CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03691233Updated Oct 1, 2018

Diagnosis and Management of Neonatal Shock

An observational study in Neonatal Disorder, sponsored by Assiut University. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 1 Minute to 28 Days. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-10-01.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Sep 2018), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
1 Minute to 28 Days
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this clinical audit is to assess the degree of adherence of medical physicians in Assiut university children hospital protocol for diagnosis and management of neonatal shock to the international guidelines.

Read the detailed description

Introduction Shock is defined as a state of impaired cellular energy (ATP) synthesis when tissue oxygen delivery no longer satisfies tissue oxygen demand (Kleinman etal., 2012)

Shock is an independent predictor of early neonatal mortality and more often a problem in preterm infants than in term infants, even late preterm infants are at much higher risk (Femitha and Bhat, 2012)

In the first phase of shock, perfusion and oxygen delivery is maintained towards the so-called vital organs (heart, brain, and adrenal glands) by selective regional vasodilation in combination with vasoconstriction to non-essential tissues, such as muscles, skin, kidneys, and the splanchnic tissues. This is the compensated stage of shock. As the product of cardiac output (which falls) and systemic vascular resistance (which increases), blood pressure actually remains in the normal range in a compensated shock. When this redistribution fails, perfusion and oxygenation of the vital organs will become impaired, resulting in multi-organ dysfunction. In this phase of uncompensated shock, systemic hypotension might be expected (Willem etal., 2018)

Echocardiography is one of the emerging technologies that can be used to measure cardiac output in critically ill newborn infants, especially since the clinical estimation of cardiac output is rather inaccurate (de Boode, 2010)

Diagnosis of Shock

The clinical diagnosis of shock in the early compensated phase often depends on assessment of peripheral perfusion,pulse volume, heart rate changes, metabolic acidosis and urine output.

Ideally, shock should be diagnosed at this stage. In the later uncompensated phase, blood pressure (BP) becomes a key parameter for monitoring and for titrating inotropes and fluids Willem etal.,2018). )

Clinicians rely on BP measurements to diagnose hypotension and to titrate therapy. Hypotension in preterm infants has been associated with an increased risk of intraventricular hemorrhage (Vishnu and Plakkal, 2015)

Treatment of Shock:

  1. Volume Expanders

    It is common practice to give one or two normal saline boluses when neonates present in shock, before assessing the need for inotropes.

    Apart from saline, albumin or other colloids are also sometimes used for volume expansion.

  2. Drug Therapy of Neonatal Shock

Dopamine is an endogenous catecholamine and has been shown to raise the blood pressure in hypotensive infants better than either albumin or dobutamine (Osborn and Evan, 2005) Cardiac arrhythmias And extravasation injury are potential adverse effects (Osborn etal., 2004)

Dobutamine, unlike dopamine, does not have endocrine effects and does not depend on the release of endogenous catecholamines for effect. It is predominantly inotropic, with some vasodilator effects, Indeed, there is some evidence that dobutamine is better than dopamine at increasing and maintaining systemic blood flow in preterm infants with low systemicblood flow (Subhedar and Shaw, 2003).

Epinephrine is usually used when shock is refractory to dopamine and dobutamine, although some use it as a first line drug, especially when septic shock is suspected (Maria etal., 2004)

Norepinephrine use in neonates is uncommon due to its vasoconstrictive effects, resulting in organ hypoperfusion and increased myocardial work (Pierre etal., 2008)

Hydrocortisone is most commonly used in catecholamine resistant shock in treatment of hypotension in very low birth weight infants (vishnu and plakkal, 2015). Hyperglycemia can be a troublesome short-term side effect (Ng etal., 2006)

Vasopressin is a potent vasoconstrictor and useful in vasodilatory shock (Brierley etal., 2009).

Supportive Treatment:

Pulmonary Support. Most neonates with shock requiring inotropic support will also require mechanical ventilation.(especially \<28 wk) (Saugstad and Aune, 2014].

Antibiotics.

  • Empirical antibiotics should be chosen based on prevailing infection patterns in each NICU (Adrienne etal., 2003)

Newer Developments in the Management of Neonatal Shock

Milrinone and amrinone are phosphodiesterase III inhibitors. they are vasodilators, hypotension can result. However, they are excellent inotropes and can also reduce pulmonary pressures (Nick etal., 2009)

Levosimendan is a newer drug which causes vasodilatation and improves calcium coupling to troponin, resulting in an increase in myocardial contractility (Papoff etal., 2012)

02

Conditions studied

  • Neonatal Disorder
03

In context

Infant, Newborn, Diseases

134 studies on the registry are indexed under Infant, Newborn, Diseases; 30 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 114 across 50 observational studies indexed under Infant, Newborn, Diseases.

