Lebwohl MG, Pink AE, Kabashima K, Boguniewicz M, Nowicki RJ, Valdez H, Zhang F, DiBonaventura M, Cameron MC, Clibborn C. Magnitude and Time Course of Response to Abrocitinib for Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022 Dec;10(12):3228-3237.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.08.042. Epub 2022 Sep 13. PubMed 36108923 ↗
  • Alexis A, de Bruin-Weller M, Weidinger S, Soong W, Barbarot S, Ionita I, Zhang F, Valdez H, Clibborn C, Yin N. Rapidity of Improvement in Signs/Symptoms of Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis by Body Region with Abrocitinib in the Phase 3 JADE COMPARE Study. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022 Mar;12(3):771-785. doi: 10.1007/s13555-022-00694-1. Epub 2022 Mar 17. PubMed 35297025 ↗
  • Bieber T, Simpson EL, Silverberg JI, Thaci D, Paul C, Pink AE, Kataoka Y, Chu CY, DiBonaventura M, Rojo R, Antinew J, Ionita I, Sinclair R, Forman S, Zdybski J, Biswas P, Malhotra B, Zhang F, Valdez H. Comparing abrocitinib and dupilumab in the treatment of atopic dermatitis: a plain language summary. Immunotherapy. 2022 Jan;14(1):5-14. doi: 10.2217/imt-2021-0224. Epub 2021 Nov 15. PubMed 34775830 ↗
  • Simpson EL, Silverberg JI, Nosbaum A, Winthrop KL, Guttman-Yassky E, Hoffmeister KM, Egeberg A, Valdez H, Zhang M, Farooqui SA, Romero W, Thorpe AJ, Rojo R, Johnson S. Integrated Safety Analysis of Abrocitinib for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis From the Phase II and Phase III Clinical Trial Program. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2021 Sep;22(5):693-707. doi: 10.1007/s40257-021-00618-3. Epub 2021 Aug 18. Erratum In: Am J Clin Dermatol. 2021 Nov;22(6):905. doi: 10.1007/s40257-021-00638-z. PubMed 34406619 ↗
  • Bieber T, Simpson EL, Silverberg JI, Thaci D, Paul C, Pink AE, Kataoka Y, Chu CY, DiBonaventura M, Rojo R, Antinew J, Ionita I, Sinclair R, Forman S, Zdybski J, Biswas P, Malhotra B, Zhang F, Valdez H; JADE COMPARE Investigators. Abrocitinib versus Placebo or Dupilumab for Atopic Dermatitis. N Engl J Med. 2021 Mar 25;384(12):1101-1112. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2019380. PubMed 33761207 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

Data sharing details ↗ · www.pfizer.com

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 19, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03720470
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 25, 2018
Start date
Oct 29, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 27, 2019
Completion
Mar 6, 2020
Results posted
Jan 19, 2021
Last update
Jan 19, 2021

Study contacts

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
study director · Pfizer

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Abrocitinib

Start the discussion