Browse Infant, Newborn, Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 4,901 studies on the registry; 2,098 are open to participants now.

Of its 13 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Minute to 28 Days
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The neonates who are admitted to neonatology Unit at Assiut University Children Hospital through this period

Inclusion criteria

  • All neonates (preterm or full term) who are developing shock

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neonates with multiple congenital anomalies
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • DrugClinical audit on diagnosis and management of neonatal shock

    intervenous

    Also known as: fliuds

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of healthcare providers by evaluating how much diagnosis and management of neonatal shock adherent to Assuit University Children Hospital guidelines.

    analysis of results and compare them to guidelines

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bhat BV, Plakkal N. Management of Shock in Neonates. Indian J Pediatr. 2015 Oct;82(10):923-9. doi: 10.1007/s12098-015-1758-7. Epub 2015 May 21. PubMed 25990594 ↗
  • de Boode WP, van der Lee R, Horsberg Eriksen B, Nestaas E, Dempsey E, Singh Y, Austin T, El-Khuffash A; European Special Interest Group 'Neonatologist Performed Echocardiography' (NPE). The role of Neonatologist Performed Echocardiography in the assessment and management of neonatal shock. Pediatr Res. 2018 Jul;84(Suppl 1):57-67. doi: 10.1038/s41390-018-0081-1. PubMed 30072807 ↗
  • Osborn DA, Evans N. Early volume expansion versus inotrope for prevention of morbidity and mortality in very preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;2001(2):CD002056. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002056. PubMed 11406028 ↗
  • Ng PC, Lee CH, Bnur FL, Chan IH, Lee AW, Wong E, Chan HB, Lam CW, Lee BS, Fok TF. A double-blind, randomized, controlled study of a "stress dose" of hydrocortisone for rescue treatment of refractory hypotension in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2006 Feb;117(2):367-75. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0869. PubMed 16452355 ↗
  • Femitha P, Bhat BV. Early neonatal outcome in late preterms. Indian J Pediatr. 2012 Aug;79(8):1019-24. doi: 10.1007/s12098-011-0620-9. Epub 2011 Dec 10. PubMed 22161578 ↗
  • Saugstad OD, Aune D. Optimal oxygenation of extremely low birth weight infants: a meta-analysis and systematic review of the oxygen saturation target studies. Neonatology. 2014;105(1):55-63. doi: 10.1159/000356561. Epub 2013 Nov 15. PubMed 24247112 ↗
  • Brierley J, Carcillo JA, Choong K, Cornell T, Decaen A, Deymann A, Doctor A, Davis A, Duff J, Dugas MA, Duncan A, Evans B, Feldman J, Felmet K, Fisher G, Frankel L, Jeffries H, Greenwald B, Gutierrez J, Hall M, Han YY, Hanson J, Hazelzet J, Hernan L, Kiff J, Kissoon N, Kon A, Irazuzta J, Lin J, Lorts A, Mariscalco M, Mehta R, Nadel S, Nguyen T, Nicholson C, Peters M, Okhuysen-Cawley R, Poulton T, Relves M, Rodriguez A, Rozenfeld R, Schnitzler E, Shanley T, Kache S, Skippen P, Torres A, von Dessauer B, Weingarten J, Yeh T, Zaritsky A, Stojadinovic B, Zimmerman J, Zuckerberg A. Clinical practice parameters for hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal septic shock: 2007 update from the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med. 2009 Feb;37(2):666-88. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819323c6. Erratum In: Crit Care Med. 2009 Apr;37(4):1536. Skache, Sara [corrected to Kache, Saraswati]; Irazusta, Jose [corrected to Irazuzta, Jose]. PubMed 19325359 ↗
  • Osborn DA, Evans N. Early volume expansion for prevention of morbidity and mortality in very preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;2004(2):CD002055. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002055.pub2. PubMed 15106166 ↗
  • Subhedar NV, Shaw NJ. Dopamine versus dobutamine for hypotensive preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(3):CD001242. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001242. PubMed 12917901 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 1, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03691233
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Walaa Ahmed Ezzat Sadak (Principal investigator, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 1, 2018
Start date
Nov 1, 2018 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2019 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2019 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 1, 2018

Study contacts

Nagwa Ali Mohamed, professer
Contact
Namma65@yahoo.com
01096260950
Safwat M Abd Al-ziz, lecture
Contact
Safwatabdelaziz371@yahoo.com
01003918080
Safwat M Abd Al-ziz, lecture
principal investigator · Safwatabdelaziz371@yahoo.com

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion